User talk:Matthias M./Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Du hast diese Datei in die Category:Hamburg-Barmbek-Nord eingetragen. Das ist (wie hier unschwer zu erkennen ist) eindeutig falsch, da die Richardstraße durch die Stadtteile Barmbek-Süd und Eilbek verläuft. Ich habe sie daher herausgenommen und möchte Dich bitten, sie nach Prüfung des genauen Standortes in die richtige Kategorie einzusortieren. Vielen Dank Mogelzahn (talk) 10:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Bin zufällig gestern an der Stelle vorbeigekommen. Die Skulptur steht westlich der Richardstraße und damit weder in Eilbek noch in Barmbek-Süd, sondern auf der Uhlenhorst. Ich habe die Kat. daher jetzt richtig eingetragen. --Mogelzahn (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:2-PropOH-Water-Dehydration.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:2-PropOH-Water-Dehydration.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 03:33, 1 July 2011 (UTC)


Adminauftrag

Kannst du bitte:

--Antemister (talk) 19:46, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Ich bin kein Administrator. Gruß Matt (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Oh, nicht mehr? Gibt es denn hier so eine Adminanfragen-Seite?--Antemister (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
COM:AN oder für deutschsprachig COM:FORUM. --Leyo 22:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Nitrous_oxide_-_10_x_8g.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

image -I-Effekt.svg

Die delta-Zeichen sind in der Abbildung spiegelverkehrt dargestellt. In der Abbildung -I-Effekt.svg sind sie richtig dargestellt.

Ich habe jetzt bei File:+I-Effekt.svg das Plus/Minus-Zeichen nach vorne gestellt. Die Delta-Zeichen waren nicht spiegelverkehrt in Inkscape. Vielleicht ein Renderingfehler? Bitte unterschreibe deine Diskussionsbeiträge mit vier Tilden. Gruß Matt (talk) 10:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:SmirfPlay.png

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SmirfPlay.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SmirfPlay.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

It is unused and seems to be Freeware (no Free Software) so I will just let it be deleted. Btw. I only transferred it to commons. Matt (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I know; but the tool automatically informs you because it assumes that, having uploaded it to Commons, you feel a stake in how the image is dealt with. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Energiediagramm

Hallo Matthias,

du hast dieses Bild von einem Energiediagramm hochgeladen: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Energiediagramm-Enzymreaktion.svg

Mich würde es sehr interessieren, wie bzw. mit welchem Programm man es am besten herstellen kann? Ich würde gerne für den Artikel "Nukleophile Substitution" ebenfalls Energiediagramm herstellen.

Vielen Dank schonmal --Minihaa (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Ich habe es mit Inkscape übersetzt. Das Original wurde jedoch ebenfalls mit dem Programm gezeichnet. Gruß Matt (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Schema-Brennstoffzelle.svg

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Schema-Brennstoffzelle.svg&filetimestamp=20100826182932#filelinks

Darf ich dein Schema in meiner Arbeit abdrucken, vorraus gesetzt natürlich ich gebe die Quelle an?

Ich finde die Zeichnung sehr anschaulich und sie gibt auch Einiges her. Gruß

Alonerd (talk) 16:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lizenz_Freie_Kunst erklärt die Lizenzbedingungen eigentlich ganz gut: Urheber (nicht nur ich), Lizenz und Quelle nennen. Gruß Matt (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Hexacyanoferrat(II).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

File:FLOW3 logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 11:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:3L55.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:3L55.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 11:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Wolfenstein Enemy Territory logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

File:AfCobra11.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2.241.218.242 13:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Campanimalkingdom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SethAllen623 (talk) 02:17, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I've moved to bugzilla an old proposal of yours. You may want to cc yourself to it. --Nemo 12:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Hippuric acid Schotten-Baumann.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Hippuric acid Schotten-Baumann.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


Thanks, I fixed this. Matt (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Wasserschlacht plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.184.164.139 11:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Matthias M.. Your files listed above are in Category:Chemical images that should use vector graphics. Could you please check, if the tag may be removed (in the case of high resolution PNGs), if there is already an SVG version, or if you consider uploading an updated version of higher resolution/quality on top of the old? Thank you. Leyo 13:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I am not the author of that PNG. Matt (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Ich seh's, aber VFC hat das nicht berücksichtigt. ;-) --Leyo 16:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Adobe PDF Icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mifter (talk) 02:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit-Temperatur.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 00:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Knifes FGM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elvey (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

I have literally nothing to do with this file. Matt (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Lichtabsorbtion

Lieber Matthias M.,

ich wollte fragen (und sichergehen), ob ich berechtigt bin, folgendes Bild

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0c/Lichtabsorbtion_eines_buchenblattes.svg

für meine wissenschaftliche Diplomarbeit zu benützen (mit Zitation) - würde eventuell die Abbildung noch an meine Bedürfnisse anpassen.

Ich freue mich über eine Antwort,

Danke, Lisa

Ja, kannst du. Zitieren musst du in wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten in jedem Fall unabhängig von der Lizenz. Ich bin nicht der alleinige Autor von File:Lichtabsorbtion_eines_buchenblattes.svg. Per Special:EmailUser/Matthias_M. kann ich dir auch den vollständigen Klarnamen von allen Zeichnern nennen. Das sieht dann in der Quellenangabe besser aus. Schick mir dazu einfach eine e-Mail auf die ich antworten kann. Dann bleibt trotzdem die Anonymität hier bewahrt. Gruß Matt (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:ET-Legacy.svg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ET-Legacy.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 13:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues

Hello Matthias M.. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:ASCOBANS HighRes Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Mbunit.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Basvb (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:UNESCO pic.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:UNESCO pic.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:UNESCO pic.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 19:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Benzol Briefmarke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)