User talk:MrPanyGoff/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Great Theatre of Havana (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FranciscanChurch Maribor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 19:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StYoanRilski church Sofia Seminary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afono Bay, Tutuila island.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Namche Bazaar, Nepal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sainshand Railway Station, Mongolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Huston.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stele Archaeological Museum Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Texas State Capitol (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Archaeological Museum, Sofia (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Copenhagen City Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chitalishte Zlatitsa .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 20:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas Church Karlovo .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Television Tower Sofia[edit]

Hi Mr PanyGoff,

look today at the main page of the german speaking Wikipedia. There is a little surprise :-) Greetings --Alabasterstein (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasant surprise, :) thanks.--MrPanyGoff 10:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Franciscan Church, Maribor (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rakovski street Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulgarian Fir cones (Abies borisii-regis) .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jeremy Irons.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DragonBridge Statue Ljubljana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sadly the architrave block is cropped but anyway QI --Taxiarchos228 07:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Saints Constantine and Helena Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pukapuka Atoll, Cook Islands.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rouen Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirdop-Bank building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 10:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StNedelyaChurch Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Protection of the Theotokos Chapel Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 15:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Palace Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, QI--Jebulon 16:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozino village church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Question Small distortion of the roof of the tower appears to lean towards the right. Maybe even he is naturally like that? --Archaeodontosaurus 17:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected the distortion of the upper part of the tower. The tilt of the cross and the waterspout is actual.--MrPanyGoff 20:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 13:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tennessee State Capitol (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cape Ortegal, Spain.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Las Condes Town Hall, Santiago de Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Katholikon-Etropole Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 06:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Institute of Sociology Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sofia Seminary-side risalit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good overall quality. --Tomer T 09:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Lazarov school Karlovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment CA in left part --Archaeodontosaurus 13:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't see where is this CA but for each case I apply some defringe option and tiny crop from left to hide the trunk.--MrPanyGoff 06:33, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
see notes for CA. They are minimal and for me the subject is more important than the CA: QI.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OldClockTower Sevlievo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Interior of Italian churches[edit]

There are few images of the interior of the church in Italy because they are prohibited. So you get into the church, you do your photo and ... you run fast. :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds familiar to me. It seems that taking photos in temples is not allowed everywhere. I also have few images of church interiors - all of them illegally taken. --MrPanyGoff 06:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo old town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, a panorama of this buildings would be nice --Taxiarchos228 09:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolno-Kamartsi-village 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church-Klisura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 17:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

VI[edit]

Hi MrPanyGoff,

can I re-candidate undecided images for VI? Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can but pay attention why they are undecided. Probably there is some reason not to be supported. Read and follow carefully the procedure here. --MrPanyGoff 12:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. George the Conqueror Church, Sofia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Epupa Falls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sydney Pollack.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estadio Nacional de Honduras (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sopot central sqare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 14:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ANTONY GORMLEY Hochalpe 9.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great quality. --Tomer T 14:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grafton Street, Dublin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Transamerica Pyramid, San Francisco.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MrPanyGoff!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request Assistance[edit]

Hello my friend,

It seems you know import images from other Wiki. Could you put an image in Commons that exists for the United States and Germany and I'd like to place on an international basis. If you get there I suggest you put it in VA because it is very useful.
deutch english
Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'm going to see what is the case.--MrPanyGoff 06:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for him: he deserves. You're very effective. I placed his image wherever it should be. It is a pleasure to work synergistically. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChitalishteSabuzhdane-Vrachesh village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banya Bashi Mosque Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me (perhaps a bit of CA at the top of the tower)--Lmbuga 21:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarevets Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:45, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RoyalPalaceGarden Sofia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me QI, but I think that the image needs perspective correction--Lmbuga 23:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued image nomination[edit]

Hello MrPanyGoff,

Thanks for your nomination of the image as valued image. Cheers. Donaldytong (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome ;) --MrPanyGoff 12:26, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tashichho Dzong, Bhutan (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Synod Palace - Sofia .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 18:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patan Durbar Square, Nepal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inguri Dam, Georgia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arco de Santa Catalina, Antigua Guatemala.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port of Taganrog (general view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eads Bridge, St. Louis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leicester Athena (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! History Museum - Karlovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 10:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Radino school - Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 12:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OldClockTower-Etropole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Providence City Hall, Rhode Island (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Katholikon - Etropole Monastery - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice work --Elekhh 07:39, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Mineral Bath-Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lower crop is rather tight, but good image quality though. -- MJJR 21:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auditorio de Tenerife.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Merced Church, Antigua Guatemala (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Etropole Monastery Katholikon, (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Odessa Opera Theatre (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jacob Hübner.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Independence square, Minsk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cork City Hall (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chocolate Hills, Philippines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas Church Tower - Karlovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spinning wheel - Sopot .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Ximonic 19:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion church-scopes[edit]

Hi,

this discussion may be interessting for you: Commons_talk:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list#Scope_for_churches. Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glenfinnan Viaduct.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gdansk Main Railway Station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Utah State Capitol (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarama Island, Japan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vivien Leigh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vernazza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church - Varshets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 09:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varshets - Mineral spa building 1919 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 23:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varshets - Mineral spa building 1919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.George church - Varshets - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too tight crop (bottom) but otherwise good quality.--Ankara 23:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moses Mabhida Stadium![edit]

I suggest you change the scope for us to vote, this picture deserves the label. Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting but I think the problem is not in the scope. It seems that people always try to kill the creativeness and the enthusiasm of the knowledgeable man. There is no respect these days. No respect for quality work. I'm tired, trying to build Cathedrals which constantly are ruined by someone.--MrPanyGoff 09:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello MrPanyGoff, I wasn't aware of this thread on your talkpage. As far I am concerned, I had voted sincerely, but if the result was that you are now cheesed off and tired of the VI project, it would have been the worse vote I've ever made. Please excuse me if I have been harsh and too picky. You are important for and in this project. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 21:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ken Hensley&Sunrize - ROCK ON THE ROCKS TOUR 2011 - Sofia - 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too small for QI --Saffron Blaze 20:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Well above the required size. Otherwise good, too. --Ikar.us 21:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Happy to be wrong on this one as it is a magnificent capture. Saffron Blaze 21:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Then we can set it to simple promotion, I think. --Ikar.us 21:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varshets - Mineral spa building 1919 - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 21:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Island of Aix, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pantages Theatre, Hollywood (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George Church - Varshets - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zodiac Inflatable Boat - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 00:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Etropole Monastery entrance - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zodiac Inflatable Boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI to me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barnbougle Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Tbilisi[edit]

I've just noticed a brand new image: File:Tbilisi Panorama.jpg. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StGeorge church - Mezdra - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 17:46, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roger Waters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valdi Totev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old town hall in Tábor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Apostles Cathedral - Vratsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Ikar.us 21:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasko Krapkata - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment please fix the crop, see annotation --Carschten 12:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done.--MrPanyGoff 10:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 12:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petar Gyuzelev - Tsvete za Gosho 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good.--Ankara 10:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mal McNulty - Slade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good (but too bad that all the most images are so small) --Carschten 15:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued image[edit]

I never see you more in VI. I hope you do not tire, and you will return me to support this label. you already do a lot. Bon souvenir de France --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I join Archaeodontosaurus in asking you to be active again in the VI project. It seems to me that this project reachs an important turn now, and your participation would be a plus. Of course, like in every changing move, "evolutionists" will have to face up to some resistance and sure, as for me, I am more on the "conservative" side (for this project at least) but I truly believe that finally, a better project could arise from discussion and practice. As a sign of good faith and will, might I propose to you to implement together the first sub-topics discussed some time ago ("Ancient Cultures Remains" and "Streets and Squares")? With kind regards, --Myrabella (talk) 10:06, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Academy of Sciences picture[edit]

Hello, I work for a magazine and we are doing a story on a scientist at the Academy. We would like to get your permission to use this image.

Thank you,

Alejandro Rojas

Hello Alejandro, thanks for the interest. Please, use whichever image of mine you like. I just would like, if you don't mind, please attribute the photo in the manner I specified. Greetings.--MrPanyGoff 06:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC) I would also appreciate if you inform me where (name of the magazine or web site) and when photos of mine is used.--MrPanyGoff 06:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doug Scarratt - Saxon - Sofia Rocks 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jovianeye 12:21, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Kavarna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. What are the iron box on both sides of the facade? --Archaeodontosaurus 05:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The boxes are for candles. Sometimes when the churches are small and old the places for candles are arranged outside so that not to fill with smoke the interior.--MrPanyGoff 07:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varna Cathedral - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balgarevo village hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:23, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kavarna - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael the Archangel church - Balgarevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church - Balchik - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church - Balchik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 18:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolata Cove - Kaliakra - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --H005 21:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Klisura - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Ankara 07:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klisura town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:37, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Nova Zagora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:14, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Petka church - Nova Zagora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HighSchool Hristo Botev - Nova Zagora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now --Taxiarchos228 12:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! School Hristo Botev - Nova Zagora .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 16:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity church - Novo Panicharevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI.--Ankara 14:21, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town Gallery - Sozopol .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apriltsi town - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yasna Polyana Village Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI.--Ankara 11:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nova Zagora main square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:StanleyKubrick-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

TheGrappler (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural Centre - Lukovit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:25, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church - Lukovit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Vassil 22:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Targovishte museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in Varshets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Cyril and Methodius Church - Klisura monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--Jebulon 08:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StGeorge church - Mezdra - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad Town Hall - Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot Fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Mother of God Church - Dimitrovgrad - Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 15:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot Courthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Athanasius Church - Lozen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot central area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and good managed. Some would oppose because of the shadow, I don't. --Taxiarchos228 11:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Nativity of Christ - Pirot - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cultural centre - Dimitrovgrad - Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot Employment Service building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:32, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Nativity of Christ - Pirot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Vassil 21:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House in Varshets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 16:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambasador Hotel, Niš, Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:52, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Fountain, Niš, Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Land Forces Command entrance, Niš, Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niš Fortress, Niš, Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 22:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Knyaz Milosh street - Pirot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments To me, the image can be QI, but the left vertical lines aren't stright--Lmbuga 21:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I hope that I understood your remark and have done some correction.--MrPanyGoff 11:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
QI to me--Lmbuga 18:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Photos[edit]

Your images are fantastic! Thank you for your great contribution, that we (and i, firstly) appreciate very, very much! Bravo, hvala! --WhiteWriter speaks 11:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome ;)--MrPanyGoff 12:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned ZiL-157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milena - Tsvete za Gosho 2011 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and sharpness. A little lack of contrast and the left arm is slightly overexposed, but it may be a QI IMO. --Vassil 22:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --WhiteWriter 11:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pirot Fortress - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --WhiteWriter 11:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad - Serbia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --WhiteWriter 11:19, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alexander Nevsky Cathedral - Sofia - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:24, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Military Club - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Monastery church - Apriltsi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --ArildV 00:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose disturbing leafs on the top right for me. (The picture is of good quality otherwise). --Léna 00:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done-Leaves are removed.--MrPanyGoff 08:22, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Quality picture now :). Léna 09:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nishava River - Nish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me--Jebulon 16:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nish University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Archaeodontosaurus 13:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ascension of Jesus Church Tower - Botevgrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 12:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Cathedral - Niš.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 12:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Athanasius Church - Lozen - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice comp, good colours. --Saffron Blaze 18:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paraskeva Petka Church - Troyan - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Naval Club - Varna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 15:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo - Town Gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stambolov Street - Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 20:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banya Bashi Mosque - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varusha quarter east Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, I like the composition. Mvg, Basvb 22:19, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Demetrius Church - Vidima - Apriltsi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I see you have taken the picture south of the building, wheather looks nice, why then didn't you wait for the sun?
-------
The sky above and behind me was cloudy and I have no more than 10 minutes here. Anyway, I think that the object is clear enough.--MrPanyGoff 08:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC) Yes it is, would be better with sunlight though. --Sfu 09:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nish Fortress - Lapidarium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Small resolution, but good quality. --Sfu 21:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Targovishte central square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Léna 17:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hobie Cat 16 - Iskar reservoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:36, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael the Archangel church - Shishkovtsi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good--Ahonc 14:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Demetrius Church Belfry - Radomir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 08:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Athanasius Church - Sovolyano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe the previous version is better, I'm not sure the color balance was wrong.--Jebulon 22:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Previous one was somehow too bluish. Now it is OK, I think.--MrPanyGoff 07:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC) It is a QI, anyway.--Jebulon 12:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Monastery church - Apriltsi - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 14:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Petka Church - Etropole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 12:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Demetrius Church - Radomir - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and QI for me --Haneburger 08:15, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart Church - Niš - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:09, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Demetrius Church - Dragovishtitsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Véronique PAGNIER 14:40, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali Bey Mosque - Nish Fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Véronique PAGNIER 11:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Dragovishtitsa - Kyustendil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI.--ArildV 11:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Athanasius Church - Sovolyano - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 13:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Menas Church - Kyustendil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, maybe a left crop?--ArildV 10:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John of Rila - St George Church - Kyustendil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic State[edit]

We used and credited your image here:

http://www.sonicstate.com/amped/2011/11/30/paul-gilbert-announces-guitar-lessons/

Lovely! Thanks for the exact attribution and for the information.--MrPanyGoff 20:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bali Bey Mosque - Nish Fortress - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siege Bell War Memorial - Valletta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paraskeva Petka Church Dome - Troyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 10:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Cyril and Methodius monument - Vratsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 19:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo Cathedral - fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, good composition.--ArildV 14:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Menas Church Tower - Kyustendil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malta Bus - City Gate Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. Since this summer they use new buses on Malta: File:Malta Bus BW 2011-10-06 12-51-26.JPG --Berthold Werner 16:27, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ludwig_Mies_van_der_Rohe-The_Steedman_Exhibit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ELEKHHT 12:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senglea - Malta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George fresco - St George Church museum - Kyustendil..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Menas Church Dome - Kyustendil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Haneburger 13:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Saint Michael's Gardjola - Senglea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:50, 2 December 2011 (UTC) Maybe a bit tilted (see the wall behind, not horizontal) ? --Jebulon 16:26, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:National Library - Sofia.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Library - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 12:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QIC Folie Saint-James file[edit]

Hi MrPanyGoff,
Could you annotate on the image the overexposed zones and those with a CAs, please. I could agree that the image is strongly corrected for the perspective aberation, but I don't see the mentioned defects. --Moonik (talk) 07:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birgu-Vittoriosa - Malta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St George - Kyustendil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The sun must have been behind you to get saturation like that. Very nice. --Saffron Blaze 10:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bank edifice - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kyustendil Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Assembly of Bulgaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and useful. --Elekhh 05:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Saint Michael's Gardjola - Senglea - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierra Nevada observatoire Pradollano 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Obviously, it is better, imo.--MrPanyGoff 08:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, it seems that this one is mine...--Jebulon (talk) 23:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is yours. I don't know how it came here. --MrPanyGoff 09:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Targovishte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI! -- MJJR 21:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Mother of God Church - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Menas Church Tower - Kyustendil - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:48, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sofia South Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Too much sky (the image could be cropped); despite this, good quality to me--Lmbuga 16:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The sky is cropped. Is it better now?--MrPanyGoff 07:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Qi to me--Lmbuga 19:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Senglea Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have just sampled your photos from Malta that were on Wikipedia to show what I saw while there in 2004 since all my pictures were stolen with my camera after going there. I uploaded them to my facebook and noted they were taken by you.

David Melton

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew the Apostle - Bulgarian icon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:41, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Cyril and Methodius Church Tower - Sozopol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort St Angelo - Vittoriosa - Malta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 22:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Church of St George - Kyustendil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of St George - Kyustendil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banya Bashi Mosque Minaret - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 17:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old house - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 13:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministry of Agriculture - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice view and good quality. --Haeferl 00:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Peter and Paul Church - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good--Jebulon 16:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Market Hall - Sofia - fragment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for QI--Jebulon 02:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Police station - Antonovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Old residentiall building - Sofia[edit]

Bottom and side crop; it's better to transcript the plaques on the building. That's why I cannot vote.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John of Rila Church - Targovishte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Vassil 10:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Trinity Church - Antonovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --ArildV 09:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church tower - Targovishte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old residentiall building - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarevets - Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 08:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Targovishte - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 09:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone bridge - Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice! --Iifar 17:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in spite of a bit of CAs (see note) and, to me, a sky a bit dark--Lmbuga 17:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is necessary to add a few sharpness. :-) --Aleks G 23 32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Demetrius Church - Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 08:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarevets - Veliko Tarnovo - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Demetrius church - Omurtag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good !--Jebulon 09:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intercession of the Theotokos Church Tower - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and good to me--Lmbuga 01:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Building - Targovishte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentI think, it needs more contrast and the perspective correction is too much. (It may be straight, but it looks as if it were wider at the top. Never make 100 % perspective correction. ;-)) --Haeferl 02:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that there is no need of 100% perspective correction but some people here oppose if it is not. How to proceed then?--MrPanyGoff 13:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would do it as I myself am convinced, not how some people want to see it, certainly not in anticipatory obedience. ;-) --Haeferl 23:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
By this of course I did not mean that one should not think about suggestions for improvement. But I would make changes only as far as it pleases me even. ;-) --Haeferl 15:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Maybe the perspective correction looks a bit "overdone" at left (the leaning lamp pole and the shadow emphazise the phenomena IMO), but the picture is good enough for QI. No contrats problem for me.--Jebulon 17:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Veliko Tarnovo - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It has strange line on the upper left corner. --Iifar 15:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneSorry, cropped now ;) --MrPanyGoff 06:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]
IMO it's good now. --Iifar 08:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrachesh Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, perfect light and nice image composition! --NorbertNagel 20:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MrPanyGoff, where (country) is this statue located and who is the sculptor? --Túrelio (talk) 09:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually it is not completed yet. This is a model presented for discussions during the last year at some events and announcements to raise funds for this statue-memorial. It is planned to be placed near to Ronnie Dio' statue on the so called “Rock Alley” in the town of Kavarna, Bulgaria known with the famous summer rock fest. I think, it will be done for this summer.--MrPanyGoff 13:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I took this image at other music festival when the committee officially presented the model in front of the public and in front of the photographers to be photographed and popularized. OK? I think that the sculptor was also there, I can't remember. I'm sorry but I forgot his name.--MrPanyGoff 14:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the sculpture — and any photographies of it — are under the copyright of the sculptor. That means, uploading this image under a free license requires the permission of the original artist (this isn't relevant for press reports about the event). If you can't contact the artist, the image has to be deleted, regrettably. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town Sozopol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonovo - Bulgaria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 15:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sozopol New Town.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 22:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historical Museum - Omurtag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. --Mattbuck 14:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pazardzhik city centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 08:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Edlund - Tiamat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Vassil 21:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neofit Rilski High School - Dolna Banya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo meets the criteria. --Iifar 11:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asenova Mahala - Veliko Tarnovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Truly spectacular. --Mattbuck 18:50, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is simply nothing in the sky. In winter most days have no sky at all, because it becomes a single dull white cloud. On my display I see the sky as a blue gradient space; maybe this is because my display is less contrast. This is a perfect background, for the blue sky days create high contrast and dark shadows, and the cloudy sky days give no shadows at all. On the other hand, this means the image will present incorrect and dark picture. But if I show a real light situation, if I show a bright and lightful house — people will state that I loose the sky and that the photo is overexposed.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stari Most - Maribor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Iifar 18:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church Belfry - Dolna Banya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 23:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pazardzhik theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 14:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George Church - Kostenets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems a bit squat, but no matter. --Mattbuck 17:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VelikiStol Mountain from Slovenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 22:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurko Boulevard - Pazardzhik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sfu 11:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael the Archangel church - Kostenets village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:34, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building in Kostenets.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:39, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pchelin village school.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 22:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pazardzhik Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:45, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

You take amazing pictures! --Codrin.B (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. I'm looking forward to visit Romania soon ;) --MrPanyGoff 12:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George Church - Kostenets - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image. The dark clouds are nice here. -- MJJR 16:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asenova mahala - Veliko Tarnovo - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 19:54, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Park - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good IMHO --Berthold Werner 18:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pchelin village - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tecnically it's OK IMHO. --T137 20:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. John of Rila Church - Sennik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little darkishly, it seems to me that so to look. it will be better ;) (the file is updated) --Aleks G 22:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a bit dark, but good. It seems a little bit tilted to me, don't know why. Nice composition. --Kadellar 14:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bled Castle Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veliko Tarnovo art gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great quality, as always by this user. --WhiteWriter 15:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stamboliyski boulevard - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great quality, as always by this user. --WhiteWriter 15:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas Church - Karlovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Jebulon 14:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Theotokos chapel - Pchelinski Bani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ByzantineTower Ouranopolis2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice.--ArildV 14:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pchelinski Bani.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 19:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pchelin village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intercession of the Theotokos Church - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asenova mahala - Veliko Tarnovo - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Ankara 08:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Harbour - Senglea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 15:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valletta ship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TownHall Gabrovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. --Mattbuck 12:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael the Archangel church - Kostenets village - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I'm not sure about the tilt because all horizontal lines are at an angle to the axis of the lens. Only the verticals can say it in this case. In the central part, the cross on the dome and the pylon with the floodlight are perfectly vertical, imo.--MrPanyGoff 09:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)  Support Looks good to me. --Iifar 17:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

A greeting and a wish[edit]

Hello MrPanyGoff, With my greetings, I would like to adress you an invite. Would you ever consider participating again in the VI project? Things have changed there, and for sure your return would be greatly appreciated. You used to nominated rare images of less-covered countries, and you were such an asset for this project. Hoping this call won't upset you, with best regards, --Myrabella (talk) 20:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Well...I'll see next days. Thanks for the nice words.--MrPanyGoff 21:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old house - Sofia - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 10:43, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dormition of the Theotokos Church - Karlovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality, QI to me--Lmbuga 19:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klisura viaduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.-ArildV 15:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dyado Stoyan's watermill - Sopot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me --Lmbuga 02:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Claude Monet : Urgent[edit]

I misspoke. I think this topic is very important and there must be space for photography and for a pictorial. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tikal Temple II.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bighi Hospital - Kalkara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 17:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuba State Capitol (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Cyril and Methodius National Library, Sofia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsar Liberator boulevard - Sofia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pirot Fortress.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Livorno Cathedral (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charyn Canyon, Kazakhstan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The New Town of Sozopol.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.