User talk:Michielverbeek/Archief13

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruurlo, huize Ruurlo RM32992 foto2 2012-07-22 11.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

New version of File:Mülheim_an_der_Ruhr,_die_Petrikirche_foto3_2012-08-19_15.38.JPG

Hi! I've uploaded an improved version of your photo and nominated it for QI. Hope it is OK. If not, please revert, then I'll create a derivate work. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

BTW: The photo mentioned is now a Quality Image. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for improving my photo (Petrikirche in Mülheim) to a Q1-quality. Which program did you use? Greetings, Michielverbeek (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my discussion page. I've edited the photo with Adobe Lightroom 4 - for me a perfect solution for RAW processing, photo management & editing. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC) --Tuxyso

Foto in de krant

Bewuste foto

Hoi Michiel. Je mooie foto's zijn ook door anderen opgemerkt. Wellicht had je het al gezien, maar de foto die hiernaast staat afgebeeld, is gebruikt in dagbladen van Wegener van afgelopen zaterdag. Groet, Pompidom (talk) 18:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Pompidom. Heel erg bedankt voor je opmerkzaamheid. Ik wist niet dat Wegener deze foto heeft gebruikt in haar dagbladen. Ik ga er van uit dat Wegener de bron/de naam van de fotograaf heeft vermeld om de auteursrechten niet te schenden. Kan jij mij de naam van het dagblad/de dagbladen geven wanneer dit niet mocht zijn? Dankjewel en groeten Michielverbeek (talk) 10:42, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hoi Michiel. Om het centraal te houden zal ik hier wel reageren. Ik heb deze pagina ook op mijn volglijst, dus zie evt. toekomstige reacties. Maar de foto stond in ieder geval in de Gelderlander van afgelopen zaterdag (30 maart), in het uitgebreide artikel van dit stuk. (Zo uit mijn hoofd in het grote artikel middenin het eerste katern) Aangezien het een groot stuk was, vermoed ik dat het ook in andere Wegener-bladen heeft gestaan. Jouw foto stond daar gecombineerd met andere foto's. Als bronvermelding stond in de hoek je naam erbij. Officieel is dat te weinig bronvermelding, maar het is in ieder geval iets. Groet, Pompidom (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Schermbeck, Sankt-Georg-Kirche, Foto4 2011-04-11 10.13.jpg

Hello, this photo seems broken. Can you maybe upload it again? Holger1959 (talk) 15:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Holger, ich habe das Bild wider hochgeladen, Grüssen aus die NL-en, Michielverbeek (talk) 15:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doetinchem, Sint Catharinakerk RM13084 in straatzicht foto7 2012-07-22 14.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen, Kruittoren in Kronenburgerpark foto9 2010-12-20 13.55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:57, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rozendaal, kasteel Rozendaal foto6 2010-04-18 10.22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, but very much empty sky --P e z i 22:15, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 's-Heerenberg, huize Bergh RM9268 foto2 2011-04-11 17.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 18:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Heurne, de Teunismolen foto5 2010-07-19 16.19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Michielverbeek, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weerselo, molen foto3 2011-04-02 09.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doetinchem, kasteel Slangenburg RM527492 positie3 foto4 2012-07-22 13.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - slight perspective distortion is acceptable IMO.. --NorbertNagel 22:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Driebergen, de Grote Kerk in straatzicht foto1 2012-05-27 16.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veenendaal, de Bernard van Kreelpoort foto3 2012-05-27 11.16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vught, kasteel Maurick RM38161 foto27 2011-05-30 13.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sorry, there are perspective distortion.--XRay 10:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Done Does it look better like this? Thanks --Michielverbeek 21:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Weak  Support The leaves on the left are disturbing, but I think it's still QI. --XRay 06:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Michielverbeek, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montfort, monumentaal pand foto3 2011-03-16 12.19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I appreciate that you worked hard on some reviewers critic on perspective problems with your photos. Nothing to complain in this field, though some minor enhancements could be done; but IMO it can pass as QI.  Support --Cccefalon 20:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spaarndam, de Oude Kerk foto2 2011-04-17 19.01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for QI, inspite of slight sharpening haloes (the flag mast), denoising a bit strong (house in background), some remains of CA (glass of the car).--Jebulon 16:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, het Witte Huis foto6 2010-11-28 13.51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the perspective. I think it needs correction.--XRay 06:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks, better like this? --Michielverbeek 21:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 07:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, station Blaak+het Potlood en de kubuswoningen foto5 2013-07-07 16.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check the perspective. I think it needs correction.--XRay 06:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC) Done Thanks, better like this? --Michielverbeek 21:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 07:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)