User talk:PetarM/Archive 5

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miltiades (Roman replica).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Christ Pantocrator (Church of St. Alexander Nevsky, Belgrade).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Christ Pantocrator (Church of St. Alexander Nevsky, Belgrade).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candleroom in Serbian orthodox church in Ljubljana, Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:48, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sacrifice of Isaac mosaic - Basilica San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knez Miloš Obrenović.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baptistry of Neon ceiling mosaic (Ravenna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apse mosaic - Basilica of San Vitale (Ravenna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parboiled rice with chicken, peppers, cucurbita, peas and tomato.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the image is quite OK, maybe the white balance is a bit too bluish (not much). What do you think? --Basotxerri 15:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Reconsidered: Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:37, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Parboiled rice with chicken, peppers, cucurbita, peas and tomato.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parboiled rice with chicken, peppers, cucurbita, peas and tomato.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Минарет Ајдар кади џамија Битољ (Minaret of Hajdar Kadi Mosque, Bitola).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The perspective is ok to me. --Cayambe 11:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Knez Miloš Obrenović.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Knez Miloš Obrenović.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Penne with eggplant and basil in yogurt-tomato sauce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you fix the overexposure on top-right? (PS: And some more categories about the ingredients) Otherwise, a QI for me. --C messier 15:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC) Done I think - please check, C Messier.--Peulle 20:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --C messier 10:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Huawei P10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaic of Classe, ancient port of Ravenna (Basilica of Sant'Apollinare Nuovo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra KT4M-YUB (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shimano 600 Tricolor brake caliper (Shimano Ultegra 6400).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:34, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slovenian Philharmonic Orchestra (Ljubljana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:52, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shimano 600 brake caliper.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikasa VLS300 offiical beach volleyball.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Serbian military cemetery from 1WW by Skočivir (српско војно гробље поред села Скочивир, Македонија).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The green objects on the light side, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:06, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skočivir (Скочивир, Македонија).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bitolj - crkva svete bogorodice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.PumpkinSky 21:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bitola railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ--Nikhilb239 02:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach volleyball (Slovenian championship 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC) I would give another name to this photo --Livioandronico2013 13:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Манастир Моштаница-капела за паљење свећа (Moštanica Monastery, chapel for lighting candles).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The light on the right should be cropped out but the quality is good. --Ermell 12:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferhat-Pasha mosque arabesque close-up (Banja Luka, Republika Srpska).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Река Уна код Козарске Дубице (Una river at Kozarska Dubica, Republika Srpska).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Река Уна (лево) код ушћа у Саву (десно) код Доње Градине (River Una at mouth at Donja Gradina, Republika Srpska).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirsium eriophorum (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Звоно Манастирa Моштаница (Bell Tower, Monastery Moštanica, Republika Srpska).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samuil's Fortress in Ohrid (Самуилова тврђава у Охриду).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Solid QI, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 19:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ferhat-Pasha mosque arabesque (Banja Luka, Republika Srpska).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ferhat-Pasha mosque arabesque (Banja Luka, Republika Srpska).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Saints Clement and Panteleimon (Ohrid).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ферхадија, Бања Лука (Република Српска).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I can't see any category. And why only f/5.6? (Sharpness could be improved with vor example f/7.1 or f/8.) --XRay 11:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC) * @XRay Ask RussBot what is he doing...sharpness: I find it very sharp, and no, 7.1 and 8.0 are maybe for APS-C or FF. --PetarM 13:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)  Support Today I found the categories. --XRay 15:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cirsium eriophorum (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cirsium eriophorum (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Сунцокрет (Helianthus annuus) Национални парк Козара.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit of chroma noise in the sky but OK for me; try to reduce if possible. BTW, what lens do you use? Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Крст на мосту преко Мљечанице (Манастир Моштаница).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you add some cross-related category, please? --Basotxerri 18:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC) * Done Basotxerri --PetarM 16:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC) GQ --Basotxerri 19:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry that I made a mistake. I have fixed it. I asked Yann to double checkc it. PumpkinSky talk 11:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Yann said everything is fine now. PumpkinSky talk 12:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Church of Saints Clement and Panteleimon (Ohrid).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of Saints Clement and Panteleimon (Ohrid).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Samuil's Fortress, Ohrid, Eastern part by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not very comprehensible --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment VI rules state that images of building should be taken in daylight (See Commons:Valued image scope#Buildings). Also I think that this image shows that fortress better. Martinvl (talk) 15:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
• @Martinvl Daylight ? Of course, we will make Milky Road and Moon on daylight... erase that rule soon as possible. --Mile (talk) 08:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC) (should is not must )
  • @PetarM: I suggest you make the scope clearer as Archaeodontosaurus alluded to, and add "nighttime illumination". Something like "Samuil's Fortress, Ohrid - nighttime illumination - viewed from the (insert view direction here)", perhaps. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
• I added Eastern, by night. Just eastern part is built to look like fortress. @Martinvl i checked 3 times scope, i dont think there is any singular to cope, even that one you like. --Mile (talk) 10:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment@PetarM: The rule about daylight applies to buildings. The Milky Way is not a building. Please read the rules before you respond. Martinvl (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, is good now, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Sophia (Ohrid).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Given what it is (architectural photograph with 14mm lens) good quality. Don't see much chance of getting straighter lines given how tight the space is. --Crisco 1492 12:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Чамац на ушћу реке Уне у Саву (Доња Градина).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Цвети, улазак Христа у Јерусалим (Church fresco - Triumphal entry into Jerusalem, Bitola).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirsium eriophorum flower head (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska) v2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good One --Shishir 11:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Sophia, rear courtyard by day.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Close-ups of Cirsium eriophorum flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support High quality. Charles (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Of course this will be promoted; I just wanted to add my support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 23:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Naum Monastery (манастир Свети Наум код Охрида, Македонија).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cirsium eriophorum flower head (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska) v2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cirsium eriophorum flower head (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska) v2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary with medallion of Jesus Christ (Monastery Saint Naum, Macedonia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seven Saints (Седмочисленици, Св Наум).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)