User talk:Metoc~commonswiki/Archiv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Metoc, what about the rest...?! :) pfctdayelise (translate?) 21:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had some busy weeks. Totday I try to write something well ;) Metoc 14:17, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I made it so far. Not perfect yet. Should i translate it? what do you think?Metoc 18:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is it different information to the English version? We should maximise the information from both versions. The format of the German one is just really nice! I would like to see it in English too. (Note: I don't speak German. :)) pfctdayelise (translate?) 23:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The information is the same, even less then in the english original but i'm still working on it. i'm going to start a translation on the weekend. It would be nice if you take a look then to proof it. Metoc 17:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. Just leave a note on my talk page when you've done it. pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bild für Symmetrische Signalübertragung[edit]

Hallo Tobias, Danke für das tolle Bild! Leider aber ist es nur genau die Hälfte der Wahrheit. Man müßte noch die Störungen einzeichnen: Diese sind auf beiden Adern identisch! dr.g.heinz@web.de


Image Tagging Image:Federn.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Federn.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. skINMATE 20:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]

File:Spiegel in der Reichstagskuppel - 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spiegel in der Reichstagskuppel - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

An interesting perspective well done Gnangarra 09:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thakyou very much! *happy* I'll finish my gallery on commons today ;) Metoc
that'll be fantastic I look forward to viewing all your images, I was just looking at your user page can you reduce the width to stop the horizontal scrolling Gnangarra 12:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmiedefeuer 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4-Wege Lautsprecher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Deletion ?[edit]

Hello, I will probably delete the page Commons:Graphics abilities next week. I happy to see that you like this idea, but your Commons:Graphics abilities page is exactly like the fomer one (Category:Graphics abilities). We don t need to have too time the same page, that can be confusing for others users.
If you need to work in an english to german translation you can move this page into User:Metoc/Graphics abilities-de.
--Yug (talk) 10:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Brilliant[edit]

Ich habe gesehen, dass Du so tolle de:POV-Ray Bilder gemacht hast (zB Image:Glas-2000-enery.jpg) und dachte mir, dass ein de:Brilliant, also ein besonders geschliffener de:Diamant eine weitere gute Bildidee wäre. Da ist nichts rund und es funkelt ordentlich ;) Würde Dich das interessieren? Image:Diamond facets.gif hilft Dir bzw Category:Gem cutting und alle Diamanten-Bilder. Ich kenne mich leider weder mit 3d-Modellen noch mit POV-Ray aus. --Thire 12:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hay, danke! Ich versuch mich mal. Ist aber nicht ganz einfach, sag dir dann wie ich vorwärts komme ;) Metoc 14:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Klappte bis jetzt überraschend gut:
Ja, sieht toll aus! :) Ich bin kein Experte, aber in der Seitenansicht sieht er unten (Winkel an der Kalette) etwas spitz aus - oder täusche ich mich da?
Ist das jetzt ein 3d-Modell, das Du erstellt hast?
Ich dachte mehr an ein Bild, in dem der Brilliant so richtig viel funkelt, einerseites für Brilliant zu gebrauchen, andererseits für POV-Ray (wenn ich das so grob richtig verstanden habe). Bin gepannt, wie's weiter geht!
Danke für deine Bemühungen, (Ich checke die commons-Seiten nur selten, bin aber täglich auf der de-wikipedia) --Thire 09:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Ich probiere mal die Winkel den Vorgaben anzupassen. Funkeln tus noch nicht ;) Kommt noch -- hoffentlich bald ^^ Bis dann, Grüße Metoc 14:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Weiterarbeit* Ich habe mich in der Form an die Eppler Vorlage gehalten. Nur past die Seitenansicht nicht zur Drauf- und Untersicht. Ein Wechsel zum rund Brilliant Schliff sieht einfach aus. Mal sehen. Ich werde die Ober- und Unterhälfte des Diamanten ohne diesen komischen Rand zusammenfügen. Diese wellenartigen Linien auf der Zeichnung sagen mir leider nicht viel. Fang ich mal an ihn glänzend zu machen ;) Kann man ja alles noch ändern Metoc 15:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, das sieht immer besser aus! Vielen Dank für Deine Bemühungen, es freut mich einfach den Fortschritt mitverfolgen zu dürfen...
Leider habe ich noch kein Brillianten-Bild von der Seite hier gefunden. Aber ich denke, dass der Rand schon "richtig" ist, die fassung verdeckt ihn oft. Zum "Blitzen": Image:CZ brilliant.jpg oder so; Image:AEW diamond solo dark.gif ist etwas übertrieben, finde ich. Bin gespannt, wie'S weiter geht, --Thire 08:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe heute (in letzter Zeit leider viel Stress) erste Versuche für glänzende und funkelde Bilder gemacht. Läuft schon ganz gut, das Licht bricht schön. Ich muss das Model noch abrunden, sollte klappen. Bis dann (Bilder kommen) Metoc 18:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kein Stress, aber ich bin gespannt! :) --Thire 00:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe mir mal erlaubt ein paar Dinge nachzumessen.
  • Die Breite oben ist ca 62% statt 56%
  • Die Spitze unten ist mit 34% etwas spitzer als die angegebenen 43,2%
Versteh mich bitte nicht falsch, ich finde es wunderbar wie es jetzt aussieht! Und ich bin schon neugierig aufs funkeln! :) --Thire 00:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist jetzt excelent! Nach die Änderungen. Ich gratuliere dich von deine Metode. Grüße. --Wladyslaw Golinski 20:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke! Tobias, Metoc

POTY 2006[edit]

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 11:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You previously voted in the FP candidacy of Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg. This image has now been nominated for removal of its FP status. If you have not already done so, you might like to join the discussion at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Male and female superb fairy wren.jpg. I'm notifying both pro and anti-voters. --MichaelMaggs 16:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Headline text[edit]

Wikinews Photo[edit]

Hey!

Can you take a quick look at User:Symode09/Wikinews, if you can help, I would really appreciate it

Symode09 16:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been sent to around 25 people

                Thank you


Pay attention to copyright Image:Opera at 180%.PNG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

FedericoMP 02:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright Image:Opera at 100%.PNG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

FedericoMP 02:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Stickstoffumwandlung im Aqu.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

--Deadstar 10:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Metoc[edit]

The french graphic lab is currently talking to merge all the template "Graphic Lab" together. This new template is under construction there : {{Graphic Lab}}

It currently plan to :

  • state the iso code of the wikipedia fr/en/de
  • make that english sentence's link lead to the english Graphic lab, Deutsch sentence lead to the Deutsch graphic lab, etc.

Are you [Bilderwerkstatt wikigraphists] interesting by this idea of a common template ? We are considering to add your fields :

  • former image
  • graphist
  • change.

(Please answer/discute on Template talk:Graphic Lab)

Regards, Yug 10:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Airplane_wing.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai ^_^ 06:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]