User talk:MichaelBueker

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

QI and geocode[edit]

Hi Michael!
For QI candidates geocode is only optional, not as a criteria.
You can read more COM:QIC
In this my case I can't authentically specify geocode, maybe, in month.
With best regards --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I was mistaken, geocoding is indeed optional. I went back to promoting your image :) --MichaelBueker (talk) 13:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI feedback[edit]

Hi Michael!
Only as the comment and feedback. I don't like to decline nominations of new users. It can offend, and users will leave the project.
Your work File:Broke-down_Truck_in_Sarajevo_2009.jpg doesn't correspond to the QI. You can see it. Too much CA (chromatic aberration) and blown sky - total white. As object photo is interesting, but technically not QI.
Yours faithfully, George --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your vote on my QI nomination
Hi George!

It's okay if you go ahead and decline my nomination of File:Broke-down_Truck_in_Sarajevo_2009.jpg. I agree about the blown sky, but I wasn't going to withdraw the nomination because I wanted some feedback. So go ahead and decline it, so things can go their normal way :) While you're at it, kindly take a look at File:Srebrenica_massacre_memorial_gravestones_2009_3.jpg which I nominated on Febrauary 7—maybe it stands a better chance. --MichaelBueker (talk) 20:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer dialog on one page, there where conversation has been begun. So it is more convenient.
About memorial gravestones my vote is  Neutral. With much more crop at top (delete 2/3 sky) maybe better. Very dramatic view, however technical defects issue. Bit blurred, bit noised background, bit CA, blown sky. It is not Your errors, it is weak camera (A80) result. If You prefer a Canon PowerShot tool, then SX 20 IS (or like) is good choose.
I too use compact cameras.
My old camera Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ2 result: 1 FP, approximately 20 QI.
With my second camera Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ5 taken 6 FP and approximately 150 QI and to be continued. However I too receive remarks from other users concerning quality of my compact camera.
And finally: I am far not a veteran . I have received my first QI half a year back. Therefore my opinion only as the information for You, instead of as final judgment.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey George! Yes, I can see the problem with my old A80. Sadly, that's what I took most of my photos with. I now have a newer powershot, but the SX 20 was too big for me. I have an SX 120 now, and I hope to get some better results. --MichaelBueker (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
SX120 is much better, than A80. Good luck in creativity! --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Submarine drawings by Mike1979 Russia[edit]

Hello. I changed scope and added sources to images of set Commons:Valued image candidates/Submarine drawings by Mike1979 Russia. Please could you tell your opinion once again? --Rave (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI and correction :)[edit]

Hi, Michael!
Thank You for support and for correction of my photo. Result is very good.
However usually ask before updating of another's jobs.
Once again thanks!
Yours faithfully, George.
--George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey George!
I'll keep in mind that it's good practice to ask :) Greets --MichaelBueker (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had one case which has afflicted me.
A user with weak skills corrected my job during FP nomination without any ask. Intentions were good, however result...
Your skill is very good. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome[edit]

It's a nice picture, and I hope it will be promoted. You're going well with Serbian/Croatian. Auf Wiedersehen! :) --Lošmi (talk) 03:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for correcting the tilt on my picture of wine bottles! I've been busy processing other photos for Commons so I hadn't seen your comment on the QI candidates page. Thanks again! guillom 00:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome! I like the picture, and you have my vote. I hope the wine was good, too :) --MichaelBueker (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, following your request, then according to the rules, this is to inform you that i changed the scope (by removing "fruits") of my candidate. Thanks for your review ! Friendly from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 6c70e5e362cc11f04e4cfe0781bb35ba[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MichaelBueker!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

update needed for nuclear power plant[edit]

  1. pakistan: must be light blue, completed only under construction reactor, considering others
  2. nederland: considering new buolding ad borselle nuclear power plant
  3. brazil: construction angra 3 is ON
  4. sweden: considering new building to replace old ones in old sites
  5. belgium: situation is now stable, decision postponed by new mayority in parlament

--95.249.52.71 15:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these hints, but I do not feel responsible for the image you refer to, even if I recently changed it to reflect the current situation in Germany. If you can find reliable sources for the updated information you have (like I provided for my last change), you can go ahead and change the image. It would be nice of you to get a user account for that!
If you don't know how to change the image, I am ready to do it for you, if you can present sources for your information. --MichaelBueker (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Slovenian_Parliament_Panorama_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Warfieldian (talk) 18:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slovenian_Parliament_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Warfieldian (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slovenian_Parliament_Entrance_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Warfieldian (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:2010_Ljubljana_student_protests has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


84.61.170.156 08:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

nuclear power in the world[edit]

for these changes, the informations are from http://www.world-nuclear.org

you can talk with me in my it:wiki --79.7.154.35 12:30, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Islam im Afrika und Asien[edit]

Guten tag! Ich arbeite für den Islam Projekt ins französisch, und ihre Arbeit für die Mappe (?) Islam in Europa hat mich gedienst für die französische Navigationsleiste. Könnten Sie die gleiche Arbeit für Afrika und Asien herstellen? Danke sehr. Ghalloun (talk) 10:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo! Vielen Dank :) I am happy that the image I modified helped you. Unfortunately, I did not create the map myself (“map” is “Karte” in German :)), and I am afraid I cannot easily create similar maps of Africa and Asia. But maybe you can modify images from this category, or maybe you can ask historicair, who made the Europe map before mine. Viele Grüße! MichaelBueker (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 11:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]