User talk:Senemmar

Welcome to the Commons, Senemmar!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 07:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

And your point is...

And your point is... That his scholarship is good doesn't make any points on the validity on the image. You trust one newer source on his scholarship, but don't trust another source that states the image is incorrect. In my mind that is complete intellectual dishonesty. Regards, -- Jeff3000 15:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't claim that the book at [1] states that the image is incorrect. I claim the Balyuzi book does. Find the hardcover version of that book, and you'll see the reference. Regards, -- Jeff3000 19:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You repeat that yet!? :-) Please show me (and show any one) that qoute exist in book (on line) --Rohan 19:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Page 15 and 16 of Balyuzi's book. Hardcover edition from 1973. Go get it, you'll see it. I've quoted the exact text on the image description page. Regards, -- Jeff3000 19:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

That qoute not exist in online version, how about this? is this possible? en:WP:V --Rohan 19:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Which online version? If you're referring the soft-cover version, yes, it's not in the soft-cover, but only in the hardcover version which isn't online. Go get the book. Regards, -- Jeff3000 19:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You should know this already, but verifiability doesn't mean it has to be accessible online. Check out the hardcover book in person. Regards, -- Jeff3000 20:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

of course. I access to onlin vesion and you claim the hardcover version is different from online version. can you scan that page of book please? while you proof your claims you can not add it any where --Rohan 20:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You know well that it would be against the rules of Commons if I were to scan the image in as the book is not out of copyright. Also read Amanat's book regarding the recantation. Regards, -- Jeff3000 20:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

No obligation to upload that here. Just proof (and show to me and others) your claims is exactly right. If this manner continuance, I can claim more wonderful assertions! --Rohan 21:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

And how would I do that would I ask? I'm not giving you my e-mail address or anything that would lead you back to me. You've posted pictures of Baha'is on the web in the past. You can easily prove my assertions by your self by finding the book; you have failed to try to do so. Regards, -- Jeff3000 21:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You wanted proof that Balyuzi's book states what I've been stating, here it is. Regards -- Jeff3000 02:00, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Even after I provided you with the exact proof you requested, you are still removing the tag. Completely dishonest actions I believe. The fact is that there is a dispute to the image, and it should stay there until it is resolved. And secondly don't remove verifiable infomration from the other pages. Regards, -- Jeff3000 13:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Here isn't wikipedia. you can add comment in disciption of image in wikipedia or upload the image that you (and your ref) claims he is not Bab's pic. please see new image: Image:Seyyed AliMohammad Báb.jpg --Rohan 13:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

As you well know the quote specifically describes the document in question and it quite germane to the description of the image. Please refrain from removing any information that is against your beliefs. Regards, -- Jeff3000 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry about your tone. that is not against my beliefs :-) May be for an image you can make an article! only description of source image can include in image page --Rohan 14:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

And why does your description get any precedence over a published reliable source's description of the document. Regards, -- Jeff3000 14:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

See Rocket000 notes in Administrators' noticeboard ‏• Rohan ^T 7:47, 10 May 2008

Deletion request

As you probably know the deletion request tag states "Do not remove this tag until the deletion request is closed." Regards, -- Jeff3000 15:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

About your dispute with Jeff

My comments here apply to you as well as they do Jeff. In short, keep it cool, be mellow, and remember that he is not your enemy. Just someone that disagrees with you. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

over your talk page • Rohan ^T 14:12, 15 May 2008

{{Speedy}}

Thanks for helping out tagging out of scope pages for speedy deletion. One small thing though: When you do so, please add the speedy template above the text instead of replacing the content. Regards, Finn Rindahl 14:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I am ordinary doing that way, but one case forget this. regards • Rohan ^T 14:11, 15 May 2008

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: thanks

No worries. Kind regards, RedCoat 16:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Statua Rodolfo Valentino2.jpg

Thank you :) The subject of the image is a copyrighted art work situated in Italy (it:Castellaneta). In Italy, thereisn't freedom of panorama, so the photo is an unauthorized derivative work.--Trixt 21:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

You are right. thanks • Rohan ^T 21:46, 8 June 2008

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Folio from a Koran (8th-9th century).jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Folio from a Koran (8th-9th century).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 20:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

FP Candidate Iguazu Falls

Good day

I saw your vote on the FP Candidate page about my picture. From you and other users, I recieved opposing vote because my image contains either artifacts or a lack of details. Here is the comment I posted on the voting page in reaction to your votes:

•  Comment Please consider the fact that the image is 4800 x 3500 pixels. You are judging it from it's quality (artifacts, details) when viewed at 100%. Pictures stitched with Hugin have artifacts from the manipulation (rotation, deformation of the original image). Have a look when I downsample this image to 2000x1500 px, (the same size than the previous and following candidates images), and you can clearly see that my image has the required levels of details and no artifacts. From the guidelines: "it is important that nominated pictures have as high a resolution as possible". If the artifacts and lack of details at 100% is the only reason why it fails FP nomination, if I upload a downsampled version of this image, would you change your vote? If yes, then we need to change the guidelines. -- S23678 18:33, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

If my picture presents problems other than lack of details or artifacts, please state it in your vote. However, if was the only reason for your opposing vote, please reconsider your position basing yourself on my arguments, and either cancel your vote, make it neutral, or support my picture if you now think it's a FP.

I also posted a comment about this on the FP candidates talk page. Feel free to add your comments.

Thank You

S23678 20:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

re: Image Tagging Image:Peyman_tonbak_green.jpg

OTRS info is in the page history there - it seems to have been vandalised leading to the "warning" on my page. I'm just about to revert the page, but thought I'd let you know :) Martinp23 21:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

OK. You are right and my action/mistake may be calamity . But it become better if you add description like this on image page. I hope that would'nt arise once more • Rohan ^T 21:40, 8 June 2008

The Virgin of Guadalupe

Dear Rohan,

I read your copyright notice. The image in question is a five-hundred-year-old painting (which I'd imagine would mean its copyright would be expired), and it's being used at Wikipedia to illustrate an article about the Virgin of Guadalupe (which I believe would make it "fair use," at least for the encyclopedia). The tag says it's a five-hundred-year-old painting, so I don't really understand what else I'm supposed to do? Thanks. Katsam 03:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. It seems to have been vandilized by IP here. I reverted to right version • Rohan ^T 8:22, 9 June 2008

Image re-released

Thank you for your email regarding Image:SGA Judicial Branch.JPG. I created the image myself, on my home computer; and when I originally posted it, I provided copyright information (I tagged it with the {{PD-self}} tag. The information regarding this matter, which is posted on the Wikipedia Commons website, states, "If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain." I have done this yet again - just now, using the {{PD-self}} tag - so hopefully I will not be hearing from you again on this particular issue. -- User:Dcrumbaker 09:13, 16 June 2008 (MST)

Image Tagging Image:Imad Mugniyeh.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Imad Mugniyeh.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Image:Escudopinatar2.jpg

Hello,

You recently tagged this image with the template {{no license}}. When you look at the history of this file, it appears that an IP did modify it and deleted the license that the original uploader put. I reverted both you tag and the modification made by the IP. I think it's better to watch the history of the file before tagging it as unlicensed.

Best regards, --Pymouss Tchatcher - 00:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sharon_in_the_Kenesset_1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Sharon_in_the_Kenesset_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kimse (talk) 05:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Imad_Mugniyah_(youth).png

Image deletion warning

Image:Imad_Mugniyah_(youth).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Muslems in Al-Aqsa Mosque.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Muslems in Al-Aqsa Mosque.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

-dave pape (talk) 17:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Prime_Minister_Shimon_Peres.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Prime_Minister_Shimon_Peres.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mormegil (talk) 13:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Image deletion warning

have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Image Tagging Image:Imad_Mugniyeh.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Imad_Mugniyeh.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Tarawneh (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

File tagging Image:Remey1.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Remey1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Remey1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jodo (talk) 22:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Senemmar!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 01:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Folio from a Qur'an (8th-9th century) f.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Folio from a Qur'an (8th-9th century) g.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Surat al-Fatiha inscribed upon the shoulder blade of a camel.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Folio from a Qur'an (8th-9th century).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Báb's repentance in E.G. Browen's book.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Báb Image in Nicolas.gif was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Folio from a Qur'an (8th-9th century) a.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Al-Kafi-last.gif was uncategorized on 28 September 2009.
• Image:Al-Kafi-first.gif was uncategorized on 28 September 2009.
• Image:Kashf al-hiyal (2) 1.gif was uncategorized on 27 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Shoghi Efandi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Shoghi Efandi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Noddy93 (talk) 18:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Imam_Khomeini_-_has_exiled.jpg

File:Imam_Khomeini_-_has_exiled.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--feydey ^(talk) 15:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_08.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_08.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_08.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--feydey ^(talk) 15:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_39.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_39.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_39.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--feydey ^(talk) 16:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Imad_Mugniyeh_(after_operation).jpg

File:Imad_Mugniyeh_(after_operation).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

FunkMonk (talk) 11:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_01.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_01.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_01.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Imam_Khomeini_02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Imam_Khomeini_02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_07.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_07.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_07.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_14.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_14.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_14.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_21.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_21.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_21.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_32.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_32.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_32.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_33.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_33.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_33.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_38.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_38.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_38.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_43.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_43.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_43.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_53.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_53.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_53.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_54.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_54.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_54.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Imam_Khomeini_84.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Imam_Khomeini_84.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Imam_Khomeini_84.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 04:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Bahá.jpg

File:Bahá.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tomajok (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Hassan Nasrallah

Hassan Nasrallah has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Plot Spoiler (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Al-Buraf Hafifa.jpg

File:Al-Buraf Hafifa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DawahEssence (talk) 22:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Istiqlal Mosque.jpg

File:Istiqlal Mosque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Canopus Grandiflora 04:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Vahid Khorasani.jpg

File:Vahid Khorasani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)