User talk:Michiel Hendryckx

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Michiel Hendryckx!

Bevestigen identiteit[edit]

Beste Michiel, bedankt voor je uploads. Ik heb alleen een verzoek. Iedereen kan natuurlijk zeggen dat hij Michiel Hendryckx is. Zou je ter bevestiging van je identiteit een mailtje vanaf je @michielhendryckx.be emailadres naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org willen sturen? Iets in de trant van http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Michiel_Hendryckx ben ik is voldoende. Alvast bedankt, Multichill (talk) 15:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt voor je mailtje. Als iemand er ooit nog aan twijfelt dan kan je ze verwijzen naar OTRS #2010070310021743. Multichill (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:56, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Michiel Hendryckx!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please categorize our images !!![edit]

You already have been asked by a bot to categorize your images. Therefore I don't understand why you keep on uploading images without categories. Uploading images without categorizing them doesn't make sense. Only categorized images can be found! -- Ies (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proper werk[edit]

Dag Michiel, 't doe wel ne ki deugd vô nen ôop sebôorte pertretten te ziene iere. Oat er meserie es vô de category, vult de noame in van den typ ip de foto. Zelfs oat'rôod es, es den bot content. Wulder goan da loatr wel reegln. --Foroa (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Van_istendael675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Deadstar (msg) 15:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Michiel, deze vraag om verwijdering berustte op een misverstand: Deadstar dacht dat het beeld kapot was, maar dat bleek niet zo te zijn. De "deletion request" werd dezelfde dag nog afgesloten, en het beeld is dus helemaal veilig. :) -- Michel Vuijlsteke (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De Keersmaeker[edit]

Hi,

Great picture, thanks for uploading. Do not hesitate if you have more photos of dancers and choreographers to share them on Wikipedia. At the end of the day it's a mutual benefit. Sincerely.--LPLT (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and I would add that elpi' wrote a wonderful page about the work of ATDK ! thank you both ! and pitibizou ! --Mandariine (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bende wim31.jpg[edit]

Bij het bestand File:Bende wim31.jpg staat vermeld: 'Own work'. Ik vroeg me af of je die foto werkelijk zelf hebt getrokken, aangezien je ook op de foto te zien bent. Donarreiskoffer (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb jouw reactie op mijn talk-pagina hier naartoe gekopieerd voor de duidelijkheid
Beste Donarrreiskoffer, Inderdaad. De foto is op mijn nauwkeurige aanwijzing gemaakt door de vrouw van die booteigenaar. Hoe dan ook, zijn de rechten in mijn bezit. En ik zie ook dat u dat dubbelportret van Mark Eyskens en zijn echtgenote hebt versneden tot een banaal pasfotootje. Mag ik u vragen die verknipte foto uit Commons te verwijderen. U ontneemt me alle zin om hier nog aan mee te werken. Met groet, M.
Beste Michiel, Alvast eerst bedankt voor de uitleg ivm de foto van 'Bende van Wim'. Trouwens ook heel erg bedankt voor alle prachtige professionele foto's die u al hebt vrijgegeven onder een vrije licentie.
Toch moet ik u teleurstellen wat betreft de uitsnede. De foto's hier op commons zijn vrij voor iedereen om de kopiëren, en te wijzigen zolang de nieuwe foto's ook onder een gelijkwaardige licentie worden vrijgegeven en de auteur van de oorspronkelijke foto duidelijk vermeld blijft. Ik kan begrijpen dat het voor jou niet gemakkelijk is de mooie kadrering te zien te verdwijnen door een 'pasfoto'-crop. Toch kan het zijn dat zo een crop voor bepaalde pagina's in wikipedia nuttiger is dan jouw oorspronkelijke foto. Kijk bijvoorbeeld naar de pagina en:Prime_Minister_of_Belgium, waar alle foto's, al dan niet banale, pasfoto's zijn. Daar past dan toch geen foto van Mark met zijn vrouw? Daarom heb ik mij de vrijheid genomen om jouw foto te bewerken.
Ik hoop dat deze teleurstelling u niet zal beletten nog foto's vrij te geven in de toekomst. Dat zou ik spijtig vinden wat het zijn prachtige foto's. Maar ik zou het wel ergens kunnen begrijpen dat u het een moeilijke stap vindt om te zien dat deze foto's van u ook mogelijks bewerkt zullen worden door anderen.
In elk geval geval nog veel fotografeerplezier.
Met vriendelijke groeten, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ik kan eventueel wel de gecropte foto verwijderen uit de categorie (Photos by Michiel_Hendryckx). Dan breekt hij jou reeks mooie foto' sniet zo. mvg, Donarreiskoffer (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Corbu675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Groucho NL (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Michiel Hendryckx, uit de deze categorie blijkt dat heel wat afbeeldingen baat zouden hebben bij een renaming. Als auteur van deze foto's lijk jij de geknipte persoon. Bedankt Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Gedag![edit]

Hi Michiel,

Blij je hier ook te treffen! Topfotografen bij een project als wikipedia, ik word er helemaal filantroop van. Eindelijk een portret bij mijn wikipedia-pagina :-). http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Lieven_scheire676.jpg

Groeten, Lieven Mushlack (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Michiel Hendryckx, jouw naam vind ik niet terug onder deze category. Wanneer je {{User Belgium}} op je User page zet, kom je in deze category terecht. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Als ik zo arrogant mag zijn even voor de gehele Wikipedia-wereld te spreken: oprecht bedankt voor uw prachtige fotografische bijdragen. Een staaltje onzelfzuchtigheid dat respect verdient. Jellevc (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Flor Grammens 675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Milow image[edit]

You added a nice image of Milow, which was used in Milow. His management company has provided a more up-to-date image. Of course, it is the editorial judgment of Wikipedia editors to choose which image should be used. I uploaded the recent image, and replaced in the Wikipedia article (I did not make any changes to the German or Dutch articles. If you think this issue should be discussed, feel free to bring it up on the talk page, I have no opinion on the artistic merits of either image, other than the simple observation that a 2012 image of an active performer would be better than a 2008 image, all other things being equal.--Sphilbrick (talk) 00:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Michiel Hendryckx, beschik jij over een recente afbeelding van Bart De Wever? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magritte675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vimy she.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vloeken zaltbommel675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JurgenNL (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dag User:Michiel Hendryckx, beschikt U over een recentere file? Die is wérkelijk outdated. Lotje (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Dag Michiel! Gisteren nog een genoeglijk kopje thee gedronken in Utrecht met uw echtgenote. Ik geef u graag een extra grote pluim voor uw prachtige bijdragen hier op Wikimedia Commons. Spinster (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by other user[edit]

You may want to review the license used for File:Herreweghe_Philippe.jpg and File:CVG choir & orchestra by Michiel Hendrickx.jpg, since both these images were uploaded by another user. Buxtehude (talk) 16:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Léna (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jan leyers mh 675.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

MoiraMoira (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this nomination. This portrait is photographed by Michiel Hendryckx, and he uploaded it to Commons under a free license just like he already uploaded so many others. What makes this image suspect? Spinster (talk) 18:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Michiel Hendryckx, er zijn veel koeien die blaar heten, vandaar dat ik de filename liever zou gewijzigd zien. Wat denk je van File:Chesney Henry "Chet" Baker, Jr. - Chet675.jpg. Wat denk je? Lotje (talk) 12:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

U doet maar, Lotje. Met dank, Michiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michiel Hendryckx (talk • contribs) 12:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Verriest hugo ca1920.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Verriest hugo ca1920.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecce homo 675.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 09:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Michiel Hendryckx, volgens de beschrijving bij deze afbeelding lees ik: vlnr Wim Opbrouck, Michiel Hendryckx en Jean Blaute. Is dit Michiel Hendryckx of een naamgenoot? Ik wil de namen van de fotografen (met een artikel op Wikipedia) vermelden bij de foto's , maar daarvoor moet ik zeker zijn geen kemels te zullen schieten... Sterk staaltje bovendien, om op het water een zelfportret te maken. Of klopt de beschrijving bij het artikel niet? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 06:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Michiel Hendryckx, de datum waarop de foto genomen werd vind ik nergens terug. Of zie ik iets over het hoofd? Thanks. Had je misschien ook een recentere foto? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 14:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]