User talk:SKopp

There is some difference in whether the colours in the Flag of Iceland are like this or like this, the latter being your version, what sources did you use when colouring it that way? --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 07:38, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I used the data from Vexilla Mundi (Mello Luchtenberg). It's supposed to be PMS 293. (The RGB values shifted a little when I converted the image to a 3 colour palette, but not much.) As to wether the lighter or the darker colours are correct: On Flags of the World it says:

In recent years, the government of Iceland considered issuing colour specifications in the more well known Pantone Matching System and in the CMYK system. For printing, PMS 287 and CMYK 100-69-0-11.5 were proposed for the blue colour, and PMS 1795 and CMYK 0-94-100-0 for the red colour.

The RGB value of #003897 in your version is indeed a good rendering of PMS 287, just as #d72828 is for PMS 1795, so it may very well be that your flag better follows the specifications and that my flag is too light. Luchtenberg's data is supposedly from the Album des Pavillons which in this case probably tries to approximate the colours from the official specifications. -- Sebastian Koppehel 10:41, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It would be really nice to get the official colours, according to the law regarding the flag (see: Flag of Iceland ) they are the following (I don't suppose you can use SCOTDIC colours?):

• Sky-blue colour: SCOTDIC number 693009.
• Snow-white colour: SCOTDIC number 95.
• Fire-red colour: SCOTDIC ICELAND FLAG RED.

--Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 14:27, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with the SCOTDIC colour system; I gather it is meant to be used exclusivcely for textiles. The amateurish website of the SCOTDIC company is not very helpful either. However, if (as indicated above) the Icelandic government has proposed PMS 287 and 1795, then we might take these shades as the best approximation of official values that we can get hold of for the time being. I therefore reverted Image:Flag of Iceland.png to your version. --Sebastian Koppehel 03:09, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Could you make a new version of Image:Flag of Iceland.png which uses the newer darker colours but is in the same size and dimensions as the new one? Thanks. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 22:27, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Borders

Regarding the borders: If the image is framed then it has a background and a border. Either way is fine by me, as long as the image itself has no border. Again, thanks for your diligent work, and I DO appreciate it (border or no boder). -- Chris 73 07:58, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

By the way, I re-uploaded some of the flags where you removed the border so that they have the right size. I guess I can sometimes be a bit perfectionist :-) I also "freed" some other flags of their borders. And thanks for your warm appreciation - dafür nich, wie man bei uns hinterm Deich sagt. -- Sebastian Koppehel 01:49, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It's best to do it in the html code i think, the images themselves should be exact replicas. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 11:02, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Andorra.png

I uploaded Image:Flag of Andorra.png which is not in tune with your flags, perhaps you'd like to make one and replace it? --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 00:50, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I shall look into it. As for the Iceland flag, I made a bigger version. -- Sebastian Koppehel 01:49, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC):

European flag

You uploaded the Flag of Europe under the name "Flag of the European Union.png", i have moved it and deleted the old file as it was both misleading and unfactual, see en:European flag. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 01:52, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks, you are right of course. By the way, could you delete this old version of Image:Slovakia Coat of Arms.png I uploaded accidentally? -- Sebastian Koppehel 03:40, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

No problem, deleted that old revision. --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 05:25, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Benin

Hi, I made a flag of Benin and I tried to follow your instructions (height 800px, ratios and RGB values from Vexilla Mundi). Can you check if I did it correctly? Mtcv 12:02, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Het afbeelding is heel correct, voor zover als ik kan zien -- Sebastian Koppehel 05:48, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Flag template

Hi SKopp,

The work you're doing with flags is great---thanks! Have you considered putting a template, say Template:SKopp-flag, on the image description pages? It could have some of the information from User:SKopp, with a link to more details.

Dbenbenn 19:34, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hello again, SKopp. Great work with the SVG flags. Did you know you can easily get more accurate results by editing the SVG by hand? For example, compare the two versions of Image:Flag of Japan.svg, or Image:Flag of Bolivia.svg. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 05:17, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Hey, I have some flags drawn at the EN Wikipedia, and if you want, I can upload them here. Zscout370 (sound off) 06:14, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I shall look into hand-optimising some of the flags. --Sebastian Koppehel 08:32, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Colours of the flag of Latvia are incorrect

The colours of the flag of Latvia should be like on this description page[1]. Thanks! --Juzeris 21:59, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

India flag

Thank you for drawing the India flag in svg. There are a few minor issues with the flag:

1. The diameter of the blue chakra in the centre should be 75% of the central white band. It is currently 90%.
2. I also notice that there is no white central band, I think this may cause problems when the background is of another colour
3. The colours are currently incorrect: w:Image:India flag large.png has the nearest approximated colours.

If you need any other help; w:User:Brhaspati has written a MATLAB code for the flag; available here: w:User:Brhaspati/indflag. Nichalp 13:54, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Two answer the points:

1. Please see here for an eploration of the issue of the size of the Ashoka Chakra. Apparently the official definition is 75%, but has no relevance in reality. 90% looks about right to me.
2. The image has a white background.
3. The colours may be debatable, but I don't quite see why the one linked by you should be better and mine should be incorrect.

--Sebastian Koppehel 15:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Japan.svg

I like the new array of flags that you're creating, but I have one problem with the Japanese flag. Is it possible to put a faint, gray outline around the flag, for times when it's used on a white background? I would do this myself, but I have no clue how to do so. Thanks! -70.176.93.225 05:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

This has been discussed before in regards to flags so I'll answer this one: Our with the flag images is to produce the flag as accurately as possible, hence, if the flag doesn't have a border according to the flag law of the country in question (or whatever the authority on the flag happens to be) we don't put one on it. —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 08:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Furthermore, it's easy to add a border with HTML. See w:Template:Frame, which is used at w:Washington, D.C., for example. dbenbenn | talk 14:15, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Taiwan flag

You have been replacing en:Image:ROC flag large.png with Image:Flag of Taiwan.svg. However, the colors do not seem to match. I believe the colors used at Image:ROC flag large.png are indeed the correct ones, as that is the version found on government website (it also matches the flags flying from government buildings and hanging on the walls in Taiwan). Did you use another source in drawing this flag? --Jiang 00:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Flags

Could you put in your flags for Guernsey, Puerto Rico, Maldives, and Tunisia. I saw them at your site and would very much like to see them on commons. – Krun 22:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

The flags at [2] are all public domain, right? (At least, you don't assert any copyright over the specific SVG code?) Your user page says they are GFDL, but it seems you've been using {{PD-self}} for the SVG flags you've been uploading. Anyway, I uploaded Image:Flag of the Orange Free State.svg and used {{PD-user|SKopp}}. If I should change that to GFDL, please let me know. Perhaps you could add a note to your web page explaining the copyright status? I'd like to upload the other flags that aren't here on the Commons yet. Thanks, User:dbenbenn 20:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Gambia.svg

Hi SKopp. Kannst du noch die Flage Gambias erstellen? Schaengel89 11:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Ich seh grad, die Flagge heißt Image:Flag of The Gambia.svg. Hat sich also erledigt. Schaengel89 11:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Flag of Cameroon.svg

I've an user on fr:, who lives in Cameroon, who think, that the star on flag is too big. He think that the png is more accurate.

Anyway, thank for your work, it's great one, we gonna drop png flag soon. fr:Utilisateur:Bilou

Pakistan Provincial Flags

Hi,

On your website, I saw some provincial flags of Pakistan: Sindh, Punjab, NWFP, Balochistan and Azad Kashmir. If possible could you add them to Category:Flags of Pakistan, also there needs to be provincial symbols of Pakistan, under the similar along the lines of the Canadaian rules and regulations.

Here the link to your website: http://www.vexilla-mundi.com/pakistan.htm

Many Thanks -- Fast track 19:16 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Vatican Flag

I noticed that the Vatican City State was absent from your list of flags. Might you consider making one? (The rest of your work is awesome!)

Image:Flag of Algeria.svg

Image deletion warning

Image:Flag of Algeria.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Saint Vincent and The Grenadines

Flag_of_Saint_Vincent_and_the_Grenadines.svg can't be read by Firefox outputting xml errors.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Flag_of_Saint_Vincent_and_the_Grenadines.svg

XML Parsing Error: prefix not bound to a namespace Location: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Flag_of_Saint_Vincent_and_the_Grenadines.svg Line Number 18, Column 5: <rdf:RDF

---

^

Graphik Alte Hamburger Eisenbahnhöfe

Hallo, Du hast offenbar diese Graphik erstellt. Er wird (auch) verwendet bei "Hamburg Altonaer Verbindungsbahn". Kannst Du noch den von 1903 bis 1906 bestehenden Interims-Bahnhof Lippeltstr. nachtragen? Dann wäre der Umbau vor Eröffnung des Hauptbahnhofes besser nachzuvollziehen. Wäre sehr schön.

hello, this picture is essentiell by "Hamburg Altonaer Verbindungsbahn". Is it possible, to add the provisorious station Lippeltstr. (1903 - 1906)? The situation before the Hamburg "Central-Station" were opened would be more clear. Thank you! --Horstbu 21:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Émile Ollivier.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Émile Ollivier.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Jodo 23:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Flag of India.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of India.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^Talk 21:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Specifically the fact that _you_ made a derivative work of a Flag that you marked as PD-Self. The license would need to retain what ever the original flags license is. --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 21:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:Flag of tajikistan.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of tajikistan.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 17:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_South_Africa.svg

File:Flag_of_South_Africa.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jappalang (talk) 03:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Bangladesh Flag colors

On the discussion page of the Bangladesh Flag svg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Flag_of_Bangladesh.svg I have renewed the color discussion...

I refer to a color sample i have uploaded

Should any action be taken?

Gregors (talk) 16:58, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flag of Tanzania.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Tanzania.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Rodejong (talk) 14:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flag of Somalia.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Somalia.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

McZusatz (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Slovenia.svg

File:Flag of Slovenia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:28, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Slovenia.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Slovenia.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:08, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Mauritania.svg

File:Flag of Mauritania.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

182.178.55.82 23:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of Italy.svg

File:Flag of Italy.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

200.88.196.85 15:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

.svg

Hello,

I've seen your photos with. "svg" upload, can you tell me what program you used? Thanks, Josse.Cottenier _Overleg 06:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of Tanzania.png

File:Flag of Tanzania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 11:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of France.svg

File:Flag of France.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

196.201.72.152 19:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of Burkina Faso.png

File:Flag of Burkina Faso.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of Transvaal.png

File:Flag of Transvaal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Orange Free State.png

File:Flag of the Orange Free State.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of Ethiopia (1996-2009).png

File:Flag of Ethiopia (1996-2009).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 21:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of Cameroon.png

File:Flag of Cameroon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of Tanzania.png

File:Flag of Tanzania.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, SKopp

	Thank you I forgot to be a new person!
	Thank you for choosing the type "Make your own". Please make sure to find out where SKopp is here. Used on and created award in Norasisl (talk) 13:28, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konica Digital Revio KD-300Z, comparison of open and closed state.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Pfannkuchen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Advocaat bottle with glass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Prokop, Stellingen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Archi38 20:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peugeot pepper mill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AK Barmbek old main building 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AK Barmbek old main building 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alma Hoppes Lustspielhaus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alma Hoppes Lustspielhaus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:37, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg labour court 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please provide EXIF data with your images? It is good practice in QIC to provide the full set of metadata. --Cccefalon 03:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Added (unspectacular) Exif data. --SKopp 22:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC) Good quality. EXIF data mustn't be spectacular. But for taking part in a quality contest, it is a help for assessing the work of other photographers and it is instructive for others, to see how a photo was taken. Anyway, thank you. --Cccefalon 19:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon F75.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Info The scope is identical to the category name. --Sebastian Koppehel (talk) 17:42, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not bad, but next time remove dustspots Sebastian Koppehel. --Mile (talk) 13:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Jar of rose hip jam.jpg

File:Jar of rose hip jam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(t) Josve05a (c) 13:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Netherlands Antilles.png

File:Flag of the Netherlands Antilles.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 13:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Flag of Puerto Rico.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Flag of Puerto Rico.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

• File:Flag of Nauru.svg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Honduran flag

Hi, SKopp. In 2005 you upload a version of the Honduran flag. The current version of the flag is a misrepresentation of the flag's real color. So, being you the original uploader, would you be willing to support the change I propose? -Kes⁴⁷ (?) 17:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of India.svg

File:Flag of India.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Editor8220 (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Grenada.svg

File:Flag of Grenada.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.140.246.27 06:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Flag of Burundi.svg

File:Flag of Burundi.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Vandal claiming that this is the new flag of Burundi, even though there's no source or even evidence that they're changing their flag) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Skycloud86.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Flag of Kyrgyzstan.svg

File:Flag of Kyrgyzstan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)