User talk:NickK/Archive/2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

(2012 | current | archives | 2014)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:44, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Izmail Train Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cezarika1 (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Мда, не люблять румуни одеситів і придністровців…--Anatoliy (talk) 09:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 23:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kiev[edit]

Посмотрите, пожалуйста, нашу утреннюю тему: надо Мартену дать отмашку. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, ответил — NickK (talk) 19:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 00:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 00:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 15:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Встановлення документів[edit]

Добридень!

Якщо у людини немає якогось документу, суд може відновити цей документ. Наприклад, видати свідоцтво про народження, чи встановити стаж за показами свідків. Чи існує на commons орган, який має право відновити відсутні документи? Оскільки ця ситуація очевидно суперечить здоровому глузду, абсурдна. Якщо не існує, які шляхи його утворення? В наших умовах це вкрай необхідно.

Yuriy V Dzyadyk (tc), 09:30, 15:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

та нічого там суперечливого нема. Не міг Юрій зробити своє фото на своїй же прес-конференції. Власне у скайпочаті ГО «Вікімедіа Україна» Юрій сам зізнався, що це фото робив дійсно не він, а інший оператор. Тож тут і доводити нічого не треба.--Anatoliy (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Уточню, що пан Юрій повідомив, що нібито має домовився з фотографом ще до публікації, проте це не було формалізовано. Відновлення відсутніх документів просте — сконтактувати ще раз із фотографом, зазначити конкретного автора (не Unknown, а конкретне ПІБ) і отримати чіткий формальний дозвіл. Якщо лише пан Юрій знає, хто насправді був фотографом, ніхто інший не може замість нього отримати дозвіл на це фото — NickK (talk) 18:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • У мене десятки фотографій, на яких я зображений, а кнопку натискав випадковий перехожий. То що діяти? — Yuriy V Dzyadyk (tc), 11:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]
    Це досить цікава ситуація, бо перехожий виступає тут анонімним автором, якого немає можливості ідентифікувати, а ви — єдиною особою, яка може здійснити публікацію (загальний консенсус схиляється до того, що ви можете опублікувати це фото, бо ідентифікувати автора змоги немає, а поки ви не опублікуєте, навіть не піде 70-річний термін охорони авторського права). Проте це відрізняється від ситуації з вищезазначеним фото, бо там можливо ідентифікувати автора (можливо, він навіть зазначений у договорі, якщо ні, то принаймні відомо, що це штатний фотограф) та автор має змогу сам опублікувати фото (фотоапарат був його) — NickK (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Згідно з сучасним законом США, навіть анонімні неопубліковані роботи захищаються АП: w:Wikipedia:Public_domain#Current_standard_copyright_duration_in_U.S._law. У даному випадку, АП діє 120 років з дня створення. --DixonD (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    У такому разі ваші правнуки, можливо, доживуть до того часу, коли вони зможуть опублікувати ваші фото на Вікісховищі, і все заради того, щоб випадково не порушити авторське право людини, яка навіть не в курсі... — NickK (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Здається, ситуація з файлом File:Прес-конференція Вікімедіа Україна 07.JPG вирішена:

Сьогодні вперше почув термінь OTRS. Але де путівник у цих хащах? Де довідкове бюро? Шкода, що українські адміністратори Commons виявилися схожими на найгірших працівників ДАІ, а не на наших доброзичливих колег. Допоміг лист від Wikimedia Permissions <permissions-uk@wikimedia.org> (надіслала Львова з російської Вікіпедії), у розсилці wmua. — Yuriy V Dzyadyk (tc), 11:49, 14 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Перенаправлення там ставити було неварто. Той файл згаданий у неприйнятому дозволі. Якщо справа дійде до вилучення, то він теж буде вилучений. Окрім того, другий файл є таким самим як перший, тобто він фактично був відновлений без обговорення.--Anatoliy (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ви ж самі посилаєтеся на лист Львової. Там на його початку написано: в данной ситуации служба ОТРС действительно никак не может принять разрешение. У Global Usage виправив.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I clearly have not been watching my Watchlist closely enough lately, because I missed your two thoughtful responses to the questions I had posed. I didn't notice until today, when I saw the discussion was closed by Jim. I just wanted to know that I wasn't ignoring you, and appreciate you taking the time to address my concerns. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Skeezix1000 and thanks for your comment. It is unfortunate that this situation was resolved this way, as this potentially means that not even a single picture of a post-WWII building from Ukraine would be allowed, even if the building is simple and nondescriptive. Looks like Commons is pursuing law that is not even practically working in Ukraine — NickK (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Jim's decision. Having said that, you provided links to many decisions here on the Commons that were decided the other way. The Commons approach to this issue is a mess. You may want to consider initiating a COM:RFC. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос[edit]

  • Почему были оставлены этот и другие файлы? --Agent001 (talk) 12:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Потому что владельцы видео на YouTube разместили их под лицензией Creative Commons, разрешающей их использование здесь. Я объяснил на Commons:Deletion requests/File:Valeriy Zubov.jpg как это проверить — NickK (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Мало ли кто загрузил на Ютуб ролики и поствил свободную лицензию. Вы хотите сказать, что Новый канал и другие канал из перечня опубликовали свои программы под свободной лицензией? Глупости, этой фейк.--Agent001 (talk) 13:38, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Нет, это не глупости, это правда. Зайдите на главную страницу канала «Культура» — и вы увидете там видео с канала UACulture, именно того канала, с коротого взято видео, откуда вырезано фото File:Fagot.jpg. Уважать надо владельцев каналов, готовых делиться своими видео, а не обвинять в фейковости — NickK (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Я повторяю - нет никаких доказательств подлинности аккаунта "Культура" и "Новый канал" на Ютубе. --Agent001 (talk) 15:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Вы считаете, что канал «Культура» вот просто так ставит ссылку на ролики с пиратского канала на Ютубе на своём сайте и делает это на протяжение двух лет? Меня бы это крайне удивило. YouTube имеет крайне жёсткую политику по борьбе с пиратским контентом, и существование канала с сотнями пиратских видео явно не осталось бы без внимания администрации. Если вы всё же считаете, что имеет место нарушение, вы можете пожаловаться в Центр борьбы с нарушениями YouTubeNickK (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Я счтаю, что канал ppshowN, на который ссылается File:Prytula comm.jpg — фейковый.--Agent001 (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Если вы так считаете, обратитесь в Центр борьбы с нарушениями YouTube. Если будет обнаружено, что видео опубликовано незаконно, будет удалено и данное фото — NickK (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Видалення[edit]

Привіт!

Щось Агонк не відповідає, тому ще звертаюся і до тебе.

Видали, будь ласка, швидко оці фотки:

Дякую! --Nickispeaki (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Привіт!До мене не варто звертатися: я тут не маю прав адміністратора. Серед українців права адміністратора є ще в користувачів Butko та George ChernilevskyNickK (talk)

العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear NickK/Archive,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks — NickK (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 21:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 07:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear NickK/Archive,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo