User talk:Paname-IV

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Paname-IV!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Paname-IV!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What fur is it?

Fine. Thank you. --Kürschner (talk) 07:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Sorry that you had to modify my category ! Sometimes they are very precise and most often I don't find simple ones, like "chapeau" in this case.

You made it great. I am only specialist for furs. I just put your panama hat on the German page. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama-Hut
Have a look here: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Обсуждение:Ушанка. Auf Wiedersehen --Kürschner (talk) 13:31, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I could make a photo of a nice brown Merino cap purchased in Kastoria last year if you think it has an interest for someone. I saw the lambs on your page ;o)

You have been in Kastoria? This is one of the things I have to do before I die... You got fotos from there? From a Furrier's shop? :)
I wait for your Merino cap for categorizing.
I have a book, also with Kastorian fur traders. A Greek historian wanted to buy it, but I won't. I promised him to upload the relevant pages to commons. And decided, to load up all, over 100 pages. But now I have the problem, the uploader for so much images, called Commonist, will not work with me, I do not know why. And know I must load them all by hand, awful, it's not funny. Here I started: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ledger_of_the_fur_trader_Dedo_in_Leipzig,_1876-1885 --Kürschner (talk) 13:49, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kastoria and its region are a very nice place for holidays. I have no photo of furrier's shops but something that could interest you. cf "Fur panel kastoria.JPG". This is ubiquitous in the streets of old Kastoria. Feel free to improve the entry. I guessed it was mink but tell me if I have to change something. I would be happy if it can illustrate some article. The cap was not easy to photograph. I tried my best to find categories. "Merino cap.JPG" Good luck with the uploading of your book !

Found :) - thank you! I saw it - thought, that must it be, and it was. A fine picture and very fine categorized! Today somebody gave me the right hint for uploading my Kastorian book. A good day! Have a nice evening! --Kürschner (talk)
I just saw your message up there - oh yes, that's my day, I found the mink plate too. I completed your entry and I will use it in the German Wikipedia in 'Nerzfell' and in 'Kastoria'. My wife asked me to make holidays there - before I saw your message. Thank you very much, ask me, if I can help you anywhere. The German furrier = --Kürschner (talk) 21:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have good holidays there then. You can fly to Corfu and rent a car. Most luxury fur shops don't open all the year round there. Beginning of June is perfect for tourism but not for business for example.

Danke! --Kürschner (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I got a present from my family: A journey to Kastoria next year. Great! --Kürschner (talk) 08:35, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder how they guessed you would like it ;-)

I too. --Kürschner (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Pas0.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pas0.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pas0.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "jcw"? Is it you? Please help me to clarify this. --High Contrast (talk) 21:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is me. Paname-IV (talk) 16:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thermoluminescence.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Thermoluminescence.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 10:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lombards Museum[edit]

Hi Paname-IV, we're having a discussion as to the identity and location of Lombards Museum, on the village pump Commons:Village_pump#Lombards_Museum.3F, could you please enlighten us as we're dying of curiousity. It would also be worthwhile creating an institution category for the files.--KTo288 (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Paname-IV, da das Foto vermutlich in Deutschland aufgenommen wurde: hast du die Genehmigung der Abgebildeten bzw. ihrer Erziehungsberechtigten zur Veröffentlichung dieses Fotos unter einer freien Lizenz? Verstöße gegen die Persönlichkeitsrechte werden in D. recht strikt verfolgt und können teuer werden. --Túrelio (talk) 14:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kürschner in Kastoria[edit]

Schon gesehen? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Furriers_in_Kastoria

--Kürschner (talk) 07:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you have the illustrations, you can write a book! Happy Year 2015!

Just today I got the 2 books from Wikipedia, only with my articles about fur skins. Really great and exclusive made! And not expensive. Nearly 1000 Pages and 1000 pictures. Best wishes for the coming year too!
The Kastoria article exists here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelzreste#Kastoria_und_Siatista
--Kürschner (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressive scholarly work, next step will be to translate it into English ;-)

Please, feel so free ;) --Kürschner (talk) 13:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lophotrochozoa (talk) 14:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lombards Museum 005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ghouston (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, lNeverCry 07:45, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marque sur une image importée[edit]

Bonjour Paname-IV, merci pour le versement de l'image mentionnée et d'autres. Pourrais-tu l'enrichir, si tu les connait, par la signification de la marque sur la droite de l'image et le F ; sur la bibliothèque où l'objet est conservé ? COrdialement Garitan (talk) 07:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Garitan, Je ne sais pas d'où vient le tampon. F261 correspond peut-être à la cote de la bibliothèque du Collège des Bernardins si j'en crois la mention plus bas, "F" correspond peut-être à "Français", la langue du texte. Le livre se trouve en mains privées. Rien de bien intéressant à ajouter, donc. Cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paname-IV (talk • contribs) 17:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tom Ibarra CdO.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Low resolution. Metadata indicates that it was sourced from Facebook
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chocarne-Moreau atelier 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chocarne-Moreau atelier 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tom Disquaires.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait d'une jeune Bretonne Emma Herland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Ospital tribune.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Thomas Ospital tribune.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Titlutin (talk) 00:33, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]