User talk:Ratmanz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ratmanz!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  русский  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  বাংলা   +/−

--Veikia (talk) 08:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same for File:Zatch Bell!.jpg, File:They Were Eleven.jpg. --Veikia (talk) 08:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobby Kotick photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 14:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"optimized" versions[edit]

Hi,

you upload "optimized" file versions, that have drastically smaller file size and miss exif data. You only give "optimized" as rationale. Please elaborate?? --C.Suthorn (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello. I write text through a translator. The word "optimization" just describes what I did with the image. In one case, I just shrink the image, without losing the quality. In another, I first use AI to improve the image, and then I compress it. I do this by reducing the traffic, and the page loading speed. It helps everyone. Sometimes I do this if the image is in poor quality. I do not know what "exif data" is "--Ratmanz (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The quality of the images doesn't really change. You can check on different versions of the images. Sometimes the images get even better. To reduce the image and use https://squoosh.app/ Ratmanz (talk) 18:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the same name as another file, which already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elbrus-16c 1891VM038.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Drakosh (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Содержит орфографические ошибки. Вот правильные написания:
протагонист
сверхъестественная
возвращение — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.119.39.52 (talk) 17:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]