User talk:Sanandros/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Re:

Hi sanadros, I am writing to ask you if it is possible to restore the file stains:

Extended content

many of the following listed files are completely covered by copyright protection, with the proper license of the PD, where some were included in wikipedian voices regarding the subject or the following character--82.48.43.191 20:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sry but currently I don't have so much time to check all of them als real life needs me right now more than virtual life.--Sanandros (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
FYI that's user:a1cb3. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Meaning: Go away, vandal! We don't want you here. You are not welcome on Commons. Not our loss, your loss. Not our fault, your fault. You are a longtime abuser and vandal. We don't care about your stupid requests. Jump in a lake, [...] So ein ekliger Schleimscheisser. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
FYI: 116 socks so far: Category:Sockpuppets of A3cb1 --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: Wo ist denn die CU disk zu dieser Sockenfarm?--Sanandros (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Here's most of it: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/A3cb1, some is on meta, I believe. ITwiki should have some stuff also. Same MO, IP always from Northern Italy, Telecom Italia. Always same request, restore my files because they are PD, yadda yadda yadda, ain't I nice. Very slimy character, a brown noser. We already have most of those files, we don't need his low quality junk. Further, his uploads usually lack source and description. Total waste of time to deal with this vandal. MAin acct globally blocked. His vandalism and disruptive editing is going on since 2014. He always found someone who he could persuade to do something for him, excellent con artist. Caused a lot of trouble globally. We block his IPs on sight and delete his useless whining. On top of everything, if an innocent user gets caught in his BS, he/she risks a global ban as well. Just delete his crap, block the IP (usually a dynamic one) and carry on. :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Thx for the info.--Sanandros (talk) 09:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Happy to be of help. This guy is going admin shopping, since we deny his request on Com:UDR asap. What a lousy life this guy must have. Oh boy.... Today he's asking Stein Splitter, btw. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
.--Sanandros (talk) 10:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Deleted Image

Sanandros,

Thank you for protecting the content on this platform!

I've recently been notified that my Image KornelijaSlunjski.jpg was deleted as it violates copyright but I am confused since I own that photo?

Please let me know what can I do to resolve this and have that photo as a main on Kornelija Slunjski Wikipedia

Thanks! --TheGalaxyMan (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

@TheGalaxyMan: You need to send an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org that you agree to publish file:Kornelija Slunjski.jpg under cc-by-sa-4.0 license. I know that we on commons have a pretty restrict copyright policy, but a lot of people don't resprect the copyright and that's why we sometimes delete a little bit too much.--Sanandros (talk) 19:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Cambridge Five

Cambridge Five has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gungir1983 (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

File:FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation MRAP.jpg

File:FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation MRAP.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2600:1009:B045:4A51:1C81:6EEC:F7B:4825 18:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

That cracks me up, the stupid file is from Flickr, but Commons makes it too public? m(m(m(. That's worth three facepalms for sure. C(_)--Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:10, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Renotification upon converting SDs to DRs

Hi. When converting SDs to DRs, is it customary to renotify the uploaders? For example, Commons:Deletion requests/File:EricPrattHamp.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ ping or talk 14:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi usually the tool is doing that but sometimes it seems to have hick ups.--Sanandros (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyvio → DR

Immediately stop sending copyvio images to DR,
Those I (and others) tag as copyvio are blatantly obvious copyright violations, If you cannot tell the difference between a legit image and a copyvio image then kindly stop with the work you are doing,
Alls your doing is creating more work for myself and others so again stop with your interference otherwise I will take you to ANI and we can discuss your issues there,
Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 20:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't know what is for you an "ovbious" copyright violation but I work in a way to delete the pics when I'm 100% sure about it. I'm deleting also clear cases like getty images or other stock photography. But when I can't see the intention of the author I need to assume something and for that I'm giving 7 days.--Sanandros (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The uploader of the Gabbie image had put the source to the file in the source bit (which was an Instagram link) so it was an obvious violation, Ofcourse I absolutely accept that what's obvious to me may not be obvious to you but in this case an Instagram link was provided which confirmed the uploader simply saved the image and reuploaded it,
I will say that I've been tagging copyvios for the last 3-4 years and no one's ever had an issue but anyway could I ask that in future if you see a copyvio tag done by me that you kindly leave it be ?,
I apologise for the tone above as well as for the ANI part which I've struck - We all do things differently and we all see things in a different way (it'd be boring if it everyone thought and did the same! :) ),
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The problem with FB and Insta is that they don't allow you to specify the license like flickr is doing it.--Sanandros (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Esquadrão de Bombas - 5451706420.jpg

File:Esquadrão de Bombas - 5451706420.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Esquadrão de Bombas - 5451720036.jpg

File:Esquadrão de Bombas - 5451720036.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Esquadrão de Bombas - 5451725746.jpg

File:Esquadrão de Bombas - 5451725746.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

廣九直通車 (talk) 04:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Jessica_Drake_and_Kayden_Kross_at_the_XBIZ_Awards2012.jpg

Hi Sanabdris, I just discovered the discussion regarding this photo. If you need it for any reason, I can Upload it. Since the photo has been deleted, I don't know where it was used or exactly which one it is since that is not the way I title photos. The reason it is watermarked Exposay is because exposay purchased a useage right from a photo Agency which send photos to. Still, it is my photo and I am the owner of it, so I can release usage to Wikipedia/Commons. Thanks........ Toglenn (talk) 09:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@Toglenn: Thank you for your answer. I think we don't need the picture as we have enough of Jessica Drake in Category:Jessica Drake in 2012 and we have also enough of Kayden Kross in Category:Kayden Kross in 2012. The original picture on flickr is here which somebody uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons.--Sanandros (talk) 11:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Sanandros, thanks for the link. Good to know all is resolved. Thanks..... Toglenn (talk) 12:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Forex - 14414549017.jpg

File:Forex - 14414549017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yngvadottir (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:IRC2002-2006Luxembourg.jpg

Vielleicht bin ich ja doof, aber wie erkennst du hier eine Landkarte? --2A02:1206:45C0:11F0:C15A:830C:EABA:2187 11:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Es könnte auch sonst wie irgend wie frei sein. Solange nicht irgend wo steht, dass alle Rechte vorbehalten sind oder wir es schon mal gelöscht haben, ist es kein Eindeutiger Fall und geht damit 7 Tage in die Disk.--Sanandros (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Sonst wie irgend wie irgend wo. Ich verstehe. --2A02:1206:45C0:11F0:C15A:830C:EABA:2187 14:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Ich weiss hört sich komisch an, aber so ist das nun mal rechtlich.--Sanandros (talk) 14:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Alles klar. Ich sage dir jetzt nicht, dass ich Rechtsanwältin bin, und wünsche frohe Weihnachten. --2A02:1206:45C0:11F0:C15A:830C:EABA:2187 14:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Dann hast du ja auch die Sache mit dem "Wille" gelernt. Und so lange ich den Wille des Urhebers nicht erkennen kann müssen wir nun zunächst einemal diskutieren was wohl sein Wille ist bzw ob der Uploader evtl den Willen des Urhebers uns sagen kann. Und wenn wir dann immer noch nicht schlauer sind dann löschen wir es tatsächlich.--Sanandros (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Ich sehe dem Schlauerwerden, bzw. dem Löschen (was immer zuerst kommen mag), in freudiger Erwartung entgegen. --2A02:1206:45C0:11F0:C15A:830C:EABA:2187 15:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Quod erat demonstrandum. Drei IRC wurden nach LD gelöscht, acht weitere schnell. Ein Gutschein ist ein Gutschein ist nicht eine UNO-Landkarte. --2A02:1205:5077:C620:C801:9B4B:3747:4411 09:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Alexander Khodakovsky

You deleted category, but Alexander Khodakovsky is a former commander of the Alpha special unit of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). --Butko (talk) 08:34, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes I deleted it because all his files are referring to the time after he was in Alpha. If you want him in that cat then make a gallery and categories the gallery in the alpha cat.--Sanandros (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Over-The-Beach

Category discussion warning

Category:Over-The-Beach has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File:ASC Leiden - Coutinho Collection - F 27 - Farim, Northern frontline, Guinea-Bissau - Children's drawings - 1974.tif

Dear Sanandros,

You made the edit watering down the specification of the firearms shown. So you dispute that those firearms are AK-47's? They appear to be so though, isn't it? And they were actually used there and then, so they might well be. But then I'm not a weapons expert. Please your comment. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 14:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

My Problem is that this file lacks details, as AK-47, AKM or AK-74 all look pretty the same.--Sanandros (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The improved version AK-74 went in production only by 1974, so probably would not have reached Guinea-Bissau by that same year? That leaves your other option, the AKM. However, these rifles show two colours, with brown wooden parts, not visible in the drawing. So what may we conclude? Greetings, Hansmuller (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
According to Military Factory they used AKM and AK-47. So which one is it on the drawing?--Sanandros (talk) 20:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Arsenal-shipka.jpg

File:Arsenal-shipka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

188.110.61.151 16:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

File renaming

Hello Sanandros,

You have renamed file from File:חכרוש.jpg to File:Jamal Hakrush.jpg with the summery: ASCI letters. It is against file rename policy. See Which files should not be renamed? #2. iles should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized. Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages. I'll appreciate if you don't do it again. -- Geagea (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

We used to have a policy where it is written that asci is in favor.--Sanandros (talk) 21:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Roni_Alsheikh_as_General_Commissioner_of_Israeli_Police

Category discussion warning

Roni Alsheikh as General Commissioner of Israeli Police has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Geagea (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Uros Susa

Elite police Uroshshusa (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Russian Federal Security Service designated terrorist organizations

Don't quietly remove contents from this category again. Your complaint about this category is nonsensical given how categorization on commons works. - Themightyquill (talk) 22:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes but it is not concequent. We can do it like on (german) wp then it would work also.--Sanandros (talk) 22:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand what you mean about German wikipedia. - Themightyquill (talk) 22:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
U understand a little bit german so i mean this.--Sanandros (talk) 23:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
I see. That's a little easier to accomplish when you are dealing with articles. Take a look at Special:Statistics vs de:Spezial:Statistik. It's an incomparable task. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes but we have gallery pages and no policy prohibits it to categorize them like articles. That's why i made ti Al Quaida gallery and categorized it accordingly.--Sanandros (talk) 12:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome to create whatever gallery page you want. My problem is with you removing Category:Al-Qaeda‎ from this parent category. - Themightyquill (talk) 21:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
But then why we can't categorize the galler page instad of the category in the FSB Terror cat?--Sanandros (talk) 12:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Seabees-and-cameroon-military-complete-health-outposts-to-assist-local-villages.jpg

File:Seabees-and-cameroon-military-complete-health-outposts-to-assist-local-villages.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zenwort (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Deletion requests 5 Oct

Please familiarise yourself with the guidelines before considering images “educational” or “encycolpaedic.” For starters: COM:NOTUSED: “For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we should keep all photographs of unknown people.” The fact that these US soldiers photographed are for once not killing others (for which they get paid) does not make them educational, those shown are too low ranking for that. --Zenwort (talk) 20:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Yes but military life and civil partnership projects (see en:Civil-military co-operation) are also important aspects of military.--Sanandros (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Brain lobes.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Brain lobes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Edmund Johanson

Do we need this cat for him, as he is on this file on top of the book? Sanandros (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

The Edmund Johanson Category contains files related to the KGB general of the Latvian SSR, Johanson. On the file placed in this category is a book written by the general. The file is already placed in the article of the Russian Wikipedia - Йохансон, Эдмунд Волдемарович . Subsequently, other illustrative materials related to Johanson will be placed in this Category. -- Kalnroze (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Jimmy scuba.jpg

So because it says “own work” you automatically believe them without doing research? Unbelievable! -- 1989 (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

it has a higher quality than other works published.--Sanandros (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata Infobox

Hallo Sanandros,

bei der Wikidata Infobox für den Erinerungsort [1]haeb ich die coordinate location eingefügt. Diese erschienen aber nicht dann der Infobox. Kannst du bitte helfen? Viele Grüße --Ham-96 (talk) 09:35, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Es könnte am Cache liegen dass der auf Commons die Daten noch nicht geladen hat. Manchmal hilft ein Null edit, aber hier anscheinend nicht evlt noch ein bisschen Warten.--Sanandros (talk) 20:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Revert

Hallo, Bezüglich deinem Revert hier. Bitte lies dir Commons:Forum#Litspamming durch, und revertiere deinen revert. Es gibt absolut keinen konsens diese Links (zu einem so umstrittenen Medium) auf den Diskussionsseiten zu behalten. Danke. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Und User_talk:Sanandros/Archive 4#File_renaming muss ich auch aufgreifen, gem. COM:RENAME sowie der language policy und gängiger Praxis (gab schon diverse diskussionen) sind solche umbenennungen nicht erlaubt. Bitte revertiere auch dies. Es gibt keine policy welche asci in Dateinamen bevorzugt. Besten Dank! --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Beim Ersten habe ich mich mal auf dem Forum gemeldet, beim zweiten hat der User danach nicht geantwortet.--Sanandros (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Bitte schau dir die gelöschten Edits des Nutzers an, der Account wurde angelegt um die Links zum besagten Medium (ingesamt zwei Links, um genau zu sein) zu spammen. Die unzulässigkeit liegt eigendlich auf der Hand, und wird analog durch den Projekrahmen bestätigt. Es ist für mich befremdlich, dies einen Administrator erklären zu müssen da mein Vorgehen so gängige Praxis ist und auch von anderen Admins so gehandhabt wird. Ich bitte dich daher erneut abschließend deine Bearbeitung zu revertieren. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Ich bin zwar kein Jurist, aber ein bisschen Juristische Ausbildung habe ich genossen. Unter anderem habe ich dort gelehrtn dass man die Individuellen Rechte gegenüber den Rechten einer Gruppe agbewägt werden. Daher müsstest du mir schon sagen gegen welche Richtlinie er verstossen hat. Denn unter Com:Spam werden Beispiele genannt welches unseres nicht betreffen. Btw es macht mir nicht so viel Bauchschmerzen wenn du meinen edit einfach revidierts.--Sanandros (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Overcat

I have clearly misunderstood about categories, thank you for correcting. Can you please point me to an explanation that will help me understand better? --TedColes (talk) 08:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

See com:overcat.--Sanandros (talk) 19:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Henry_Druce&oldid=prev&diff=346069719&diffmode=source

Hi Sanandros, I removed the description because it is not in correct German. Better to have it in the language you speak fluently. Lotje (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

OK I changed it there was only an E too much. Now it should be correct.--Sanandros (talk) 06:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

ShKAS

Hi, kannst Du mir mal erklären, wieso es _kein_ sowjetisches Maschinegewehr sein soll? Und auch, was dein Revertkommentar damit zu tun hat? --Markscheider (talk) 11:50, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Das Shkas wäre als Sowijetisches Maschienengewerh teil der Category:Firearms und dort wird eine Definiton gegeben wie dem Shkas widersrpicht.--Sanandros (talk) 14:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Weil es nicht 'portable' ist oder warum? Selbstverständlich ist ein MG eine Schusswaffe, auch ein schweres MG. --Markscheider (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Ja das steht dort drin. Steht übrigens auch hier drin.--Sanandros (talk) 14:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Da du auf en verweist: en:ShKAS machine gun gehört zur Kategorie Machine guns of the Soviet Union. Es wird dort selbstvrständlich als machine gun bezeichnet und machine guns gehören zur Kategorie firearms. Ich denke, du hast dich hier mit deiner Einschätzung vertan. --Markscheider (talk) 14:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Aber der en Artikel widerspricht damit der Definition. Sollen wir ein Kategorie Disskusion bei Firearm oder der Shkas anfangen und den Widerspruch zu lösen? User:Themightyquill u understand what we wrote?--Sanandros (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Imvho the firearm definition in en:firearm does not exclude machine guns or, more particular, the ShKAS. Machine guns, be it light, medium or heavy ones, installed in aircraft or vehicles, are firearms. (We're talking 'bout this edit)--Markscheider (talk) 04:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm no expert in this, but Category:Machine guns is a subcategory of Category:Firearms, and its wikidata definition says "fully automatic mounted or portable firearm." Category:Aircraft gun is listed as artillery. en:Aircraft gun suggests specific calibre requirements, but it's pretty weak on sources. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Editing File:Tudela escapa del MRTA.jpg

Hello, This is an award winning photo taken by photographer Silvia Izquierdo for Reuters agency. Below is the link to world press where you can corroborate Best https://www.worldpressphoto.org/collection/photo/1998/32496/3/1998-Silvia-Izquierdo-SNS3-CG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceciliagrb (talk • contribs) 03:26, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

I deleted it as copyright violation.--Sanandros (talk) 06:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Yarborough & J.F.Kennedy big.jpg

File:Yarborough & J.F.Kennedy big.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Roy17 (talk) 20:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Boldak

Category discussion warning

Boldak has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Zwei kurze Fragen zu einem Bild...

Hallo Sanandros, ich versuche gerade den M16-Artikel etwas ansprechender und "einheitlicher" zu bebildern (momentan stehen erst das M16A2 und das M7 Bajonett)... Bin auf Commons dann auf dieses AR15 gestoßen, das meiner Meinung nach gut in den Artikel passen würde. Dazu 2 Fragen: A) ich verstehe die Lizenz nicht ganz, - muß ich etwas besonderes beachten? B) falls ich das Bild verwenden/ändern darf, ist es dann legitim das Gewehr als "M16A1" im Artikel zu führen? (um Verwirrung zu vermeiden)... Für deine Hilfe wäre ich dir sehr dankbar. Schöne Grüße, --Auge=mit (talk) 09:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

So lange es du auf Commons oder in der Wikipedia einbindest musst du nichts mehr machen. Das AR-15 als M16A1 auszugeben kann man machen aber es kann jedoch sein, dass jemand kommt und sagt das ist ein AR-15 und nicht ein M16A1. Es könnte zu langen Diskussionen führen.--Sanandros (talk) 13:58, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Danke für deine schnelle Antwort. Werde das alles berücksichtigen - Und zum Thema "Diskussionen": Mit mir wird es NIE einen Editwar geben, - dafür ist das Leben zu kurz ;-) Danke & Gruß, --Auge=mit (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

File review

Sanandros,

Thanks for reviewing File:YAMAM fighters in active field duty.webm. But you have added the template from the source field which cause a problem there. You should add a simple link to the video instead. Maybe reverting yourself and doing the review again is a good idea. -- Geagea (talk) 09:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Yea now it should be fine.--Sanandros (talk) 15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Novelli P.A. (1790), La Chiesa rende omaggio alla Fede.jpg

I have added some notes. --YukioSanjo (talk) 09:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

File:FN MINIMI Standard.jpg author change

Hi Sanandros,

The description says "If you'd like to use this image, please credit FN Herstal as the author, that is the condition to be licensed under Creative Commons Attribution." so it seems reasonable that the author is FN Herstal. The RedBurn (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

For me that is unclear if FN realy published it under a Crative Commons license.--Sanandros (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Eine Frage an dich als Admin...

@Sanandros: eine Frage: kannst du als Commons-Admin, vier (von mir selbst gemachte und hochgeladene) Bilder löschen? - Hintergrund: Durch gute persönliche Kontakte ist es mir gelungen, für die Rennveranstaltung "Nitrolympx" (Drag Racing Europameisterschaft) auf dem Hockenheimring eine Akkreditierung zu erhalten, um "für Wikipedia aktuelles Bildmaterial zu diesem Themenkomplex zu erstellen" (wirklich!!). Um die "Ausbeute" zu maximieren, habe ich mir von einem befreundeten Fotografen Profi-Equipment ausgeliehen. Jetzt habe ich nach dem Upload der ersten Bilder gesehen, daß wir leider in der Kamera vergessen haben in den Einstellungen (Exif/Metadaten) mich als Fotografen bzw. Urheber einzutragen. Mein Bekannter hat mir jetzt zwar gezeigt, wie das nachträglich geändert werden kann, aber bei einigen Bildern ist eben er noch eingetragen, und ich befürchte jetzt natürlich Probleme auf Commons wegen Rechteverletzung etc... Vielleicht wäre es am besten, diese Bilder einfach zu löschen, und die berichtigte Version hochzuladen??... Eine Bestätigung meiner Akkreditierung durch die Pressestelle der Nitrolympx, und eine Bestätigung über das Ausleihen des Equipment kann ich jederzeit gerne vorlegen... Es wäre sehr schön, wenn du mir in dieser Angelegenheit weiterhelfen könntest, da ich über das Wochenende einige (wie ich glaube) wirklich brauchbare Bilder gemacht habe, die ich zusammen mit den eingeholten Informationen sehr gerne in die verschiedenen relevanten Artikel einbauen würde. Das momentan in den Artikeln verwendete Bildmaterial ist entweder absolut veraltet, oder von größtenteils schlechter Qualität. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 06:35, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Uuups, ich glaube es wäre vielleicht ganz sinnvoll wenn ich noch angeben würde, welche Bilder ich meine...;-) Sorry! - BILD01 / BILD02 / BILD03 / BILD04 mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
OK Ich habe es gelöscht. Btw es gibt de:Wikipedia:Förderung/Akkreditierungen und Redaktionsbestätigungen. Aber danke fürs hochladen.--Sanandros (talk) 03:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für deine schnelle Hilfe, das hat mir wirklich sehr weiter geholfen... wünsche dir eine gute Zeit, mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 10:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests...

Hallo Sanandros, tut mir leid, dich schon wieder zu behelligen (siehe oben)... aber ich wäre dir für eine kurze Einschätzung der Lage sehr dankbar: ein Commons-Admin Namens Tavio hat mich angeschrieben wegen Rechtebedenken bei den von mir eingestellten (und von meinem verstorbenen Vater fotografierten) Bildern von Gen. Hans Schlemmer... da die Entscheidung in diesem Fall ja auch Auswirkungen auf andere Bilder aus diesem "Themenkreis" (die ich bereits hochgeladen habe - und noch hochladen möchte) hat, wäre ich dir für jeden Tip, der die Situation (auch für die Zukunft) auflöst, wirklich sehr dankbar. mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Bist du der einzige Erbe?--Sanandros (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Habe noch eine Schwester, mit der ich mich sehr gut verstehe, die an diesem Teil der Hinterlassenschaft unseres Vaters aber keinerlei Interesse hat. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 16:24, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Sanandros, - Entwarnung!! Admin Taivo hat meinen Erklärungen geglaubt, und seinen Antrag zurückgezogen - freut mich sehr... Danke für deine Reaktion, mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
@Auge=mit: Die Lösung ist trotzdem nicht Wasserdicht. Es wäre gut, wenn du mit deiner Schwester einen Schriftlichen Vertrag machst, dass alle Rechte an den Bildern eures Vaters dir Übertragen werden. Oder als zweites, dass sie zustimmt alle Bildrechte unter einer Freien Lizenz (müsstest ihr dann aber genau angeben) veröffentlich werden. Diesen Vertrag und den Erbschein, wo beide eure Namen und der Name des Vaters erwähnt werden sendest du an das OTRS-Team. Es geht dabei nicht primär um deine Schwester, sondern evtl ist sie irgendwann nicht mehr ansprechbar und der vom Gericht bestellter Vormund hat ein Problem damit, dass du Bilder von deinem Vater veröffentlichst. Jedes Bild welches dann von deinem Vater ist erwähnst du das OTRS Ticket.--Sanandros (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hallo Sanandros, Danke für deine Hilfe, werde mich drum kümmern... das mit dem Erbschein könnte evtl. schwierig werden, das war 1983 und ich bin inzwischen mehrmals umgezogen... momentan keine Ahnung wo ich den finde... noch Mals danke & Gruß, --Auge=mit (talk) 05:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Also wenn du den Erbschein nicht findest, dann ist das nicht so schlimm, am wichtigsten ist immer noch dass deine Schwester ihre Rechte an den Bildern frei gibt. Zusätzlich gibt es auch Alternativen zum Erbschein.--Sanandros (talk) 05:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Munitionssortierung

Grüß Dich Sanandros,

wir haben ja schon lang nicht mehr geschrieben. Auf P:WF isses ja auch ruhig ;-)

Jemand hat de:Sellier & Bellot geschrieben, was mich gefreut hat. Nach Ausbau des Artikels hab ich mir das Zeug zu Munition auf Commons angesehen.

Die Querverbindungen zwischen Munition und Munitionsherstellern waren bisher ziemlich unterbelichet. Als Dreh- und Angelpunkte habe ich eingerichtet:

Wäre gut wenn Du das im Hinterkopf behalten kannst, wenn Dir entsprechendes Material über den Weg läuft.

Ansonsten hoffe ich, dass Du wohlauf bist und sende Dir herzliche Grüße --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 20:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Tom. Nun ja RL braucht auch seine Zeit, daher kann ich nicht auf jeder Baustelle tanzen. Ich werde es mir merken obwohl es eher schwirig ist den Hersteller heraus zu finden.--Sanandros (talk) 15:23, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
PS: dir auch herzliche Grüsse.--Sanandros (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Historische Zeichen & Artikel Weihrauch

Grüß Dich Sanandros, zu de:Weihrauch & Weihrauch habe ich einen Anfang gelegt. Derzeit bin ich noch dabei mit umfangreichen Recherchen dort weiteres Material zu sammeln, woraus nach und nach Infos in den Artikel einfließen sollen. Diese Firmengeschichte ist ein ziemliches Puzzlespiel, weil es nirgendwo eine Zusammenfassung gibt auf die man sich beziehen könnte. Daher auch die Klimmzüge mit zahlreichen Quellen für verstreute Informationen. Schon klar, das es mir um die Firmengeschichte bzw. den historischen Rahmen geht. Vertriebsunterstützung für aktuelle Produkte ist ja nicht unsere Aufgabe ;-) Kannst mal reinschaun. BTW bei einem "Klimmzug" hakelt es hier auf Commons ... ein altes Logo ... (man könnte es auch mit niedriger Auflösung nehmen, damit die Details kaschiert werden) Falls Du eine Meinung dort dazu hast? Grüße --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Tom, ja der Artikel ist soweit gut. Ein paar Leute könnten auf die Idee kommen, es sei nicht relevant weil wenig Umsatzt, wenig Mitarbeiter und keine weiteren Posten, jedoch würde ich sagen, dass die Literaturerwähnung in drei Bücher ausreichen sollte. Die Links zu den Patenten würde ich als ref einfügen. Und ob das Gelände in Thüringen jetzt unbebaut ist oder nicht scheint niemanden zu interesieren. Darum würde ich das rausnehmen.--Sanandros (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Und die Logos, da sehe ich auch, dass die Wahrscheinlich Urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Ausser du findest heraus wer sie gezeichnet hat, dann könnte der Grafiker evtl lange genug tot sein.--Sanandros (talk) 07:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi Sanandros zu den Logos schau mal in en:Arminius (revolvers) das blaue Ding wollte ich eh noch später holen. Zu den Details des Artikels ... hey der Wikiartikel ist noch lange nicht fertig ... derzeit grabe ich ziemlich tief => bis zu Prototypen s. de:Benutzer:Ｔｏｍ/Werkstatt_Weihrauch#Sonstige_Typen. Zum Grundtück ... es kann eventuell Sinn machen sich damit zu befassen ... der Standort ist in der offiziellen Liste zu Rüstungsaltlastverdachtsstandorten des BUNDESMINISTERIUMS FÜR UMWELT, NATURSCHUTZ UND REAKTORSICHERHEIT zum Objekt 06060 im Forschungsbericht 103 40 102/02 UBA-FB 96-030/1 ... Du siehst ich bin da schon ziemlich gründlich. Was davon letztlich in Artikel kommt ... na schaun mer mal ... erstmal wird gesammelt ;-) Zur Bebilderung sind die historischen Logos schon ganz nett ... leider gibt Commons sonst für den Artikel nicht viel her. LG --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 08:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC) P.S. ich such noch sowas: https://www.100zm.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/waffenfarbik-500x374.jpg aus der Nachkriegzeit. Leider sind die Bildspenden vom Bundesarchiv noch immer nicht so gut sortiert das man das findet.
Das Bild das du suchst schient vom Stadtarchiv zu sein. Und wenn da was anderes kommt mit dem Gurnstück ok.--Sanandros (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Nachfrage zu DelReq

Moin, mal ne Frage, welchen Sinn hat es eine [ https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BW_Barettabzeichen_KSK.jpg niedriger auflösende Version eines Bildes zu behalten, wenn die Höherauflösende ebenfalls in Commons zur Verfügung] steht? Und was ich noch weniger Verstehe, wieso sollte man für diese gleichen eine Kategorie anlegen und sie darin sammeln?

Vielleicht gibt es ja einen Mehrwert den ich nur nicht sehe. -- Gunnar (💬) 00:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Weil wir nicht abschätzen könnnen welches Deteil, für einen zukünfitigen Autor, wichtig sein könnte. Daher lieber zuviel behalten, die Server werden nicht so schnell voll, als zu löschen.--Sanandros (talk) 06:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Commons Undeletion Request

hi Mr. Sanandros. I am writing to ask you, if you could kindly see me this old request for file recovery, where half of the following files had been restored, but at the appeal, ten files are missing, and all of the same copyright status as the restored files. the files in question concern scanned images taken from a status archive, and the files have been labeled by the PD license, therefore the copyright expiration, where the author has been dead for more than a century--2.44.63.169 12:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I checked some files, but I don't resotre them as they are critical, according to the copyright. So I trust Ruthven.--Sanandros (talk) 07:19, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
however, they are scanned images--2.44.63.169 13:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Löschantrag für File: Kambodscha 10riel 1975 noBG.jpg

Hallo Sanandros, dürfte ich dich mal in deiner Eigenschaft als Common-Admin bitten, über diesen Löschantrag drüber zu schauen?... und ggf. ein Statement abzugeben. Falls es wirklich. ein Copyright-Verstoß ist, sollte es natürlich gelöscht werden. Der beanstandete Schein ist inzwischen auf verschiedensten Seiten im Einsatz (nicht von mir eingestellt). Mich wundert auch, daß die kambodschanische Wiki selbst Riel-Scheine abbildet (und damit ja wohl gegen ein staatl. Gesetz verstoßen würde). Wie auch immer, Du bist in dieser Thematik sicher besser bewandert als ich. Danke vorab & freundliche Grüße, --Auge=mit (talk) 09:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Für mich leider kein klarer Fall. Habe mal was dazu geschrieben. Wenn ihr mich mehr braucht ping mich bitte an.--Sanandros (talk) 10:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Sanandros, Wow! - vielen Dank für dein ausführliches und fundiertes Statement dort, ich übergebe diese Sache gerne in (deine) kompetente(n) Hände... falls du Lust hast... Wenn man durch Abänderung der Darstellung (Copyright Vermerk, weglassen des Schattens, o.ä.) etwas verbessern könnte, bin ich jederzeit bereit. Die Abbildung dieses Scheines ist wohl die einzige auf Commons, und es wäre doch ein Verlust, wenn sie gelöscht werden müßte. Gruß & Danke, --Auge=mit (talk) 12:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Vielleicht kommt noch etwas von jemand anderem. Ich glaube jedoch nicht, dass Änderungen gross helfen werden. Denn in Frankreich ist die Schöpfungshöhe, ab der etwas Urheberrechtlich geschützt ist, tief. Und wie ich schon im Text geschrieben habe könnte Kamboscha sich an der Französischen Rechtssprechung orientieren. Klar, dass es für die Wikipedia ein verlust wäre, aber es wäre für die Wikipedia auch ein Verlust, wenn der Verein ein paar Tausend Euro Gerichtskosten tragen müsste weil jemand die Wikimedia verklagt. Frag mal de:wp:urheberrechtsfragen ob man es lokal auf der de wp hochladen könnte.--Sanandros (talk) 13:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Hallo Sanandros, habe deine Idee aufgegriffen, und bei "Urheberrechtsfragen" angeklopft. - Bis jetzt keine Antwort, mal sehen wie es sich entwickelt... Nochmal Danke für deine Hilfe, mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Auge=mit (talk) 08:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
JA die Urheberechtsfragen werden nicht mehr so schnell beantwortet wie früher. Aber warte einfach mal ein bisschen. Wenn dann nichts kommt melde dich noch mal.--Sanandros (talk) 20:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Blue_guns

Category discussion warning

Blue guns has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Dvaderv2 (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Category:Qouzi

Category discussion warning

Qouzi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 03:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on user:sanandros/ogre/firearms

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, user:sanandros/ogre/firearms, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27776 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on user:sanandros/ogre/firearms

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, user:sanandros/ogre/firearms, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 28686 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 14 October 2020 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on user:sanandros/ogre/firearms

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, user:sanandros/ogre/firearms, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 27949 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC))

Prüfung URV-Löschung

Moin Sanandros! Frohes Neues, ich hoffe Du bist wohlauf! Bitte diese[2] Uploads checken. Min. 2 Bilder sind URV von dort[3] oder ähnlicher Quelle. Aufgefallen bei [Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/15._Januar_2021#BL_5.5-inch_medium_gun WP:LK 15.Jan]. LG --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ｔｏｍ: Mach mal bite eine Dissusion auf. Evtl wird sich der Uploader melden. Ich glaube auch, dass es eine URV ist, es wäre aber trotzem gut die Argumente zu erst zu hören.--Sanandros (talk) 06:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Nee, die Baustelle wird mir zu groß. Der User verhält sich eindeutig[4] daneben. Wozu bist Du Admin hier? => Massenenlöschung + Benutzersperre. Alles andere ist Beschäftigungstherapie. YM2CTS --Ｔｏｍ (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Ja aber Sperrug und Löschung muss trotzeem formal "angeklagt" werden. Ich bin kein Admin der mit Pistolen um sich schiesst.--Sanandros (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Magpul Magazine Patent No20100212653A1.pdf

File:Magpul Magazine Patent No20100212653A1.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bri (talk) 21:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Sanandros

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Sanandros,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Ganzouri.jpeg

Hello. I saw the file of File:Ganzouri.jpeg without a license, and saw a closed deletion request for it sumbitted by AntiCompositeNumber. In it, you mentioned that if anyone would find a pic earlier than 2012 then we can discuss it again. The file is a cropped version of a photo which has been used before 2012, see this post from November 24, 2011 and this post from the next day, which both credit Reuters and the Middle East News Agency as attribution, the latter of which stated that the photo was taken on the preceding Thursday (November 24, 2011). While I could not dig up the original Reuters report nor the Middle East News Agency file, I think it is safe to say that this file was taken before 2012. TGHL ↗ talk 03:03, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Open it again and provide these two links. Probalby then it will be deleted.--Sanandros (talk) 18:59, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Danke (Siegel staatl. gepr. Betriebswirt)

Danke!! Ich sehe das in gegebener Sachlage genauso!! - "Papst und päpstlicher" - "Einige "USER" bei Wiki nehmen Sachlage "Sehr Ernst!" -. Hoffentlich ist das nun mit "Siegel" bei Wiki geklärt??! Bitte an Adminstator wurde von mir gerichtet: - Antrag Vermerkung Richtlinien Wikipedia (Ergänzung) - zur Gemafreiheit und Zulässigkeit (Siegel) im Zusammenhang als neues Teil - "Werk" in Deutschland - Freundliche Grüße ----Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 17:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sanandros/Archive_4&oldid=601070121"