User talk:Scooter20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: == File source is not properly indicated: File:Mars Earth Comparison.png ==[edit]

Perfect, you were faster than me fixing it Lobo (howl?) 11:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Subject: File talk:Europe Completed Motorways Dec 2012.png inaccurate[edit]

Subject: File talk:Europe Completed Motorways Dec 2012.png inaccurate

This map is inaccurate as it does not show the full extent of the motorway network in Ireland as of December 2012.

Based on sources such as Wikipedia, Open Street Map (http://www.openstreetmap.org/),Google Maps, Ireland's National Road Authority's website (www.nra.ie), offline resources (AA Road Map of Great Britain and Ireland, 2012 edition), and personal knowledge, the map relating to Ireland is incorrect.

The map does not show the M7 as complete (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17732,en.html)

The map does not show the M8 as complete (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17186,en.html)

The map does not show the M9 as complete (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17283,en.html)

The map does not show the M4 (http://www.nra.ie/GeneralTollingInformation/TollCharges/M4Kilcock-Enfield-Kinnegad/)

The map does not show a portion of the M18 from near Crusheen, Co. Clare (north of Ennis) to north of Gort (http://www.nra.ie/News/PressReleases/htmltext,17643,en.html).

I see, I'll try to correct it whenever I'll have some time! Scooter20 (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the last Version of the map is wrong concerning Croatia, you included Motorways which are in construction or ony planned right now (almost all changes). The previous version was better. Also i want to question, if Expressways are added or not. I thin it is very complicated to decide if this should be done or not. Once you start to include some its about the criteria. Better dont include any at all. For example there are non in germany included but some in french Bretagne and in Croatia of course. Some expressways have smaller lanes, some are only 2+1... But maybe it is a good idea to decide this for a whole country. In poland the newbuilt expressways have the same standard, so its more political reason. In hungary its evolving, right now all are2+2 but smaller. I would ask to keep it as simple as possible. 2003:E3:3F22:3E00:B534:B4FB:6A78:C096 17:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Scooter. Can I ask for your help for adding the majority areas of Romanian and Aromanian on that map? It's almost complete but missing Romanian area in Serbia.--Nonemansland (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll try to take a look this evening. Thanks!--Scooter20 (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done! --Scooter20 (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Could you help with Ukrainian? Do you think it is a plurality in areas of southern Russia? It is in northern Moldova- File:Harta_etnica_a_Republicii_Moldova_-_2004.jpg File:Languages_in_Moldova_2006.jpg. Nonemansland (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to take a look this weekend. Yeah, Moldova needs some clean-up as Russian and Ukrainian speaking minorities are not really shown on the map. --Scooter20 (talk) 09:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:RO TM - Iulius Mall - United Business Centre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 19:56, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:RO TM Centrul Bancar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:RO TM City Business Centre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:RO TM OpenVille UBC3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright status[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:04, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 09:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

(talk) 18:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

(talk) 21:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]