User talk:Peteremueller

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Peteremueller!

TUSC token 5863c932d3e8f06a3e593c8c2fc00f9f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Peteremueller!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Laredo LP Rachmaninov Sony.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

– Adrignola talk 13:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Scriabin Sonatas LP Vol1.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Scriabin Sonatas LP Vol1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Scriabin Sonatas LP Vol1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 10:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Scriabin Sonatas LP Vol1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

High Contrast (talk) 11:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Petermueller. Wie ist es zu verstehen, dass die Metadaten eine Entstehung des Bildes am heutigen Tage ausweisen? Gruss, --Martin Sg. (talk) 21:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dadurch, dass ich das (analoge) Foto heute fotografiert habe (und bei meiner Kamera das richtige Datum eingestellt ist). Gruss, --Peteremueller (talk) 02:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, Petermueller, für die Erläuterung. Also weiter: woher stammt die analoge Fotografie? Gruß, --Martin Sg. (talk) 08:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tat 1977 Erstausgabe Boulevardzeitung.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

January (talk) 11:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ausweisung Rimli 19360206.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an official document. Official documents are not copyrighted. The template in German Wikipeda is Bild-PD-Amtliches Werk. What is globally the corresponding template? --Peteremueller (talk) 03:33, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)[edit]

In other languages (translate this)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  italiano  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−

Please use SVG
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Keystone historisch.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Keystone historisch.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Berner Tagwacht 1992.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Berner Tagwacht 1992.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lösch es, und ich setze die Datei auf den Stand vor meiner Überarbeitung! --Peteremueller (talk) 19:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eugen Theodor Rimli.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Eugen Theodor Rimli.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

diba (talk) 10:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Der Rechteinhaber ist die Tochter, und sie hat die Genehmigung längst erteilt (Ticket# 2015120810027102). Das Foto stammt aus dem Familienalbum der Rimlis, ist ein Passfoto, Fotograf unbekannt (heute wäre es eine Maschine), null künstlerischer Anspruch, null Schöpfungshöhe, nach schweizerischem Recht nicht schutzwürdig, nicht schützbar (siehe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_of_originality#Switzerland). Aber wissen Sie was? Löschen Sie es ganz einfach, es wird mir zu mühsam. --Peteremueller (talk) 11:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Andreas Glarner.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 02:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hansjürg Saager (2017).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Der Rechteinhaber hat am 14. August 2017 (!) eine Freigabeerklärung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org gesandt unter dem Betreff Ticket#: 2017081310002874! --Peteremueller (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Peteremueller, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Hansjürg Saager (2017).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kommen diese Sachen bei Euch eigentlich nicht an?
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Ticket#: 2017081310002874
Datum: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 08:18:17 +0200
Von: thomas.peterhans@awp.ch <thomas.peterhans@awp.ch>
An: permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org
Kopie (CC): peteremueller@bluewin.ch
Guten Morgen
Ich erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild Hansjürg Saager (2017) (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hansjürg Saager (2017).jpg), dass ich den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes rechtmäßig vertrete.
Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz „Creative Commons Namensnennung-Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0“ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.de).
Ich gewähre somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann.
Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, aufgrund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.
Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft auf der Wikipedia eingestellt wird.
Thomas Peterhans
sda awp multimedia
Corporate Publishing Redaktion
--Peteremueller (talk) 04:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Automobil Revue Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 20:00, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Express.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 20:03, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aroser Zeitung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 20:17, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Peter. Bei diesem Logo hat dankeswerterweise User:1-Byte die unechte SVG-Grafik (eingebettete Rastergrafik) durch eine echte Vektorgrafik ersetzt. Es gibt aber noch weitere von dir hochgeladene Logos mit analogem Problem. Magst du selbst korrekte SVG-Logos hochladen oder dir z.B. in der Grafikwerkstatt Hilfe holen? --Leyo 20:28, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, noch so gerne. Bitte um Bedienungsanleitung. --Peteremueller (talk) 20:43, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kennst du de:Wikipedia:WikiProjekt SVG bzw. de:Benutzer:Afrank99/SVG-Tipps#Wie bekomme ich ein Logo aus einer PDF-Datei in ein SVG? schon? --Leyo 22:07, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, ich hatte mir das einmal angesehen, aber als viel zu kompliziert verworfen für jemand, der sich damit nicht intensiv beschäftigen möchte. Ich werde mich in Zukunft wohl mit {{Convert to SVG |1= }} behelfen. Ok? --Peteremueller (talk) 10:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Allenfalls darfst du dich bei Bedarf an SVG-Profis wie JoKalliauer oder Sarang wenden. --Leyo 22:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, vielen Dank. --Peteremueller (talk) 00:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Sowohl ich JoKalliauer als auch Sarang sprechen Deutsch als Muttersprache. ;-)
Mir fällt auf, dass du keine sinnvolle Quelle angibst, bei Quelle sollte stehen die gesamte URL nicht nur die Domain, oder "scan" oder "own redrawing after ..." oder ähnliches.
Je nach Quelle gibt es drei unterschiedliche Möglichkeiten
  1. Das Bild ist im Internet als PNG oder JPEG
  2. Das Logo ist als Vektor in einem PDF enthalten: Dazu habe ich leider keine wirklich gute Anleitung gefunden (Werd' ich wohl selber irgenwann machen) aber hier mal eine Videoanleitung: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DA97T7K658
  3. Das Logo ist als Rasterbild in einem PDF enthalten: In dem Fall verwende ich https://www.rlvision.com/pdfwiz/about.php (aber da ist Bildersuche also Punkt 1 vermutlich besser)
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 09:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Peter, bitte ersetze niemals eine SVG-Graphik wie diese durch irgendwelchen anderen Code! Hier mit fast 30facher Grösse. Wenn du nicht den Wpdc benutzen willst, frage lieber andere um zu aktualisieren. Gruss -- sarang사랑 06:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werde niemals mehr irgend etwas mit SVG-Graphiken machen, s.o. --Peteremueller (talk) 08:31, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Aber alle Grafiken als PNG hochzuladen ist auch nicht gut! Dann muss irgendwer anderer sie anschliessend konvertieren - und deine PNG liegen ab da als Leichen im Keller. Wir würden es begrüssen, wenn du deine Abneigung vor etwas Neuem überwinden könntest; SVG ist eine ganz tolle Sache, und das optimale Format für viele Arten von Grafik. Keiner will dich demotivieren; im Gegenteil, wir versuchen dich zu ermuntern damit du mit qualitativ hochwertigen Dateien beitragen kannst. Du bist imstande PNG zu erstellen: da sollte es dir viel leichter fallen mit SVG umzugehen. -- sarang사랑 09:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe eine Abneigung gegen Neues? Ein etwas freihändige und gewagte Feststellung, nicht wahr? Und vollkommen unzutreffend. Aber meine Zeit ist limitiert, ich muss Prioritäten setzen. Allerdings, wenn es so einfach ist, sollte es doch eine Dummy-sichere Anleitung geben, wie man in maximal 10 Schritten von einem PNG zu einem SVG kommt, mit der sogar meine Grossmutter bei exakter Befolgung der Schritte, sogar ohne sie wirklich zu verstehen, reüssieren würde. Darauf habe ich eigentlich gewartet. In der Zwischenzeit nahm ich an, die online verfügbaren Converter seien eine taugliche Lösung. Sind sie offenbar nicht, da sie die Datei nur im ursprünglichen Format in einen SVG-Rahmen einbetten. Nun, da Ihr Euch so nett um mich bemüht, werde ich mal schauen, ob ich mich tatsächlich ins Thema vertiefe, am ehesten mit Inkscape. Beste Grüsse, auch an Johannes. --Peteremueller (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Es sollte eigentlich moglich sein dass Johannes genau so eine kochrezeptartige Anleitung bastelt; ich habe leider gar keine Erfahrung mit Inkscape &Co, meine Sache ist die rein manuelle Code-Erstellung. Aber das erfordert ein etwas weitergehendes Auseinandersetzen mit den SVG-Instruktionen, die zum Teil einer CSS-Notation ahneln. Wenn dich das nicht so arg interessiert bzw. weniger in dein Prioritatenschema passt, will ich dich nicht damit qualen. Lieber hoffe ich dass Johannes dir die Infos liefert und du gute Erfolgserlebnisse haben wirst mit Vektorgrafiken, und so diese Darstellungsform schatzen lernst. Gruss -- sarang사랑 05:28, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Peteremueller!
In der Wikipedia kann jeder mitmachen und es gibt keine Hirachie, das klingt auf den ersten Blick toll, aber es hat auch die Schattenseiten, dass User "alles" machen dürfen auch wenn sie noch nicht die notwendige Erfahrung haben und dazu, dass man Neulinge häufig auf etwas hinweisen muss und deren Fehler ausbessern muss. Das ist für erfahrene Nutzer leider oft mühsam und anstrengend und man neigt dazu es sehr klar und hart zu formulieren, weil man ehrenamltich kaum die Zeit hat, neben den Dingen die man selbst machen muss/will auch noch jemanden zweiten zu helfen wo man es selbst vl. schneller machen könnte.
Jeder von uns hat einmal angefangen. Und wenn man nicht seit den ersten jungen Jahren der Wikipedia dabei ist, dann beginnt praktisch jede Diskussionsseite mit Kritik, auch wenn das von den Nutzern gerne ins Archiv vergraben wird. (siehe z.B. meine Benutzerdiskussionseitenarchiv von der de.wikipedia) Also siehe es nicht als Kritik, sondern als Feedback von Verbesserungswünschen.
Ich weiß nicht ob/wann ich zu einer Anleitung dazu komme, aber du kannst mir gerne hier (auf deiner Diskussionseite) oder auch auf meiner Diskussionseite mich anschreiben und etwas fragen wenn du etwas brauchst.
Liebe Grüße  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Tag, Johannes, vielen Dank, das werde ich gerne machen. Wie lange gilt man denn bei Dir als «Neuling»? Ich bin seit Januar 2011 dabei, habe über 9000 Edits gemacht und rund 150 Artikel geschrieben und helfe gelegentlich Neulingen. Ich habe mich ganz einfach wenig um dieses grafische Thema gekümmert, weil andere Sachen für mich wichtiger waren. Beste Grüsse. --Peteremueller (talk) 01:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ups, dann hast du mehr Erfahrung als ich. :-) Ich meinte in verschiedenen Bereichen hat man verschieden viel Erfahrung. Es gibt Leute die kennen sich mit Artikel schreiben aus, andere mit Kategorien, andere mit SVG-editierung, andere mit Bildrestaurierung, andere mit Qualitätsbildbewertungen, andere mit Urheberrecht, ... . Viele kennen sich in vielen Bereichen weitgehend aus, aber kaum jemand (vl. auch niemand) kennt sich in allen aus. Ich bin zwar seit 2010 bei Wikipedia (aber weniger aktiv) aber bei commons bin ich erst seit 2017 aktiv. Ich selbst versuche gerade einen Bot zu betreiben und bin da wirklich erst in den Kinderschuhen. Also ich glaube solange man sich weiterentwickelt und bekanntes Gebiet verlässt man hört nie auf ein Neuling zu sein. Und Entschuldigung nochmal, dass ich dich als Neuling eingestuft hatte, ohne mich genauer damit auseinander gesetzt zu haben, war gerade auch mit was anderem beschäftigt.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 05:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:SRF Tagesschau.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 22:00, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Burgherr.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Thomas Burgherr.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Andrea Kauten 2020.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Andrea Kauten 2020.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Lade die Datei(en) hoch mit Lizenzangabe und gib in einem der Beschreibungsfelder {{subst:OP}} an. Damit wird gekennzeichnet, dass eine informelle Genehmigung vorliegt und die schriftlich-formelle noch per E-Mail geschickt werden wird." Genau das habe ich getan. Ihr seid wirklich zum Verzeweifeln! --Peteremueller (talk) 15:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dies ist eine Botmeldung, die auf fehlende Lizenzvorlagen reagiert. Aber nun ist der Fall ja sowieso erledigt. --Leyo 11:53, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, besten Dank! Das ging ja unglaublich schnell! Nehme alles zurück ;-) --Peteremueller (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Phnom Penh Post.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Habe die Datei beschnitten, um den Schmuckrand zu entfernen. --Peteremueller (talk) 07:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:SC Bruehl SG Logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Bastoche*.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Limmattaler Zeitung.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo FC Paradiso.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:SC Italiana Juventus Zurigo Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Standschuetzen Oberwinterthur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 15:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senado RD.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camara Diputados RD.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergwelten.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buendner Tagblatt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 16:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]