User talk:NAC

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NAC!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

File:SEFT BDe 4-4 6 SanVittore 211012.jpg

File:SEFT BDe 4-4 6 SanVittore 211012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jnn (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you very much for your work on categories of the Orbe-Chavornay railway ! Abaddon1337 (talk) 19:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Catégories du matériel roulant

Je constate que tu introduis beaucoup de nouvelles catégories pour le matériel roulant. D'abord merci pour ton travail mais quand même une remarque. Il ne me semble pas avantageux de séparer trop les séries identiques ou similaires, par exemple Be 4/4 11...15 du MBC. Il faut chercher trop dans les sous-catégories si on définit une catégorie par quatre ou cinq photos. C'est plus agréable d'avoir au moins une dizaine par sous-catégorie. Merci!-- Gürbetaler (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Je me suis aussi posé la question. J'ai décidé de faire ainsi, afin de pouvoir insérer un renvois depuis la catégorie (à créer) des Be 4/4 TRAVYS-ysc. Si t'as des propositions meilleures, je suis preneur. ;-) Il serait néanmoins dommage de perdre le lien entre la Be 4/4 15 du BAM et ses "sœurs" de Travys. NAC (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Dans un cas comme ça je propose: BAM Be 4/4, YSC Be 4/4 et une catégorie ACMV Be 4/4 1981 dessus.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

D'accord, je vais procéder ainsi, merci. À propos de Travys, saurais-tu si la dénomination de Be 4/4 II qu'utilise Travys sur son site est-elle courante? Stolz dans Triebfahrzeuge der Schweiz ne l'utilise pas, par exemple; sur les véhicules, d'après les photos, il n'en est pas question non plus. NAC (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Cette dénomination Be 4/4" ne se trouve pas ailleurs, elle n'est donc pas courant.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Merci! NAC (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! NAC (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Ponte Corcapolo 030514.jpg

Hallo NAC,
ich bin zufällig gerade über dieses Bild von dir gestolpert und wollte dich fragen, ob du weißt, dass es gerade einen Photo-Wettbewerb zum Thema Brücken gibt, wo dein Bild gut dazupassen würde. Vielleicht magst du ja ein paar einreichen?
Ganz liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, ich schaue mal; danke für den Hinweis! Liebe Grüsse, NAC (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. Anna reg (talk) 14:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Immagini di carrozze FFS

Caro NAC, ho fotografato due carrozze svizzere, ma non sapendomi orientare fra le serie lascio a te l'onere di categorizzarle. Le trovi qui e qui. Grazie!--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Fatto; in entrambi i casi si tratta di CU I (la semipilota è una ex-ABt 50 85 38-33 900-921). NAC (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

File:FS_625100_Luino_xx0793.jpg

Caro NAC, non vorrei sbagliarmi, ma quelle sulla destra non mi sembrano delle carrozze tipo 1955/57: quella di prima classe dovrebbe essere una tipo 1946 con i finestrini ricostruiti, le altre due visto il profilo del tetto sembrano delle tipo 1959.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 08:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Può darsi; non sono un esperto. Correggi pure. Ciao e grazie, NAC (talk) 08:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Categories

Hi,

I have noticed the creation of those two categories : Category:First class train interiors in Switzerland and Category:Second class train interiors in Switzerland. Thanks for that.

I just want to ask you a small question. What are the criteria to add pictures on those two categories ? Are those categories refering prior or after 1956 ? E.g. those 3 pictures File:BC4563SBBCFFFFS-20121014i.jpg, File:LE B11 - intérieur.jpg and File:Blonay-Chamby Régional des Brenets - 11 - 02.jpg are in the category : Category:Second class train interiors in Switzerland. However, those cars are, after 1956, first class passenger cars. They kept the old classification for reasons of museum material.

Anyway, it is not consistent to put them in the same category as this kind of photos : File:FFS B 50 85 21-73 348-7 interno 011213.jpg or File:FR B 54103 interior Landquart 010215 1.jpg.

Would it be appropriate to create categories for historical material and therefore also a category for the third class cars?

So what is your suggestion ?

Best regards --Abaddon1337 (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Salut,
c'est une bonne question; en ce qui concerne la B11 du LEB, à mon avis, il s'agit bien d'une voiture de seconde classe (B); plus de problèmes se posent aussi pur les actuelles "C" historiques: ces voitures ont-elles vraiment gardé une classification de 3ème en 1956, ou ont-elles reçu une classification de 2nde pour redevenir de 3ème alors qu'elles sont devenues "historiques"? Il faudrait peut-être demander à quelque usager plus expert (Gürbetaler, p.ex.)... NAC (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok merci. Désolé, je ne savais pas que tu parlais français. Je vais lui demander. --Abaddon1337 (talk) 12:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016

Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno. Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione. Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link. La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST. Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-) per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste

Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File:6 Bucuresti Parliament 130916.jpg

File:6 Bucuresti Parliament 130916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpg

File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 14:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpg

File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 22:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:63-64 36-43 20 Vallorbe-Domodossola.pdf

File:63-64 36-43 20 Vallorbe-Domodossola.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

190.13.216.1 01:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Railpool 185 705-1 Domodossola 150811.jpg

Hi, did you add Category:Rail transport electrical substations here because of the building in the background, or because of the locomotive? Is it a mobile substation? --Te750iv (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Te750iv: , I added the category because the locomotives were a sort of substation (I'm not a technician...); that was after the 2011 fire into the Simplon tunnel. NAC (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the helpful reply; very interesting issue. I've now added some information and used one image for dewiki. --Te750iv (talk) 17:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Varna Gagarin 110916.jpg

File:Varna Gagarin 110916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tomer T (talk) 11:35, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Sandweid_train_station

Sandweid train station has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mackensen (talk) 03:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Hamburg Dammtor Intercity 190217.jpg

File:Hamburg Dammtor Intercity 190217.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Pictures of Swiss P-16 patrol boats

Hi User:NAC
I love your pictures of the Swiss P-16 patrol boats. Very nice. Thanks for sharing them. I would love it if you could add more pictures of these boats. Pictures of other P-16 boats and detail-pictures would be great! Thanks.
Fons den Dekker (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Votazioni 120217 Bellinzona FFS 290117 1.jpg

File:Votazioni 120217 Bellinzona FFS 290117 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

File:FA-Reform-Nein Chur 080914.jpg

File:FA-Reform-Nein Chur 080914.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 09:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Lega dei Ticinesi poster CdS Locarno 120415.jpg

File:Lega dei Ticinesi poster CdS Locarno 120415.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Poster UDC-SVP Sommaruga-Juncker Zuerich HB 130315.jpg

File:Poster UDC-SVP Sommaruga-Juncker Zuerich HB 130315.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

File:ATM 1917 Milano Cadorna 211209.jpg

File:ATM 1917 Milano Cadorna 211209.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Seawolf35 (talk) 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

HB-ZLK (aircraft)

This Category you created has now two helicopters and I am a bit confused. Maybe you could double check over my edits? Thanks. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)