User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2009/April

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeche-Gneisenau-Dortmund-2009-2-0046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments well done --3268zauber 22:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago-Maggiore 1488.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, good detail. Jonathunder 17:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeche-Gneisenau-Dortmund-2009-2-0121.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeche-Gneisenau-Dortmund-2009-2-0103.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeche-Gneisenau-Dortmund-2009-2-0003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Alsike kyrka

Die Funktion automatisches Ergänzen bringt bringt gelegentlich neue Perspektiven in die Welt. :) --Marku1988 (talk) 06:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostenfriedhof-Dortmund-2009-0145.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice shot --AngMoKio 21:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franziskanerkirche-Dortmund-2009-0012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-chin 0080 DSC 6343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it --3268zauber 20:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-Hauptgebaeude-von-Venusinsel-DSC 5912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done. --AngMoKio 16:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melanchthon-Gemeinde-Dortmund-0025.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Berthold Werner 08:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-chin 0067 DSC 6330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Die Dame hat einen schönen Schwung --Dellex 17:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franziskanerkirche-Dortmund-2009-0020b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Neutral I see the point in the composition but I'm not convinced, I think it lacks a clearer subject. --Eusebius 08:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Support I like the 'ordered chaos' in this image --Ianare 20:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-Leuchter-0004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments godd composition and textures --Ianare 06:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-DSC 5613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ansprechende Bildkomposition --3268zauber 09:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss-Nordkirchen-Trauzimmer-DSC 5461.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I fixed the barrel distortion (17mm!) for you, now it's ok --Richard Bartz 18:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) thx, should have seen that, too many pictures at the moment, need a pause --Mbdortmund 21:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-nebe 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you rotate the picture 0.8 degree CW, please ? I'll support, then --Richard Bartz 18:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
done Danke für den Hinweis --Mbdortmund 20:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Now QI --Richard Bartz 17:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss-Nordkirchen-2009-4-Uhr-0017.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crop is a bit tight on the left side. Details are good for the given size, perspective on the roof is a bit strange - 2nd opinion ? --Richard Bartz 12:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss-Nordkirchen-Wassergraben-DSC 5389.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like it --3268zauber 19:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-Sphinx-0001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Berthold Werner 12:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zeche-Gneisenau-Dortmund-2009-2-0190.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostenfriedhof-Dortmund-2009-0157.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordkirchen-Skulptur-DSC 5624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality's just fine, a little bit of noise on the bottom of the image, but in an acceptable amount --Mr.checker 11:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Sinnvolle Idee, habe dort geantwortet, obwohl der Effekt auf Artikeln in den Textwikis nicht zu umgehen zu sein scheint. --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Danke für dein positives Interesse, kannst du es bitte auch supporten damit wir es bei Mehrheit auch bald umsetzen können. Lg --Richard Bartz (talk) 22:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
done (x) --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Advice for me regarding Kamehameha?

I thought a bit about the orientation on that photo that was promoted. I shot it off center and the background was distracting. I shot it totally lined up with the columns in the background, and it looked geometric- like Kamehameha on a grid. When it was a little off, I evaded both problems, but I could not say I was real happy about it. How would you solve this composition problem? I can shoot this tons more times till I get it right since I am frequently downtown. If you have any advice/ thoughts, I'd like to learn. Thanks. -00:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I like the promoted one, although there are some things you could do better.
-You used 90 mm and 1/30, so that the camera moved slightly during the exposure. So you have little halos around the borders, look at the fingers for instance.
To solve this problem you can use a tripod or have a try with a shorter time even if the building will be not in DOF.
-Another try could be to take a picture in the sunlight, where you should try different exposure times, perhaps not against the light, because that is hard to manage for our digital cameras. Sometimes it helps to take a picture to dark so that you get no blown-out-lights and to lighten it up on the computer. If you like I could try to help you when you try that solution.
I would like to have some of your sunlight-problems, its often raining in Dortmund....
Excuse my terrible English --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I will try things things. Regarding weather, I apologize for complaining about sun to you, and actually I very much miss the seasons. I spent most of my life in Seattle where it always rained. Honestly I don't miss working outside in the freezing rain on windy days in the winter, but I do miss fall, snow, and spring. -J JMesserly (talk) 01:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss-Nordkirchen-Venusinsel-Blumenmaedchen-DSC 5836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and nice Albertus teolog 07:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 Oppose Good, but does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. --Siipikarja 10:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
What is with Panoramafreiheit? And i think the Author is longer dead than 70 years. -- Pro2 11:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, license added --Mbdortmund 16:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 Support Definitely a QI. (Pictures without a copyright status get automagically deleted, nothing to do with freedom of panorama. --Siipikarja 21:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC))
Oh sorry. I have not seen that the license was missing. The word "copyright" was confusing me. -- Pro2 14:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, As you suggested, I cropped this image. Yann (talk) 17:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

New proposal for the FP candidates voting process

Hello! I've written a proposal to bring more impartiality in the voting process of FP candidates. Could you please give your comment on that here? Regards -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 20:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Your proposal is interesting, but it seems to be difficult to realize it, because the pictures contain the names of the author. --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

OTRS invitation

The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our German-language image submission queue. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider signing up at the volunteering page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Lizenz ergänzt --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Lizenz ergänzt --Mbdortmund (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gasometer-Sonnenmodell-DSC 6641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice atmospheric shot. Gasometer rocks! --AngMoKio 18:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menden-20070426 088-DSC 6779-Gasse-hinter-St-Vincenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems today is the day of old towers. --Berthold Werner 17:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menden-20070426 304-DSC 6995-Kreuzweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition, looks fine --Lucarelli 19:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menden-20070426 201-DSC 6892-St-Vincenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments quality image --Ianare 04:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
och neee, seit wann laedst Du denn unter GFDL-1.2-only hoch :-( --Dschwen 16:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Aus Bockigkeit wegen der absolut nervigen Lizenzdebatten --Mbdortmund 22:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menden-20070426 141-DSC 6832-Graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Berthold Werner 17:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)