User talk:Okstartnow

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Okstartnow!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Hongkonger has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Achim (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please stop making changes related to "Hongkonger" and to Hong Kong being a nation. These changes are disruptive, and not consistent with the naming of categories here. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong is not a nation but Hongkonger is a nation. And why these changes are disruptive? And why British can be called "British" here, but Hongkonger? --Okstartnow (talk) 03:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"British" is the adjective used to refer to the United Kingdom (just like "American" and "French" are used for the United States and France, respectively). It can refer to people or anything else.
The changes are disruptive because you are making a significant change without discussing it first. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. --Okstartnow (talk) 03:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:喺葵芳嘅鄭松泰「全面取消TSA,改革香港教育」Banner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

太刻薄 (talk) 11:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]