User talk:Moroder/Archives 2013-3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

profile for Wikimedia blog[edit]

Hi Moroder,

My name is Matthew Roth and I'm a communications manager with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Wikimedia blog [1] to profile the photographers who take the photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on Wikimedia Commons. You can see some of our past POTD profiles here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/ Given that http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Furnadoia_de_Seceda_y_Resciesa.JPG is scheduled to hit the home page of Commons on 9 July, I would love to do a short interview with you by email to discuss your photography and your POTD. Please let me know if you would be interested. You can email me mroth@wikimedia.org or respond on my talk page. Thanks! Matthew (WMF) (talk) 00:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moroder, I'm not sure if you received my Commons email? If you want, please feel free to reach out to me by email mroth@wikimedia.org. If the Talk page is the best, here are the questions. Feel free to add more info as you like and feel free to answer only the questions you like.

Thanks! Matthew (WMF) (talk) 17:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1) Where are you from? Have you always lived there? I was born at home in a small town in the Dolomites at the bottom of the cable car in the picture, spent seven years in Tuscany, one at Yale University in New Haven Connecticut and the rest in this region. I am a physician specialized in Maternal Fetal Medicine andsince 10 years I do only Ultrasound scanning of pregnant women. I scan pregnant women also in an office in Venice two days a week. 2) How old are you? I am 65 years old

3) Do you have a family? Two wonderful doughters one works for a cultural online magazine called Franzmagazine and one works as a textile designer for a majorr silk manufacturing company.

4) Are you a professional photographer or do you consider it to be more of a hobby? Photography is a hobby for me, but I consider myself a professional what imaging is concerned since my profession is fetal imaging which I'm involved in since 1976.

5) If it is a hobby what else do you do outside of Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons? Most of my photography is involved with Wikimedia Commons

6) How long have you been a photographer? How did you first get started? I started as a young boy with my father who was also not a professional but very involved in mountain photography and we had our darkroom where we printed our own photos. There is a long tradition of photography in my family. My great-grandfather was a painter and he started shooting photos at the end of the 19th century. He documented all the old farmhouses in our Valley called "Val Gardena".

7) Are there particular types of photos that you specialize in, or especially enjoy taking (i.e. specific subject matter, landscapes, portraits, black-and-white, etc.)? I like doing art, buildings and landscape photography,

8) Why do you contribute to Commons? I participate to some projects on Wp a) I illustrate the buildings which are under protection in my region which is South Tyrol in a German speaking area in northern Italy. I already documented more than 200 objects b) I illustrate the articles regarding Val Gardena in the Dolomites, which is my native valley. c) I illustrate the peaks of the mountain ranges in the Dolomites d) I contribute to illustrate Venice and its art since I work there two days a week. e) Illustrate articles on WP regarding pregnancy and fetal medicine.

9) How long have you been contributing, and how did you first get started? I started end of 2007 with images regarding mainly local history. I am the president of the local heritage museum of my town Ortisei. About 10) How has your experience on Commons been? Excellent. I feel to be part of a great global community which likes to to share visual contibutions in every way for the construction of Wikipedia.

11)Can you tell us a little more about your featured picture? Is there a story behind it? The Seceda cablecar starts from Urtijei, my hometown at elevation 1300 m and goes as high as 2400 m. where it connects to "Dolomiti Superski" the greatest skiing circuit of the world.

12) What were you doing when you came across the shot? Skiing with my camera in the backpack.

13) Was there anything tricky/interesting about the composition of the shot or the situation you were in? As I broke though the clouds on the tram i thought this is gonna be the best picture of my life - In fact I found the appalling see of clouds and the clear vision to mountains as far as Switzerland and Austria above it.

14) What do you hope the picture will communicate to viewers? The same emotions I had that morning.

15) How do you feel about having your photo featured on Commons and in the Wikimedia projects? As always when I can share a good picture with the WP community

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Michael Kapelle in Völs am Schlern Fresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finger Hof Völser Aicha Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. See notes, please--Lmbuga 11:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Konstantin Völs Christophorus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:56, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weihanachtskrippe Hauptaltar Kirche Sankt Vigil Kastelruth .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments <
 Support --Christian Ferrer 21:22, 01 July 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehemaliges Gerichtsgefängnis Gasthof Turm (Völs am Schlern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 05:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bredles y l Odles cun Sas Rigais dinviern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 05:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Costamula de seura im Winter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterpsenner Hof Völser Aicha Eingangstür Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Oppose Sorry, I think that it's not QI for me: Slight dust spots (see notes). Big size, but poor detail perhaps due to a strong sharpness. White halo between the sky and the horizon (see notes) and it needs perspective correction (see note, please). Sorry, for me, with this size (very good size) is possible more quality--Lmbuga 22:51, 30 June 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Fixed DS and perspective --Moroder 12:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the picture with 4 megapixels and it looks very good--Lmbuga 09:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

wow: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/07/09/wikimedia-commons-picture-of-the-day-seceda-cable-car/ --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Furnadoia de Seceda y Resciesa[edit]

Good morning,

I wanted to ask you if I can use the photo you recently uploaded (Furnadoia de Seceda y Resciesa) for a picture manipulation. I would use it for my portfolio and mention your name on my website, as the author of the original picture.

Thank you for your attention,

Kind Regards,

Chiara Colombi

Dear Chiara, I'm very happy if you do that. May I see the webpage? Buona giornata e buon lavoro --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you so much for your answer! The website is still not active, since I'm working on it before the official release, but you can see a small preview here http://chiaracolombi.altervista.org/index.html If you want I'll text you back once is active and your picture and credit are uploaded. Thank you again, I really appreciate your help and your picture is really awesome and impressive. Love it!

Yes please, thanks for your appreciation --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moarboden Schwaige Schlern.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:45, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kassian Kapelle auf dem Schlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU[edit]

Hello Moroder,

Thanks for sharing such a beautiful shot of the cable car in the mountains for the enjoyment of others.

-Glenn

(USA)

Use photo[edit]

I would like to use your photo of "Cable car on the Mount Seceda in the Dolomites at an elevation of 2453 meters" as a desktop background on my home computer. Is this fine with you?

I'm very happy if my work is useful for you. Thanks for your appreciation --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prossliner Schwaige Seiser Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Konstantin Völs Konsole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 23:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Using one of your picture[edit]

Hi,

A friend and I write RAW, a infoletter published on the French Wikipedia. In the coming publication, we will use File:Furnadoia de Seceda y Resciesa.JPG. Nice pic.

Regards,

Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 16:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prossliner Schwaige mit Schlern Seiser Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Florian Fuchs 17:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos von dir[edit]

Hallo!

Nachdem die letztens echt gute Fotos von dir auf prominenten Wiki-Seiten auftauchen, stellt sich mir die Frage, ob du bei deinen Bildern immer ein Stativ benutzen tust? Grüße!!!

Danke für das Kompliment. Wer bist du?--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of the Campanile[edit]

I used your outstanding photo of the Campanile in a tweet. I put your name and Wikimedia contact information in a text box at the bottom of the photo: https://twitter.com/WorldHistory101/status/356479684495695873/photo/1

I also used your photo of the Grand Canal in this tweet: https://twitter.com/WorldHistory101/status/356486977945743360

Great work! Thank you for sharing these!

Thanks for your appreciation and for letting me know --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verant Hof Völser Aicha Weinkeller Südseite .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kassian Kapelle auf dem Schlern Innenansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kassian Kapelle auf dem Schlern Antlitz Christi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prossliner Schwaige und die Seiser Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Essstube im Schlernhaus auf dem Schlern.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verant Hof Völser Aicha Beschreibung .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Need perspective corrections, the low part of the table is straight but all the rest seem tilted at left --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Moroder 16:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC) OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Konstantin Völs Konsole links .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 15:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Mittelstück.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bildstock mit Jungfrau Maria holzgeschnitzt in Völs am Schlern.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bildstock mit Jungfrau Maria Völs am Schlern.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huberweiher und der Schlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 09:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schützenkompanie Gröden St. Ulrich Kirchtag 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kassian Kapelle auf dem Schlern Lage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Aufsatz .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 14:06 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Kruzifix .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Eingang Nordfassade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:59, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Moroder, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.


Habe schon einige Dateiverschiebe Anfrage von dir gesehen und mich entschieden dir das recht zu geben. Sprich: Du kannst jetzt Bilder selbst umbenennen. Viel Spaß damit!--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Auferstehung .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 19:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Kanzel .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 18:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Kanzelbereich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 18:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Heilige Katharina .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Heilige Laurentius .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col dala Pieres Ostflanke (SE) Gherdeina von Val Lietres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 19:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality despite a snow flake on the right (easy to clone out!) --JLPC 17:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks![reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zecca da Ruatsch Calfosch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Glasmalerei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steindy 17:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Fenste Südfassade 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Steindy 17:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saslong udu da Sacun ora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Corvara.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pedecorvara.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 11:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza d’Sura Corvara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle vom Guten Rat Guntschöller Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --A.Savin 18:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle vom Guten Rat Guntschöller Hof Völser Aicha Deckenfresko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kassian Kapelle auf dem Schlern Altarbild.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 11:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steviola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 11:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Hl Afra .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 11:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Predella .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK  Support Christian Ferrer 17:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parish church Vigilius of Trent in Kolfuschg, external view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marin de Sura La Ila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciapela Lourdes La Ila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality. --ArildV 12:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Margareth in Obervöls am Schlern Flügelaltar Hl Margareth .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ue of image request[edit]

Hi,

As per your request I hope to use your ultrasouund scan image in educational materials.

Regards,

Nick Rowlands

It's my pleasure --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mulin de Funtanacia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 3 spots in the sky (right part) --Christian Ferrer 11:47, 25 July 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Fixed, thanks --Moroder 18:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC) It's not the same picture?!? --Christian Ferrer 18:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Oops, sorry, now it shold be OK --Moroder 22:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Yes, it's the good picture with... the spots! I have add notes --Christian Ferrer 05:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)✓ Done This time it should be it. Thanks again --Moroder 22:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)Good quality  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:56, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Utilizzo della foto sulla rivista nazionale del CAI "Montagne360"[edit]

Buongiorno Moroder, le segnalo che sul numero di settembre 2013 di Montagne360, la rivista nazionale del CAI (Club Alpino Italiano), utilizzeremo la sua foto (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Furnadoia_de_Seceda_y_Resciesa.JPG) nell'ambito di un articolo dedicato al turismo montano, citando la fonte.

Distinti saluti

Stefano Aurighi, caporedattore di Montagne360

Mi fa molto piacere - grazie per la segnalazione WM

Dear Dr. Moroder,

I would like to use your ultrasound image for a piece I'm writing on human genetics and pregnancy that will appear in the journal Trends in Genetics.

Thanks, Rhiannon Macrae, PhD Editor Trends in Genetics

You are very welcome, could you please send me the data of the publication. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna[edit]

Hr, Meroder,

Vielen dank fur die foto van Madonna van Flavio Pancheri in der Langkofel

Wij zijn dit Jaar voor de 10e maal in de Dolomiten op Vakantie geweest.

En met mujn Camera De Nikon 300S is het me niet gelukt om zo een mooie foto te maken.

Via Tourist Info Toblach van Birgit Costamoling heb ik toch nog een mail met foto ontvangen.

Wij genieten al vele jaren van de mooie foto's uit de Dolomiten en van Sud-Tirol.

Dank U wel en vele groeten van Fam Bruijns uit Vaals Nederland.

Halo , es freut mich sehr, dass Ihnen mein Foto gefällt. Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larsei San Ciascian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A litte white fringing can be seen by some edges but anyhow good quality and resolution. --Ximonic 09:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciasa Püter a La Ila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:17, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wollkämmerei mit Wasserantrieb in Funtanacia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice shot of a beautiful place. Disturbing bit in upper left corner should be cloned out (see note). --Jastrow 19:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for the appreciation and the hint--Moroder 20:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atlantico sign at Punta de Tarifa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doi ciocs tl bosch che sla dorm 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality... but wrong caption on this page !. --JLPC 17:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Fixed description, an error of the QIbot. Thanks for the hint and review --Moroder 20:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorà y Zecca da Ruatsch a Calfosch da pert de mesdi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Indeedous 23:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila da O.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila dedite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 18:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (Just a slight problem, easy to fix : see note, please). --JLPC 17:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC) --JLPC 17:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Fixed, thanks a lot --Moroder 06:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza d’Sott Corvara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mulin de Funtanacia 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sassongher y Gardenazza seura La Ila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please see note, also some dustspots in the upper part of the sky.--ArildV 06:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)✓ Fixed Many thanks --Moroder 07:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)  Support--ArildV 07:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila Madona de Franz Tavella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Corvara 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment I'm sure that it must be QI, but what do you think if you increase a bit the contrast or clarity?--Lmbuga 17:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your comment. I understand that you mean the contrast or clarity of the background mountain because otherwise there is plenty of contrast in the picture (see histogram). On the other side the uniform background puts the houses more in contrast and that's what I like of the picture--Moroder 17:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, I want to increase the contrast of the foreground. Thereby the background will be more contrasted. But QI for me--Lmbuga 17:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you have time, try it, please--Lmbuga 17:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your choice is my choice--Lmbuga 18:02, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mulin de Funtanacia3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please check, if there is a little tilt. --Dirtsc 19:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)✓ fixed verticals and horizontal. Thanks --Moroder 11:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI now IMO. --Dirtsc 04:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capeda de Cianins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciampidel a San Ciascian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Linert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Ciascian autere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Sebastian Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tubla dla blava a Jusciara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Pescol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality but there is a spot, see note --Christian Ferrer 17:37, 4 August 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Fixed 2 DS, thanks a lot --Moroder 21:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC) Support OK now --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foto[edit]

Hallo verwende dein Foto von Villanders für einen Bohrbericht für die Autonome Provinz Bozen, öffentliche Arbeit kein privaten Zwecke. mfg David

Freut mich, nützlich zu sein --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corcela Pedraces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition. The sharpness could be better but it's ok for QI --Martin Kraft 21:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Crusc da Pescol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great View an ok ro QI, but the contrasts in the backgrounds should be enhanced --Martin Kraft 21:10, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Linert depent tla cupula Matthäus Günther.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capeda de Cianins entreda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Cianins autere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Pescol autere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Linert viere depent San Mateo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Ciascian autere pitura de Henrici.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI& Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciampidel a San Ciascian W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Little spot (see note) in sky but OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:46 6 August 2013 (UTC)✓ fixed Thanks!--Moroder 05:58, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciampidel a San Ciascian entreda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tubla dla blava a Valgiarei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Fine details and natural colours. --Smial 07:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Costa a Pedraces entredes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 07:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Costa a Pedraces.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Though I don't like these extreme wide angle photos with such old buildings. --Smial 07:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your review and comment. Would you have suggestions? It is difficult to take pictures from far in these cases because of the territory unless you take them from a helicopter ;-)--Moroder 10:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I know the problem. I only wanted to say, that I try to avoid these extreme wide angel photos if possible ;-) -- Smial 13:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mulin de Rudiferia de Sura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very beautiful! There are negligibly small blown out areas (see notes). It would be perfect if they could be fixed, but if you can't then just delete the notes. I think a QI anyway. Heuschrecke 10:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Ciascian fresco seura l autere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela a Maria Piccolplang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It appears from the verticals on the chapel that the image could do with a slight clockwise rotation - or the building itself is tilted. Otherwise good. --Slaunger 20:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)✓ fixed Thanks for the hint.--Moroder 17:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Good now. --Slaunger 17:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila Glasmalerei Herz Jesu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo use with credit.[edit]

Mr. Moroder

Per your photo notation, we would like to use your photo on our website in a story about NGS repermitting. With your permission we will include the photo credit: Wolfgang Moroder. Please advise. Thank you and best regards,

John Petraglia AECOM Environment 2101 Webster Street suite 1900 Oakland, CA 94516

Photo use with credit.[edit]

Mr. Moroder

Per your photo notation, we would like to use your photo on our website in a story about NGS repermitting. With your permission we will include the photo credit: Wolfgang Moroder. Please advise. Thank you and best regards,

John Petraglia AECOM Environment 2101 Webster Street suite 1900 Oakland, CA 94516


Please kindly let me know which photo and the URL of your website. Regards

Wolfgang Moroder

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Linert depent tla cupula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Vassil 13 August 2013, 19:46 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela de Pescol dedite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 13:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Michael Vilnöß Heilige Sebastian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Le Zitelle[edit]

Hello I used your photo for my tumblr blog. Thank you, Venetianist

http://venetianist.tumblr.com/

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de San Linert orgun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Xicotencatl 02:31, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Antone Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good--Jebulon 16:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abside de l'église paroissiale Saint-Jean Bourg-Charente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cianacëi Badia S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abtei von Trizay.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara La Val fresco Friedrich Pacher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 17:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean (Bourg-Charente),refurbished fassade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean (Bourg-Charente), apse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligne à haute tension a Courcoury Charente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plan d’Sura Corvara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments great picture, very good --Ralf Roletschek 10:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colz a San Linert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Two spots (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 18:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Fixed, thanks --Moroder 11:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Ok for the spot but I've just seen a white mark in the sky (see note) --Christian Ferrer 17:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC) CommentChristian, it is the moon on August 2, 2013 in Italy as you can see here.  Support Alors c'est ok --Christian Ferrer 11:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Antone Val Badia lat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:36, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alfarei Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les remparts de Brouage sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul de Brouage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality too. --JLPC 15:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul de Brouage facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.--ArildV 13:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Façade de l'église paroissiale Saint-Jean Bourg-Charente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beginnin of Mediterranean at Punta Tarifa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment : horizon a bit tilted to the left imo. Easy to fix. --JLPC 17:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Merci!--Moroder 08:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Comment : I'm very sorry, Wolfgang, and you know I often like your pictures, but it's still a bit tilted. --JLPC 16:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your appreciation and comments, but I'm afraid it'is your browser taking the old pic from the cache. I checked the horizontal and vertical lines (I put 2 annotations) and they look perfect to me. Maybe you should try again with F9 --Moroder 09:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Really confused : it's OK now. QI. --JLPC 16:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tubla dla blava a Valgiarei detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Pierre chuch in Brouage, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Royal Saltworks of Arc-et-Senans, building of the director, SE face.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

GGG Stadtbibliothek Basel[edit]

Wir haben Ihre Photo auf https://www.facebook.com/GGGStadtbibliothekBasel verwendet, besten Dank und freundliche Grüsse Niklaus Schäfer

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela sun streda de La Ila.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 19:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seventeenth century altar in Val Badia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good --Rjcastillo 13:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont transbordeur de Rochefort du E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasthaus Frommer Seiser Alm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments looks good --Rjcastillo 21:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciasa Sompunt dala strada 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rochefort-Martrou Transporter Bridge, general view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Constantine church in Völs, southern aspect.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Michel Kirche Pizzag innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Michael Vilnöß Heilige Rochus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Mary chapel on the Seiser Alm, rear view from East.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sompunt Mühle innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 18:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wollkämmerei mit Wasserantrieb in Funtanacia 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granciasa a La Ila.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Ciascian dlijia dovia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality.-ArildV 08:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Jakob und Valentin in Tschöfas Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.-ArildV 08:47, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciampidel a San Ciascian porta de entreda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle in Pardell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle in Pardell Apsis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Bartholomäus in Nafen Nansicht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 23:44, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Bartholomäus in Nafen Altaraufsatz Vinazer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Bartholomäus in Nafen Decke Chor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Bartholomäus in Nafen Hauptaltar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:17, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colz a San Linert depent sun ciasa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Sorry, it seems a random photo (poor composition). Why is cutted the window of the top?--Lmbuga 22:55, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I perceive a bit of vignetting and noise--Lmbuga 23:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for the hints, I wasn't that happy with the crop myself --Moroder 17:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support good QI--Lmbuga 23:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela a Maria Costadedoi danca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 800 1115 modifié-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seventeenth century altar in Val Badia in a housechapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia dla ploania de La Ila Glasmalerei Herz Mariä.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The contrast is rather too much - can you raise the levels of the church interior? Mattbuck 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks --Moroder 20:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It now seems very unnatural. Try again? Mattbuck 18:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the shadow regions have now been highlighted too much. As a matter of fact I think the original was just fine - it had a nice exposed mosaic, and I do not mind the dark foreground, it adds to the mood IMO. --Slaunger 20:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Changed lighting on the RAW file with an intermediate solution. Thanks for the review--Moroder 10:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 10:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Hi Wolfgang, I've promoted your file and I've also uploaded a sharpened version without CA, I've reverted on your version immediatly after, You can use yours or mine if you want, friendy --Christian Ferrer 10:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Christian, frankly I'm not able to see the CA you put a note on or at least I think it is irrelevant. I thought that you ment the purple shadow in the leaves which I am not able to correct. However, whatever version you feel should be the definitive version it's fine for me. I appreciate your effort and help a lot! Merci! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne parlais pas des ombres mais bien de CA sur les feuilles en haut à droite, mais comme il n'y en a pas beaucoup (la preuve : tu ne l'a pas vus) j'ai tout de meme promus ton image. Par contre je ne comprends le sens de ta phrase "at least I think it is irrelevant", qu'est-ce qui est hors de propos?--Christian Ferrer 17:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heilige Georg Sankt Valentin Pardell.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:44, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle am Kalvarienberg Mantschkapelle 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 10:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle am Kalvarienberg Mantschkapelle Mater Dolorosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 10:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antoniuskapelle in Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good.--Jebulon 16:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus Ganeid in Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 14:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Bartholomäus in Nafen Madonna am Hauptaltar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geburt Christi Pescoller senior 1923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhuber Hof Völs am Schlern SOseite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support nice --Rjcastillo 13:21, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Kirche Nafen Seitenaltar Vinazer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Bartholomäus Statue Kirche in Nafen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle Oberkantioler.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ansitz Thurn in Teis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chateau de Font Joyeuse,view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldthun mit Dreifaltigkeitskapelle Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldthun mit Dreifaltigkeitskapelle Villnöß 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ganderhof Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Mich stören die stürzenden Linien nicht, im Gegenteil. --Ralf Roletschek 20:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle Gsoihof Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:40, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untermantinger Hof Sankt Magdalena 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Heilige Familie Riezhof Villnöß.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prahmstrahl Villnöß 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prahmstrahl Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prahmstrahl Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Somewhat tight crop. --Smial 10:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prahmstrahl Villnöß 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prahmstrahl Villnöß 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrmesner in St. Peter 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 16:10, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrmesner in St. Peter 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition imo.--ArildV 14:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Font Joyeuse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Right part is leaning in --Christian Ferrer 18:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks!--Moroder 20:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 20:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christophorus Sankt Valentin Pardell.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:40, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Pardell Opferstock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Pardell 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Pardell Apsis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus Glenig Teis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle am Kalvarienberg Mantschkapelle 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good depth, good composition, QI for me. --Mr.choppers 03:39, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhuber Hof Völs am Schlern Kellertür.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela a Paracia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good but purple CA (see note) --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, but Ican't fix it --Moroder 20:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Support Acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 10:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciasa Sompunt de sot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capela a Maria Costadedoi depent cun pastri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiligkreuzkapelle zu Munt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice but it is leaning to the left (counterclockwise). Can you fix that please? --Kadellar 16:46, 21 September 2013 ✓ Done Thanks!--Moroder 13:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Kadellar 16:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans maison.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:58, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldthun mit Dreifaltigkeitskapelle Villnöß 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 13:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Pardell Mauerfratze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 19:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Valentin Pardell Seiteneingang.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Pleclown 19:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resizing of Ciasa Sompunt porta de ciule.jpg[edit]

Just a joke to make a point. -- Smial (talk) 11:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Verstehs nicht ganz? Danke jedoch für deine Unterstützung --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, nicht mitbekommen, daß ich das auf 2 Mpixel runtergepöhlt habe? Kannste sofort revertieren oder evtl. noch eine kurze Zeit abwarten, bis die anderen die Sache ebenfalls mitbekommen haben ;-) -- Smial (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Habs nicht mitbekommen, bin mit downscaling und Schärfen nicht einverstanden - kann doch jeder danach machen. Warten wir jedoch ab wie die Diskussion ausgehen wird. LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ich mag es auch nicht, wenn einer ungefragt an meinen Bildern rumfrickelt, wenn ich das ausnahmsweise bei fremdem Bildern mache, schreibe ich IMMER etwas wie "Ist nur ein Vorschlag, bitte bei Nichtgefallen zurücksetzen" dazu. -- Smial (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Bartholomäus in Nafen Umgebung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Some light dust spots on the sky. --Iifar 15:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Heilige Familie Altar Villnöß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jakob am Joch Geisler 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good quality --P e z i 12:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jakob am Joch Geisler 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good quality --P e z i 12:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sompunt Interne Kellertreppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good quality --P e z i 09:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sompunt Gewölbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good quality --P e z i 09:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untermantinger Hof Sankt Magdalena 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, even though there is little noise in the window. hopefully that they do not paint over Maria during the next renovation:-) --Isiwal 20:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Untermantinger Hof Sankt Magdalena 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 21:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --JLPC 15:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 11:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vedla dlijia de La Val 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 11:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberhuber Hof Völs am Schlern Rundbogentür.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please leave a blank line between every new entry... Anyway, difficult picture but very well managed.--Jebulon 17:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antoniuskapelle in Villnöß innen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Housechapel Val Badia, Pieta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice--Jebulon 16:53, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vedla calonia La Val 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 22:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasthaus Unterwirt Wengen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Blue Elf 07:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasthaus Unterwirt Wengen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans la maison du directeur detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldthun mit Dreifaltigkeitskapelle Villnöß 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice and good--Jebulon 22:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldthun mit Dreifaltigkeitskapelle Villnöß 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 22:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bearbeitungskonflikt QIC[edit]

Hallo Moroder,
sieht so aus, als hätten wir einen kleinen Konflikt-Unfall gehabt: [2] - meine Tilden wurden erst in deinem Beitrag zu einer Signatur (von dir). Ich mag da jetzt nicht rumwurschteln, aber falls du keine "Promotion" für die Musiker unzeichnen möchtest, solltest du das evtl. korrigieren. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Problem! Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saline royale d'Arc-et-Senans maison a w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 02:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Villnöß 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hof Zinnen in Villnöß 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. What about the wasp nests? --Cayambe 20:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks. I'll have to check on that with the owner--Moroder 21:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite porta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dedite autere.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Laitche 06:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara W.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments tiny shift but still 100% QI --P e z i 00:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dalunc E.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments tiny shift but still 100% QI --P e z i 00:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlijia Santa Barbara dalunc.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 00:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciasa Rü La Val 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Nice and good IMO, bur it needs a bit of perspective correction IMO--Lmbuga 00:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks!--Moroder 07:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality--Lmbuga 21:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasthaus Unterwirt Wengen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasthaus Unterwirt Wengen 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:14, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldthun mit Dreifaltigkeitskapelle Villnöß 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs maybe a perspective correction (see the fence at right), but good enough.--Jebulon 22:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks!--Moroder 07:50, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]