User talk:Marrovi/Archive 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File source is not properly indicated: File:Erika Dobosiewicz (2).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Erika Dobosiewicz (2).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Erika Dobosiewicz (2).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Taichi (talk) 03:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cartel en idioma otomí en metro del DF.JPG[edit]

File:Cartel en idioma otomí en metro del DF.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 20:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ts'elek.png[edit]

Please expand on your request for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ts'elek.png. ~riley (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Marrovi,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerro Mesa Ahumada (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be more contrast or removing haze could improve the image. --XRay 04:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zumpango Lake, Mexico and others[edit]

Hi! We don't add a country in names of categories when it is the only one such thing. When there is only one "Lake Zumpango" all over the world, the Category name should be "Category:Lake Zumpango".
But when there are some lakes with whe same name, we make the name more precise: "Category:Lake Victoria, Canada", "Category:Lake Victoria, Finland".
Stop moving good categories, please. Yours, Wieralee (talk) 20:30, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cerro Mesa Ahumada (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corozal (35).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK acceptable --A.Savin 14:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oceloxochitl morada en Cerro Mesa Ahumada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bad for a compact camera. Resolution could be higher, but overall quite good quality. It has my support for QI. --Peulle 20:00, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port La Coruña.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 10:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

El serio problema de la versión de Wikipedia en español[edit]

Hola, Marrovi, me comunico con usted en ésta parte en la que los sysops de Wikipedia en español no tienen poder para comunicarle sobre ésto: lea la parte en la que habla sobre el syosp-títere presente desde los inicios de Wikipedia en español.

Además, cómo ví que estaba interesado en las lenguas indígenas de México, le quiero mostrar cómo dicha señora se empeña en bloquear una edición en el artículo de México: [1].

Inclusive no me dejan reportarla en el ya extinto arbitraje contra sysops en Wikipedia en español (extinto por ellos mismos): [2].

Si quiere le paso lo que escribí ahí y que borraron (lo apunto todo en un .txt), pero es casi lo mismo que ya sabe.

Por cierto, sus imágenes no están categorizadas, y debería de hacerlo por que toma fotos de categorías más o menos vacías en Commons, son joyas que de hecho están pero no pueden aprovecharse.

Saludos.

File:Bandera de Nuevo León (Propuesta).PNG[edit]

File:Bandera de Nuevo León (Propuesta).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Julius Cæsar (talk) 09:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres en Chimalistac, Ciudad de México.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Japanese community of Mexico[edit]

Hi! I would like for Category:Japanese community of Mexico to be a separate category that covers institutions (schools, libraries, embassies, etc.) for Japanese nationals living in Mexico and the Japanese Mexican immigrant community.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 15:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación Buenavista, DF (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Although it's still a little noisy --Daniel Case 23:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not remove deletion requests[edit]

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

You can make an argument to keep the specific one, separately from what happens to the others, at the DR. Reventtalk 15:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Teotlalpan 1.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Teotlalpan 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Teotlalpan 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Strakhov (talk) 00:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Teotlalpan 2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Teotlalpan 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Teotlalpan 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Strakhov (talk) 00:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No tengo razón para dudar de que los dibujines en blanco y negro sean suyos. Los autores de la/s fuente/s original/es de todos ellos probablemente hayan muerto hace más de 100 años y sus obras haya/n entrado, por tanto, en el dominio público. Si los ha sacado calcando a una copia moderna de un códice... under the threshold of originality creo yo. Mejor no me hagas escarbar en tus banderas con escudos copipegados encima, que quizás haya también que fumigarlas. Mira que eres mal bicho, te marcan un par de copyvios y no se te ocurre otra cosa que venir a mi discusión a meter caña a otro usuario. Marrovi, anda, pasa página de una vez, hazte un favor. Recibe un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 00:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dices demasiadas cosas sin sentido. Nada aquí es mi trabajo pues nadie me paga un duro. Si no he marcado para borrar algún escudo dudoso tuyo que vi es porque me tengo que asegurar del todo de si es plagio. Y eso lleva un tiempo. Y que una imagen esté vectorizada no la hace más obra derivada u obra propia que un jpg o un png. Adiós, Strakhov (talk) 07:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Si crees que el mapa es plagio (es de 2008, ¿de cuándo es la web que me mandaste?)... márcalo para borrado, es muy simple. Pasarlo por AutoCAD y dejarlo más profesional no le quitará derechos de autor y seguirá siendo tan plagio o tan poco plagio como antes, eso sí. Y no he dicho que los dibujines en blanco y negro no sean plagio, sino que, al revés que tus fotografías de páginas de un libro aparentemente contemporáneo (obvias infracciones de copyright acá), existe la posibilidad de que los haya dibujado él, basándose en obras fuera del derecho de autor por antigüedad, y, salvo que se presente alguna evidencia más, no tengo motivo para marcar nada para borrado. Strakhov (talk) 08:04, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias por tu amabilidad. Iré marcando para borrar esas imágenes que me has pasado. Por otro lado, el mapa al parecer era plagio externo a Wikimedia Commons. La fecha de 1997 era la de fundación/creación de la página, pero no significa que todo su contenido se subiera en esa fecha. Gracias, también, por tus buenas colaboraciones fotografiando México. Recibe un saludo, Strakhov (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Por favor Marrovi, nunca hagas eso. Básicamente lo que logras es propagar un bulo por decenas de wikis. No sé si se debería dejar subir a Commons banderas falsas/ficticias que no existen, pero por favor, no las cueles en Wikipedia vía Wikidata. ¿Ok? Gracias por entender. He visto unas fotos tuyas en Toledo hace unos años. Una ciudad preciosa! Recibe un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marrovi/Archive_2016&oldid=274569109"