User talk:Saffron Blaze/Archive

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palladian Wide Swan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Banqueting Wool Church Chipping Campden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 07:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Slaughter Cotswolds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshill Church Barnabas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tyndale Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintern Abbey South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice an Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Notre-Dame du Cap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting basilica, good quality, it's a pity that the right part is cropped but anyhow QI --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rialto Bridge Grand Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broadway Tower Picnic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 15:04, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burano Walk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 11:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garbage Day Burano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 11:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintern Church Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and very nice. --Berthold Werner 20:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valencia Spain Bridge de l'Assut de l'Or.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments much better now, bit noisy, but I'll improve later, QI --Taxiarchos228 06:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agora and El Puente de l'Assut de l'Or Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Congratulations

For your new Featured Picture at en.wiki! --Tomer T (talk) 10:53, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Heh, I have you to thank for that. Cheers... :) Saffron Blaze (talk) 11:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halifax Metro Transit Ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 04:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saskatchewan Farm Elevator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 04:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York Redoubt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 04:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Church Prescott.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 09:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burano Red Bucket.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty colors, and the composition pulls the viewer into the scene. Good exposure with some detail visible even in the bright white towel and in the shadows. I worry that a little too much noise reduction has been applied, as some of the surfaces look smoother than I think they should be, but I think that's not enough to block promotion. —David Eppstein 03:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)  Comment I don't remember applying NR to this. Just in case I checked the original file and there is little detail in the coloured stucco. In fact the green towel has more detail than the stucco. I even looked at some files where I took pictures of the walls and the newer stucco they use is quite flat compared to what used to be on the homes. Much of Burano appears to have been "upgraded" in recent times. Saffron Blaze 09:31, 31 May 2011 (UTC) Ok, I guess the walls are just smooth. Nice picture, anyway. —David Eppstein 15:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. Just thought I would add that not all the walls are smooth as evidenced by the first house in the row. I also noted while there that the renovated homes use much brighter/saturated colours than the ones that are yet to be redone. I think it is more than a function of fading and quite a deliberate initiative to "brighten" up the area.Saffron Blaze 08:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tintern Abbey and Courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venice Gondola Grand Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice view --Taxiarchos228 12:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Slaughter Mill Calm Cotswolds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheepscombe St Johns Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very beautifull. --Berthold Werner 15:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary Corpus Christi Down Hatherley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 15:34, 27 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment seems underexposed to me. Maybe you can lighten the pic a bit up? --Carschten 17:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Done A.Savin 18:03, 27 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment I prefer the original as it frames the church better. Saffron Blaze 21:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harescombe Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very sharp and nice composition but there are some dustspots in the sky. --Berthold Werner 17:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)  Done Thanks for picking those up. Fixed now. Saffron Blaze 18:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment May be there is one very small (really very) left (see annotation)? I'm not sure, but nevertheless now QI imho. --Berthold Werner 19:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment Yes, found it. Thanks again. Time to clean the sensor. Saffron Blaze 20:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge-over Bourton Waters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 00:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cotswold Vine Cottage Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Seems oversaturated colors--Lmbuga 00:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)  Comment Checked the RAW file, not much different. A bit of colour contrast increase but I rarely add saturation. Saffron Blaze 08:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Good quality. --Yann 12:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael and St Martin's Church Eastleach Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:00, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Church of St Michael and All Angels-Stanton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very good dof--Lmbuga 17:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Le clocher de Burano.

Exact; la tour de Burano est celle qui penche le plus, de la laguna di Venezia... And every year I wonder Why it does not fall! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Moi aussi, c'était incroyable. It must lean as much or more than the Tower of Pisa yet nowhere near as famous. Vous êtes chanceux. J'espère que je pourrai revenir à Venise... un jour. However, my time in Europe is short so I suspect not. I think Turkey will be next. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:39, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tintern Abbey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

QIC comment

Hi! I've commented on one of your QIC pictures. It's a good image, but I think you can easily improve it. I'd appreciate a little rework! Thanks! Kadellar (talk) 14:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

• I have checked the white balance and histogram and I am confident the lighting is correct. I do note the water and sky is partially polarised by the angle of the shot. Thus the colours are quite saturated. If you look at my wife you will see her blouse is white and suitably exposed for being sunlit by cold early morning light. However, when I have a moment I will upload an alternate version with the curves pushed to make it lighter. I will include it as another version in the original. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I see the temple is correctly lit, but I still think the sky is dark. Next time please answer on other users' talk page, so the one questioning can notice if you have answered or not. Thank you. Kadellar (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Agree, the sky is dark but it is first sunrise and the sky is polarised. This will always give the effect of a slightly darker sky. People use polariser filters to get this effect but it can be achived naturally by ensuring the sun is fully, but at least partially behind you, as it was in this case. If you prefer something a bit lighter there is this photo I took the same day but under different conditions and the processing was pushed: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sunrise_apollo_side.jpg
As to posting on other people's talk page I prefer to keep a conversation on one page. Otherwise it gets rather disjointed. I had understood this was a community norm.Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perge columns mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upper Duden Falls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madeline Du Cap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)  Comment Clear QI to me (as Jean-Pol GRANDMONT) but a bit of CAs (improvable to me)--Lmbuga 20:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Race-4-Life Rabbits Cheltenham2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malvern Hills AONB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malvern Hills British Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tewkesbury Abbey 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:28, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knight-in-Shining-Armour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

RE:Hostile?

Do not worry. My English is too bad. I can understand your comment in my talk page, but I can not understand the comment in QI candidates. When I write, I write with a translator. In Spanish "hostile" is "hostil". When I wrote, in the translator, I don't wrote "hostil", but I don't remember the word that I wrote.

Is not worth arguing on an image (in this way) (to me). I'm thinking withdraw the image. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 02:58, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Nos discussions

Dear friend you are a gentleman. We agree on many things, and we spend time to discuss our differences. We do it politely and it is a pleasure to talk to you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Malvern Hills panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fishing River Coln Fairford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please try shft-n --Mbdortmund 03:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC) Sorry, I don't understand your sugestion. Saffron Blaze 08:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC) He suggest to use the freeware shiftn for a correction of the perspective --Berthold Werner 18:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)  Done Surprising results. Thanks. Saffron Blaze 21:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC) Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Monument Valley-Utah2197.JPG

Hello, you asked if it is fine that you upload a new version of the file, why not? thanks a lot for your interest! regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Ummmhh, it is better now, what did you exactly do? I also have NX2 installed so, I would try to follow your steps. By the way, who is now the reviewer? none of us? :) regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I first used the noise reduction feature with edge noise reduction de-selected. I used about 8% intensity and left sharpen on 5. Then I applied this setting with quality selected. I then sharpened the picture with unsharp mask at 20/4/0. That's it.
Hopefully someone else will promote but if not in a day or so I will do it. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Perge nymphaeum.jpg

Bonne image mais : 3 spots dans le ciel faciles à enlever. Bonne journée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup. Je fixerai les taches cette soirée. La Turquie était très poussiéreuse et il faut nettoyer la sonde chaque jour!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pendock Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI, imo.--MrPanyGoff 14:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Malvern Priory Hills.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI, imo.--MrPanyGoff 14:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antalya Side Apollo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perge nymphaeum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Spots gone! Saffron Blaze 17:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)  Support QI now --Archaeodontosaurus 17:55, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myra Rock Tombs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stone Balancing Sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe some noise, and some CA (left "sculpture"), but al last an interesting sunset !--Jebulon 22:11, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowshil-Lavender.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a very beautiful photo and the quality is good, but title and focus do not fit together. --Haeferl 00:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)  Comment That's a good point. If the image is to be about lavender I should have started the focus at the front! Perhaps I should re-imaginbe this as a image of Snowshill Lavender Farm. Thanks. Saffron Blaze 07:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)  CommentI miss the sky a little bit. Otherwise great photo --NorbertNagel 21:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC) But QI to me nevertheless.--Jebulon 22:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspendos Amphitheatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Augustin de Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - all criteria met. --Claritas (talk) 00:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:28, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Cheltenham Regency architecture - municipal offices

Hi Saffron,

Not sure if this is the right way to contact you as I'm having difficulty finding an e-mail address! I'm currently developing a website for primary school children called www.lewisthelion.com and was wondering if I could please use your picture as an example of Regency architecture? Many thanks,

Helen Molloy

Helen, thanks for asking and you are more then welcome to use any of my images. Cheers. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:13, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gondola Gondolier Grand Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 06:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tewkesbury Abbey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Normally a VI of a church should show the front, but this seems to be a standard (postcard) view. Berthold Werner

•  Comment The front is fairly obscured and there is no position to gain a meaningful perspective due to other buildings. The other side is high street for the town. This is indeed the only perspective that you can catch much of the scope and scale of the structure.Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
  • And the dog looks like mine, which is a Flat Coated Retriever ;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yivli Minaret Mosque Antalya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- George Chernilevsky 21:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Oswalds Tower Lassington.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is QI! --NorbertNagel 19:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Bald Eagle Portrait.jpg

Very nice. Maybe you should try FP?--ArildV (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks. It is not in an article yet. I note a similar image is FP and in the Bald Eagle artcle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Haliaeetus_leucocephalus_LC0195_edit_1.jpg Not sure we need another FP on this subject.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh Calton Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! --Iifar 19:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment I think that it's good, but I'm not sure if it's QI: To me too blue, see the little houses of the left side--Lmbuga 21:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC) {{o}} By what was said (see note. You can delete the note when you want)--Lmbuga 21:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)  Done Saffron Blaze 01:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC) I'm not sure with the blues, but QI to me--Lmbuga 14:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bald Eagle Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, very nice.--ArildV 19:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holyrood Palace Abbey Calton Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh Castle Rock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little busy composition but QI IMO. --Moonik 09:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle combe river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle combe cotswolds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunrise apollo side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. I remember one you nominated time ago, I prefer this one. --Kadellar 14:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC) yes, very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scotland Eilean Donan Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Iifar 18:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment I feel it's a little bit tilted (look at the main building or the bridge), please fix it. --Kadellar 18:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment I checked and most sides except the far right are straight. Other examples: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eilean_Donan_Castle Perhaps the building has non-straight walls?Saffron Blaze 20:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasfield Court Gloucestershire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasfield Great House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quedgeley Church War Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple Apollo Side Wide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ximonic 12:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bald Eagle Portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bald Eagle Portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sunrise apollo side.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise apollo side.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your question

I answered here --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 00:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheltenham Municiapl Offices.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arlington Row Bibury.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple Apollo Side Boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wonderful. --Jkadavoor 10:29, 29 February 2012 (UTC) I like realy, but sorry, if you could remove the dust spots in the sky I accept it better. --Moonik 13:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Saffron Blaze 17:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment Sorry Saffron, but I still see them in the highest resolution, especially on the right top of the first column and avove. If you want I can correct them. --Moonik 07:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)  Comment No worries, but I can't see any more spots. If you would annotate the page that would be helpful that way I can edit from the original. Saffron Blaze 08:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Support It's OK now. (I have probably the last image in the cache)--Moonik 10:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

White balance

See for my reply on your comment about the eagle-picture on my talk page. Citypeek (talk) 19:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Binocular.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (sorry I have to say it: it's a call for remix, we used to have lolcats, now we will have lolbirds). --PierreSelim 18:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

File:North Gate, Jerash, Jordan2.jpg

Hello, some days ago you made a remark on this pictured (tilted) and I uploaded a new version right away with the hope to fix the tilt problem. Since I didn't hear anything else back from you I was wondering if you didn't see my reply or if there are other issues with the picture? Take care, --Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I started with RAW after that trip. The original picture is actually the first version I uploaded. What are the issues to talk abou? I am unsure. By the way your eagle pictures are great! --Poco a poco (talk) 21:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I actually like both but when I was about to replace my file with your version I noticed that the size increased considerably from 4,12 MB to 7,6 MB, so, now I am not really sure what to do. Bye, Poco a poco (talk) 21:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holyrood Palace and Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aspendos Basilica Antalya Turkey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:49, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frampton Mansell St Lukes Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Moonik 13:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edinburgh_Castle_Overview.jpg

Hi, Saffron. I ask to excuse me if I "corrections" have interfered with your creative process and was an irritation source. And my actions over your photo were simple: 1. To find a correct point for balance white (it should be the neutral, light gray point) - after that invisible color shades and a photo are shown before will look more accurate; 2. Accurately to adjust contrast by means of curves (! Not to use a marker "contrast"), probably it is necessary to work with masks. After that the photo will be even more accurate than process; 3. We raise sharpness with the help "Unsharp Mask". Corrected here such - the less details in a photo, the there should be a value "Radius" less (approximately from 0,3 to 0,7), further raise "Amount" to the necessary result, is possible to 80-120 - here it is necessary to experiment, as the general standards aren't present, the main thing that wasn't white auras round contours. In brief process looked so. I hope, it is useful to you in processing. --Aleks G 17:21, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tintern Abbey and Courtyard.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tintern Abbey and Courtyard.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lower Duden Falls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice ! But two spots in the sky, easy to fix : one above the highest white building at the left, the other one just above the plane, close to it. --Vassil 12:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks. -- Saffron Blaze 13:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Fine. --Vassil 13:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:North Cerny Church of All Saints.jpg

Hi Saffron Blaze

First, I would like to thank you for all your very interesting comments (and frequently, your supports) of my pictures in the QIC page.

It helps me a lot.

Regarding your nomination above, I have some comments.

The subject, the mood (the vicar ! Wonderful !), the light and the colors are very good and interesting, looking for me very "british", and better, very "english" I should say...

But there is a slight problem of overall sharpness.

In my opinion, you know that, because it seems that you tried to improve this by digital sharpening.

And...it is visible, the picture suffers of little sharpening halos between sky and architecture, especially at the top (see the crosses and the vane, for example), but not only (the battlements).

I'm afraid there is nothing to do, except rework the sky manually, pixel after pixel, but it is very tedious ! (I know that !)

Anyway, I hope your image will be promoted, because I do like it very much.

I hope this comment will be helpful.

Again, many thanks for all your kind supports, and for the nice pictures of your country I love (except this afternoon in "Stade de France") ;).

Sorry for my bad english, and greetings from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I hadn't noticed until i zomed to 200%. I will re-look the original. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sheepscombe St Johns Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sheepscombe St Johns Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh Castle Overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

The gilt ewer

Hi Saffron Blaze,

Another time, many thanks for careful review.

That is the problem with masking job... Let the truth as it is, or change it ? In this case, the metal was a bit "twisted" at some edges of the plate, probably due to age. Yes, I can "correct" this, I'll probably do it to avoid useless controversy, but I'll change the truth...

BtW, congratulations for your very nice FP candidate !--Jebulon (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

1)-Nobody's perfect...;))

2)-As we say in french: "On est souvent le plus mauvais juge de sa propre cause" or "Il est plus facile de voir la paille dans l'oeil du voisin que la poutre dans le sien"...;). That's why we submit pictures, isn't it ? If not, let's promote ourselves our own pictures ! Thanks for comments. Cheers,--Jebulon (talk) 10:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harescombe Panorama Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality even if the church is slightly tilted at the left. --Moonik 14:33, 10 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks, I did a bit of perspective correction and it looks better but it is almost an 1000 year old building. Hard to tell which walls are tilted by age as opposed to my camera. Saffron Blaze 15:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Arlington Row Bibury.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Arlington Row Bibury.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Frampton Mansell St Lukes Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frampton Mansell St Lukes Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

FP review

Hi, I don't really understand why you withdrew your support, which I appreciated a lot, for this picture a FP nominee, with the motivation "only two edits on Commons". Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rialto Gondoliers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! DimiTalen 16:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duntisbourne Leer Ford 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! DimiTalen 13:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frampton Mansell Church Wide2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Model

Hi Saffron Blaze,

yes, it is the same model. Ralf, me and other user took part last weekend at a workshop for photography in Nürnberg. And this art nude foto shooting was a part of this event. Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

This workshops are every half year, if you want, you can come to us. (excuse my bad english!) --Ralf Roleček 20:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your English appears to be much better than my German:) Thanks for the offer of participating in a workshop but it would be a long way to travel for such an event. Danke. Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venice Gesuati Church 3D.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Harescombe Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harescombe Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Selsley Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 07:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peace of Christ Eastleach Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastleach Swan Stone Footbridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! DimiTalen 21:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Ciel bleu britannique

Salut mon ami !

Merci de tes votes pour mes images.

J'espère que tu as compris que ma réflexion à propos de ciel de ta photo n'était qu'un plaisanterie, et d'ailleurs à chaque fois que je suis venu en Grande-Bretagne, j'ai toujours profité d'un temps magnifique ! :J'espère ne t'avoir blessé en aucune manière.

Cette église est magnifique, très typique, et ta légende (caption) sur la page de description est très intéressante, j'ai appris beaucoup de choses. Merci de toutes ces informations passionnantes.

Si j'en crois les photos de Mattbuck, il fait meilleur temps en Angleterre qu'au Pays de Galles !

Amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

LOL, Il faisait tellement beau toute la semaine. Quelque fois, je pense que je ne suis pas en Angleterre:) La semaine prochaine je vais a "Greece". J'espere que le meteo sera aussi doux avec les ciel en blue!

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rialto Gondoliers.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rialto Gondoliers.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upleadon Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. inspite of the fake sky: the weather is never so nice in Britain ! lol ! (This is a good candidate for a Valued Image label, IMO.)--Jebulon 22:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odda chapel deerhurst stone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:39, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

Hi Saffron Blaze:

Wish you a wonderful Easter filled with happiness, peace and love!

I like your churches, so much.

Regards, Jee Jkadavoor (talk) 07:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braodway Tower 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a small dust spot on your lens, close to the standing man. DimiTalen 17:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)  Done That was a nasty one too. Thanks. Saffron Blaze 18:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality & very nice! --NorbertNagel 12:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White horse portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Selsley Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Selsley Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Duntisbourne Leer Ford 2011.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duntisbourne Leer Ford 2011.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumbleton Old Rectory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great QI. Just need a category. --Selbymay 22:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)  Done and thanks for fixing the location. Saffron Blaze 00:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumbleton Drinking Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:12, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumbleton Hall Hotel Cotswolds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Selbymay 22:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumbleton Hall Grounds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 05:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Banqueting StJames Chipping Campden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 23:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumbleton Hall Cotswolds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 05:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruffalo Sculpture Final.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. :) --Jkadavoor 06:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Bougainvillea

Hello,

Thanks for your message. I am not sure what corrections are needed. I have the RAW files for these 2 pictures: [1]. Yann (talk) 10:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durdle Door Dorset Sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 15:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durdle Door Dorset Coast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 15:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durdle Door Overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Broadway Tower 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Braodway Tower 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

It is a better portrait

• In my humble opinion, QI is about technology, not about artistic value (compared to FP or VI). This is why I think both Tumanov portraits have enough quiality. Your remark about «tired eyes» made me jump: he's a temporary acting mayor, moved into this position to solve the problem with city utilities. He has a huge reason to be tired, yes.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

You make a good point about QI being more focused on technical aspects, but I think composition is still part of it. This portrait just stood out to me even in thumbnail because of its compositional elements. That aside, he sure does have that look about him that he has many responsibilities and issues to deal with so his eyes just add to that quality that makes the portrait just a little bit better in my opinion. With this said there is no reason that any of your recent portraits can't be QI. Cheers... Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

• Crop? In case you know the size (in pixels) to be cropped from left and right sides, I may try. Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:13, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I will have a look... perhaps add an annotaion of an approximate crop? Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:16, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

• File:Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Binocular.jpg — why not COM:FP yet?!--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Heh, I like that one too. I recently had this same bird promoted from another perspective and people were commenting on all the Eagle FPs. I thought I'd give it some time before submitting another. Thanks for the compliment.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindos Windmill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perfect! --Alchemist-hp 20:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple of Athena Lindos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perfect! --Alchemist-hp 20:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		I hereby award Saffron Blaze, The Photographer's Barnstar for 15 Featured pictures on Commons, other perfect photos and his admission to the restricted club Meet our photographers. --Jovian Eye storm 11:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter Church Lindos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}