User talk:Pline/archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives discussion Commons 2015 - 2019

Wiki Loves Earth 2015[edit]

Hello,

You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia).
The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end.
A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event.
See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c)

For more details | Contact
Category discussion warning

Aide de Commons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


197.26.200.128 18:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte-St-Jean-a-Chateau-Thierry DSC 0011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peniches sur la Seine a Boulogne P1000112.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Pour la vue de la cathédrale de Laon! Aarp65 (talk) 18:38, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrage-de-Borts-les-Orgues-sur-la-Dordogne-DSC 0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velo de randonnee DSC 0122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordogne-pres-du-pont-de-Chambon-DSC 0403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Шухрат Саъдиев 15:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural-arch-of-Manneporte-in-Etretat-DSC0-1037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 en France, 17 September 2015[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Château-de-Janville-à-Paluel-DSC0-820.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 17 September 2015. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

Trizek from FR 13:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle-Notre-Dame-de-Bonne-Encontre-a-Rohan-DSC1-210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me but a bit bright -- Spurzem 22:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle-Notre-Dame-de-Bonne-Encontre-a-Rohan-DSC1-206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancienne-grange-a-Bassignac-le-Haut-DSC 0471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sllightly too light for my taste but good quality, --Ermell 09:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 15:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Courances-DSC 0190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau-de-Fleury-en-Bière-DSC 0092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour-de-Saint-Thugal-à-Château-Landon-DSC 0149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye-Saint-Séverin-à-Château-Landon-DSC 0128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0093-Pont-du-moulin-Thorame-Haute.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Domdomegg 21:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strates-calcaires-au-bord-du-lac-dr-Castillon-France-DSC 0429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0846-Saint-Geniez-Alpes-de-Haute-Provence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enceinte-de-Colmars-DSC 0208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Installations-électriques-du-barrage-de-Castillon-DSC 0478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voie-du-train-des-Pignes-le-long-de-l'Asse-près-de-Barrème-DSC 0998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paysage-vers-Clumanc-DSC 0016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0829.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac-du-grand-Laus- Queyras-DSC 0276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments perhaps could have been a little sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac-du-grand-Laus-Aiguilles-Queyras-DSC 0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Extremely good picture! But I would appreciate a geo tag though. --W.carter 22:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue depuis le pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0853.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallée-du-Guil-Queyras-DSC 0708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition! Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison le long du-GR58-pres des-lacs-de-Malrif-et d'Abries-Queyras-DSC 0531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely composed, too! Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue depuis le pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic-de-Caramantran-Queyras-DSC 0888.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Detail site Kourou-en.svg building acronyms.[edit]

Hi, Dear Pline. Could you expand building acronyms on Detail site Kourou-en.svg, like UPG, BEAP, BIP, BSE, BIL BAF, CL, ZL, ZLV etc.? There no any description of that acronyms in Articles. --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 19:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kirill, I have added the description. --Pline (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is the CL3 = CDL3? --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I have to correct the svg. --Pline (talk) 06:21, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour Hassan a Rabat P1060435.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carte des fleuves de Russie[edit]

Bonjour, il y a plusieurs années vous avez fait un travail remarquable pour l'article "Liste des cours d'eau en Russie". https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carte-reseau-fluvial-Russie.png Il y a cependant plusieurs problèmes avec cette carte : d'une part cette carte oublie la région de Kaliningrad, ou passe le Niémen (qui fait la frontière avec la Lituanie) qui est assurément un fleuve important (c'est le 16è fleuve d'Europe par la longueur). Vous avez aussi oublié le Narva, qui fait la frontière avec l'Estonie et qui est plus important que le Terekt et l'Okhota qui sont sur votre carte. Sur la page de discussion de l'article j'ai signalé les autres fleuves que l'on pourrait encore ajouter, en fonction du critère choisi. Si l'on utilise le même critère que pour la carte des fleuves français qui s'arrête aux fleuves de plus de 150 m³/s de débit moyen, il y a encore 9 fleuves de plus (peut-être 10 si j'en ai loupé un). N'étant pas compétent pour l'édition d'images, je voulais savoir si vous seriez partant pourvous en occuper ? Н Француз (talk) 10:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Laon Cathedral[edit]

Hi Pline, I'm co-writing a book on Capetian France for students, and we'd like to use your image of Laon cathedral [1]. The publisher has asked us to contact rightsholders, hence this note - is that OK? We'd attribute the image to you of course.--Charleslincolnshire (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thank you for asking ! You have the permission without saying.--Pline (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

Hi Pline,

some of your files don't have any valid category (File:Microlock antenna site in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 293-3885bc.jpg), many more not a single specific category. Please try to avoid generic categories like Category:Jet Propulsion Laboratory – it's always possible to find or create a better fitting subcategory.

Kind regards, DCKH (talk) 00:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DCKH: Removing a category without moving the image in a subcategory ? Are you a beginner ????? It 's very very very unpleasant ... --Pline (talk) 07:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]