User talk:Orf3us

==

Welcome to the Commons, Orf3us!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Riss dansekompani.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Øvedskloster_kirke.JPG

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Øvedskloster_kirke.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 17:30, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Att ange ett landskap som källa verkar lite underligt. Det du ska ange i det fältet är var bilden är hämtad ifrån. Om du inte har hittat bilden på Internet eller liknande, utan det är du själv som har fotograferat, ska du ange {{Own}} i det fältet.

Sedan var det lite andra problem med din version som jag har fixat till. Det finns ingen mall som heter {{Information Rokokokirken ved slottet Övedskloster}}. Beskrivningen "Rokokokirken ved slottet Övedskloster" hör istället hemma under description=, helst med en mall som anger vilket språk det är. Dessutom vore det bra om du läste igenom Commons:Categories. Den mest passande kategorin för den här bilden är Category:Öveds kyrka. Category:Sweden är en alldeles för bred kategori. Category:Skåne är också för brett, och att ha bilden i båda är överkategorisering eftersom Skåne ligger i Sverige. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Tak for hjælpen : ) --Orf3us (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Ingen orsak. Jag har tagit bort mallen om att källa saknades. Ytterligare ett tips: "tl" ska inte vara med när du anger "own" som källa. Jag har fixat det också. tl används när man vill länka till en mall istället för att använda den. Mallen own används för att automatiskt översätta "own work" till det språk som läsaren har inställt. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Så blev jeg så meget klogere, tak igen. Skal jeg så lave alle mine billeder om? --Orf3us (talk) 18:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Ja, det vore jättebra om du kunde fixa till liknande saker med dina andra bilder också. Jag kan hjälpa till om det behövs. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Det er jo et kæmpearbejde, så jeg siger ja tak til lidt hjælp : ) --Orf3us (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Bombed

I feel bombed with all these messages! I'll do my best.

Hei Orf3us! Ikke mist motet, skjønner godt at du føler deg bombet. ;-) Det er litt forvirrende dette med kategorier på bildene sånn i begynnelsen. Jeg har gått gjennom noen av bildene dine i går og lagt til flere kategorier og tar noen i dag også. Sender deg svar på mailen også. Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 08:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Har lagt til kategorier mm. Nå er det bare disse tre som mangler lisens: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duborg.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Holbergsgrav_soroe.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erik_menved.JPG Fikser du det? Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Tusen takk! Det later til at en annen har vært forbi lisensene, hvis ikke så må jeg få be om litt veiledning. --Orf3us (talk) 20:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Det stämmer. Du hade råkat ta bort licensmallarna när du lade till kategorier på några av bilderna. Jag lade tillbaks de ursprungliga licenserna och fixade till lite andra saker samtidigt. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Så sier jeg igjen takk! --Orf3us (talk) 10:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

C8

Fort gjort å gjøre en feil, har gjort sånn jeg også. C8 :-) Du kan spørre Kjetil om han vil hurtigslette den for deg. Eller sette på merke med speedy selv. Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Takk for tipset, jeg har nå kontaktet ham. Vennlig hilsen Orf3us (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Endre navn på fil

God lørdag! Du? Jeg har bedt Kjetil endre navn på denne filen Polykarp, så da blir det nok i orden. Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 11:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

God lørdag også til deg. Det var veldig fint, takk skal du ha. Mvh. --Orf3us (talk) 13:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Vet du?

På dette bildet Marie står det på sokkelen at dette er Marie - prinsesse af Danmark. Vet du hvilken Marie og evt. hvem som har laget den? Her er et annet bilde Engel?? Om vi fant ut hvilke parker de står i er det enklere å finne ut hvilke skulpturer det er. Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

De står begge ved Nordre Toldbod, om det regnes for en egen park vet jeg ikke, men det tilhører trolig Langelinie. Engelen er monumentet over Iver Huitfeldt, og bysten av prinsesse Marie av Orléans av Carl Martin-Hansen (ting henger sammen). Mvh. --Orf3us (talk) 21:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Hva du vet! Tusen takk! (Engelen burde jeg skjønt, forresten). Vennlig hilsen Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Det var så lite. Orléans var interessant, så der bør det komme litt mere kjøtt på. Mvh. --Orf3us (talk) 22:23,

Magnus

Hei! Leste hva du skrev hos Kjetil om bilde av Magnus av Øsel. Jeg har fikset det i dag; du får sjekke disk.siden. Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Fine bilder

Flotte bilder du har lastet opp igjen i dag! Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Takk skal du ha for påskjønnelsen, jeg hadde nok glemt at jeg hadde dem. Mal à propos, tusen takk for Magnus av Øsel. Mvh. Orf3us (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Lurblæserne.JPG

File:Lurblæserne.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Den udvalgte

Hei! Vet du hvem som har malt dette?? Fine bilder du tar, Orf3us! Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Hei igjen, fantastiske bilder du legger ut Aso. Nei, jeg vet ikke hvem som har malt bildet, jeg tror at det er lavet av en anonym kunstner, men jeg undersøker det nærmere. Mvh. Orf3us (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Jeg har undersøkt litt, og maleriet er tilskrevet Morten van Steenwinckel. Maleriet forestiller Chr. IV til hest, og den utvalgte prins skal ifølge Frederiksborgmuseets katalog 1943, være tilføyet senere. Mvh. Orf3us (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Takk for detektivarbeidet. :-) Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 09:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A. C. Lamoureux (detalje).JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A. C. Lamoureux (detalje).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

License for the photographic work is missing, the photographer is, I hope, not dead for 100 years as said on the file description. --Martin H. (talk) 16:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Dear Martin H., thank you for your comment. The sculptor has been dead for at least 100 years, is this not the proper file description to use? The photographer is alive and kicking though. Orf3us (talk) 17:03, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Sculptor is part of the description, yes. But the sculpture is not the work decisive for the licensing. For the licensing it matters that this is a photographic work, that it is a photo of a 3D object and therefore the photo is creative enough for copyright, and it requires a license/permission to be used on Commons. A license that you must add because its your copyright. --Martin H. (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Solum kirke - våpenskjold

Hei! Jeg så hva du har skrevet under bildet og har spurt Eaglestein http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eaglestein#Sp.C3.B8rsm.C3.A5l_om_v.C3.A5penskjold Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Herlig, tusen takk for hjelpen! Mvh. Orf3us (talk) 06:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 07:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, that is kind of you. Orf3us (talk) 22:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Ung mand med Falk(Rathsack).JPG

Hi Orf3us, you have likely choosen a wrong license template for this image. I assume that you have shot the photography, right? The original statue is out of copyright per the year of death of its creator. So there is no problem with that. However, the photography of the statue is copyrighted by the photographer. If you are the photographer, you are free to license it per your choice. However, this licensing is unrelated to the creation or publication of the original statue as it is out of copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the reminder Túrelio, I have now changed the license template to PD-self. Orf3us (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

To ting!

Hei! Du er mye i Norge, skjønner jeg. Har sett mange fine kirkebilder fra din hånd her på Commons. Vet du forresten hvem som har malt din Sophie? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sophie_Brahe_%281578%E2%80%931646%29.JPG Mvh.--Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Takk skal du ha! Kan Sophie henge litt? Jeg har nemlig glemt hvem maleren var, men vil gjøre det jeg kan for å følge opp på det. Mvh. Orf3us (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Sisu (Færø).JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Sisu (Færø).JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

De728631 (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Californiu rúsínur (islandsk guf).JPG

File:Californiu rúsínur (islandsk guf).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Pete F (talk) 21:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Absalons ligsten (detalje).JPG

File:Absalons ligsten (detalje).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 10:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Døbefont (Katolske Kirke i Rekjavik).JPG

And also:

• File:Mindeplade Pius XI (Katolske Kirke Reykjavík).JPG Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Christian VIIs frihedsstøtte (detalje).JPG

Hi Orf3us, which sculptor created that statue and when has it been installed? Commons:FOP#Denmark is not applicable to such works. --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

The same for File:Detalje af hund (Frihedsstøtten).JPG.

Dear Túrelio, thank you for your comment. The sculptures and medaillions in this monument are all made of different early 18th/19th century Dano-Norwegian artists – the monument was installed in 1792. If you would like me to clarify that, I will do my best to do so. Yours sincerely Orphée (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. So, we don't have a problem with copyright here. However, it would be nice - also towards the sculptors - to find out their name and add it to the descirption, if possible. --Túrelio (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Høydalsmo kyrkje

Hei Orf3us, jeg så bildet av File:Høydalsmo_Kyrkje.JPG og er ganske sikker på at det ikke er den kirken. Om du sammenligner med File:Høydalsmo kirke, Tokke kommune, Teleamr.jpg som jeg vet er riktig er det noe som ikke stemmer. Du har ikke andre kandidater? Mvh Noorse (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hei Noorse, du har fullstendig rett, det er Brunkeberg kirke. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Ah, ja! Når du sier det, så kjenner jeg den igjen :) Har bedt om flytting nå. Håper navnet er ok for deg :). Mvh Noorse (talk) 15:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Veldig fint at du så det, takk for dét og for flytting til nytt navn :) Det lå et annet feilkategorisert bilde i samme kategori som jeg selv har endret. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Bare koselig! Flere hender gjør arbeidet enklere ;) Noorse (talk) 17:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Svensk bok använder Din bild på omslag

Hej Orf3us!

Jag vill barta informera Dig om att en nyutkommen svensk bok om drottning Filippa använder Ditt foto här som omslagsbild utan att vare sig ange Ditt namn eller under vilken licens bilden lyder. Du kan läsa litet mer om det i ett inlägg jag har gjort på svwp här. /FredrikT (talk) 12:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hej Fredrik T. Tak for din interessante oplysning. Jeg har kontaktet forlaget, som tilbyder at kreditere billedet med fuldt navn (ikke så gerne "kunstnernavn") og licens ved et evt. genoptryk eller en paperbackudgave. Det er et interessant tema som tages op på listen Commons i svensk press, tak også for den. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Photo of count Dietrich of Oldenburg

Hello Orf3us, please excuse, that I write in English. I live in Germany and cannot speak Swedish. I saw your picture of Dietrich of Oldenburg (a part of a pedigree) and I would like to als you if you have a picture of the hole pedigree and can send my a copy of this? Kind Regards Bjjansen (talk) 02:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Bjjansen

Hello Bjjansen. I do not have a photo of the pedigree myself (it is 7 meters long!), but theres are some photos of it on this webiste. I hope that might help you. Kind regards, Orphée (talk) 06:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hei Orf3us, I noticed that the photo of Count Dietrich is licensed ShareAlike. I would like to use it for 5 seconds of a potentially-monetized video on the House of Oldenburg, which would not be released under this license. I had been considering following the principles behind COM:PDART. However, you are providing a great service with these photographs, so I thought I'd ask. Satyadasa (talk) 02:12, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello there! I have nothing against you using the photo in your video, the subject is of great interest so please tell me where I can see the result. Now the license-question is a bit tricky though; I am not sure that the tag you suggest applies to Nordic countries, but apart from that I am not sure I can help you. Or can I? Kind regards, Orphée (talk) 19:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dyrkøb (København).JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Dyrkøb (København).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 21:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Frogify.JPG

File:Frogify.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Anna Beate Rosenkrantz' våben.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Beate Rosenkrantz' våben.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:02, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nørre Søgadestrik.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nørre Søgadestrik.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your comment on licensing JuTa. I have now added a proper license for the photo in question. Could these messages be styled a little less intimidating? Yours sincerely Orphée (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mendel Philip (1790-1853).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mendel Philip (1790-1853).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mendel Philip (1790-1853).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mendel Philip (1790-1853).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Erik Menved (Sankt Bendts Kirke).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Erik Menved (Sankt Bendts Kirke).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Monogramme royal

Hello and Thank you very much for the information, I actually deceived

Thanks again for your help, bonn end of the day to you cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Hr. Claus Bille.jpg

Hej Orf3us, ved man hvem maleren var? Jeg kan ikke finde en online udgave af DAÅ, så derfor spørger jeg deg. De728631 (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Hej De728631, det er desværre ikke nævnt i DAA. I DBL 3. udgave står der dog om afbildninger af CB at der skal findes et maleri på Gavnø, som skal være en kopi efter en tvivlsom original, samt en tegning efter maleriet af C. Bayer på Frederiksborg. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Mange tak. Jeg var bare interesseret i denne billeds virklige alder. Men det er ja tydelig gammel nok til at have PD-lisensen. De728631 (talk) 19:28, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Orf3us,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

War graves in Denmark

The errors were 2:

1. creating the wrong category War graves of Denmark instead of in Denmark
2. putting in it graves that are actually in Germany.

Thus it's not my fault. All I can do is moving them "War graves in Germany" and to "Monuments and memorials to people of Denmark". -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Dear Blackcat, thank you for your answer. Why is it wrong to have a category called " War graves of Denmark", if the category also includes the nationality were the deceased once were buried? If you just move them to another category that point will be lost. Yours sincerely, Orphée (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Because a more appropriate category would be "War graves to people of Denmark", not "War graves of Denmark". -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. I am looking forward to see that new proper category with the proper content. Yours sincerly, Orphée (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Yderlandsvej.jpg

File:Yderlandsvej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Orf3us,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Stenhugger Peder Albrækt Jensens Familie-Begravelse.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Spejlvendt billede

Hej Orf3us

Jeg så lige File:Fr sund station i september.jpg, som du har uploaded i forgårs. Jeg undrede mig lidt over det, for det er nemlig blevet spejlvendt. Se for eksempel stationsskiltet og de forskellige påskrifter på S-toget. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 12:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Hej Dannebrog Spy, den var vidst gået helt galt, tak fordi du så det. Jeg har nu uploadet den korrekte version af filen. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 06:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Oskar Ewerlöfs gravminde.jpg

File:Oskar Ewerlöfs gravminde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Orf3us,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

King Birger better?

Hello! Do you have access to the whole image of this, including his face? It is sorely needed. I hope you'll upload it of you have it. You could crop it about like this and upload over that version. Best wishes, --SergeWoodzing (talk) 04:50, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello @SergeWoodzing: . I am sorry for seeing your message so late and for the fact that I do not have a photo of the whole motive. If I go there again I will try to remember your wish. Regards, Orphée (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Orphée for replying! Better late than never. In the meantime, a couple of kind Danes in Ringsted climbed up on a ladder for me, som now I've got it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:Skøjtedag på Frederiksberg Runddel.jpg

---

Hello Orf3us, it appears that the version of File:Skøjtedag på Frederiksberg Runddel.jpg which you uploaded 2020-01-27T22:01:16Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 21:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Just Høg

Hej Orf3us. Tilbage i november 2016 uploadede du dette billede af Just Høg, men så vidt jeg kan se er der tale om en anden Just Høg en teksten angiver. Jeg mener at det må være af Just Høg (1584-1646), som var rigskansler fra 1640-46 og i al fald var ham som ejede Gjorslev (som teksten rigtig nok angiver). Lige nu angiver teksten at billedet er af Just Høg (1640-1694) - vicestatsholder i Norge - og anvendes således også på en forkert side. Holder du fast i at billedet er af sidstnævnte eller kan jeg rette teksten og fjerne billedet fra omtalte biografi?Ramblersen2 (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Hej @Ramblersen2: . Tak for din kommentar. Vi har formentlig her med far og søn Høg at gøre. På billedet læses, at den portretterede er statholder i Norge, og at vedkommende er til Gjorslev. Det var de begge. Jeg synes ikke helt at hår og tøj passer til den første Just Høg. I følge DAA, hvor billedet er hentet fra, er det junior der her ses. Jeg er ikke mere sikker end det. Orphée (talk) 21:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC) Mvh. Orphée (talk) 21:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Ja du har helt ret, det er netop far og søn og selvfølgelig dér Gjorslev kommer ind. Undskyld ulejligheden.Ramblersen2 (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Intet problem. Tak for de mange fine billeder du bidrager med. Mvh. Orphée (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Gravearbejde i Nansensgade maj 2019.jpg

File:Gravearbejde i Nansensgade maj 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Letlands Nationalbibliotek (Gaismas pils).JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Niels Eriksen Rosenkrantz' gravsten - DMR-25687.jpg

Copyright status: File:Niels Eriksen Rosenkrantz' gravsten - DMR-25687.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Niels Eriksen Rosenkrantz' gravsten - DMR-25687.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gravsten over Jens Brahe og Anne Bille - DMR-193052 (cropped).jpeg

Copyright status: File:Gravsten over Jens Brahe og Anne Bille - DMR-193052 (cropped).jpeg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gravsten over Jens Brahe og Anne Bille - DMR-193052 (cropped).jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Gravsten over Jens Brahe og Anne Bille - DMR-193052.jpeg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)