User talk:Mattbuck/Archive16

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 April 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - October 2012 November 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - April 2013 May 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - October 2013 November 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - February 2014 March 2014 - April 2014 May 2014 - July 2014 August 2014 - September 2014 October 2014 - November 2014 December 2014 - February 2015 March 2014 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2017 Current

2014

Hello Matt, best wishes, good health and what of the happiness!! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Requesting page deletions.

You have requested deletion of several image files. Before you do so again please check the details of the image files.

Source Distilleria Marzadro

Author Luca Marzadro

Quite clearly I obtained the images directly from the owners and creators of the images. Also written in Italian, a statement to this effect: Bottiglia di grappa stravecchia - 18 Lune. Foto caricata su Wikimedia Commons con permesso della distilleria Marzadro. Please use any web based translator if you are not able to understand the language of the description.

My apologies. Could you please forward the emails to OTRS so that it can be properly ticketed? -mattbuck (Talk) 20:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Best wishes for 2014

) Feliz año nuevo --The Photographer (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queenstown Road railway station MMB 03 455905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --P e z i 00:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «43 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes MMB 01 The Quadrant MK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 13 222004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 20:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «P5 Westferry Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 15:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Netherfield railway station MMB 06 158799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 01 390051 390037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich station MMB 05 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:26, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «E7 Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «S7 Emirates Airline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northallerton railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 65 Grand Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:34, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northampton railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Retford railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 11 390037 390046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments { Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:57, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading MMB 28 Great Western Main Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Despite the shadow I think it's a good image. --Cayambe 20:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matlock MMB 02A Peak Rail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the left side is too blurry. However it is a nice shot and I think, that a 1:1 crop which is also removes some of the dark areas at the right side, could be a good idea. I made a proposal in the annotations. --Cccefalon 13:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 14:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC) Fine to me. --Cccefalon 02:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadwell railway station MMB 06 378218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe it would be a bit better with a little noise reduction but ok --Christian Ferrer 06:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 01 1972 stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB A1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB C2 222006 153308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you bright the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 08:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)  Done, but I'm not entirely convinced. I will have another go over the weekend when I'm back at my usual PC. Mattbuck 13:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Better, even I did not ask so much, I was almost dazzled... --Christian Ferrer 23:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hewish MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «P3 Canary Wharf Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby MMB 43 Larpool Viaduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I like the composition very much, but sharpness could be somewhat better, and perhaps the image has somewhat red tint. -- Smial 09:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 13:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)  Support Still not perfect, but I won't be nitpicking. To make a point: This is QI, not PI as in "perfect images". --Smial 18:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «96 The Downs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Swinsty Reservoir MMB 01.jpg

Hi Matt, I just made an attempt to optimize the pic a bit, fixing the magenta cast (which I think it has) and brightening the shadows by a little tone mapping. Have a look at the result and upload it as new version if you like. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 20:32, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hm, I think you went a bit far, I'll have a go myself later. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «K4 25 Churchill Place.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality ~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB J8 Tower Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 28 220018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 21:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 01 144010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:50, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 90 43034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --P e z i 22:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 25 376019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 14:46, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross St Pancras tube station MMB 07 1995-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «02 Bathurst Basin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 26 378202 378136 378144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 04 Roald Dahl Plass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 78 332003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 17:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 11:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «A1 The Downs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hucknall station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brondesbury Park railway station MMB 04 66713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 61 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 86 91110 365511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «L7 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 01 Enfield.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «Z1 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Covent Garden tube station MMB 01 1973-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 17:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Z0 The Gherkin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otterington railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coventry railway station MMB 17 390014 153371.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Hampstead railway station MMB 09 350238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf DLR station MMB 07 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idridgehay railway station MMB 03 101XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. (Looks as if it was a smaller station …) --Kreuzschnabel 12:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 49 170109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 09:46, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Stratford station

I note you have changed the title of File:North Greenwich station concourse geograph-3796285-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg‎ to Stratford. I will ask for a change of the file name shortly but am contacting Ben Brooksbank first.

What do you know about File:North Greenwich station geograph-3796403-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg and File:North Greenwich Millennium Dome under construction geograph-3796354-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg ‎Chevin (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Done the rename myself. The others are legitimately North Greenwich, it's just that single one which was misnamed. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Okeydoke. Thx Chevin (talk) 15:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «C5 Clifton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 24 185135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some minor CA, but not disturbing main object. QI for me. --Smial 09:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 10:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB P8 Westferry Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 20:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «50 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB off IMHO (magenta), check neighbouring pics as well --Kreuzschnabel 12:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 12:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)  Support OK for me now. What kind of highly protected area is it ahead? --Kreuzschnabel 10:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «57 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kidderminster Town railway station MMB 07 42968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tonto II. 09:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rugeley Trent Valley railway station MMB 08 170630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tonto II. 09:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Starbeck railway station MMB 18 150276 150118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford station MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little bit noise, but IMO still QI.. --XRay 18:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swinsty Reservoir MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Z7 Djanogly LRC and The Exchange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «O1 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could be enhanced by some careful denoising in the sky. Do you know NeatImage? --Smial 08:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «L3 The Landmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I9 Nottingham to Grantham Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «C4 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 99 90019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:53, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

COM:ANU notice

Why have you not yet moved the files as specified in the reply at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Vandalism by user onto deletion process? That was a response on a comment made apparently by you; it was posted about 12 hours ago and has not been processed. -In case you missed or haven't followed the topic since you last commented it might be suggested that you attend it, thanks. Orrlingtalk 06:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

This was why (Fastily?) got fed up with you. We edit here for fun, and we don't always want to look at the same thing. Also maybe sometimes we're asleep? -mattbuck (Talk) 08:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

This is fine. I'll portray the situation from my angle: the topic where you left your message, and got even more involved by locking a filepage (one that was originally not even related to the topic), is very sore for me, involving a good share of my contributed media that went vandalized as part of a stinky personalized circle and I'm attempting to nothing but get assistance in what seems obvious. You dropped your note about GBG.jpg in a thread that handled the behaviour of a third user concerning five whole other files, and did not appear to take any corrective action about them. And still, as you came across in that short topic very accountable and seemingly fair, it's natural that I'd expect you to stay and use the same power used when taking your measures on GBG.jpg to also satisfying the logical expectations regarding the kernel five other images. Please find your right time to reread my topic & fix wht's needed. Orrlingtalk 11:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

You now commented (appreciated in itself), but didnot take an actual action (if you did and I missed it accept my appology). Which means this matter is still heavily suspended. Thank you in advance for further finding the three minutes to perform the requested changes, so this can be resolved and satisfied in a just way. Orrlingtalk 12:14, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «O3 Cabot Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «26 West India Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB D0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I can't read the information on the Platform 2 sign, but IMO it's QI. --XRay 18:37, 14 January 2014 (UTC) That's due to the interaction of shutter speed and screen refresh rate. Mattbuck 22:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrews Road railway station MMB 16 66109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 03 1967 Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments chromatic aberration, please see notes --The Photographer 15:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC) Still there but acceptable --The Photographer 15:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackwall DLR station MMB 01 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, however would suggest cropping the reflection on the right side, which is a bit distracting --DXR 15:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB R5 South Quay Plaza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 21 A-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gummer's How MMB 07 Lake Windermere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perhaps a notch dark IMO --DXR 18:41, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeming Bar railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penis1.JPG

Yes, I am sorry. It's a mistake of mine. There was twice this DR, so I removed the redundant one. But after I saw that it was a mistake, because there was another DR of File:Penis2.JPG. I try to restore it, but I wasn't able. Now this DR is in the DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:I am at home having so much fun---) 2014-01-20 00-13.jpg. Can you restore it? Thank you very much! Sorry again. --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «08 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «43 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Staithes MMB 16 Old Jack's Boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 16:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent action

You were requested to rename File:GBG.jpg into "Göteborg canal.jpg", here. Why do you think this move is satisfactory for that request? Please fix this, thank you Orrlingtalk 14:11, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I realized that the mover tool that has been on my self-service for long time was revoked, please reinstate it, as it was a helpful feature. Orrlingtalk 14:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I wasn't the one who removed it, so no, I will not reinstate it. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:19, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean? Do you not have administrator tools? Orrlingtalk 15:31, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Since you have the mover right, please move File:GBG.jpg to "File:Göteborg canal.jpg", Orrlingtalk 15:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I do have the tools but I will not undo another admin's action when I do not think that action was vandalous. And no I will not move that damn file, it's now at File:Vallgraven canal, Göteborg.jpg which seems to be accurate. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:08, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

This couldn't be more sad. :( It's clear that you moved it after being exposed to my explicit, well-defined naming solution at COM:ANU, so what point did you wish to illustrate by pretending to not see it? I mean, eventually the image will move as I requested, no verbose names among my portfolio's images; so why not seem like you're a respectable helpful toolholder when you can? Orrlingtalk 18:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

If this were for some sort of scheme, then I'd be willing to rename. For instance all my photos are File:Place or subject MMB #Number# Further identification.JPG, eg File:Thirsk railway station MMB 07 185142.jpg - Thirsk railway station is the subject, 07 is the series number and 185142 is the extra detail (MMB is my initials). But "GBG" is not a naming scheme, it's just a useless set of letters, probably even for most people who live in the city! I will not rename this, and if you think three words is verbose, then you really need schooling in how to name photos. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

You missed my meaning, I'm not advocating "GBG" anymore. Please read more catefully, I was asking to move it to "Göteborg canal.jpg", agreeing with you about GBG being possibly meaningless to non-Swedes. "Göteborg canal.jpg" is my preferred solution. Orrlingtalk 19:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I agree with mattbuck. The file is named fine as it is. Orrling's name seems to come up a lot in rename disputes, always demanding more generic and less specific names for his/her pictures. --Dschwen (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

I disagree. future uploads by me might be given more focused and precise names than older habits, no problem with this fair expectation, but those that are already present shouldn't have gone through a rename. There's other ways to say "Orrling, please use less generic names in future uploads", I'd have respected it. Orrlingtalk 19:22, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

If you at least agree that using less generic names is more helpful, I don't quite understand why you fight the renames do vehemently. --Dschwen (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Reply: The filenames I fight for are 100% valid, they are not even "generic", certainly not in a way that should attract replacing them with others. Since there is actually no dispute that these names are the accurate ones for the respective files it's rather obvious that the serial replacement a month ago was abusive. But beside being valid, they also form a consistency that is critical for me. That I may be inclined to apply more specific naming in future uploads doesn't mean there's anything wrong in past uploads' names that should attract agitating them to just cause me this much restlessness and pain that I'm having. Correct? Orrlingtalk 00:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, we can wikilawyer all day if a filename is "valid" and not all cases are totally clear cut. But ultimately, for the users of this site it is more important if the filename is actually useful. And more specific names are arguably more useful, or aren't they? --Dschwen (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I see a lot of arguing over something that as far as I can tell is not very important. I agree strongly with Matt Buck and Dschwen. Orrling, if there is a specific problem with the current name, please state it clearly. If not, please just let it drop and put your time into something more productive. I have sympathy for the restless feeling you are having, but the restless feeling in itself is not a good reason for renaming. Preserving names so they are persistent through time (except when there are clear problems with them, as outlined in the renaming policy) is much more important than satisfying one person's urge like that. -Pete F (talk) 00:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to see how you (or anyone) are missing the entire issue and conveniently reducing it in such a typical way. Please read this. The filenames which I currently process deletion were uploaded by me, with a high degree of naming adequacy; they were then however soon renamed by another user, unreasonably, and I'm actually into restoring them, not renaming them.. Since you appear to agree that a restless feeling in itself is not a good reason for renaming, you may be deeply questioning the set of renames of December 22 which was merely a result of restless emotions flung at me, fair?. I only want to get it through, think - if I could overcome the redirects and restore the mandatory names for these 5 images this would have been over, right? Preserving names so they are persistent through time - except when there are clear problems with them, as outlined in the renaming policy - is an important thing to stick to, we agree on this too, wow! And that this rule (and others) have been violated and I'm rather committed to doing everything to restore the peaceful previous state eventually means I should get criticized? Sad that some with good intentions actually ignore/forget that donors of mediae have some level of say about titles of their uploaded photos. Not-very-important for one of us might be very important for another. Orrlingtalk 04:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, I see the situation is more complex than I recognized. The one thing that I think is a particularly bad idea is to apply a third name to any of the files, if one of the first two is more or less meaningful. I don't have a strong opinion about either of the first two names. I see that emotions here are heightened and I did not intend to exacerbate that, so I'm going to check out of this discussion. (I also am not an admin, so I can't delete a redirect, so I'm not in a position to help even if I were persuaded.) -Pete F (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crewe railway station MMB 21 390130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok from sharpness point of view --Poco a poco 10:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 10:23, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 35 Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pleclown 10:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxford Circus tube station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 10:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalkwell railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 09:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB I5 Wensor Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 09:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «12 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 09:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 09:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «C3 1 Cabot Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

problematic edit

Hi, I am not sure what happen in this edit, but something went wrong. --Jarekt (talk) 14:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I missed putting the date in. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:46, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 19 390046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «I6 River Thames and London Eye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «29 Sherwood Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 08:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Z6 HMS Belfast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 08:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 64 170117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support right a bit unsharp however acceptable IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston railway station MMB 26 222012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chepstow MMB 17 Gloucester to Newport Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Branch is distracting but quality is ok. --The Photographer 17:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 31 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good DoF --The Photographer 17:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Otterington MMB 22 Coverdale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pleclown 12:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brimham Rocks MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pleclown 12:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »05 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Pleclown 12:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 61 221XXX 221XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but can you crop the cut woman on the right please?; she is a bit disturbing. --Christian Ferrer 06:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC) I tried that, but it made the crop too tight. Mattbuck 19:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC) weak  Support it's disturbing but it's the only issue so ok --Christian Ferrer 06:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Q3 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not bad but unsatured, uncontrasted and a bit noisy. Need : more contrast, clarity, and "vibrance" (saturation) and also a bit of noise reduction --Christian Ferrer 06:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Done all except noise reduction. Mattbuck 20:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok like that --Christian Ferrer 06:16, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «L6 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glaisdale railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shadwell DLR station MMB 01 DLR 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 06:50, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «65 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Bgag 15:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornbeam Park railway station MMB 03 153330 155345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice composition, sharpness a little bit borderline but ok for me --Cccefalon 08:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, sorry, I did, good now --Poco a poco 23:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 08 144011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portsmouth and Southsea railway station MMB 07 313219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is something wrong with the WB. There is a lot of magenta in the photo. Also some magenta CA on the right side. --Cccefalon 08:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok now! --Cccefalon 10:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB B3 222102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice heat blur in the background. Please remove the magenta CA from the rails. --Cccefalon 19:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)  Support fine now --Cccefalon 10:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Town tube station MMB 03 D Stock 1973 Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EveryPicture 13:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB N8 Ruislip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --EveryPicture 13:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worksop railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brondesbury Park railway station MMB 06 378218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stourbridge Town railway station MMB 03 139001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 21:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 43 175115 175008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

New copyright infringement suspects in Category:Warner Bros. Studio Tour London (The Making of Harry Potter)

Hi there, could you help me out? I have categorised about 800 new uploads in http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Warner_Bros._Studio_Tour_London_%28The_Making_of_Harry_Potter%29, but before I spend more time on it, would you help me by sorting out the suspects like you did last time? I do not know how to create a deletion request for a large collection of files. Most of the files are in this category, but you may also want to look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Warner_Bros._Studio_Tour_London_%28A_Magical_Production%29. This is a 3 dimentional work of art, but with lots of small graphic elements. And the exterior of the building has a lot of posters. See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Warner_Bros._Studio_Tour_London_%28exterior%29. --Judithcomm (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Happy to help. To do it yourself, click "Perform Batch Task" in the toolbox, and follow the onscreen instructions. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:44, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB E1 153357 153383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 19:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 79 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Improvable bottom crop, but ok --Poco a poco 19:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fishbourne railway station MMB 03 377468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Underexposed --The Photographer 16:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 19:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB W1 City Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice compo, it would have been great with the first full crane --Christian Ferrer 16:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egton railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and sharp--Lmbuga 11:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shoeburyness railway station MMB 03 357028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 13:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newark North Gate railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 21 323239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Cccefalon 08:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)  Done (don't know who changed this to promote, but as there was no comment I have reverted it). Mattbuck 10:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC) QI now. --Cccefalon 08:18, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 45 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark in the black parts IMHO. Would like to see its eyes too. --Kreuzschnabel 10:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC) He's a black and white cat - frankly the black bits are a bit too bright already. Mattbuck 10:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC) I think it's ok --Christian Ferrer 06:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «F4 Freshford House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice now, and QI --DXR 23:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. --Pleclown 12:23, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of East London MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Florstein 16:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 13:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «E2 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «73 Westferry Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 34 43301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB N5 Russell Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB A7 390017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives (left and right are leaning out --Christian Ferrer 06:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thirsk railway station MMB 07 185142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives and maybe need a little sharpening --Christian Ferrer 21:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:54, 29 January 2014 (UTC)  Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulse Hill railway station MMB 03 319361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure, maybe a bit blurred and (or) unsharp --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)  Support After an other, other, other look, it's ok now! --Christian Ferrer 19:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hackney MMB 01 Peak Rail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London City Airport MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 10:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crewe railway station MMB 22 150231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Q1 Millwall Dock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 36 Ambleside "Kismet".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 18:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 35 43027 166220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB W9 New Providence Wharf and Ontario Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «F5 River Thames and Ontario Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now --DXR 11:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB T1 Westferry Circus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «Q1 Canary Wharf and River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 14:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice platform. ;-) --XRay 07:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB G7 Mini 7s and Miglia Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Abbey MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not 100% sharp to the right but still QI IMO --P e z i 21:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 2 Hot pixels (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC) There were a lot more, but all fixed. I think. Mattbuck 17:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Croydon station MMB 15 377106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted or perspectrives (the right is leaning out, see the big building), a bit unsharp at left but it's not an issue, it's the train warmth --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)  Done. It's probably not train warmth causing unsharpness though. Mattbuck 17:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:39, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe

Hello Mattbuck,

first of all: thank you for your review concerning the picture of the Memorial.

To let the harshness of the shadows be less intensive is not a big deal. I have done this with a few steps. But the problem is: the complete light impressive is not any more authentic and realistic. The complete image looks dull and gray.

Have a look at yourself:

(A) QI-nomination

(B) alternativ with less intense shadows

Because this day the sun was shining well version (A) comes much more closer to reality. Look at the nearly golden light impression in between of the concrete cuboids.

Apart from the light reason my opinion is: shadows are in general not good because they hide the objects. But here we had a different situation. The shadows are wanted and are an integral part of the memorial. You walk through the blocks of stone with different heights and should have the possibility to feel captured and restricted. The shadows mean anxiety. To lighten the image up would mean to ignore this wanted associations.

And last but not least: although you have the shadows in the image you can distinguish everything of the surface. Therefore I would not overwrite (A) with (B). Best regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «N2 Millwall Dock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 08 357005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Cccefalon 08:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB X6 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 23:33, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB P9 Plashet School.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westerleigh Junction MMB 07 43321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acton Works MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Quay DLR station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DXR 09:09, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «S3 Emirates Airline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pleclown 12:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open University MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pleclown 12:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redland railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:09, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York MMB 18 York Minster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 09:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 23:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB Z2 HMS Belfast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenford station MMB 05 165134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 21:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolverhampton railway station MMB 11 221111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2013 MMB 88 Bonfire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 11:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «W9 Students' Union Elections 2013 Results Night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 03:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyprus DLR station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gospel Oak railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «O9 Riverside South.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

The

Hi, I just wanted to alert you to the fact that I expanded on my earlier answer to your enquiry on my talk page Oxyman (talk) 18:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worle railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 12:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dockray MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hucknall station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right is leaning out a bit --Christian Ferrer 18:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 24 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Miau. --DXR 17:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB D8 153357 153383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northallerton railway station MMB 10 185107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC) OK good quality --Sebastian Wallroth 14:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 95 43XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it's ok, but can you try a little sharpening please? --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 5 February 2014 (UTC) I'll get on this on Monday. Mattbuck 23:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 48 378227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspectives (left and right are leaning out), I think sharpening is just ok, if you can do better, do it --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC) I'll get on this on Monday. Mattbuck 23:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 16:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB »09 New Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 82 Uphill Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 11:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilsill MMB 02 B6265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality. However, while one bird is clearly recognised as a bird, the others are only depicted as blurry spots. I suggest to remove them. --Cccefalon 17:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC) I found about 6 in the end. Mattbuck 17:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC) ok now --Cccefalon 13:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newark North Gate railway station MMB 07 91128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Long Eaton railway station MMB 09 170637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Worle railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grosmont Depot MMB 07 60007 12139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 10:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Mardi Gras 2010 MMB 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok for me, it's the fisrt time I see it, I do my job --Christian Ferrer 06:00, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 81 43277 91120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «85 Columbus Courtyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 29 150127 153361.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Sobre archivo File:Campo de Flores.JPG

Hola Matbuck, le escribo en mi lengua natal pues solo hablo español, le pido disculpas por ello. Respecto a su sugerencia sobre ubicar un lugar y geolocalizar mi archivo: File:Campo de Flores.JPG, le comento que por mi tipo de conexión; vía modem, y mis conocimientos, no estoy en condiciones de hacer la geolocalizacion correctamente, y no quisiera cometer errores, mi único interés es llegar a ser un buen colaborador de Commonns. Ya lo ubiqué en lugar, pero lamento que el resto no podré. De todas formas agradezco mucho la sugerencia. Un saludo cordial.Ivan2010

Si usted tomó la foto como dices, ¿por qué usted no sabe dónde fue tomada? -mattbuck (Talk) 09:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «M8 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 12:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 63 170636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 22:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Clitoromegaly-penis.jpg

Hey, Mattbuck. Would you be willing to provide me with the URL link that this image came from, so that I can have it as part of the documentation of ‎HappyLogolover2011's upload? At the time, I didn't think to save a copy of the URL link even though I knew that the image would likely be deleted. Flyer22 (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

[1]. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Mattbuck. Flyer22 (talk) 23:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 13:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB B0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 21:44, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading MMB 19 Reading Traincare Depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 13:39, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapham Junction railway station MMB 20 377212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 02:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 08 365517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 22:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leicester railway station MMB 12 222010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 46 222006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 13:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «A4 Orchard Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smethwick Galton Bridge railway station MMB 08 158830 220030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:59, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of East London MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments several CA --A.Savin 11:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC) OK for QI. --A.Savin 20:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichfield Trent Valley railway station MMB 10 323242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 96 Uphill Junction 220XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenwich station MMB 02 465171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Minor CAs (see note), but good quality--Lmbuga 11:13, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left is leaning in --Christian Ferrer 22:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 17:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greenhow Hill MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Windermere MMB 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Lewis Hulbert 19:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. --Pleclown 12:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB D9 Castle Combe Sports & GT Championship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 32 43017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 02 158844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Christian Ferrer 08:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need a little sharpening IMO --Christian Ferrer 15:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 21:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 08:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «C6 Queen's Medical Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB X8 River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 11:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of East London MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A Bit soft perhaps, but i think its ok for QI.--ArildV 00:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln MMB 04 High Street level crossing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:46, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kettering railway station MMB 01 222016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Frankly spoken: I like the colours but not the composition. Too much shadow in the foreground and the sharpness is faded away already at the letters of the service door. What about the blue front - is it dirt or noise? I am not sure for now, but perhaps a square crop could be a possibility (I made an annotation). --Cccefalon 11:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)  Cropped. Mattbuck 22:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC) better. --Cccefalon 18:06, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive16⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amersham station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southend-on-Sea MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK. --DAJF 04:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gummer's How MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 04:33, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 59 156411 153308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Benfleet railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:32, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 13:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! East Midlands Parkway railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 13:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:44, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milton Keynes Central railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right seems to leaning out Christian Ferrer 08:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Support ok Christian Ferrer 18:27, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avonmouth railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --ArildV 09:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harrogate MMB 01 Spa Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit distorted due to wide angle, but fine to me --Poco a poco 08:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rievaulx Terrace MMB 20 Rievaulx Abbey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 08:18, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB J7 River Leen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

QIC reviewing

Hi Matt, may I ask you, when adding a first review to a nomination, to put it behind the | following the nomination? Any review just attached by <br> will be taken as part of the nomination by the parser, still saying „Review needed“ though there actually is one. It’s a bit confusing that any additional content following the first review is to be added by <br> anyway. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I used to do that, but then it makes it difficult for anyone using the review script, and since when just adding a comment I need to edit manually anyway, it makes sense for me to put it before the | to allow an eventual review to actually use the space. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 34 Benjamin Bloom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 84 91110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 07 220029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Llandudno Junction railway station MMB 06 150264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Magenta CA at the right side. I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 11:08, 19 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:30, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Better now. --Cccefalon 16:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portsmouth MMB 37 Harbour and the Spinnaker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --ArildV 08:46, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orpington railway station MMB 07 465XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Runswick Bay MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:26, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB R2 Docklands Light Railway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 96 150229 153325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleethorpes railway station MMB 11 185123 144006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 62 170636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «E3 City Canal and Millennium Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 15 323239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 12:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB «N6 Students' Union Elections 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Face out of focus IMO. --Kreuzschnabel 17:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Support Not very sharp but ok I think --Christian Ferrer 18:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryde MMB 10 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar East railway station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --P e z i 23:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canary Wharf DLR station MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --P e z i 08:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duffield railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok but need a little sharpening and to bright a bit the shadows please --Christian Ferrer 18:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 23:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Support ok Christian Ferrer 12:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentGood but maybe to dark?--ArildV 08:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 18:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks.--ArildV 13:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Ruislip station MMB 22 1992-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barmouth railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 94 332013 43034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB C4 43177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB «N8 Canary Wharf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Quay DLR station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}