User talk:Mouryan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mouryan!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:All India Trinamool Congress logo 2016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More discussion is at User_talk:Bluerasberry#File:All_India_Trinamool_Congress_logo_2016.jpg. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nominations[edit]

Hiya! Thanks for all those deletion nominations! May I ask that you review some of the deletion reasons in future, please? Obviously as you have a picture of yourself, all personal images are not to be removed. Those need additional modifiers, such as "not in use, not own work, not a selfie, non-notable person" and so on. For those 720x900 images of nature which you felt had been edited in Picasa, something to point out is that they were all "Facebook sized" at 720x900 pixels. Then someone who can search Facebook will look. I really thank you for taking an interest in Deletion Nominations, I am not being critical at all of your work, only asking for some additions to your nominations! I have additional help on my user page. Again thank you! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your valuable inputs. In the future I will keep these in mind while nominating images for deletion. -- Mouryan​ (cHiT-ChAt! - Contributions) 17:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WLM[edit]

Hi @Mouryan, Welcome to WLM team. Please select a team -- Naveenpf (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes done! -- Mouryan (cHiT-ChAt! - Contributions) 17:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Mouryan,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello Mouryan,

I have updated the map. The borders are certainly not very accurate but I had no detailed map of the districts of WB for use as a template (if you find one – preferably a pdf file – you could notify me).

You could easily translate the map to Bengali using Inkscape.

Best --Furfur Diskussion 14:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much for your kind help. I do not have a PDF; however you may find a clearer map here. Just a small note, this map doesn't have the district of Paschim Bardhaman district (bifurcated from Bardhaman district) shown in it.
Sorry to repeatedly ask of your help and bother you but would you be kind enough to also take a look at this map.

On behalf of my entire community, I'd like to reiterate our sincere gratitude for your time and kind assistance. -- Mouryan (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mouryan, the Paschim Bardhaman district is included in the map. I uploaded a new version shortly after the first upload, where I forgot to mention it. Maybe you have reload the page or purge the browser cache.
Concerning the File:India West Bengal location map.svg map I think it would be best to ask the creator User:NordNordWest. This is a really high quality map with quite accurate borders, rivers, sea shores, etc., and I think it should only be changed when we have good sources for the new borders. I really wonder that there is no official publication of the government of West Bengal on the new districts. I already noticed the mapsofindia.com map but it does not include Paschim Bardhaman district. --Furfur Diskussion 21:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Thank you for reverting. Yes, I shall get in touch with User:NordNordWest as you have suggested regarding the location map. Also yes, it is a bit surprising but as of now, the only remotely official publication by the Government of West Bengal regarding these new districts can only be found at the link which I had shared with you earlier. A highly unwelcome laxity on the part of the administration to not release a proper svg/PDF map.

Once again, our profound thanks to you for helping us by creating this Map. Thank you! -- Mouryan (talk) 03:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:State- and union territory-level parties.svg[edit]

Thank you for putting the correct political parties in File:State- and union territory-level parties.svg. Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 11:06, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The results of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, 2018 will be annaounced soon (I'll send you the date later). I request you to make changes in the colour of the ruling party in Karnataka as given in the results.

  • Red - Others
  • Blue - INC
  • Orange - BJP
  • Light Orange - BJP + Others

Thank you. 15 May, 2018 ; 16:44

Anish M. Nagpal (talk) 11:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

অনলাইন স্কেলেবেল ভেক্টর ডায়াগ্রাম অনুবাদ অভিযানে যোগদানের অনুরোধ[edit]

সুধী,

আমরা নিশ্চয় সকলেই চাই যে নিবন্ধের ছবিগুলির লেবেল বাংলা ভাষায় হোক। এজন্য সকল সম্পাদকের সহযোগ দরকার। অনলাইন স্কেলেবেল ভেক্টর ডায়াগ্রাম অনুবাদ অভিযানে, কেমন করে আপনি কাজটি সম্পন্ন করবেন, তা নীচের সংযোগে দেওয়া ইংরাজী ভিডিওর মাধ্যমে বুঝতে পারবেন, কিছু উদাহরণও দেওয়া আছে।

  • অনলাইন স্কেলেবেল ভেক্টর ডায়াগ্রাম অনুবাদ অভিযানের সংযোগ এটি
  • চারটি টিন্ডা দিয়ে আপনার নাম দিতে পারবেন এখানে
  • বাংলাতে যে ছবিগুলির লেবেল অনুবাদ করতে হবে তার তালিকা, দরকারমত টেমপ্লেটটি বানানোর বিধি এবং অভিযানের বিষয়শ্রেণীটির নাম এখানে
  1. অভিযান চলাকালীন তালিকাটি বদলানো যাবে না।
  2. অভিযানের সময়কাল ২১ ফেব্রুয়ারি থেকে ৩১ মার্চ অবধি।
  3. আমার/আপনার সবার এই অভিযানে বাংলায় অনুবাদিত ছবি দেখতে পাব এখানে
  4. পুরস্কারের খবর এখানে

আপনাদের অনুবাদ শুভ হোক। কোনপ্রকার বুঝতে অসুবিধা হলে যোগাযোগ করুন @Marajozkee: , @Moheen: অথবা আমাকে। আপনার সুন্দর SVG অনুবাদ দেখে আপনাকে খবরটি দিলাম। Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Coast Railway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

√Tæ√ 07:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi @Mouryan, I'm requesting you to please Update and upload Kazi Nazrul University, Asansol logo in .svg format. Thanks Regards. Kulbhushan Jhadav (talk)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Southern Railway.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Southern Railway.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 16:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Eastern Railway.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Eastern Railway.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 16:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:South Eastern Railway.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:South Eastern Railway.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 16:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:South Western Railway.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:South Western Railway.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 16:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Telangana Rashtra Samithi symbol.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Telangana Rashtra Samithi symbol.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Whpq (talk) 12:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you removed Category:Mamata Banerjee in 2018 from Category:Old women of India in 2018? As a 63-year-old female, it seems like an appropriate category. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Actually, the category Category:Old women of India in 2018 seemed somewhat abstract to me. Sorry, if it is deemed as an arbitrary edit. That wasn't my intention.
Thanks. Mouryan (talk) 12:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In what way is it abstract? I think it's all a bit odd but everything from Category:Old women to Category:Old women in 2018 defines Old people as age 60+. It helps to separate Category:Women of India in 2018 a bit. For Category:Mamata Banerjee in 2014 and before, she is in Category:Middle-aged women of India in 2014, etc. I'm just trying to keep her categories consistent with all female politicians (in India and elsewhere). Ricky81682 (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 06:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WB EMBLEM & FLAGS ARE IN DELETION STAGE[edit]

Please see Undeletion.

Help Dada please. The logos are getting deleted due to an unsolicited request by Sbb1413. I have given all possible theory and explanations, and even compared all the pages of these files with their Maharashtra counterparts. Please participate in the undeletion talk. 🙏🙏 Rourib.2004 (talk) 19:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Master Minds Academy poster on an autorickshaw in Hyderabad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category[edit]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Female politicians by party. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 23:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: Hi. Sure, will do this, going forward. -- Mouryan (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This came up again for Category:2022 in Hyderabad, India, Category:2021 in Hyderabad, India, 2019 in Hyderabad, India. - 01:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)