User talk:Rune370

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rune370!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChaosMagicEvolution.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Guy 18:08, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AustinSpareSigils.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Magic battle[edit]

I'm sorry, I did not intend to put the following on your user page, but here instead. Modanung (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This started because of differing interpretations of the sources. You calling in the authorities to silence me is hard to ignore and is by no means calming or changing my mind. Why are you labeling my work as "promoting my own material" whereas your efforts are "contributions"? Why did you start trampling my well-intended efforts? Is it even possible for me to contribute without you labeling it as self-promotion? Are you aware everything I create and share is free/libre and in this case even CC0? Do you not see I did my best to match the color scheme you picked? I'm trying to collaborate.

Just because you wield power, doesn't mean you're doing it responsibly.

The sigil of Chaos ("2D version" of a Chaosphere) is stated as being the symbol of the IOT and a way for its adepts to communicate. Besides that the New Right uses it to promote fascism, are you aware of that? Again, according to Liber Null to the adept Chaos magician the Chaosphere - clearly describes as 3D and optionally physical - is the prime radiant or magic lamp (in common parlance: the central symbol). In this case we may also translate it to spiritual beacon. Modanung (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Modanung do not upload anything that is in violation of COM:OVERWRITE, upload as a new file. Please do not import issues from Wikipedia to Commons. Bidgee (talk) 02:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is besides the point! This is not about my behaviour or even rules. Those are merely used as a stick here to beat the persistent and help the first caller. I'm fighting for truth with my hands increasingly tied. It seems you people just want to be right, win a discussion and move on. That has nothing to do with truth. Drag me away if you have to, but you will be preserving bullshit. Modanung (talk) 06:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care what ever it is, it is a Wikipedia issue that you're importing here and at the same time ignore the fact that overwriting and warring over a file is totally frowned upon. If this were Wikipedia, WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT would apply to your comment above. Bidgee (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and there's an obvious vicious cycle there resulting from ignoring the other half of the dispute because it rang. Creating a bias now. Idiots. Modanung (talk) 09:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]