User talk:Poco a poco/2015-06

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Lerés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña volcánica Akrafjall, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 024.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molinos de Polvorín, Villafeliche, Zaragoza, España, 2014-01-08, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Virgen de la Peña, LIC Sierras de Santo Domingo y Caballera, Aniés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 13-15 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de la Almudena, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Puerto de Cotefablo, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02-04 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puerto de Cotefablo, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02-04 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The good news first; amazing composition and colours. The bad news: tilted ccw. I wish that the mountains also was in focus. QI as soon the tilt is corrected. --ArildV 08:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC)  Done, thanks, lighting conditions here were pretty tricky Poco a poco 08:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC) Support--ArildV 08:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguarales de Valpalmas, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 02-05 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenschwangau, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 08:29, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faro Urða, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 076.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe rocks are very dark imo.--ArildV 07:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 16:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Ok.--ArildV 08:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 13-15 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Ohrid, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo -- George Chernilevsky 09:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de la Tranquera, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leona (Panthera leo), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña en Hnappadalur, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 036.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceremonia de entrega de premios de WLM España, Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but acceptable --Hubertl 13:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador de Mélida, LIC Tramos Bajos del Aragón y del Arga, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio de Correos, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-12-26, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail all-around --Daniel Case 05:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Marjal de la Ribera

Hola. Muchas gracias por el esfuerzo. Las fotos las sacamos yendo de Riola a Llaurí -esos eran los blancos principales, esto y Sueca eran blancos de oportunidad- y sabemos que corresponden a esa zona húmeda, la cual está recogida en un catálogo de la Generalitat Valenciana. El código, que sacamos de ca:wiki, parece ser el número dentro del catálogo. Lo que se ve en las fotos, por raro que parezca, son campos de arroz. Claro que... están secos. Como corresponde a la época. Un poco extraña una marjal sin agua ni vegetación, pero ¡es lo que hay! No hubo forma de encontrar el número de LIC. El mapa existe, porque lo vi en su momento, pero no lo he conseguido volver a encontrar, así que me tocó orientar a Montse con unas instrucciones muy generales sobre qué cosas estaban en el humedal protegido. Pero es divertido sacar fotos al paso. B25es (talk) 19:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Hola B25es, el caso es que al ver las imágenes me empané y pensé que sí pertenecían a un LIC, a saber, Marjal de Almenara (ES5223007), pero luego caí en la cuenta de que ese LIC no está al sur del Júcar, por ello no podía ser. Según el mapa de Natura esa zona húmeda, definitivamente, no está en ningún LIC. Saludos! Poco² 19:58, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mesón Casa Diego, Gavín, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucky en Panzerwiese, Múnich, Alemania, 2014-12-24, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--Hubertl 03:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal-Canada010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 17-19 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de la Tranquera, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas Brandur, Álsey y Surtsey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 046.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucky en Panzerwiese, Múnich, Alemania, 2014-12-24, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Lion d'Afrique

Hi Poco

You wanted to have some information about my picture. Yes it was taken in a great zoo in France (which is called Touropark) at the end of the day. The lion was on his rock and I had the chance to take the picture. Sorry for the delay of my response. I was in vacation and did not see about your questions.

Have a great day

--Clément Bardot (talk) 13:11, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks Clément for letting me know. I would recommend you to describe your pictures a bit better. It is always interesting to understand, as far as possible, where and how a picture was taken. Regards, Poco² 17:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje cerca de Laugarvatn, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 076.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photos.--ArildV 16:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje junto a Castillo de Lerés, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photos.--ArildV 16:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paneles solares en Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia del Carmen, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail in challenging light --Daniel Case 03:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grúa del Puerto de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-04, DD 95.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:33, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrafnseyrarheiði, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 021.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 21:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Júnez, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 01-03 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Ostrog, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, maybe more.--Jebulon 21:24, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Big Ben, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 200.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpsee y Hohenschwangau, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguarales de Valpalmas, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 06-11 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 11:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campos de Cariñena, España, 2015-01-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casas de Esper, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:04, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de las Artes Reina Sofía, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Nacional Lahemaa, Estonia, 2012-08-12, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en la calle 3 de Mayo 8, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-12-26, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC) Isn't it tilted CCW? --Kadellar 21:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC) True,  fixed Poco a poco 10:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasieso, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Estonia Evangélica Luterana, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muro histórico, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mural en Casa Tapón, plaza de los Santos Niños, Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal-Canada027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosca verde (Lucilia caesar) sobre una camomila amarilla (Anthemis tinctoria), centro de Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Strokkur, Área geotérmica de Geysir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 086.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Strokkur eruption sequence has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital del Espíritu Santo, Füssen, Alemania, 2012-10-06, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry,but what's happ to the trees up? --Livioandronico2013 08:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)  Support Good for me. What is with the trees? -- Spurzem 09:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)  New version, Livio, why do you actually decline a pictures for things like that, which are so easy to fix?. Please, give first an opportunity to the author to fix the issues. I reduced a bit the denoising and retouched the curves. Still, I think that the former version wasn't that bad. Poco a poco 12:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC) Ok now ,Do not see this opposition as some kind of revenge, just do not think it was repairable--Livioandronico2013 16:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio en la calle 3 de Mayo 9, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-12-26, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal-Canada037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a la Independencia, México D.F., México, 2014-10-13, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:28, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Lucha Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 26.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 23:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Losanglis, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Gniezno

I jak Ci sie podobało? :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertus teolog (talk • contribs)

Bardzo dobrze, jak zawsze, ze ja tam jestem (czesto!) :) Poco² 21:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

To miłe, zwłaszcza, że Gniezno jest miastem bliskim mojemu sercu. Bardzo podobają mi się Twoje fotografie. Wszysztkiego dobrego! Pozdrawiam. Albertus teolog (talk) 22:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

QI statistik rohdaten

Hallo Poco. Ich musste erstmal meine scripte wiederfinden und habe sie jetzt etwas erweitert, so dass das Erstellen der statistik noch leichter ist fuer mich. Wenn Du kurz vor der Wikimania noch ein Update haben moechtest waere das kein Problem. Rohdaten sind im Quelltext angehaengt (gleiches Format jahr,monat,promoted,declined,unevaluated,discuss). --Dschwen (talk) 05:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Super, vielen Dank, Daniel. Ich dachte dennoch, dass gerade heute du mit anderen Angelegenheiten beschäftigt bist :) Poco² 18:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hrafnseyrarheiði, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 023.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiordos cerca de Vattarnes, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 107.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortaleza de Rada Viejo, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ibort, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel Arcángel, Gniezno, Polonia, 2014-12-26, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful light.--Famberhorst 18:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isla Tapu, Phuket, Tailandia, 2013-08-20, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Martín, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Lucha Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucky en Panzerwiese, Múnich, Alemania, 2014-12-24, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality is it your dog? I think breed and ages is more relevant information for the images description when the name of the dog--ArildV 23:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Yes, he is, I had added a category but now I added the breed and age in the description Poco a poco 19:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de la Tranquera, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 23:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de la Tranquera, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-09, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de los Jerónimos, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012-05-12, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:30, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Aguarales de Valpalmas, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 06-11 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aguarales de Valpalmas, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 06-11 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vista de Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 04-18 HDR PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 04-18 HDR PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moeraki Boulders-Nueva Zelanda04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Sitio del Centro Cultural de España en México, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 115.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estatua de Tomislav de Croacia, Zagreb, Croacia, 2014-04-20, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.-ArildV 07:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympiaturm, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment May be a little bit oversharpened (no problem) and a dust spot (see note).--XRay 11:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 14:22, 13 June 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. --XRay 17:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peñón de Ifach, Calpe, España, 2014-07-01, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 11:54, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Monastery, Petra, Jordan9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 22:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo marítimo Ósvör, Bolungarvík, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 054.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. A little bit of noise on the green paint, but nothing too bad. --Crisco 1492 15:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lucky en Panzerwiese, Múnich, Alemania, 2014-12-24, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de BMW, Múnich, Alemania2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Nacional de Cerámica, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 139.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nave de la antigua siderurgia, Puerto de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-04, DD 93.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nenúfares (Victoria amazonica), Zoo de Ciudad Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 2013-08-14, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaciar Perito Moreno19 - Argentina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Several dustspots, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 05:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)  New version uploaded Poco a poco 18:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juego de Curling Pedalo, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguarales de Valpalmas, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-06, DD 19-25 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Help needed

Hi Poco a poco! Could you please have a look at these three maps as one user claims they are incorrect? Maybe you could ask on eswiki? Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 

Hi Hedwig in Washington, I can try it, but before that I'd like to know where are the problematic differences. What is the issue actually? the geographic delimitation? the names? some data? affects the issue to some particular areas or to all? Poco² 12:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Here's the discussion. Thanks for having a peek! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 19:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots

You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!

• The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
• Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Spanish speaker needs help

Poco a poco, Could you help me with User:Juancar22, who uploded someone else images with no license and then reverted my {{No license}} tags? The user wrote me in Spanish at user talk:Jarekt#Imagenes_SEAT_Bolero and it seems like he understands much about licenses. Could you explain about OTRS and that the photographer will need to pick the license and send permission to OTRS. Thanks in advance. --Jarekt (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jarekt, thanks for your message. I have contacted him and explained him the situation and the needed steps. Best, Poco² 09:09, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

 Thank you. --Jarekt (talk) 12:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo del Heróico Colegio Militar, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas Suðurey, Hellisey, Súlnasker y Geldungur, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 047.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo marítimo Ósvör, Bolungarvík, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 057.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo histórico militar, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 168.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:01, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de la Colegiata de Santa María la Mayor, Calatayud, España, 2012-09-01, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment At the right in front the vault seems to be distorted. -- Spurzem 21:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de la Tranquera, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-09, DD 37-42 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments See note please Poco a poco --Livioandronico2013 20:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Do you mean the moon? I guess that I shouldn't remove that Poco a poco 17:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC) That is the moon? Strange is so small....ok if is it --Livioandronico2013 20:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Príncipe Felipe, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 59.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, good colors and good quality -- Spurzem 20:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juego de Curling Pedalo, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granja en la península de Akranes, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-15, DD 104.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambio de la Guardia del Castillo de Windsor, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Crop at the left is not the best choice. --XRay 20:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ceremonia de entrega de premios de WLM España, Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de la Tranquera, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 19-23 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me. --Hockei 20:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hokitika-Nueva Zelanda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Grey sky... but Good quality. for me. --Cayambe 07:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Imagenes SEAT Bolero

Muy buenas Poco a poco, gracias por responder, el tema de subir fotos con permisos siempre me a dado problemas y me las han acabado borrando, por eso decidí subir solo fotos mías con las que nunca he tenido problemas, el caso es que yo estoy en unos cuantos foros de coches y hablamos a menudo de la Wikipedia en la mayoría de modelos Prototipos no hay fotos y como SEAT llevo este año 2015 al Espíritu de Montjuïc el modelo de estas fotos el Bolero, me dijo el autor de las fotos que las podía subir sin problema yo quería que las subiera el por no tener estos líos, pero como no esta registrado y decía que no sabia subirlas pues me encargue yo, dejando el enlace de donde están las fotos además que pusimos un comentario dentro del enlace para que se viera el permiso. Pero esto es mas complicado de lo que parece, decirte que le he pasado el correo al autor y acaba de mandar un mensaje autorizando subir las imágenes del Bolero. Gracias --Juancar22 (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hola Poco a poco pues han contestado al autor el correo que envió por lo que se supone que esta solucionado, pero no han retirado la etiqueta de borrado de las 2 imagines. ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:SEAT_Bolero ) --Juancar22 (talk) 09:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Juancar22: En su respuesta ha dado las gracias pero sin acceder de forma explícita a un cambio de la licencia (y malentendido imagino), si responde de nuevo accediendo al cambio de licencia, elimino esas plantillas y cerramos el tema. Poco² 12:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

El autor mando el mensaje basandose en plantilla Modelos de mensaje rellenando los datos incluido licencia deve de haber un error o se a equivocado al elegir la licencia, las he estado mirando y me pregunta si es esta la que tiene que elegir {{PD-author}}--Juancar22 (talk) 10:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Juancar22, ya hemos podido zanjar el tema. El autor de las imágenes ha reenviado el correo indicando que publica las imágenes con la licencia CC-BY-SA 4.0. Acabo de retirar las plantillas de borrado y he incluido la información de la licencia adoptada, así como una referencia al ticket de OTRS para posibilitar el rastreo. Saludos, Poco² 16:17, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

He creado una obra derivada de un archivo tuyo

Hola, Diego,

He creado una obra derivada de un archivo tuyo, por cortesía, te lo indico (ya que a mí me gustaría saberlo).

Esperemos que no haya que borrar el original .

Un cordial saludo, --jynus (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hola jynus, si esta pantomina sigue adelante, imagino que no será posible tomar esa foto de nuevo y subirla a Commons, pero no me puedo imagino que el despropósito tenga, además, carácter retroactivo. En cualquier caso, gracias por el aviso Poco² 18:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC) PD: El reflejo en el agua también sería una violación de FoP, ¿no? :(

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Búlandshöfði, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 085.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Búlandshöfði, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 085.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juego de Curling Pedalo, Oberschleissheim, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Príncipe Felipe, Ciudad de las Artes y las Ciencias, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 56.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WoW --Livioandronico2013 21:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münchner Stadtentwässerung Fröttmaning, Múnich, Alemania05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isla Panak, Phuket, Tailandia, 2013-08-20, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Islas Elliðaey y Bjarnarey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality; there are some spots over the left island. I think this are birds, not dust spots. --Llez 19:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Bombonera - Buenos Aires - Argentina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. For a moment I thought it was from Sweden (due to the colors :-)). Maybe foreground shadows could be lifted a bit? --Slaunger 21:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC) according to the legend, Boca had to choice new colours in 1906 and decided to adopt the colors of the flag of the first boat to sail into the port and it was a Swedish ship.--ArildV 22:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundarfjörður, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 102.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leopoldstrasse, München, Deutschland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 22:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de arqueología, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiordos cerca de Vattarnes, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 108.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de la Ciudad de México, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 126.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 17:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de Lucha Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Nacional de Cerámica, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 140.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Minor CAs at the right. --XRay 13:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacimiento del río Queiles, Vozmediano, Soria, España, 2015-01-02, DD 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:04, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3779.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3779.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3596.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3596.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3604.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3604.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3619.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3619.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3636.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3636.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3640.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3640.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3649.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3649.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3656.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3656.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3666.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3666.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3727.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3727.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3747.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3747.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3763.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3763.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3801.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3801.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3815.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3815.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3829.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi3829.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi9013.JPG

File:Emirates Palace-Abu Dhabi9013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.207.14.150 19:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 15.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Colmano, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 15.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loarre, Huesca, España, 2015-01-06, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 14:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moeraki Boulders-Nueva Zelanda02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montaña en Hnappadalur, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 034-035 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments bit mysterious.--Famberhorst 15:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelle de Ao Por, Phuket, Tailandia, 2013-08-20, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia del Salvador, Poznan, Polonia, 2014-09-18, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO good quality. --XRay 17:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín vertical en la Universidad del Claustro de Sor Juana, calle Regina, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumento a los caídos, Gniezno, Polonia, 2012-04-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a bit more contrast is useful. --XRay 17:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiordos cerca de Vattarnes, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 108.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo Hohenfreyberg, Eisenberg, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 48.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:08, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Pirenaico de la Electricidad, Biescas, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Hubertl 05:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Casco viejo de Dubrovnik, Croacia, 2014-04-14, DD 04.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casco viejo de Dubrovnik, Croacia, 2014-04-14, DD 04.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus, München, Deutschland10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de la Ciudad de México, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 131.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image and good quality -- Spurzem 19:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moros, Zaragoza, España, 2013-01-07, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newdegate cave-Tasmania-Australia10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santa Cruz, Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla Fernandina, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 18:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nevera de la Culroya, Fuendetodos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:00, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Field, Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-20, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oficina del servicio postal, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Livioandronico2013 19:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda CB350K4 de 1972, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nevera de la Culroya, Fuendetodos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Müllersches Volksbad, Múnich, Alemania06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:38, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio de Buckingham, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 192.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Buckingham, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 192.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orná de Gállego e Ibort, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:52, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cráter Eldborg, Vesturland, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though the semi-transparent border is a bit strange. --DXR 17:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte de San Felipe, Setúbal, Portugal, 2012-05-11, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (see notes), lot of noise. Sorry. JFYI, Canon 5Dm2 ISO rating higher than 400 mostly produce very bad quality in case of noise that hard to remove. --Nino Verde 10:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)  Fixed As a proof that what you say is just not true. I have shot FPs with ISO 1600 with that camera. Poco a poco 11:16, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Ok, there is no noise now :) But what about CA? --Nino Verde 12:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Have you purged? I cannot see any CA in this version. Actually I already addressed that issue in the current version Poco a poco 14:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)  Support Very good for me. I see no CA. -- Spurzem 15:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)  Support ISO 1600 with a FF camera should be no QI issue :) Well composed. --Tuxyso 16:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Strange. Something went wrong, now i see no CA. Sorry. Promoted it. --Nino Verde 19:21, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus, München, Deutschland07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:15, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:24, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford T-Hot de 1923, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now it is good. Thanks --Nino Verde 08:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Record de 1959, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Do you have an image of the entire car? --Palauenc05 15:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC) Palauenc05, here you are: File:Opel Record de 1959, Helsinki, Finlandia, 2012-08-14, DD 01.JPG Poco a poco 16:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Wanaka-Nueva Zelanda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I made a proposal for a better crop, see my note. --Cccefalon 06:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 17:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Photowikimeetup

Hi, Is it possible to reschedule the photowikimeetup in Wikimania? If the photowikimeetup on 18th be rescheduled to 17th, then we can attend the Museo Soumaya reception on 18th, as the photowikimeetup will take at least 3 hours to complete . thanks. Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bodhisattwa, I don't see how to do that. There is already a planned visit to the National Anthropology Museum on Friday. I guess that you have to choose...sorry Poco² 17:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Pirenaico de la Electricidad, Biescas, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaciar Perito Moreno1 - Argentina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambio de la Guardia del Castillo de Windsor, Inglaterra, 2014-08-12, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de la Ciudad de México, México D.F., México, 2013-10-16, DD 129.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orná de Gállego, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Hubertl 16:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Marítimo, Kotor, Bahía de Kotor, Montenegro, 2014-04-19, DD 31.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neuschwanstein, Schwangau, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 20:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Strahl, Parque Estatal Brown County, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-14, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 20:10, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old City Hall, Toronto, Canada2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:45, 30 June 2015 (UTC)