User talk:Nobody60

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nobody60!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Nobody60!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philosophen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 22:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quan_Yin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saibo (Δ) 22:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both are kept.--Nobody60 (talk) 17:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Nobody60, bitte nimm die Löschanträge nicht persönlich - ich kümmere mich nur um dei Freiheit unserer Inhalte. Schön, dass sie alt genug sind!
Ich habe mir erlaubt die drei Philosophen zu bearbeiten: File:Philosophen.jpg#filehistory (weniger rot/orange-stichtig) Findest du es gut? Wenn nicht, mache ich es wieder rückgängig. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 03:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Es hat mich ehrlicherweise ziemlich genervt. Aber ich kann verzeihen. Deine Bearbeitung der drei Philosophen ist okay. Ich freue mich, dass du offensichtlich auch ein Fan von den drei Statuen bist. Gruß --Nobody60 (talk) 17:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe nun direkt auf den beiden Dateiseiten noch einen Hinweis eingefügt, wieso man keine Urheberrechte der Bildhauer beachten muss. So etwas in der Art (Alter angeben) sollte eigentlich bei jedem Foto einer Skulptur angegeben sein (ist es hier oft nicht - da bist du nicht allein).
Danke für deine Ehrlichkeit - tut mir leid. Wir sollten die Löschanträge hier vielleicht in "Klärende Urheberrechtsdiskussion zur Datei" umbennen - das würde die Verwendung hier besser beschreiben.
Ihr bin auch ehrlich und sage dir, dass mich die drei Philosophen nicht sonderlich interessieren - ich bin nur irgendwie über sie gestolpert - weiß ich auch nicht mehr wie. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist okay, wenn dich die drei Philosophen nicht sonderlich interessieren. Ehrlichkeit ist immer gut. Der beste Weg ist meines Erachtens bei Löschanträgen sehr vorsichtig zu sein und die Dinge am besten vorher mit dem Autor zu besprechen. Ich sage ganz ehrlich: nach einem Löschantrag hat kaum jemand noch Lust hier mitzuarbeiten. Viele Grüße --Nobody60 (talk) 10:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nun, das Problem ist die Masse an Dateien - wenn ich für eine Datei, wo etwas urheberrechtlich nicht okay ist, immer den Hochlader anschreiben muss, müsste ich mir immer Listen anlegen, dass ich nach einer bestimmten Zeit nochmal nach der Datei schaue - denn nicht immer sind die Autoren aktiv bzw. ich weiß ja nicht, ob sie antworten werden. Außerdem tragen in "Löschanträgen" auch andere Leute zur Klärung bei, falls ein Hochlader nicht aktiv ist. Mit Löschanträgen geht das eigentlich sehr gut - nur sollte es eben wirklich vieleicht nicht Löschantrag heißen. Bei dem Äquivalent von Kategorieseiten heißt die Überbegriffsseite auch "Categories for discussion" (Diskussionen über Kategorien). Meinst du, dass das vielleicht gangbar wäre? Wichtig ist die Überprüfung der Urheberrechte in jedem Fall - das ergibt sich aus Commons:Lizenzen (Einleitung). Dateien, die Urheberrechte verletzen, sind nicht frei und können für Nutzer jener (und auch für den Hochlader) beträchtliche (finanzielle) Probleme verursachen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vielleicht sollte man die Löschanträge, wie du vorgeschlagen hast, umbennen. Das dürfte etwas bringen, aber nicht viel. Entscheidend ist letztlich der Umgang der Menschen hier miteinander. Viele Grüße --Nobody60 (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Philosophy of Happiness.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Art-top (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author. It is completly my work. I have all copyrights. --Nobody60 (talk) 21:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see this cover, published earlier, for example here. To previously published works should send the permission at COM:OTRS. --Art-top (talk) 21:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am the author. I am Nils Horn. I have all copyrights. --Nobody60 (talk) 22:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the anonymity of the Commons may not accurately relate the author of the work and the Commons user. For this purpose a system OTRS. I replaced the warning on the file description page to request permission through OTRS. --Art-top (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the permission to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org --Nobody60 (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Art-top (talk) 11:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Prayer Mother Mary.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altar of the unity of all religions.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 12:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermit with computer.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:I love you (Teddy Bear).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

QazyQazyQazaqstan (talk) 00:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]