User talk:Moroder/Archives 2008-2009-2010-2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Bell-Sankt-Jakob.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Parish church front.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Cuenz.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Christus-Marzahn.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Christus-Marzahn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.57.78.85 04:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Christus_Marzahn-detail.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Christus_Marzahn-detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.57.78.85 04:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Christus_Marzahn-detail.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Christus_Marzahn-detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.57.78.85 04:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Christus_Marzahn-detail.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Christus_Marzahn-detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.57.78.85 04:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Church-Marzahn.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Church-Marzahn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 11:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metadata (answer)[edit]

Il faut faire attention quelles ne soient pas supprimées par le logiciel d'édition. Photoshop par exemple avec un enregistrement pour le web supprime les données exifs. Il faut regarder dans les options d'enregistrement de ton logiciel. GIMP que j'utilise ne supprime pas les données exif. J'ajoute les données géographique avec un module GPS connecté au Nikon D300 qui ajoute les données de localisation dans les exifs. Il y a un robot sur common qui regarde les données exif et qui ajoute le lien de localisation automatiquement après 1 ou deux jours. --Luc Viatour (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Radio Ladin 16-10-57 Alex y Bruno.JPG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Pieta by Moroder in wood.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pieta by Moroder in wood.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Rosenzweig δ 22:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Moroder!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File dell'alba dal Rodella[edit]

La catena delle Odle e del Sass de Putia viste dal monte Pascolo.

Ciao, la tua domanda è lecitissima...in quanto per noi brissinesi il Rodella è il monte Pascolo, ai cui piedi sorge il lago rodella e l'omonimo rifugio... Le montagne che vedi sono state riprese quindi dal monte posto di fronte alle Odle e alla Plose: il monte Pascolo --Llorenzi (talk) 22:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

OK tutto chiaro a sinistra il Putia poi le (..Geisler) ....... (via Ferrata Messner?) poi Furchetta, Sass Rigais, Odle Ciao e grazie--alpinus5 (talk) 19:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Richiesta foto Tavella[edit]

Come già (mi sembra) di averti detto, appena posso vado e scatto la foto, devo solo capire un po meglio quale è la scultura che dici: riassumendo è una "pietà" in legno, e si trova nel vecchio cimitero (quello per capirci tra il duomo e la parrocchia?) ho capito bene?--Llorenzi (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, almeno abbiamo (o meglio ho ) individuato dove andare...resta da capire come riuscire ad entrare nella cappella... idee?? purtroppo io al momento non ho grandi idee in proposito, se non tentare la sorte e provare ad andare li e sperare che ci sia qualcuno... tentar non nuoce... Se mi ricordo domani mattina faccio un salto dato che sarò in ospedale... ciau--Llorenzi (talk) 11:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Il guardiano del cimitero dovrebbe essere un certo Robert Röggla (insegnante), spero di poter farti avere il # di telefono fra qualche giorno. Ciau --alpinus5 (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

foto Luis Trenker[edit]

Ciao, per la foto che mi richiedi, quella che io ho pubblicato è una copia che io ho eseguito da una rivista/libro,...ora nn ricordo. Dici che nn va bene?--Llorenzi (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ParcoPuez-Odle.JPG[edit]

Ciao, questa foto l'ho scattata l'anno scorso all'interno del parco naturale Puez-Odle; Se conosci la zona, ti dico che ero partito da ri. Genova e mi ero diretto verso la forcella che separa i 2 gruppi (Puez e Odle); lungo il sentiero verso la sinistra (est-nord-est direi) vi era questa vallata, diciamo che si guardava in direzione di Longiarù (coordinate: 46.632297, 11.816776)--Llorenzi (talk) 07:44, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Koons at the Metropolitan roof.jpg[edit]

File:Koons at the Metropolitan roof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WP_Luis_Trenker.jpg[edit]

File:WP_Luis_Trenker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Paulae (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stevia y Muntijela.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tomer T 17:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

test[edit]

Messeges

QIC page, oppose vote[edit]

Hello.

I have fixed your edition for you.

If you want to start discussion on promoted image on QIC page, you need to change template from "Promotion" to "Discuss". Also just add the reason after the previous vote, without additional "|" character, bacause it can make part of the text invisible (only two such characters are allowed in this template).

Regards, -- Jakubhal 10:02, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you fixed it. I got messed up and wrongly clicked the save button instead of the preview --alpinus5 (talk) 10:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion carved Swiss Pine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Harrison49 21:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzhacker Josef Moroder Lusenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry your link does not work...--Jebulon 22:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
The link has been fixed and a sharper variant uploaded --Wolfgang Moroder 12:30, 24 October 2011 (UTC) Nice, but may we have a version with a non-cropped pedestal ?--Jebulon 00:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
New version w pedestal --Wolfgang Moroder 13:30, 27 October 2011 Thank you. QI now.--Jebulon 14:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations ! ;)--Jebulon (talk) 14:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christ vinazer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Category:Pfarrkirche St. Ulrich in Gröden[edit]

My mistake. Sorry about that. --Mattis (talk) 00:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna Vinazer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments for me QI. --Alchemist-hp 20:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz Ciampac Furcela Ciampai Sassonger.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and QI for me --Haneburger 06:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: CAs?[edit]

Sorry, I speak very bad english (I can't speak gl, es and pt).

I have never done images of landscapes with snow. I think that it's difficult. To me, the blue of the borders of the trees of the left is excessive. Probably there aren't CAs and the problem is other: the snow and the reflections of the light. To me the image is good. Sorry--Miguel Bugallo 20:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry: I don't know if I can understand you. CAs = chromatic aberrations. I think that you knew it--Miguel Bugallo 22:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pic Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, perhaps a little of CAs, I'm not sure. QI to me--Lmbuga 19:48, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carved angel - Johann Baptist Moroder-Lusenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hof Peza Urtijei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, good brightness and nice colors. --Fandecaisses 17:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why[edit]

?--ArildV (talk) 10:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry: what ist the problem? maybe I did some mistake? Must have been some editing conflict! sorry! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all. I just wondered if there was a purpose. We can all make mistakes. Best regards,--ArildV (talk) 10:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


:File:Schloss Unteraufseß Innenhof.jpg deleted, why!?[edit]

History shows, that obviously you deleted my file :File:Schloss Unteraufseß Innenhof.jpg in QI candidates list, why? --J. Lunau (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lunau! I am terribly sorry but this happened by pure accident. I apologize! I am glad that you restored your nomination. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Moroder, I restored it, because I assumed, it was deleted by accident. Thank you very much for your kind review, regards --J. Lunau (talk) 23:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont de Mastle Gherdëina.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice --Taxiarchos228 11:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odles Eures de Bredles Schienboden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langkofel Group from Sellajoch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good!--ArildV 13:09, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QI Qualität[edit]

Hallo Moroder,

auf Deine Frage antworte ich mal hier, weil es bei QIC ein wenig den Rahmen sprengen würde.

Zunächst: deine Bilder sind auf jeden Fall gut, die Motive Deiner Bilder gefallen mir sowieso und die technische Ausführung ist sicher nicht schlecht. Ein Punkt, der mir aber bei vielen Deiner Außenaufnahmen aufgefallen ist: das Licht ist sehr hart und tendenziell sind deine Bilder unterbelichtet. Ich fotografiere auch gerne bei starkem Sonneneinfall etwas unterbelichtet. Wichtig ist jedoch, dass man den Bilder an der Helligkeitskurve bearbeitet um das auszugleichen. Speziell beim Bild File:Church St. Jakob Urtijei.jpg sieht die Kirche auf der rechten Seite ein wenig verwaschen aus. Falls Du nicht nur mit JPG fotografierst sondern im RAW-Datenformat dann könnte man da unter Umständen noch einiges herausholen. Allerdings ist natürlich die abgeschnittene Spitze wohl nicht zu ersetzen. Viele Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Taxiarchos, es freut mich schon sehr , dass dir meine Bilder gefallen. Ich merke jedoch, gerade weil ich bei den verschiedenen contests mitmache, wie sehr man vieles verbessern kann. Danke bestens auch für deine Tips. Ich weiss nicht woran es liegt, dass meine Bilder unterbelichtet sind - ich kontrolliere auch immer das Hystogramm. Beste Grüße --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alois Kostner Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion carved swiss pine 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 14:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart of Jesus Christ by Ludwig Moroder Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Secëda y Odles te Gherdëina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QIO for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:48, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trëbe de Egon Moroder Rusina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:50, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dutch doll from Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quaity -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GiuniBatista de Albino Pitscheider Urtijëi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice ! I like the depiction of Salome very much !--Jebulon 11:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruneck Turm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --ArildV 19:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angel-left-Crepaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough to me though I would prefer a more generous framing. But maybe that is not possible --Alvesgaspar 23:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angel-right-Crepaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments As in the left one, though the lighting is a bit worse here --Alvesgaspar 23:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain climber Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wonderful image :) --Melberg 04:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woman with sheep Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good ! What is the size of this figurine, please ?--Jebulon 16:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! It is about 15 cm. tall

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dressed dutch doll Gröden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me (perhaps too tight at top IMO)--Lmbuga 20:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madonna Mahlknecht 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me.--Jebulon 15:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodcarved Hunter from Gröden side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 12:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dlieja y curtina de Bula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 04:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johanneskapelle in Vilnöß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I will assume that tower is titled as the foreground looks correct. Wonderful shot. --Saffron Blaze 04:22, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for the suggestion. I slightly corrected the perspective --Moroder 11:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Konstantin in Völs am Schlern.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs a perspective correction IMO. Improvable. The crop above is a bit tight, but it does not ruin the picture, possible QI. --Jebulon 01:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC) InfoThks for suggestions, hope it looks better now --Moroder 23:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Is the clock oval in real ?--Jebulon 14:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC) InfoGood observation! I did not think to correct all "angles" of perspective. Fixed --Moroder 14:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Thank you. Can be a QI, in my opinion.--Jebulon 14:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moroder/Archives_2008-2009-2010-2011&oldid=77409809"