User talk:Mbdortmund/Archive/2008/August

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mergozzo-0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition --Pudelek 21:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago-Maggiore 1165.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice -Pudelek 12:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerte-00051.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments That's a precise capture of this COA specially for contrast and crop. --Ikiwaner 20:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago-Maggiore 0972Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good composition: The portal leads into the image and titles it. Inside the portal I find that village. Good job! --Ikiwaner 19:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-City- 1744.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely done. A little more sharpness on the left would have meant perfection. QI as it is. Lycaon 22:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-City- 1655Ruhrkohlehaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice pic. --Sfu 12:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-City- 1602.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and interesting object. --Lestath 17:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-City- 1619.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and good lighting. --AFBorchert 09:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago-Maggiore 1302a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, just a bit overexposed, but I think it passes the requirements. TimVickers 20:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mergozzo-0026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful composition and colours (maybe a bit oversaturated?). I'm willing to forgive the blown sky if the geometric distortion is corrected (the lines at right should be vertical)-- Alvesgaspar 23:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
better now? light was really difficult in the streets of Mergozzo) --Mbdortmund 21:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC) -- Better now, the composition really compesantes for the flaws. With a better exposure choice a larger DOF could also be achieved... -- Alvesgaspar 22:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dortmund-City- 1741Kopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good rendering of difficult balance between light and dark; nice composition. -- MJJR 20:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mergozzo-0065a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. TimVickers 13:54, 30 August 2008 (UTC)