User talk:Poco a poco/2022-09

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Dead Vlei, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 101-104 PAN.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pez cocodrilo (Papilloculiceps longiceps), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 71.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pez cocodrilo (Papilloculiceps longiceps), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 71.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrella roja del Mediterráneo (Echinaster sepositus), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-08, DD 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escórpora (Scorpaena notata), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-08, DD, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangrejo ermitaño (Pagurus bernhardus), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-09, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangrejo araña (Stenorhynchus seticornis), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Coral (Annella mollis), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-28, DD 108.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coral (Annella mollis), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-28, DD 108.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco de roncadores (Pomadasys incisus), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-06, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cangrejo araña (Stenorhynchus seticornis), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 13:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fula negra (Abudefduf luridus), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-08, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estrella roja del Mediterráneo (Echinaster sepositus), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-08, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 13:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 52-54 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 58-60 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 43-45 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gusano de fuego (Hermodice carunculata), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-08, DD 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bicuda (Sphyraena viridensis), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 09:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-19, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 31-33 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 19:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grupo de viejas coloradas (Sparisoma cretense), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-06, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacra de púas (Pinna rudis), franja marina Teno-Rasca, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-05, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Are the verticals ok? --Ermell 19:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)  New version --Poco a poco 11:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 102-104 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 76-78 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 73-75 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. If possible, perhaps try not to cut the Angel on the right --DXR 08:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 17:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 67-69 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 118-120 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peces halcón de cabeza moteada (Paracirrhites forsteri) sobre un coral (Pocillopora verrucosa), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-26, DD 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Batería de Castillitos, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 79-81 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Batería de Castillitos, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 79-81 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 128-130 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 11.-13 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

One mistake left

Hola Diego, again me for the same reasons! :) Your photo, the first one in this gallery: en:Jameh Mosque of Yazd#Gallery, is wrong so it should be removed from the article. Can you please do it?

By the way, I passed most of famous places you've visited (Jameh Mosque of Yazd, Borujerdi House, Tabatabai House, many others) and properly recategorized photos, yours and thousands of others. I guarantee precision is 100%; if you find out a single mistake, like that I've put a tile into a wrong room, feel free to block me for 10 years! ;) --Orijentolog (talk) 11:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello Orijentolog, thank you for the hint. I removed that image from the gallery in the Wikipedia in English. And yes, I've seen many of your improvements in the last week, many thanks for that! And regarding your proposal, I will surely not be disappointed if you make a mistake, there is no obligation here to anybody to do anything, let alone bugfree! Take care! Poco a poco (talk) 08:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome, thank you again. I was little joking regarding mistakes, of course, I just wanted to point out the maximum accuracy. :) Also don't worry if you sometimes see date changes in files' descriptions, contrary to all Wikipedias (including your articles on Spanish Wiki). That's because before every categorization on Commons, first I organize Wikidata item with strongest references possible (encyclopedias, scholarly articles, etc). On the other hand, Wikipedias copy from each other and use some tourist or news sources which are often wrong. Hence, I dare to say our "file hosting site" is far more professional than any Wiki, at least regarding Iranian architecture. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 09:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Ramsés I, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Ramsés III, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Ramsés V y de Ramsés VI, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 119-121 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the perspective warp here is a little extreme, don't you?--Peulle 08:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Indeed, I forgot to apply the perspective correction,  new version uploaded --Poco a poco 09:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC) too close, but still QI technical quality --Charlesjsharp 17:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC) OK. --Peulle 06:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 97-99 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pez cofre jorobado (Tetrosomus gibbosus), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 146.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pez cofre jorobado (Tetrosomus gibbosus), parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 146.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 51-53 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 30-32 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Episcopal, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 42-44 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 36-38 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Episcopal, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Catedral de la Santísima Trinidad, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 133-135 HDR.jpg

File:Catedral de la Santísima Trinidad, Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 133-135 HDR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Castillitos, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 79-81 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:58, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Castillitos, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 85-87 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:06, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 131-133 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 116-118 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:04, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Castillitos, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 70-72 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the two dust spots at the top. --Milseburg 13:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  Done, thank you! --Poco a poco 20:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)  Support Well done --Milseburg 09:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Ramsés III, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 04:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Merenptah, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Ramsés I, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo funerario de Hatshepsut, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo funerario de Hatshepsut, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tumba de Tutankamón, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Palauenc05 07:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 102-104 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, España, 2022-01-07, DD, DD 102-104 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tumba de Ramsés V y de Ramsés VI, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 69.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tumba de Ramsés V y de Ramsés VI, Valle de las Reyes, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 69.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 19:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batería de Castillitos, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 73-75 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also very good and atmospheric. I would remove the ghosts on the cannon as well as the dustspot on the far left just above the horizon. Speaking of: The horizon seems to drop off to the right. The peaks of the mountains should be well above sea level. --Milseburg 10:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)  Done --Poco a poco 20:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC) Godd quality. --Milseburg 13:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Batería_de_Castillitos,_Cartagena,_España,_2022-07-16,_DD_92-94_HDR.jpg

Hast du schon einmal NeatImage (https://ni.neatvideo.com/download) ausprobiert, um Bilder zu entrauschen? Es gibt eine kostenlose Testversion davon, die allerdings darauf beschränkt ist, nur JPG in mittelmäßiger Qualität zu speichern. Aber zum Testen ist das ausreichend. --Smial (talk) 11:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Smial, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich werde es mal mit Topaz Denoising probieren (ich habe es vor kurzem gekauft) und sonst mit dieser SW. Ich versuche es aber mal in ein paar Tagen, ich bin derzeit unterwegs. Viele Grüße! --Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Smial, ich habe eine neue Version der Datei nach einer Kur mit Topaz hochgeladen, was meinst du? --Poco a poco (talk) 20:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Puh, schwierig. Generell würde ich weniger agressive Einstellungen vorschlagen. Es gibt zahlreiche Bereiche, die zu stark geglättet wurden. Ich müßte jetzt etliche Ausschnitte im Vorher/Nachher-Vergleich basteln, um meinen Eindruck zu verdeutlichen. Es ist zu erkennen, dass die Software sich bemüht, "intelligent" mit unterschiedlichen Bildbereichen umzugehen, von daher große Ähnlichkeit mit NeatImage. Das Problem, dass bei der Kamera in sehr dunklen Bildbereichen das Grundrauschen so stark durchschlägt, kann es aber auch nicht wegzaubern, nur brutal glattbügeln. Ich würde daher gar nicht erst versuchen, das komplett zu entrauschen, sondern diese kritischen Bereiche gnädig im Dunklen absaufen lassen, zumindest aber nicht zu versuchen, die Helligkeit so stark anzuheben wie in Version zwei und drei. Was bei Bildern, die in dieser Hinsicht schwierig sind, natürlich immer geht, ist ein angemessenes Downscaling, dabei rechnet sich ja ein Teil des Rauschens von alleine weg. Kurz: Das aktuelle Ergebnis ist etwas besser als Version 2, aber ich würde eine Variante versuchen mit den Kontrasten der ersten Version (bzw. nur ganz wenig Aufhellung der Schatten) und mit etwas milderen Einstellungen beim Topaz. Beim NeatImage spiele ich auch oft lange mit den Reglern herum, bis ich ein Ergebnis erreiche, bei dem das Rauschen nicht mehr zu sehr stört, vor allem aber möglichst viele Details übrig bleiben. Manchmal funktioniert beides gleichzeitig nicht. Btw: Ich kenne deine Arbeitsschritte nicht. Beim Neatimage ist es so, dass es am Besten in Originalauflösung arbeitet, noch vor irgendwelchen Objektiv- oder Perspektivekorrekturen. --Smial (talk) 22:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Hallo Smial, vielen Dank für deine ausführliche Antwort! Ich hatte sie leider bisher übersehen und erst jetzt, beim Archivieren, gecheckt, dass ich dir Rückmeldung geben möchte.

Ok, finde ich ein guter Vorschlag, ich werde die dunklere Bereichen abdunkeln und als Basis die letzte Version nehmen bzw. mit Topaz ein bisschen rumspielen. Und dann nochmals das Bild in QIC vorschlagen. Viele Grüße! Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Alejandro Nevsky, Tallin, Estonia, 2012-08-11, DD 46.JPG

The photo is during this week on main page of Estonian Wikipedia (archive link). Thank you for the beautiful image! Taivo (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 143-155 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 21:10, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio Maltacom, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio de la Guardia Principal, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:19, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:19, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 13:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:19, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 144-146 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pablo, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 147-149 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Catedral de Santa María, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 33-35 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Santa María, Murcia, España, 2022-07-12, DD 33-35 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 23:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Ramsés II, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 53-55 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stratokumulus 14:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Virtual-Pano 09:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 09:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --VileGecko 09:28, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-18, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:34, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de la Diputación Provincial, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-18, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 14:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-18, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de toros cuadrada, Santa Cruz de Mudela, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-18, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Nuestra Señora de las Virtudes, Santa Cruz de Mudela, Ciudad Real, España, 2021-12-18, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 11-13 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotonda de Mosta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 106-108 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:51, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Xlendi, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 86-88 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:11, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Luxor, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 153.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Templo de Nefertari, Abu Simbel, Egipto, 2022-04-02, DD 153.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantera del obelisco inacabado, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 16:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cantera del obelisco inacabado, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco inacabado, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco inacabado, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 16:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obelisco inacabado, Asuán, Egipto, 2022-04-01, DD 166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica de San Jorge, Victoria, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-22, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albergue de Castilla, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molino de Ta' Kola, Xagħra, isla de Gozo, Malta, 2021-08-23, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a la guerra, Floriana, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:50, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Falson, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Ferreria, La Valeta, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 231-233 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:36, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Testaferrata, Mdina, isla de Malta, Malta, 2021-08-25, DD 158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 07:52, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 143.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 22:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gorgeous quality. --Terragio67 22:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Karnak, Luxor, Egipto, 2022-04-03, DD 159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2022 (UTC)