User talk:Moroder/Archives 2016-4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlieja da Sacun Crist original Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me. Ikan Kekek 03:24, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlieja da Sacun dovia 2 Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lycoperdon utriforme on the Resciesa pasture in Val Gardena Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leresc y pec sa Sacun cun Saslonch Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 17:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesa Bruma Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pescosta desseura tubla Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesa Pescosta a Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freina luec a Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archi gotici sul Rio Santa Caterina Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cesa dl Meune Sacun Urtijei porta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Procuratie nuove e Campanile di San Marco a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa su Corte Trapolin e Rio Misericordia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di San Francesco di Paola a Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:16, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farmhouse Col de Flam in Urtijëi east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Selva da pista 3 Ciampinoi Gherdeina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 14:02, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacun streda dla Dlieja Urtijei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This image is tilted CCW, isn't it? Could you check that? --Basotxerri 20:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Corrected the vertical lines, thanks --Moroder 16:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Much better, thank you! GQ --Basotxerri 18:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

==

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaico traslazione San Marco e portale Venezia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Please fix the red link in the description page. --XRay 19:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Marco Venezia facciata nord arcata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:33, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Surian Bellotto portoni Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg Vahrn Südfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The weather vane on the tower could have been a little sharper, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg Vahrn innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krönung Mariä Leonhard von Brixen Vahrn Pfarrkirche St Georg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte löschen.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg Vahrn Glockenturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg Vahrn Ostfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lidlhof west in Vahrn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa su Rio Misericordia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Neustift bei Brixen Innenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustift Kreuzgang Gottvater Michael Pacher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 17:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Salern Vahrn Westansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Surian Bellotto portone Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support but it would be preferable if you fixed the horizontal perspective issues. --King of Hearts 04:15, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for the review. Do you have any suggestion for the correction of horizontal line since I don't see any better reference lines and correction could be quite arbitrary imo --Moroder 12:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually my bad - it seems like the ground really is tilted in reality. The bottom bricks are shorter on the left than on the right. --King of Hearts 01:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg Vahrn Erntedank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:59, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Neustift bei Brixen Gebäude Fenster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Neustift bei Brixen Gebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taxa name[edit]

Hi, Moroder, this butterfly is a Zygaena species. For a precise identification please visit the relevant category on Wikimedia. All the best.--Zcebeci (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Krönung Mariä Leonhard von Brixen Vahrn Pfarrkirche St Georg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krönung Mariä Leonhard von Brixen Vahrn Pfarrkirche St Georg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Moroder,

I am writing to you on behalf of the Italian Art Society, a learned association dedicated to the study and promotion of Italian Art and Architecture. Next Friday 18 November we would like to feature some of your photos on our blog, http://italianartsociety.tumblr.com/, which has more than 9000 followers. We will of course attribute the images as necessary. We hope you will grant us permission to use your images.

Thank you and kind regards

Costanza Beltrami — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.185.26.190 (talk) 22:32, 06 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using your pictures of Tre Chiese on the Italian Art Society's Blog.[edit]

Dear Moroder,

I am writing to you on behalf of the Italian Art Society, a learned association dedicated to the study and promotion of Italian Art and Architecture. Next Friday 18 November we would like to feature some of your photos on our blog, http://italianartsociety.tumblr.com/, which has more than 9000 followers. We will of course attribute the images as necessary. We hope you will grant us permission to use your images.

Thank you and kind regards

Costanza Beltrami

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Cool! You should try it at FPC, I vote for it. :) --W.carter 19:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niccolo De Simone capella Cacace San Lorenzo Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This is insane - I don't know how you did it, lying on the floor, perhaps? The perspective boggles the mind. One thing, though; the medium is surely fresco, isn't it? You can't have a canvas ceiling. --Peulle 18:22, 5 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment I don't know how to manage these artist templates:it is a fresco. I put the camera on the floor with random shooting, I was also in a hurrey, not supposed to be there. The next day there the camera fell on the floor from a railing with probably a total damage :-(( --Moroder 18:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niccolo De Simone cupola San Lorenzo Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niccolo De Simone Vanitas Pio Monte della Misericordia Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgruine Salern Vahrn Südansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it is ok for QI --Hubertl 09:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naples from the Castello Sant Elmo with Abbazia San Martino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church San Lorenzo Maggiore Cacace and Saint Roch chapels Niccolò De Simone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church San Lorenzo Maggiore Cacace chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 13:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli facciata Ovest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 12:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of image[edit]

Dear Dr Moroder, I am a volunteer guide in the National Museum of Scotland. I would like to use a copy of your image of the fetal ultrasound scan showing the crown to rump length measurement you have included in the article on Ultrasound on Wikipedia. This would be used in a free guided tour talking about medical imaging. I would of course acknowledge you as the source of the image. Yours sincerely, Edward Duvall — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwduvall (talk • contribs) 17:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Duvall, it is a great pleasure for me that you can use my images for your guided tour. Best regards--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church San Lorenzo Maggiore Saint Roch chapel overview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May I use some of your your Venice photo?[edit]

Dear Mr Moroder, You are a wonderful photographer! Can I use some of your images for an art historical article that will be published in a scholarly magazine? I will give you, of course, full credit! I would like to use a photo of the Colleoni, the flagstaff bases on the Piaza and one of the well-heads in the Ducal Palace. Once published I will send you a copy of the article. Thank you so much! Your photos are real life savers! All best, Claudia — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.178.186.150 (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Claudia,

it's a pleasure to see that my pictures are considered with such an enthusiasm and I'm very glad that they are helpful too. Please send me your article. Cheers--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Giovannelli Canal Grande Venezia notte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli facciata Sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 11:31, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niccolo De Simone Decollazione di San Gennaro Pio Monte della Misericordia Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit on the dark side, but that seems to be more the painting than the photo. --W.carter 11:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Egon Rusina Ghialar Istitut Ladin Micura de Rü 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica dei Santi Giovanni e Paolo Venezia campanile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sotoportego Trapolin e Rio Trapolin Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campiello San Marziale Venezia vera da pozzo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I have put Your photo on facebook in group Dioecesis Augustana Vindelicorum (Augsburg)- Biskupstwo w Solnym Grodzie that i just created it helps me to better understand the history of my country. I atributed You as an author on the photo. I wanted to make it profile photo of the group but it is too small. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.68.11.95 (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of image (ultrasound/sonogram -- 12 weeks)[edit]

Hi, Dr. Moroder,

I'm using your image in a PowerPoint presentation for a college class, where I've been asked to present on the development of a fetus at 12 weeks. (I will, of course, be properly crediting you.) Thank you for making this available so I have an accurate image to use! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:5CE:4104:9900:9CE:8723:87F:AD07 (talk) 05:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa del Gesù Nuovo a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer[edit]

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Teresa degli Scalzi facciata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done, foreground a bit busy --The Photographer 23:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gesù Nuovo church (Naples), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Teresa degli Scalzi church (Naples), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letizia Ramolino Bonaparte Museo Capodimenote Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli Salone delle feste Salvatore Giusti allegoria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli Salone delle feste Salvatore Giusti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Agnolo_Gadi_Washington_October_2016-2a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agnolo Gadi Washington October 2016-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli facciata Sudovest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo dello Schiantarelli Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli Onfale di Tommaso Solari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lower right corner is unsharp, but good quality, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 11:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli Salone delle feste Salvatore Giusti soffitto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salone delle Feste (Palace of Capodimonte).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli fontana del belvedere 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 18:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli fontana del belvedere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo dello Schiantarelli (Naples), facade on Via Foria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Pio Monte della Misericordia volta cupola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Salone della Culla (Palace of Capodimonte).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Paolo Maggiore church (Naples), main facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa Pio Monte della Misericordia statua Re Davide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica di Santa Chiara Napoli esterno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church San Lorenzo Maggiore Cacace chapel detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Capodimonte Napoli busto romano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's a pity for the shade but still OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the promotion @Basotxerri: . In my opinion the shadow makes it look more dramatic than this excellent pic by Livioandronico, cheers --Moroder 18:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church San Lorenzo Maggiore Saint Francis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:18, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orto Botanico di Napoli Calliandra tweedii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco di San Gennaro e cupola del Duomo Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object. Shadow contrast well done --Michielverbeek 22:10, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant Elmo Napoli stema di Carlo V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Using your photo[edit]

Hello,

I'm a student at the Midwives College of Utah and I'd like to use your fetal ultrasound photo for a client handout. This handout is actually only for in-class use, but we are going through the proper steps to learn about correct use of copyright.

Thank you,

Cristy Solomon — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 169.229.122.42 (talk) 06:58, 07 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiesa dei Girolamini facciata di Ferdinando Fuga Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a strange acute triangle of shadow above the cross. Whatever that is or what caused it, please fix it. -- Ikan Kekek 00:24, 3 December 2016 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 12:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing that. The sky is not smooth - are those tiny clouds, or was the sky cloudless and are those imperfections? It looks like a cloudless blue sky except at full size, but I know there can sometimes be very thin clouds in a blue sky. -- Ikan Kekek 12:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC) CommentMaybe?--Moroder 16:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, with the benefit of the doubt, I'll say good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant Elmo Napoli lato ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Angelo a Nilo church in Naples, North facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church San Lorenzo Maggiore Saint Roch chapel altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, however, try upload the image in full size next time --The Photographer 12:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Comment I never risize unless it's cropped like this. Cheers--Moroder 16:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco di San Domenico Maggiore a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a white triangle on the lower left corner, perhaps badly cropped after correcting the perspective. Could you fix that, please? Perhaps I would also crop a bit of the lower border, too, to get rid of these cut off heads. Otherwise, the image is OK! --Basotxerri 10:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 15:54, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:56, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco di San Domenico Maggiore a Napoli dettaglio base.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality.--ArildV 09:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Picture teatro alla scala[edit]

Dear Mr. Wolfgang Moroder,

If was searching for pictures of the scala theatre in Milan, when I found your wonderful picture on wikipedia. We are planning a little concert in Germany and therefore I search for background images of the Scala. Is it possible to use your picture for our concert? The picture will printed on a wall to build the background of our little stage. Please let me know if it´s ok.

Best regards from Germany

Permission to Use "Banquet of Absalom" in Bible Curriculum[edit]

Hello,

I work for Museum of the Bible, a non-profit organization in the United States. We are currently building a museum in Washington, DC to open in the fall of 2017 as well as developing a Bible Curriculum for home schools and private schools.

We would like to include your photo in the curriculum. Do we have your permission to do so?

Please let me know if you need more information.

Best regards,

Samantha McIntosh Publications Assistant Museum of the Bible Email: samantha.mcintosh@mbible.org — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.32.221.195 (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Martiri base monumento Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Martiri Colonna della Vittoria Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza dei Martiri a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments La qualita' 'e buona. -- Ikan Kekek 12:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat 1101 Campagnola a Bulla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: Hello colleagues, I saw this image in the CR section of the QIC page, I made an attempt by adding sky with photoshop and also some selective sharpening, you can revert if it is not an improvment. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Christian for the new version. In my opinion it is indeed an improvement. Poco2 19:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of Santa Chiara (Naples), view from Via Santa Chiara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Palace Soranzo Pisani in Venice[edit]

Hi there, I believe the building you named Palazzo Soranzo Pisani on the grand Canal (three floors, terrace on roof, canal door asymmetric on right), ground floor exposed brickwork, 2nd and 3rd floor red intonaco, should more correctly be labelled Palazzo Tiepoletto. It is located immediately to the left of Palazzo Tiepolo Passi, a larger, 16th Century building. Palazzo Tiepoletto is mixed 15th and 16th century. We have always called it Palazzo Tiepoletto in the family. If by Palazzo Soranzo Pisani you meant the even larger rose-intonaco building to the RIGHT of Palazzo Tiepolo Passi, that building is what we normally call Palazzo Pisani Moretta. Thank you for your attention to this, best regards, Alessandro Passi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexpassi (talk • contribs) 16:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Alessandro @Alexpassi: for your note. I called the palazzo Soranzo Pisani according to the Wikipedia article it:Palazzo Soranzo Pisani and Wikimedia Category:Palazzo Soranzo Pisani (Venice). Id suggest you contact user User talk:Abxbay who is much more familiar with Venetian "geography". Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:06, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco di San Domenico Maggiore a Napoli dettaglio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough to be a Q1 --Michielverbeek 23:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento ai Caduti Via Foria Napoli dettaglio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento ai Caduti Via Foria Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portale in Via Benedetto Croce a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naples from the Castello Sant Elmo with Abbazia San Martino the port and the Vesuv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant Elmo Napoli lato nord ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The contours of the castle in the air had was allowed to be sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galleria Umberto I Napoli timpano con angeli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galleria Umberto I Napoli interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obelisco di San Domenico Maggiore 2 a Napoli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CAs entfernen[edit]

Hallo Moroder,

hast Du wirklich nie CA-Probleme? Für Photoshop Elements habe ich diese Anleitung gefunden: http://www.chip.de/video/Mit-Photoshop-Elements-Farbsaeume-Chromatische-Aberration-entfernen-Video_49962088.html

Hmmmm, mit Lightroom scheint das einfacher zu sein...

Die CAs in Deinem Bild sind tatsächlich nicht viele und weit entfernt vom eigentlichen Motiv, aber sie sind da. Wenn Du willst, kann ich das auch ins CR stellen, damit wir noch weitere Meinungen hören.

Grüsse, --Basotxerri (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Basotxerri: Danke für den guten Tipp, werds mal versuchen. Hab nicht Lightroom, werds mir wohl anlegen müssen. ViewNX 2 das ich für die RAW konvertierung benütze ist wohl nicht so gut. Frohe Feiertage!

--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Harbour of Naples, View from Castel Sant'Elmo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)[edit]

* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)   [reply]

Happy old Year evening[edit]

Best wishes from Paris !

our Xmas tree decorated by son Jean

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portone ingresso chiesa di San Giobbe a Cannaregio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verso la facolta di Architettura Calle Amai S Croce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 22:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campo della Scuola Grande San Giovanni ingresso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:25, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]