User talk:SMiki55

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SMiki55!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaedwen[edit]

Obrazić się nie obrażę, aczkolwiek uważam, że argumenty są słabe. Wiedźmińska wiki nie jest tu żadnym wyznacznikiem, podobnie gra, bo obrazek musi się zgadzać jedynie z opisem w książce. Wzór jest jak najbardziej rzeczywisty (File:Schwäbisch Gmünd Wappen.svg) i chyba nieco bliższy wymogom heraldyki, która mówi, że zwierzę-godło ma "wypełniać" tarczę. A ten szablonowy francuski jednorożec wygląda raczej jak przedstawienie stworzenia, a nie jak godło herbowe. Zobacz pl:mobilia herbowe. ARvєδuι + 01:54, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pogoń należałoby jednak traktować jako całość :) Godło to wypełnia tarczę herbową w jej górnej części właśnie dzięki rycerzowi z wzniesionym nad głową mieczem. ARvєδuι + 22:32, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AS jest dość dokładny w opisach heraldyki, więc myślę, że pierdzącego/leżącego jednorożca by sobie nie odpuścił. ARvєδuι + 23:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Herb Estonii jest dość... nowoczesny. A poza tym nie ma w nim lwów, tylko lamparty. Nie bardzo rozumiem skąd nagle takie zainteresowanie "poprawianiem" herbów... ARvєδuι + 17:05, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jeśli już, to może raczej File:National Coat of arms of Denmark.svg. Tylko bez serc oczywiście. ARvєδuι + 17:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tarcza[edit]

Może tutaj coś będzie: Category:Quarterly shields, Category:Heraldic divisions. Mboro (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nilfgaard[edit]

IMHO: Śmiało wgrywaj nową wersję (użyj opcji pod historią pliku) i uzupełnij opis pliku o cytat z "Sezonu Burz". Świetna robota na Wiedźmin Wiki (gratuluję też awansu ;) ). Pozdrawiam serdecznie. Mboro (talk) 08:22, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


File:Cdproject--red-logo-new.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shaddim (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC) talk]]) 18:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you are in contact with CDProject red, they can give an formal and written admission that the commons can add material from them (Logos etc) cheers Shaddim (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDProjekt-logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gżdacz (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wheel of the Year.svg[edit]

I'm taking the time to write you, as I have removed the titular image from the Wheel of the Year English Wikipedia article. My reasoning for removal of the image is that the date given for Imbolc is incorrect. I have left messages on the file's Talk page, and the original uploader's Talk page, but have seen neither reply, nor action. Your name came up as part of the file, and so I would like to discuss the inconsistent dates given in the image.

As stated on said Talk pages, the image should demonstrate Imbolc as Feb 1, or as Feb 1–2, but not as strictly Feb 2. I am using legacy hardware, and lack the necessary software to edit svg files. Would you be so kind as to look into the matter and resolve the issue, please?
— CJDOS, Sheridan, OR, USA (talk) 22:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Thank you for correcting the dates; very much appreciated. I have reinstated the image on the English Wikipedia article.
— CJDOS, Sheridan, OR, USA (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]