User talk:Raghith

നമസ്കാരം

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Raghith!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Raghith!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Mural painting from kollur mookambika temple.jpg was uncategorized on 8 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Thank you icon.jpg was uncategorized on 13 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Apple blossom 1r.jpg

Only Image-reviewers and Administrators are allowed to review files! --FalconL ^?! 09:38, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Malayalam loves Wikimedia event

താങ്കൾ അപ്ലോഡ് ചെയ്ത ചിത്രങ്ങളിൽ {{Malayalam loves Wikimedia event}} എന്ന ഫലകം ചേർക്കാൻ മറക്കരുതെ --Kiran Gopi (talk) 17:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Amy_Johnson,pilot.jpg

File:Amy_Johnson,pilot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kürschner (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

QI Barnstar

Thank you for confering me the Quality Image Barnstar. I really appreciate it! Kind regards, MJJR (talk) 20:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Award

Thank you for award. I'm not sure I deserve it, but I appreciate very much.--Jebulon (talk) 14:27, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Quality image barnstar

Thank you for this! I appreciate it! All the best! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 06:21, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Your sig

Hi. Could you please not use an image in your signature? It's actually a guideline found here. There are many disadvantages and so we ask that people don't do that. Killiondude (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmotte Pyrénées Col Portet BLS.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 16:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011. День Победы в Донецке 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A touch soft perhaps, but otherwise a wonderful picture --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milky-Way-Simply-Caramel-Split.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality. --King of Hearts 21:03, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011. Пасха Красная 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Good quality. --Tomer T 21:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egretta thula (hunting).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallinula chloropus cerceris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea alba (head).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balaeniceps rex - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 09-2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 07:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue Mosque Courtyard Dusk Wikimedia Commons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would think the distortions could be fixed by someone with PP skills but this is QI nonetheless. --Saffron Blaze 07:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygneaux 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 07:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zonotrichia leucophrys CT2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentI like the image, but I don't like the crop: Too much space at top (but I can not do notes in the image, the notes in the images have been prohibited to me)--Lmbuga 21:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC) QI to me--Lmbuga 21:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quiscalus major (female).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me--Lmbuga 21:17, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limulus polyphemus (aq.).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and illustrative of the species. --Saffron Blaze 20:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entenmann-Cake-Donut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gray to white gradient for the background would have better highlighted the perspective but otherwise no technical problem. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Spain-1868 Proposal with the Civic Crown.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It was only a proposal, in 1868, without the "regalia" (royal and imperial crowns) --Jebulon 21:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC) Very good. --Jovianeye 17:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leanid Dranko-Masiuk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 16:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality image candidations

Hi, I noticed that you submitted two of my photos (a candy bar and a donut picture) that were accepted as quality images. I just wanted to thank you for taking to the time and effort to do that, and that I appreciate it. That was awesome of you.Evan-Amos (talk) 04:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coscoroba coscoroba - Weltvogelpark 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Tomer T 18:01, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Moth 01 (MK).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moth 01 (MK).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elena Gagarina RN MOW 05-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The background is a little distracting and so is the microphone, but I find it is compensated by a very nice detail level on the face with good light and colors. The expression is caught in a fairly good moment. Nice EXIF with author and license information. --Slaunger 21:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates-auratus-goldbaumsteiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 19:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliconius-hecale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thunderflash 10:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)  Comment Very good detail (QI to me), but -sorry- a bit overexposed and a bit subexposed to me (I have reviewed the image with Adobe lightroom 3.0). I think that it's possible to improve it--Lmbuga 18:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrobates-tinctorius-blauer-baumsteiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 19:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bp Jerzy Samiec 2011j.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bp Jerzy Samiec 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coturnix coturnix eggs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 21:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Su25-kompo-vers2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question The svg files needs 2 megapixels to be QI?--Lmbuga 18:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC) No, SVGs can be rendered in bitmap to any size you wish! SVGs dont include the concept of pixels. --Jovianeye 20:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Good work -- George Chernilevsky 06:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greta-morgane-glasflügler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:26, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cithaerias Esmeralda MHNT.ZOO.2004.0.976 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me a QI--Holleday 15:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuibusev sq-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perrona semimarginata 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephanorrhina-guttata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eudicella-gralli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

File:Rubber Duck.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rubber Duck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Carschten 09:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora Edulis Open Fruit2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engadiner Nusstorte2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yummy! Excellent work! --H005 20:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 274456361ed4c19c91e7a0ce2257e114

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! TUSC token: b3e2ddd6ca2d289a92e7da7a5eff734f == I am now proud owner of a WMFLabs TUSC account!(new)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Milvus migrans head.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Milvus migrans head.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phylidonyris pyrrhopterus - Austin's Ferry 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvus tasmanicus - Collinsvale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crowned Lapwing (Vanellus coronatus) Mikumi shadow lift.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A little noisy in full-res, but good at fair size. --99of9 06:44, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycercus caledonicus - Collinsvale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 16:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Litoria infrafrenata - Julatten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Litoria infrafrenata - Julatten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shaggy inkcaps (Coprinus comatus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:13, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Yilmaz-guney3.jpg

File:Yilmaz-guney3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 04:56, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Yılmaz Güney.jpg

File:Yılmaz Güney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Yılmaz-güney.jpg

File:Yılmaz-güney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Takabeg (talk) 05:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reeses-PB-Cups.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me and interesting too. --Jkadavoor 09:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Renault moteur F1 V10 - 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Retromobile 2012 - Sauber Mercedes C9 - 1989 - 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony-PlayStation-3-Eye.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 00:14, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niveoscincus metallicus - Austin's Ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I think the author name should also be specified. -Jkadavoor 09:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phoebetria fusca immature - SE Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poephila acuticauda - Bird Walk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Saffron Blaze 13:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neochmia temporalis - Jerrabomberra Wetlands.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colinus virginianus - Bird Walk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquila audax - Captain's Flat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthorhynchus tenuirostris juvenile - Australian National Botanic Gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acanthiza lineata - Captain's Flat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canberra Capitals vs Logan Thunder 7 - Australian Institute of Sport Training Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 13:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for nominating my volleyball picture, even though I think it's far from being perfect.

PierreSelim (talk) 07:16, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marpesia zerynthia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me.--ArildV 07:06, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venezuelan Troupial - Icterus icterus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition.--ArildV 07:02, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charlie Miller Infiltrate 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice studio photo. --Tuxyso 14:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brenno de Winter 28C3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. This is the best photo I've seen all day. --Mattbuck 17:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Morlang 28C3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Raghith⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Raghith,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Water and Sand on Payyambalam Beach.jpg

File:Water and Sand on Payyambalam Beach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prof TPMS (talk) 16:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Dharmendra Pradhan.jpg

File:Dharmendra Pradhan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

—SpacemanSpiff 08:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/terms.aspx#copyright is their copyright policy. -- Raghith 12:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Ramdas Athawale.jpg

File:Ramdas Athawale.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

And also:

• File:Faggan Singh Kulaste.jpg
• File:Olumuyiwa Benard Aliu.jpg
• File:Anil Madhav Dave.jpg
• File:Anil Madhav Dave and Olumuyiwa Benard Aliu.jpg
• File:Subhash Bhamre.jpg
• File:Uday U. Lalit.jpg
• File:Hansraj Gangaram Ahir.jpg
• File:Sakshi Malik won the game.jpg
• File:Sakshi Malik with medal.jpg
• File:Piyush Goyal.jpg
• File:Dharmendra Pradhan.jpg
• File:Jagat Prakash Nadda.jpg
• File:Radha Mohan Singh.jpg
• File:P.V.Sindu.jpg
• File:Jitu Rai.jpg
• File:Dipa Karmakar.jpg
• File:Sakshi Malik.jpg
• File:Khel ratna awardees 2016.jpg
• File:Arjuna Awardees 2016.jpg
• File:Parameswaran Iyer and the Swachh Bharat Ambassador Sachin Tendulkar.jpg
• File:Pema Khandu Indian politician.jpg

Yours sincerely, —SpacemanSpiff 08:19, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/terms.aspx#copyright is their copyright policy. -- Raghith 12:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

I know that, it's not an acceptable license here as I've already mentioned.—SpacemanSpiff 14:32, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear Raghith, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating sounds for the FS tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 19:41, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Frank Zane.jpg

File:Frank Zane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC)