User talk:Petermichaelgenner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Petermichaelgenner!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:NZZ 19. 1. 1780, Titelseite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 11:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old map hoechst.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skowersey (talk) 09:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Derived Work[edit]

Hi Petermichaelgenner, the author of File:Wien - Kapuzinergruft, Maria-Theresia-Gruft (2) (Detail).jpg's source is not unknown but well-known User:Bwag. You can better use a direct wiki-link to link to another image, which leads to the correct description: [[File:Wien_-_Kapuzinergruft,_Maria-Theresia-Gruft_(2).JPG]]. Please correct source and author. Use {{Derived from}} to mark the source. Using the Crop tool, or using the Upload Wizard for derived works will help you in the future with derived works. Please mind also COM:OVERCAT, it is rarely necessary to add categories to those of the original source, often you have to skip some of them. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Joseph II is something different, btw. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Petermichaelgenner, no need to delete the image, cropping the images is covered by the license. But you should fix the description of the your file to follow the licensing terms. It is completely common to crop an image, if the crop better fits your needs. --18:51, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Herzi Pinki, your wish is my command! --Petermichaelgenner (talk) 18:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image question[edit]

Can you explain how File:Plan Eroberung Festung Otschakow 1788 randlos.jpg and File:Plan Eroberung Festung Otschakow 1788.jpg are categorised in Category:Crimea on stamps? Ww2censor (talk) 10:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good question! There is a small part of Crimea at the bottom of the map.--Petermichaelgenner (talk) 10:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Von A-Z L099 Stichverkaeufer 300dpi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(tJosve05a (c) 10:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Please. delete! --Petermichaelgenner (talk) 07:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Genner London 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, please delete!--Petermichaelgenner (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Belgium 1000 Francs banknote 1980 detail monochrome.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 15:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wie angegeben, war ich mir nicht sicher. Die Copyright-Bestimmungen der Belgischen Nationalbank erschienen mir für den vorliegenden Fall (monochromes Detail) unklar. Einverstanden mit Löschung. --Petermichaelgenner (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte diese neue, bessere Version des Bildes nicht löschen! --Petermichaelgenner (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernhard Albrecht Moll Franz Joseph Märter 1783 randlos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Petergenner (talk) 14:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernhard Albrecht Moll Franz Boos 1783 randlos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Petergenner (talk) 14:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernhard Albrecht Moll Franz Boos 1783 retuschiert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Petergenner (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernhard Albrecht Moll Franz Bredemeyer 1783 randlos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Petergenner (talk) 14:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Eroten als Brandstifter" by Louis-Roland Trinquesse - 014N08759 5VW6Y.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

217.110.95.130 13:56, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]