User talk:Ralf Roletschek/Archive/2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your best shot 2018

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Frank Schulenburg: Ich bin nur noch frustriert hier. WMF meint, Commons sei es nicht wert, sich auf Island zu treffen. GFDL wird verboten, obwohl es mal hieß, "...steht unter GFDL und wird es auch immer stehen..." Freibierfreunde haben das ohne Fotografen durch die Hintertür beschlossen. Dann sollen die auch Fotos beisteuern. Ich bin hier raus. --Ralf Roleček  23:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Ralf, ich kann deine Frustration über die Entscheidung der Wikimedia Foundation nachvollziehen. Ich persönlich habe allerdings dieses Jahr auch eine ganze Menge Spaß beim Fotografieren und bei der Interaktion mit anderen Fotografen hier auf Commons gehabt. Und den sollten wir uns nicht nehmen lassen. Ich fände es ausgesprochen schade, wenn Du dich aus dem Projekt zurückziehen würdest. Dein enormes Wissen über die Fotografie wird gebraucht und ich fände es toll, wenn wir doch noch das eine oder andere persönliche Treffen für die Usergroup zustande bekommen könnten. Wenn Du magst, können wir ja die Tage einfach mal wieder telefonieren… Herzliche Grüße aus Kalifornien und alles Gute für 2019! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC) 
Wir können gerne telefonieren, war immer schön. Mich ärgern auch nicht die Kollegen hier sondern die "Schreibtischtäter" bei WMF, WMDE und auf Commons, all die Leute, die selbst nichts beitragen aber Vorschriften machen. Bei Wikimania gehts ähnlich, die über 200 $ Teilahmegebühr bewirken nur, daß niemand mehr privat teilnimmt, nur die linientreuen Leute, die ausgesiebt werden. Montreal war das letzte Mal, daß ich das privat bezahlt habe. Ich wäre gern bereit, Treffen zu organisieren. Das kann irgendwo in der Welt sein, das bekomme ich auch hin, habe ich oft genug gemacht. Aber es steht und fällt mit der Finanzierung. Alles andere ist organisierbar. Wie schön wäre es gewesen, wenn Fotografen aus Indien oder Afrika die Landschaft Islands gesehen hätten! Naja... laß uns mal schwatzen. --Ralf Roleček  01:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Rollback abuse

Hallo.
Eine solche Bearbeitung wie diese Bearbeitungen, und Sie werden von dem Zurücksetzer-Privileg auf Wikimedia Commons abgezogen, mit möglichen Auswirkungen auf andere Wikimedia-Sites.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:06, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Der Dateiname ist Teil der Attributierung, wie von der Lizenz vorgesehen. Die Änderung des Dateinamens ist Vandalismus, was man durch Zurücksetzen ändern darf. --Ralf Roleček  23:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:29, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Leni-Riefenstahl - Profile.jpg

File:Leni-Riefenstahl - Profile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 22:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7800.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

File:WP-Löschgeier.jpg

File:WP-Löschgeier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Alpöhi (talk) 12:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Ralf_Roletschek_with_his

Ich verstehe sowieso nicht, was hier geschrieben wird. Und ich werde hier kein weiteres Mal vorbeikommen. Mal wieder wurde in irgendeinem Hinterzimmer irgendwas beschlossen, was man nicht mitbekommt. Man braucht mich nicht sperren (ist mir mittlerweile aber auch scheißegal), ich bin schon vergrault hier und nur noch sporadisch anzutreffen. Entscheidungsträger sind Leute, die selbst keine Bilder beisteuern, den aktiven Fotografen aber ständig neue Vorsachriften machen wollen. Commons hat mal Spaß gemacht. Ich lasse mich nicht in meiner Freizeit gängeln.

Hallo Ralf!

Also @Incnis Mrsi: is jemand die/der kontrolliert ob die Regeln eingehalten werden und macht somit eine wertvolle Arbeit für die Community, sie hat auch mich auf der Seite gemeldet, ohne vorher mit mir zu sprechen: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#JoKalliauer_and_attribution_chain. 

Ich verstehe sowieso nicht, was hier geschrieben wird.

Es geht darum, dass du derzeit gegen zwei Vorschriften verstößt:

  1. Seit August 2010 ist die Verwendung von Bildern in der Signatur untersagt, diese ist seit März 2011 auch in Deutsch verfügbar mit dem Wortlaut: Bilder in der Signatur sind nicht erlaubt. Der Aktuelle Wortlaut heißt: Bilder jeglicher Art dürfen aus folgenden Gründen nicht in Signaturen verwendet werden:
  2. Du hast 2013 Zurücksetzungsrechte von @Steinsplitter: erhalten, damit sollte man vorsichtig umgehen, eine nicht erlaubte Verwendung dieser Verwendung liegt z.B. in Special:Diff/334922689 vor. Hierbei handelt es sich nicht um Vandalismus, daher hättest du die Rückgängigmachen-Funktion (anstatt der Zurücksetzen-Funktion) verwenden sollen. Commons:Rollback/de sagt: Es sollte nur für eindeutige Fälle verwendet werden, nur leider war die Namensänderung korrekt und du lagst falsch, insofern liegt hier eine Verletzung deiner erweiterten Rechte vor.
Mal wieder wurde in irgendeinem Hinterzimmer irgendwas beschlossen, was man nicht mitbekommt.

Das halte ich für eine Lüge, du wurdest auf beides von @Incnis Mrsi and BevinKacon: hingewiesen:

  1. User_talk:Ralf_Roletschek/Archive/2018#Signature
  2. User_talk:Ralf_Roletschek/Archive/2019#Rollback_abuse
Man braucht mich nicht sperren

Generell würde ich beide Vergehen geringfügig halten die keiner Sperrung bedürfen, jedoch finde ich dein Verhalten auf die Hinweise dass du kein Bild verwenden darfst, bzw. dass du deine Zurücksetzungs-Rechte missbraucht hast als nicht tragbar. Jedem passieren Fehler, aber du hast dich weder Entschuldigt, noch deine Edits rückgängig gemacht und zeigst anscheinend keine Einsicht, was du auch auf Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Ralf_Roletschek_with_his bestätigst. 

ich bin schon vergrault hier und nur noch sporadisch anzutreffen

Fände ich schade, aber das Wikiversum ist nun mal ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt wo man sich an gewisse Regeln halten muss. 

Entscheidungsträger sind Leute, die selbst keine Bilder beisteuern

Ich mag nur für mich sprechen: Ich persönlich habe zwar weit weniger Bilder beigesteuert als du, jedoch sehe ich persönlich, als Techniker, Fotos im Vergleich zu technischen Grafiken für Enyklopädien "irrelevant" (korrigiert: weniger relevant  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)). Das Wikiversum ist mMn nicht dafür da Qualitätsbilder auszuzeichnen, sondern dafür da Inhalte zu Vermitteln, sicher sind dafür auch Bilder wichtig und schöne Bilder noch besser. Ich hab etliche (kleine) Wünsche von c:Commons:Graphics village pump,c:Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop, de:Wikipedia:Grafikwerkstatt erledigt: User:JoKalliauer/Pictures (und habe für keines der Bilder eine Spende bekommen). 

den aktiven Fotografen aber ständig neue Vorsachriften machen wollen.

Was heißt das neue Vorschriften? Inwiefern hängt das damit zusammen dass du Fotograf bist? Lege vl. eine Wikipause ein, besinne dich und denk darüber nach was du sagst.

  1. Seit August 2010 ist die Verwendung von Bildern in der Signatur untersagt, diese ist seit März 2011 auch in Deutsch verfügbar mit dem Wortlaut: Bilder in der Signatur sind nicht erlaubt.
  2. Zurücksetzungsrechte waren doch immer schon nur für eindeutige Vandalismusfälle gedacht gewesen.(Wenn du nicht weißt was Vandalismus ist, lege deine erweiterten Rechte ab.)
Commons hat mal Spaß gemacht. Ich lasse mich nicht in meiner Freizeit gängeln.

So schade ich es auch finden, würde einen so excellenten Fotographen in der Wikipedia zu verlieren, gibt es hier Regeln. Auf diese wurdest du in User_talk:Ralf_Roletschek/Archive/2018#Signature als auch auf User_talk:Ralf_Roletschek/Archive/2019#Rollback_abuse freundlich hingewiesen. Deine Reaktion darauf war weder Einsichtig noch Bereuhend. Des Weiteren scheinst du dein Verhalten nicht an die Regeln anpassen zu wollen, siehe dein Kommenatar auf Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Ralf_Roletschek_with_his. Wenn du dich nicht an die Regeln hältst obwohl du davon informiert wurdest, wirdst du verwarnt/entziehungDeinerRücksetzungsrechte/temporärGesperrt/dauerhaftGesperrt, dann wird Commons auch ohne dich auskommen müssen, aber soweit wird es nicht kommen müssen.

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 08:22, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Ich wollte mich mit meinem Beitrag dort mit keinem Wort auf dich beziehen. Falls dies so rübergekommen ist, dann entschuldige das bitte, war keine Absicht. Die Verschieberechte habe ich nicht mehr und meine Pause begann bereits am 15. Oktober. Wenn in meinem Dateinamen Datum, Urheber und Subjekt stehen, dann ist das kein "inhaltsloser Dateiname" wie DMC-1234.jpg oder so. Ich empfinde es als Vandalismus, solche Dateinamen in irgendwas zu ändern, das ist völlig sinnlos. Nachnutzer berufen sich auf eine Datei, die nicht mehr existiert. Bei meinem Beitrag da drüben habe ich unterschrieben, vorher das Auge gelöscht. Das wurde nicht verlinkt, habe ich wohl was falsch gemacht, war ebenfalls ein Versehen. Jetzt ist das Auge kein Bild mehr. --M@rcela 16:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Das ist ja wohl ein schlechter Witz. Mit 36 kB Code den Quelltext zumüllen, bloß damit du ein Bild in der Signatur hast. Wie soll man sich da noch auf Diskussionsseiten zurechtfinden. --Sitacuisses (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Das war so nicht beabsichtigt. Selbst die unveränderte Standardsignatur bekomme ich nicht eingestellt. Irgendwas ist da gerade kaputt, vielleicht bei mir im Kopf. --[[Benutzer:Ralf Roletschek]] (talk) 17:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Ralf, ich vermute, du hast in den Einstellungen direkt unterhalb der Stelle, wo die Signatur einzutragen ist, den Punkt „Signatur als Wikitext behandeln (ohne automatische Verlinkung)“ nicht aktiviert. — Speravir – 23:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Jetzt habe ich es aktiviert. --Benutzer:Ralf Roletschek 00:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Jetzt funktioniert die Verlinkung, nur führt sie zu einer nicht existenten Seite, weil es in Commons den Namensraum Benutzer nicht gibt. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere (ich will jetzt nicht danach zu suchen), solltest Du früher so etwas in den Einstellungen zu stehen gehabt haben: [[User:Ralf Roletschek|Ralf Roleček]]. Ob [[User:Ralf Roletschek|<span style="color:#000">M<span style="color:#f00">@</span>rcela</span>]] funktioniert, weiß ich nicht (beachte die verkürzte Angabe für die Textfarben). — Speravir – 01:46, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
User-zu-blöd-error :-) Danke. --M@rcela 08:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
;-) Mir ist es ja auch nicht sofort aufgefallen, sonst hätte ich dich gleich in der Meldung darauf hingewiesen. — Speravir – 00:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Horst Seehofer.jpg

Hallo Ralf, du hattest das Bild bearbeitet, daher wurdest du automatisch benachrichtigt. Das Foto ist zwar zu Recht ein Qualitätsbild geworden, aber Phoenix hat es bereits anderweitig bzw. vorher verwendet, und zwar ohne freie Lizenz. Der Hochlader Patrick Büttgen hat sich hier leider noch nicht zurück gemeldet. Solange die Rechte da nicht geklärt sind, sollten wir dieses Foto nicht behalten. De728631 (talk) 17:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Achso, ok. --M@rcela 17:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Goethe (Stieler 1828).jpg

Hallo Ralf, meiner Meinung nach ist Goethes Gesicht durch die Tonwertkorrektur zu rötlich geworden. Allerdings habe ich das Gemälde noch nicht in natura gesehen. --Zaunkoeniglich (talk) 21:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe mich am (wahrscheinlich) weißen Hemd orientiert und darauf den Weißabgleich gemacht. Man kann natürlich noch etwas rot rausnehmen. Bei solchen Bildern ist es immer sehr schwer, wenn man es nicht selbst mit Farbwertkarte fotografiert hat. --M@rcela 21:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Meine Englische Nachricht im deutschen Forum

Hallo Ralf, zu unserer Unterhaltung im Januar wollte ich noch nachschieben, dass es tatsächlich so ist wie vermutet: Die MassMessage-Erweiterung, mit der ich meine Nachricht in verschiedenen Sprachen in Hunderte von Wikis verschickt habe, erkennt beim deutschsprachigen Commons-Forum nicht, dass es hier eine deutsche Nachricht ausliefern soll. Für die Erweiterung ist Commons ein englischsprachiges Projekt, und mit der Unterstruktur in verschiedenen Sprachen kann sie nicht umgehen. Schade, aber für die Zukunft weiß ich jetzt Bescheid. Es hat mich echt gewurmt, dass mein Text hier auf Englisch ankam, also noch mal vielen Dank für den Hinweis. -- Viele Grüße, Johanna Strodt (WMDE) (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Signature

Hi. Kindly mention your username in your signature to effectively enable pinging and mentioning.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, i don't understand, what you want? --M@rcela 17:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Er würde gerne ein "Ralf Roletschek" in deiner Signatur lesen um dich besser anzupingen und zu erwähnen. Habitator terrae 🌍 18:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC) PS: Er war ganz höflich, also nicht durchdrehen;)
Nein, nein. Ich hab schon Schiß, daß meine englische Frage falsch wahrgenommen wird. Einer freundlichen Anfrage komme ich gerne nach, zumal sie sogar noch mit Begründung ankommt. --Ralf Roletschek 18:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-03-23-Fotoworkshop-Nuernberg-DJI 0127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 11:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello. Why did you revert my edit? 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, it was a mistake with mobile phone. It was no my intention. --Ralf Roletschek 14:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Land-Brandenburg-Logo.png

File:Land-Brandenburg-Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

194.76.232.190 07:38, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-08-10-wikimania-gruppenfoto-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Fun. I'd probably choose higher ISO and smaller apperture but good good --Podzemnik 04:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 13:29, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF1019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF0950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:12, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-01-Schären westlich von Långbådan RRK7742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 13:31, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-07-Laval-RalfR-DSC 3332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-07-Laval-RalfR-DSC 3323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-07-Laval-RalfR-DSC 3320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:51, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-07-Laval-RalfR-DSC 3333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:50, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:45, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-25-Jahre-Pridnestrowische-Nationalbank-25-Rubel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Obus-Bender.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:53, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-02-06-straszburg-europarat-RalfR-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 05:34, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-02-06-straszburg-europarat-RalfR-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-02-06-straszburg-europarat-RalfR-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:16, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-02-05-straszburg-RalfR-008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Both these photos have somewhat unusual compositions, in that there is space on the right and her hair is cut on the left, but all her facial features are visible and I like the portraits. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-02-05-straszburg-RalfR-006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good enough quality, IMO, considering the time of day at that latitude in January and the beauty of the composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-12-14-Flughafen-Madrid-Barajas-RalfR-DSCF0949.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Very nice composition. --Zinnmann 07:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrojen-RalfR-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:49, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:55, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0176.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-18-Prednistrowien-RalfR-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Gute Aufnahme, aber ist die Kirche auf dem Bild nicht etwas nach rechts geneigt, sodass eine Perspektivenkorrektur nötig ist? --Aristeas 07:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC) Laut Hilfslinien in Photoshop absolut gerade, das täuscht. --Ralf Roletschek 16:13, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
 Support Stimmt, die Vertikalen rechts an der Kirche sind genau vertikal. Auf der linken Seite der Kirche sind die Vertikalen aber tatsächlich etwas nach innen (rechts) geneingt. Das Tor ist dann wieder (teils) senkrecht … seltsam! Alle Vertikalen 100% gerade zu bekommen ist heikel (hab’s probiert), daher hast Du recht, lassen wir das so. Schönes Bild jedenfalls, danke! --Aristeas 09:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy, but quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sehr schönes, lebensechtes Bild! Leider gibt es (v.a. oben links an der Stange und dem ERA-Logo und ganz rechts am Container) deutliche CAs. Könntest Du die noch etwas reduzieren? Danke! --Aristeas 08:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done stimmt, hab ich übersehen. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 Support Vielen Dank – jetzt ist es gut! --Aristeas 07:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17-08-07-Laval-RalfR-DSC 3317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is hanging a bit to the left --Michielverbeek 18:35, 18 May 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done --Ralf Roletschek 14:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 Support Good now, the suggested correction has been applied. --Aristeas 15:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-08-31-Helsingin Pitäjän Kirkonkylän Mylly-Keravanjoki RRK8338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:19, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-09-29-Görlitz-RalfR-DJI 0408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 13:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Gutes Bild. Könntest Du die CAs v.a. ganz rechts an den Türen/Fenstern noch etwas reduzieren? Danke! --Aristeas 11:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC) ✓ Done autsch, stimmt, das war heftig. --Ralf Roletschek 19:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 Support Danke! Good quality. --Aristeas 13:17, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-06-03-Beelitz RRK2445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice portrait and good quality -- Spurzem 20:13, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

File:19-05-09 Volvic Familie RRK1338.jpg

File:19-05-09 Volvic Familie RRK1338.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 18-11-30-Palma de Mallorca-RalfR2-100 0316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-01-19-Chișinău RRK0214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:50, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gestumblindi (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-06-16-Zagreb-DJI 0190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-06-16-Zagreb-DJI 0181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-06-16-Zagreb-DJI 0183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice shot! Not very sharp but ok for me. --Domob 16:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Photo walk in Stockholm

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Frank Schulenburg: Mal abgesehen davon, daß eine Wanderung im weitesten Sinne aus gesundheitlichen Gründen nichts für mich ist... Ich lade seit Oktober so gut wie nichts mehr nach Commons und ich habe trotz Stipendium keine rechte Lust, nach Stockholm zu fahren. Commons ist nicht mehr mein Projekt, nicht wegen des abgelehnten Treffens, das war nur einer von vielen Gründen. --Ralf Roletschek 17:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Na, ich hoffe zumindest, dass wir uns wiedersehn! Alles Gute! —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Hoffe ich auch und das hat auch absolut nichts mit dir zu tun! Ich werde wohl einen Tag aus Helsinki rüberkommen. --Ralf Roletschek 18:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Super, das hört sich gut an. Freue mich schon! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-07-13-washington-by-RalfR-36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Goethe (Stieler 1828).jpg

Hallo Ralf, ich verstehe nicht, welchen Sinn es hat, die Röte in Goethes Gesicht noch zu verstärken. Das Original weist diese Röte nicht auf, wie dieses Foto auf Flickr zeigt. --Zaunkoeniglich (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe den Weißabgleich auf Papier und Hemd gemacht, beides hatte einen Warmstich. So auch bei dem Flickr-Bild. Freilich ist das alles nur relative Raterei, solange man das Bild nicht mit Farbkarte fotografiert. Am kalibrierten Monitor sieht es nicht sonderlich rot aus. --Ralf Roletschek 17:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019 07 26 Trampe Windkraftanlagen DJI 0041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12-03-01-50mm-berlin-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-08-08-Axel-Prahl-Schwedt-DSF1043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJIpano 0535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJI 0579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-09-04-Cottbuser-Ostsee-DJI 0541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SH6188 07:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-08-26-BSPC-Oslo-Ralf-Roletschek DSF1914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SH6188 05:10, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Mineralogie Arabie Petree Mont Sinai Mont Horeb-NYPL b14212718-1268708.tif

File:Mineralogie Arabie Petree Mont Sinai Mont Horeb-NYPL b14212718-1268708.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gretarsson (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-11-01-Gemaeldegalerie-Berlin-RalfR DSF3932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Template:Bundesparteitag Piraten Halle (Saale) 2014-06-28

Template:Bundesparteitag Piraten Halle (Saale) 2014-06-28 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

T2: Unused template

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

CptViraj (📧) 14:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19-11-09-Alte-Nationalgalerie DSF4154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:19-11-09-Alte-Nationalgalerie DSF4154.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:19-11-09-Alte-Nationalgalerie DSF4154.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gutshof-altkuenkendorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Niabot-erklaert-manga.jpg

File:Niabot-erklaert-manga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Iruka13 (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

  * Happy Holidays 2020, Ralf Roletschek/Archive! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Baltic Queen

Du hast Recht. Ich verstehe es nicht. --Ralf Roletschek 14:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Gut, Ralf, ich werde dann langsam in dieser Woche, eventuell auch im nächsten Jahr, fehlerhaften Text durch Tallink, IMO 9443255, Baltic Queen ersetzen, einen guten Rutsch in das Neue Jahr 2020, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 16:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
    • Ich hab keine Ahnung, warum ich das als Baltic Princess bezeichnet habe. Du hast zweifelsfrei Recht, es ist die Baltic Queen. Ich wollte mich schon über deine Umbenennungen aufregen aber es ist ja korrekt. Irgendwo habe ich noch das Ticket für die Princess, ich habe das damals nicht hinterfragt. Danke fürs Aufpassen und sorry für die Rücksetzungen. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

ANU / warning

Ich weiß, ist müßig hier was zu schreiben. Aber per Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Continually_violating_QIC_guidelines_and_gaslighting_everyone_about_them spreche ich dennoch eine Warnung aus. Der QIC Prozess hat gewisse Richtinien. Eine davon ist nunmal, dass Bilder geeignet beschrieben und kategorisiert werden sollen. Nicht aus Selbstherrlichkeit, sondern aus guten Gründen. Wenn Sie bei jeder Gelegenheit einen "Trotz-Support" geben und argumentieren "Hier ist nicht die Qualitäts-Kategorie", dann ist das Disruption. Das kann nicht ewig weitergehen. Künftig müssen Sie mit einer Sperre rechnen. Sie entschuldigen mich bitte. Das ist wirklich das allerallerletzte Mal. Danke. --A.Savin 20:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Jeder kann bei QIC eigene Ansichten haben. Manch einer will stürzende Linien unbedingt korrigiert haben, andere mögen das nicht. Manch einen stört das Rauschen bei Konzertfotos, andere stört das nicht. Manche wollen unbedingt englische Beschreibungen, andere nicht. Manche wollen Kategorien, andere nicht. Sperren sind natürlich eine prima Methode, die eigene Ansicht durchzusetzen. Mir ist es egal. Bei Administrators'_noticeboard werde ich mich nicht äußern, nicht aus Ignoranz sondern weil mein Englisch einfach zu schlecht dafür ist und Google Translate nur Ergebnisse bringen würde, die mißverstanden werden können. "geeignet beschrieben und kategorisiert" kann man so oder so auslegen. Ich meine, daß eine Beschreibung in einer beliebigen Sprache ausreicht, niemand kann verlangen, daß das Englisch ist. Gleiches gilt für den Dateinamen, der kann in jeder beliebigen Sprache vorliegen. Und auch bei Kategorien kann man nicht verlangen, daß jemand die fast ausschließlich englischen Kategorien versteht. Es ist eine Diskriminierung von Benutzern, die kein Englisch sprechen, wenn man sie zwingt, sich durch den Kategoriendschungel zu kämpfen.
Zu den Weihnachtsbildern: Steindy ist gesperrt und hat mich per Mail gebeten, seine Nominierungen aus QIC zu nehmen, ich habe das gemacht, kann die Mail gern dem OTRS schicken. Ich habe ganz bewußt seine und meine Nominierungen getrennt rausgenommen. Ich sehe keine Störung darin, zu Weihnachten mit Weihnachtsbildern zu bereichern, das mag man vielleicht anders sehen. Scheinbar stört es, wenn zu Weihnachten Weihnachtsbilder nominiert werden. Ich denke, meine Bilder waren nicht so schlecht, daß sie QI nicht geschafft hätten - aber ich habe keine Lust auf endlose Diskussionen.
Was macht ein neuer Benutzer aus Sibirien, der nur Russisch kann? Der tolle Bilder macht aber kein Englisch spricht? Nur mal so ... --Ralf Roletschek 21:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Das steht gar nicht zur Diskussion wenn jemand kein Englisch kann, ist er zwar weiterhin willkommen Bilder hochzuladen, aber es gibt keine Extrawürste nur deswegen. Sie haben mit Ihren disruptiven Reviews über die Jahre die QIC zur Lachnummer gemacht. Das werden wir nicht ewig dulden. Respektieren Sie den Wunsch nach ordentlicher Beschreibung und Kategorisierung, auch wenn Sie selber nichts davon halten. --A.Savin 21:46, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ralf_Roletschek/Archive/2019&oldid=385956040"