User talk:Ruud Buitelaar

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ruud Buitelaar!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Frans Stoppelman by Norbert Olthuis.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Frans Stoppelman by Norbert Olthuis.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Frans Stoppelman by Norbert Olthuis.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ahmad^talk 20:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi {{user:Ahmad252|Ahmad}}, thanks for your message. On the website where I found the picture, it says that it is public domain Mark 1.0 I don´t know which is the right tag for that. Can you help me? Here is the reference:https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/

thanks in advance. --Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 21:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you. It certainly appears that the painting is in the public domain, but I don't know the reason. The painter passed away in 2009, so I think the copyright is not expired yet. A list of PD licenses on Wikimedia Commons is available here, but I can't find any license for this specific painting, so I suggest replacing {{Remove this line and insert a license instead|year=2020|month=10|day=19}} with

{{PD-because|[https://www.europeana.eu/et/item/270/resource_document_jhm_museum_M011491 the source] suggests that the painting has been released under a [https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Public Domain Mark 1.0] license.}}

, or a better template/explanation, in case I've missed something. Thank you. Ahmad^talk 22:43, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I disabled the transclusion of my userpage in your comment. I think you wanted to notify me of your response. If that's the case, please use {{U|Ahmad252|Ahmad}} instead. It will send me a notification. Ahmad^talk 22:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! done--Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dick Buitelaar.jpg[edit]

File:Dick Buitelaar.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This is not CC-Zero. Naamsvermelding is verplicht, en bovendien alleen voor particulier gebruik, zie https://stadsarchief.breda.nl/informatie/praktische-informatie/bestelinformatie

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Elly (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not accurate. Stadsarchief Breda (City archives of Breda) informs the following: er zijn geen auteursrechten op de BN De Stem foto’s van Johan van Gurp. Voor openbaar/commercieel gebruik dient u bij het downloadprocedure getoonde formulier in te vullen en digitaal door te sturen aan het Stadsarchief. My translation: Author´s rights on images of photographer Johan van Gurp for newspaper BN De Stem in Stadsarchief Breda have been waived. For public and commercial use please fill in the form that appears in the download request and submit it to Stadsarchief. I have done so and hereby is public and commercial use explicitly allowed.--Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have obtained a declaration in writing stating that author´s rights have been waived and that public and commercial use is allowed. I have requested clarification from Stadsarchief Breda whether they allow re-use without citation of source. I will report here as soon as I have a reply. Question: which license, if not CC0, is applicable here if Stadsarchief, who has waived rights and allows public and commercial use, requests that source should be cited every time the file is re-used?--Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The images and videos of Stadsarchief Breda can be found here: https://stadsarchief.breda.nl/collectie/beeld/films-en-foto-s/. The 270,000 images in the Johan van Gurp/BN de Stem collection were donated to Stadsarchief Breda by the photographer, see: https://stadsarchief.breda.nl/bn-de-stem-johan-van-gurp. Stadsarchief Breda digitalized the images. When a user selects an image and clicks on "download", a screen appears with conditions of use. For use in the public domain, including commercial, the user is requested to fill out a form and submit it to Stadsarchief. This is the form: https://www.breda.nl/foto-bestellingen-uit-de-beeldbank-aanvragen/formulier. The user has to state the purpose of use, and I put as purpose: Upload on Wikimedia Commons with CC0 license. Basically the form is a disclaimer (Stadsarchief cannot be held responsible etc etc ) plus a requirement to mention name of photographer and source. Which I did. All this was perfectly acceptable, as confirmed to me in writing by Stadsarchief. I hope this clarifies--Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 21:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ik geef even antwoord in het Nederlands, wel zo makkelijk. Als in dit artikel staat dat Van Gurp zijn foto's heeft gedoneerd, blijkt daar voor mij niet uit dat hij ook het auteursrecht heeft overgedragen. Dat staat er niet namelijk. Als we via OTRS gaan corresponderen zou ik het Stadsarchief vragen of ze de pagina uit de donatieovereenkomst kunnen scannen waar in staat dat van Gurp het auteursrecht overdraagt. Meestal gaat het namelijk alleen om de fysieke foto's of negatieven samen met een gebruiksrecht. Als Stadsarchief wél het auteursrecht heeft, dan kunnen ze de foto vrijgeven onder CC-0/Publiek domein, dan wel onder CC-BY-SA4.0 (of eerdere versie desnoods). Dit zijn de twee standaard opties op Commons. Ingewikkelde voorwaarden als formulieren invullen etc accepteren we hier niet op Commons. De foto is inmiddels verwijderd, mocht de toestemming toch in orde komen, dan kan die eenvoudig teruggezet (met de juiste licentie). Hier staat een tekst die het stadsarchief kan gebruiken om naar OTRS te mailen voor vrijgave van deze of andere foto's. Groet, Elly (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. dat jij het formulier hebt ingevuld met vermelding CC-0 wil ik uiteraard wel geloven. Maar op Commons geloven we niet iedereen, want daar is geen beginnen aan. Er moeten harde bewijzen zijn, die leggen we vast in het OTRS systeem. Dat geldt vooral voor professionele foto's zoals deze, want daar kunnen echt problemen mee komen, mocht iemand anders ze bijvoorbeeld in een boekje gaan gebruiken. Dan moet dat boekje uit de handel genomen.... moet er niet aan denken. Vandaar dit gedoe voor het goede doel dus. Elly (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, ik ga het proberen. De inzet is om in principe alle 270,000 foto´s uit de Van Gurp collectie op Commons te kunnen gebruiken. Wish me luck.--Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 22:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dat zou heel gaaf zijn inderdaad. Elly (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ruud Buitelaar

Copyright status: File:Frans Stoppelman by Norbert Olthuis.jpg[edit]

File:Dick Buitelaar.jpg[edit]

Navigation menu

Search