User talk:Mrkhlopov

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mrkhlopov!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Фотографии здания лицея № 344[edit]

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • Разрешение отослано в форме электронного письма с приложением файла .pdf с подписью директора и печатью учебного заведения. Привожу ниже текст:

"Настоящим я заявляю, что являюсь директором лицея № 344 Санкт-Петербурга и/или единственным обладателем исключительных авторских прав на произведение/фотографии: "Школа для девочек принца П. Ольденбургского. Фото начала XX века", "Здание, в котором учебное заведение находилось до 1969 года", "Здание учебного заведения с 1969 по 1987 год", оригиналы которых находятся в Музее лицея. Даю разрешение опубликовать это произведение на условиях свободной лицензии GNU Free Documentation License версии 1.2 (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) или любой более новой, опубликованной Фондом свободного программного обеспечения (Free Software Foundation) с дополнительными условиями, принятыми в Википедии, то есть без неизменяемых секций, без текста первой обложки и без текста последней обложки, а также свободной лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/). Выбор из этих двух лицензий остается за лицензиатом. Я понимаю, что тем самым даю право любому лицу распространять, изменять и использовать произведение в любых законных целях (в том числе связанных с извлечением коммерческой выгоды) при условии соблюдения указанных лицензий. Я уведомлена, что я сохраняю исключительные авторские права на это произведение вне условий указанных лицензий и что я всегда сохраняю право на упоминание меня как автора в соответствии с выбранными лицензиями. Я согласна с тем, что информация о моём авторстве будет сохранена в истории правок статей (если речь идёт о текстовой информации) либо на сопроводительных веб-страницах (если речь идёт об изображениях и иных медиафайлах). Модификации, которые сделают другие люди, не будут приписаны мне. Данное разрешение затрагивает только мои исключительные авторские права, и я оставляю за собой право предпринимать действия против использования моей работы с нарушением закона, в частности: для клеветы, унижения чести и достоинства, нарушения правил использования торговых марок, нарушения права на охрану изображения гражданина и т. д. Я понимаю, что я не могу отозвать данное разрешение и что моя работа может размещаться в проектах Фонда Викимедиа в течение неограниченного времени либо быть удалённой оттуда." Шелюховская Майя Николаевна

Mrkhlopov 7.07.2014, 17.45.

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • С этими фото возиться нет времени. Я на 5 файлов, связанных с лицеем потерял 6 дней (а еще некоторое время директор лицея и секретарь). Там вещь принципиальная, а здесь? Если посмотрите вверх, то я сделал скриншот антивируса Qihoo, расположенного на моем рабочем столе. Тоже доказывать, что это скриншот сделан мной, а не взят из интернета...

С уважением, Mrkhlopov 4.07.2014, 18.04.

P.S. Не подскажете, как ставить автоматически дату ответа?

Разрешения на Гимн и эмблему лицея №344[edit]

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • Я уже отослал разрешение директора лицея на использование данного файла (оно не только в тексте письма, но и в виде файла .pdf с подписью и печатью лицея). Mrkhlopov 17:06, 4.07.2014 (UTC)

Именование файлов[edit]

Уважаемый участник, пожалуйста, давайте загружаемым файлам имена, соответствующие правилам проекта - поясняющие суть изображённого на них. Названия файлов File:DP826287.jpg, File:Фотография1.png или File:Фото123.png являются неприемлемыми. Sealle (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Параметр |Date = должен содержать дату оригинальной работы, а не дату Вашей загрузки. В случае неполной информации о дате создания произведения пользуйтесь шаблоном {{Other date}}. Sealle (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Я исправил на дату создания. спасибо. С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Таких файлов в Вашем вкладе намного больше, чем Вы исправили. Sealle (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Буду день за днём исправлять. В загрузчике стоит просто дата и счётчик. Авторы алгоритма действительно рассчитывали, что им можно пользоваться для выставления даты создания картины? С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 16:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Кроме календаря, там имеется вторая иконка, с карандашом, которая и помогает вносить информацию о дате в произвольной форме, в том числе с помощью вышеупомянутого шаблона, пользоваться которым я Вам настоятельно рекомендую. Sealle (talk) 16:48, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Le sorelle della pittrice Lucia, Minerva e Europa Anguissola giocano a scacchi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Never covered (talk) 08:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:John Lavery. The Chess Players. N04544 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Попытка выдать запрещённую лицензию (см. COM:Licensing/ru#Популярные лицензии) за совместимую – это серьёзное нарушение авторских прав. Sealle (talk) 15:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Я просто ничего не понимаю? на странице Галереи Тейт чётко написано^ Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND (3.0 Unported). Напишите нормальным русским языком, в чём проблема здесь? В загрузчике файлов такой вариант есть. Чем он плох? Я могу изменить на несвободный файл прямо на странице этого файла? С уважением, Mrkhlopov
      • 1) Выше дана ссылка на русский перевод правила COM:L. Там имеется текст: Обычные примеры лицензий, которые часто встречаются в Интернете, но которые запрещены на Викискладе: Лицензии Creative Commons Non-Commercial Only (-NC); Лицензии Creative Commons No-Derivatives (-ND). Будете читать правила самостоятельно или мне каждый раз переносить их на Вашу страницу? 2) Несвободные файлы на Commons категорически запрещены. Sealle (talk) 16:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Вот теперь понятно. Так удалите просто этот файл. Я полностью на это согласен. Что тратить время и обсуждать 7 дней. Будете читать правила самостоятельно или мне каждый раз переносить их на Вашу страницу? - Вы как администратор сэкономили бы уйму собственного времени, чётко формулируя претензии. Вы пишите загадками. Если Вы действительно возьмёте и перенесёте правило на страницу обсуждения, то этим разъясните ситуацию мгновенно и предотвратите будущие ошибки. С уважением, Mrkhlopov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrkhlopov (talk • contribs) 16:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Подписывайтесь с помощью четырёх тильд. Как администратор, я применил соответствующий правилам способ обсуждения сомнительных файлов и дал Вам короткое, но исчерпывающее пояснение со ссылкой на недлинный раздел правила на русском языке. Не помогло. Правила для того и пишутся, чтобы экономить время, поскольку предусматривается, что добросовестный участник в состоянии прочитать их сам. В противном случае никаких администраторов не хватит, чтобы тратить по полчаса на каждого участника, не захотевшего читать правила. Ещё проще: запрещены любые лицензии, не предусматривающие явного разрешения на создание производных работ и на коммерческое использование. Предельно короткий список: из линейки Creative Commons разрешены лицензии CC0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA. Запрещены: CC-BY-NC, CC-BY-ND, CC-BY-NC-ND, CC-BY-SA-NC, CC-BY-SA-ND, CC-BY-SA-NC-ND. Sealle (talk) 16:39, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • Искреннее спасибо. Всё кратко и чётко.
Я учитель: 30 лет веду уроки и готовлюсь к ним. Времени на чтение правил, повествующих о том, как вести уроки, не остаётся. Если директор хороший, то он просто в краткой форме сообщает выжимку из вчера изменившихся правил ведения уроков (кстати, обычно совершенно дурацких - те, кто составляют правила, никогда на уроке просто не бывали), если плохой - то скрывает их за номерами, датами, чтобы использовать их незнание в собственных целях. С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 16:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
У Вашего покорного слуги здесь >2000 административных действий в месяц. Загляните в историю правок с таймстампами и попробуйте посчитать, сколько времени должно уходить на подробное (как здесь) пояснение каждого непонятного участнику правила. Обычно, кстати, здесь пренебрегают и пояснениями, подобными тому, которое я оставил под шаблонным сообщением. По моему опыту – подавляющему большинству участников этого достаточно. Реплику о чьих-то собственных целях оставлю без комментариев. Sealle (talk) 17:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elisabeth, 1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 00:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Mrkhlopov, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Attributed to Kokusai Demon mask. Made of stag antler.png

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 04:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Полагаю, просто прочитать, что написано в тексте массово используемой Вами не по назначению лицензии, можно и без «указаний директора». Отличить трёхмерное произведение искусства от двумерного несложно. Sealle (talk) 04:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Густав Клуцис Плакат к Спартакиаде 1928 года.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Дима Г (talk) 09:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Mrkhlopov, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Two Daughters of the Artist.png

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Фотографирование трёхмерных предметов искусства, в том числе находящихся в общественном достоянии, создаёт новое авторское право фотографа. Размещение таких изображений без разрешения автора фотографий, тем более под лицензией, одназначно предназначенной для двумерных изображений, недопустимо. Sealle (talk) 05:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Mrkhlopov.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Sealle (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mrkhlopov, I was wondering what this file has to do with Cornelis de Man. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Dogad75 (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Корнелис де Ман.gif[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Корнелис де Ман.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bogorodica s Djetetom.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This stamp is from Croatia, not Russia, and stamps of Croatia are not in PD
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Smooth O (talk) 19:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Бойня Фешина в Хазинэ.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Бойня Фешина в Хазинэ.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Обливание. Этюды в экспозиции.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Обливание. Этюды в экспозиции.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Портрет Вари Адоратской. Фрагмент 4.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Портрет Вари Адоратской. Фрагмент 4.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Портрет Вари Адоратской. Фрагмент 1.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Портрет Вари Адоратской. Фрагмент 1.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Картина в Хазинэ.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Картина в Хазинэ.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Обливание Фрагмент 3.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Обливание Фрагмент 3.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 20:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Письмо двоюродной правнучки Д. И. Менделеева о музее, созданном Л. В. Маховой..jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Книги Л. В. Маховой..jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Книги Л. В. Маховой..jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:36, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Лигети Dialogo из Сонаты для виолончели соло.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Гимнасты СССР в Русском музее.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Гимнасты СССР в Русском музее.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:В тёплых краях в Русском музее.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:В тёплых краях в Русском музее.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Федор Крестьянин. Стихира Евангельская первая, глас 1. Расшифровка Бражникова М. В..ogg was recently deleted by Sealle for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Derivative work of non-free content (F3)

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Яблоня и дети на картине Коляда.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Яблоня и дети на картине Коляда.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Доброе утро, уважаемый Sealle! Вы привели мои собственные фотографии. Там в комментарии на странице и в названии самого фото уже указан объект, который я фотографировал. Пожалуйста, приведите пример, каким образом это должно правильно оформляться. Вот эту фотографию разместили два администратора. Надписи соответствуют моим. Они тоже ошибаются? Как может так получиться? С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 03:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Это не «собственные фото», а COM:Производные произведения. Лицензионный статус таких работ определяется прежде всего статусом оригинального произведения. Если это произведение находится в общественном достоянии, должно быть указано основание для этого и проставлен соответствующий шаблон. Отдельная лицензия для оригинала и отдельная – для фото могут быть оформлены при помощи шаблона {{Copyright information}}: пример. Если в ОД оригинал ещё не перешёл, и съёмки производились в стране без свободы панорамы, такие фотографии не могут быть загружены на Commons без разрешения автора или его наследников, полученного через OTRS: пример. Тот факт, что коллега Shakko не соблюдает эти общеизвестные правила проекта (см. загрузки других участников: File:Александр Андреевич Иванов - Явление Христа народу (Явление Мессии) - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Alexander Andrejewitsch Iwanow - The Appearance of Christ before the People.jpg), очень печален, но не освобождает Вас от их соблюдения, особенно ввиду массового характера таких загрузок с Вашей стороны. Кроме этого, Вы привели пример, где произведение общеизвестно, и оно точно находится в ОД, относительно же сфотографированных Вами работ никакой информации относительно их свободы не имеется. Sealle (talk) 06:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ну, в данном примере я вообще-то фотографировала интерьер, а не конкретный объект. Невозможно указывать авторские права на все картины на стенах. Если я отдельно фотографирую картину (и обрезаю раму), то при загрузке ставлю пд-арт. --Shakko (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Если произведение является центральным объектом фото (а сомневаться в этом, например, здесь не приходится), его статус нужно указывать обязательно. А {{PD-Art}} вообще не об этом, этот шаблон предназначен для загрузки чужих фотографий двухмерных объектов, перешедших в ОД либо распространяемых под свободной лицензией. Бесспорно, не все обязаны знать это наизусть, но участникам, общающимся с читателями и пропагандирующим участие в проектах фонда, желательно этим инструментарием владеть безукоризненно – как видите, на Ваш опыт ссылаются другие. Sealle (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
вы уж напишите конкретно, как грузить такие же свои: несколько лет назад меня на форуме со смаком пару недель, наоборот, полоскали, за то, что я свои собственные фотографии двухмерных произведений (типа такого) как селф загружаю, а не как пд-арт. Это разнообразие мнений вообще несколько утомляет, особенно когда сопровождается токсичной атмосферой. --Shakko (talk) 14:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shakko, чуть выше подробнейшим образом описано с примерами, как грузить свои. Никаких разнообразий мнений здесь нет и быть не может, назначение шаблона PD-Art очевидно из его документации и – предельно подробно – из страницы Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. Резюме (nutshell) этой страницы: {{PD-Art}} may be used by the uploader of a photograph taken by somebody else to assert that the photograph can have no independent copyright as it is simply a faithful reproduction of an old, public domain, two-dimensional work of art. Для конкретного приведённого Вами примера правильное оформление таково: Special:diff/491533719. Sealle (talk) 14:47, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Уважаемый Sealle! Я исправил лицензии на файлах к статьям «ru:Портрет Вари Адоратской» и «ru:Обливание (картина Фешина). Посмотрите, пожалуйста, правильно ли сделано. Mrkhlopov (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Я поправил два файла, добавив пинг к каждой правке. По этим образцам нужно исправить остальные. Sealle (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Какую лицензию нужно использовать по отношению к моей фотографии File:Праздничное шествие с песней. Коляда. Экспозиция музея.jpg? Сама сфотографированная картина ещё под авторским правом. Приведите, пожалуйста пример. С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Размещение производных работ от несвободных изображений, полученных в странах без свободы панорамы, на Commons запрещено. Такой файл Вы можете загрузить только в рувики, при условии выполнения требований правила ru:ВП:КДИ. Sealle (talk) 17:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Спасибо, постараюсь в ближайшее время заняться. С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 18:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madonna in trono con il Bambino.jpg was recently deleted by Mahagaja for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Giorgio Schiavone (1436-1437-1504) - The Virgin and Child Enthroned - NG630.1 - National Gallery.jpg

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Золотой мальчик.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--NoFrost (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Коллега, ну всё достаточно прозрачно. Нельзя фотографировать и снимать на видео то, что защищено авторским правом и загружать это, как "свободную работу" под "свободной лицензией". Ну как бы это "производная работа" от того, что защищено АП и не может быть свободным. Вроде логика проста и понятна. Выставил на удаление. --NoFrost (talk) 21:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC) Мало того... То, что говорит экскурсовод - это тоже объект охраны авторских прав... --NoFrost (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • --NoFrost! А как тогда правильно всё это оформлять? Как с фотографией скульптуры я знаю, а как с видео? Никаких правил я не вижу (особенно насчёт слов экскурсовода). С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 05:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Ну в данном случае только два варианта. Вариант 1 - убрать голос экскурсовода (или получить от неё разрешение) и получить разрешение от скульптора, согласно ВП:ДОБРО. Вариант 2 - загрузить видео на YouTube и разместить в статье с помощью шаблона "внешние изображения". Вы поймите главное - Викисклад принимает ТОЛЬКО СВОБОДНЫЙ контент. При этом это касается и авторства того, кто записал/сделал фотографию/видео/текст/декламацию и касается авторства всех зафиксированных на любых носителях объектов авторского права. В данном случае и скульптура - объект, охраняемый авторским правом и текст, произносимый экскурсоводом. --NoFrost (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        • Спасибо --NoFrost! Я выбрал третий вариант. Загрузил в Википедию, а не на Викисклад, с лицензиями несвободного файла. С уважением, Mrkhlopov (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Иконография Николы Отвратного.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Redboston 14:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of a Young Man, 1853 by Richard Dadd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Unclevinny (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frederick Cayley Robinson. Photo1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masato.harada (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:А. В. Мельникова с детьми.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:А. В. Мельникова с детьми.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Komarof (talk) 07:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Дом Бажанова. Наборная панель на камине в Большой столовой.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Komarof (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]