User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2010/August

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phacochoerus aethiopicus (desert warthog).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question The description says Warzenschwein, but it's used in Wüstenwarzenschwein. Are there Warzenschweine other than Wüstenwarzenschweine? --Ikar.us (talk) 21:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Answer myself: According to de:, zoologists aren't sure if Wüstenwarzenschweine are a species on their own. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not geocoded. Species is correct though (the tips of the ears in Desert warthogs are always bent backwards.). Lycaon (talk) 10:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
  • geocode added --Mbdortmund (talk) 10:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support all criteria met now -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think the geocoding of zoos is important. It is very likely that this is not a species but a variety part may be Phacochoerus africanus aethiopica. In any case this picture is VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 22:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16139-Prinzipalmarkt-korr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I like the composition. The left part is absolutely straight, but the right houses leaning a little bit. Is it possible to fix? Otherwise QI.--Ankara 22:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)  Comment corrected --Mbdortmund 22:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC) Thanks, good now.--Ankara 22:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16154-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Lmbuga 21:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15965-Überwasserkirche .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. Why the personality rights warning? --Cayambe 09:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC) cut&paste... now removed --Mbdortmund 11:03, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15975-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 17:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15981-Überwasserkirche-Petrus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 17:56, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iomega Vorderseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15984-Überwasserkirche .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15982-Überwasserkirche .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15998-Überwasserkirche-Sockelfigur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 19:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-15996-Überwasserkirche-Schlüssel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, but I don't like the composition - IMO it's not a good idea to leave half of the head...If I am mistaken, let anyone correct me. --Gaeser 19:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC) StG1990 provided a cropped version, thx from here --Mbdortmund 00:49, 3 August 2010 (UTC) Support now.--Gaeser 06:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16000-Überwasserkirche-Türgriff .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16240-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the perspective and Quality is high -> OI --J. Lunau 19:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Schöne Bilder

ich sollte mir auch eine vernünftige Kamera kaufen. Deine ARbeit gefällt mir! salut--Symposiarch (talk) 12:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Danke für das Kompliment, die SLRs sind js inzwischen günstiger geworden. Mein Tipp: Achte mehr auf das Objektiv als auf den Body, die sind inzwischen fast alle OK, ob Nikon, Canon oder Pentax. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Die Marken für die Bauteile die ok sind hast du genannt, aber welches Objektiv empfiehlst du?!? --Symposiarch (talk) 13:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Das kommt auf die Kamera an. Die meisten Bundleobjektive gehen aber bis 55mm, sodass Du faktisch kurz danach ein Telezoom kaufen sollst, weil man damit in der Praxis nicht klarkommt. Entweder gleich ein Zoom, das etwas mehr bringt, oder erstmal überlegen, was Du photographieren willst. Es gibt im Netz eine Menge Tests zu Objektiven, eventuell kannst Du auch mal bei Heise gucken. Wenn Du mir sagst, was konkret Du knippsen willst und was Dir gefällt, könnte ich Dir etwas dazu sagen. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Das sind verschiedene Aufgaben: für Lebensmittel benötige ich sicher ein Makro, ansonsten eher das Telezoom für Gebäudedetails.--Symposiarch (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16342-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 05:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16352-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 05:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16005-Überwasserkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, bat what is the one and what is the other?, I can't understand German--Lmbuga 01:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC) File:XN Ueberwasserkirche 61 ov.jpg from the other side --Mbdortmund 09:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Thanks--Lmbuga 14:51, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16261-Drubbel ShiftN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 06:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16202-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Nice perspective -- George Chernilevsky 08:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16110-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looking good! Pitke 19:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC) If you want to promote you have to replace the word "Nomination" with "Promotion" --Mbdortmund 15:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)  Support Ok, although don't like "1.2 only". --kallerna 15:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:37, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16268-Roggenmarkt-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 04:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16266-buschmann-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut -- George Chernilevsky 04:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16264-Drubbel ShiftN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16256- .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut --George Chernilevsky 04:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16553-Praxisklinik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Lmbuga 20:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16456-St-Viktor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 14:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16510-Altes-Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and nice. --null 21:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)  Info Signature correction, sorry. --Cayambe 19:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16270-Roggenmarkt-k.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Cayambe 14:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden --Mbdortmund (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwerte-100812-16418-sT-vIKTOR-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ich finde die Zweige oben und links störend, zumal sie unscharf sind. Die oberen würde ich abschneiden ;-) (nein auf dem Bild) und die links wegretuschieren. --Berthold Werner 11:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Weg sind sie. --Mbdortmund 12:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC) Good. --Berthold Werner 13:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16572-Schloss-Spiegelung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 21:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16580-Schloss-Spiegelung-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 21:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16606-Schloss-Herkulesstatue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17208-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut -- George Chernilevsky 06:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Westfalenpark-100821-17761-Fernsehturm by DerHexer.jpg

Hab mal ein wenig am Licht gedreht. Was sagst du dazu? Kann auch gerne, wenn's dir gefällt, über das ursprüngliche Bild drübergeladen werden. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 17:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Der Florian ist nicht gelb. Darüber hinaus weist die Bearbeitung sowohl allgemein in hellen Bildteilen als auch insbesondere im Rotkanal Clipping auf. Ich kann keine Verbesserung erkennen. --smial (talk) 17:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Jo, die Farbe mag falsch sein. Sonst ist die Überbelichtung der Fenster entfernt, die Unterbelichtung der Schatten und vor allem des Himmels. Clipping-Fehler können bei JPG-Bearbeitung sicherlich entstehen, sind aber m. E. eher durch die hellere Grundstimmung eher zu sehen. Grüße, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:18, 22 August 2010 (UTC) P. S.: Hab die Farbe geändert.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17761-Fernsehturm-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments hellere Version nach Anregungen von Hexer und smial... --Mbdortmund 21:09, 22 August 2010 (UTC) Gut --George Chernilevsky 06:21, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17801-Telekom-Tower-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I liked the tight composition. Seems to fit criteria. --Nevit 19:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17510-Robinson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut -- George Chernilevsky 11:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17279-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ja, gut für mich--Jebulon 09:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-16987-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor parts of the duck are out of focus, but that's OK. --King of Hearts 18:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-16994-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 18:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17069-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cute. Mattbuck 17:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-16933-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Kann archiviert werden --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16567-Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut -- George Chernilevsky 20:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16578-Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut -- George Chernilevsky 20:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17771-Flamingo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 08:02, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17810-Telekomhaus-cor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- George Chernilevsky 17:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100821-17627-Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gut -- George Chernilevsky 17:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westfalenpark-100818-17165-Gallinula-chloro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- George Chernilevsky 17:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muenster-100725-16227-Lamberti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and interesting. Modern statues ? Wer sind sie ?--Jebulon 08:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC) I will try to find it out, the one on the left should be Gothe imo --Mbdortmund 20:18, 21 August 2010 (UTC) Yes, I agree about Goethe, That's was the reason of my question !! --Jebulon 11:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Kann archiviert werden. --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Nordkirchen-100814-16634-Schloss-Suedbruecke-cor.jpg

Guten Tag!
File:Nordkirchen-100814-16634-Schloss-Suedbruecke-cor.jpg
Ich sehe auf dem Himmel viel dunkler Flecke (schmutzigen Linse). Man muss korrigieren.
MfG -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Ohje, gleich ein ganzer Schwarm davon... -- smial (talk) 12:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Danke, lieber George,

habe mir schon ein Linsenreinigungsset bestellt, habe versucht zu korrigieren. Habe ich alle erwischt?

lg --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Errors =>Temporary ImageNotes -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Can you have a last look? --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Es ist jetzt ausgezeichnet. Ich habe die Anmerkungen entfernt.

Promoted MfG -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

FP

• Statue of a lion in Nordkirchen
• Vase in Nordkirchen

Du kannst versuchen, die Nominationen FP (EB) zu machen. Ich werde unterstützen.
MfG -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:12, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Danke George, das ist sehr nett, aber im Moment bin ich von FP etwas genervt, weil die Entscheidungen da sehr willkürlich fallen. QI reicht mir und das Review ist mir wichtig, damit ich meine Bilder verbessern kann. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Ja, die Lösungen kommen zufällig vor. Jedoch gibt es mir den Eifer. Es ist dem Fischfang ähnlich, das Ergebnis wird zufällig. MfG -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Netter Vergleich *g* Vielleicht sollte ich da auch ab und an fischen... --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Wir gehen auf den Fischfang zusammen! Ja? *g* --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Nordkirchen-100814-16683-Schloss-Loewentor.jpg

File:Nordkirchen-100814-16683-Schloss-Loewentor.jpg
Noch einmal, ich sehe auf dem Himmel viel dunkler Flecke (schmutzigen Linse). Man muss korrigieren.
MfG --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordkirchen-100814-16683-Schloss-Loewentor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice lightning --Carschten 16:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)