User talk:Mbeychok

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This Wikimedian has passed away. Their user page is preserved here in their memory.

Image Tagging Image:HDS_Flow.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HDS_Flow.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 16:55, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You left a message on my Talk page alerting me that the image might be deleted because I had not stated the ownership. The summary on the Image page clearly shows that I stated that I drew the image myself and I also selected the GFDL license option. What more does it take? If I drew it myself then I certainly owned the copyright ... that should be obvious, should it not? If there is soem other wording you deem absolutely necessary, let me know ... but I must say that what I already said should be sufficient.
Originally image missed license tag (probably you forgot to choose it from menu). It was added after my comment by other editor (see history). In any case everything is OK now. --EugeneZelenko 15:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am rarely on the Commons, so please contact me on the English Wikipedia if you need me to do anything else. I am User:mbeychok there as well as here. - Mbeychok 02:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed your variables on this cooling tower schematic do not match the variables within the material balance paragraph or equatoins. I suggest updating the diagram to match the article which would eliminate confusion.

Thanks, -fellow ChE

Thanks very much for picking up those errors, which I have now fixed. My face is red! Mbeychok (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Mbeychok!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--EugeneZelenko 16:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 02:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Thank you for alerting me. I have now added a GFDL tag as my license selection. But I need your help, please. I meant for this image to have the same name, Image: Trickling Filter Cross-section.png as on the English Wikipedia where I originally uploaded it. Somehow, I made a mistake and it was named Trickle Filter Cross-section.png here on Commons. Can you please rename it to be the same as the name on the Wikipedia?? Otherwise, the Wikipedia will end up with two of the same images with different names. Please help and thank you in advance. - Mbeychok 03:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I have now taken care of the problem myself with the name of the article. I have requested deletion of one of the duplicate images on the English Wikipedia. - Mbeychok 15:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I am processing the backlog of required replies of my talk page. To rename an image quickly, best re-upload it retaining information, and tagging the old image {{bad name|new name.ext}}. Cheers! Siebrand 07:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

as you can see, my bot has done only one edit. You've done the rest. By the way, now the image is ok. Bye, --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 10:55, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 3e243b58abaa7c349608a2c668119d55[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category discussion notification Category:Chemical_engineering has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

Sureshkiran123 (talk) 18:41, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTX.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 07:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User is listed as deceased[edit]

…at their English Wikipedia page. Cheers, User:Leprof_7272, Le Prof 73.210.155.96 00:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I use their work with attribution under its GNU License?[edit]

I intended to ask them, but they seem to have risen above the problem, rest in peace. With that said, I'm going to to attribute their [| diagram on hydrodesulfurization] to their account. If there is anyone with an objection, please reply. RealNamesAreFineZ.E.O (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]