User talk:Mariordo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BRT Curitiba[edit]

Thanks, please to help you. Regarding my mistake about "bus stops" and "stations" it was due to my lack of knowledge about BRT system of Curitiba. Anyway, I reverted my edits into that categories. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Pictures[edit]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware pictures (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ES_JoyadeCeren_06_2011_Estructura_9_Area_2_Tamazcal_2106_zoom_out.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ES_SanAndres_06_2011_Estructura_1_La_Acropolis_2161.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tazumal_Panorama_5.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.162.209.2 06:04, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota Prius image[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you spelled "Prius" wrong (as "Pruis") in your image below. Mattbrundage (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for let me know about the typo. Now I am quite busy, I will try to fix it (upload a corrected version) by next weekend.--Mariordo (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I still have not had the time to fix it, but I plan to update the data to include 2012 sales and fix the typo during July.--Mariordo (talk) 18:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Mariordo :) i have see your upload in this category: Category:Salão Internacional do Automóvel 2014 São Paulo. how is it possible that there is no photograph of a car FIAT which are the best selling cars and modern of Brazil? I thought maybe you forgot to charge them, if you have them can you upload to commons? There is a terrible shortage of Fiat Brazil on wikimedia commons, new road, new prizes, grand siena, new line, new one, new Doblò, new idea .. :( is really depressing, you could help commons in this sense? Thanks hello . BUON ANNO :) --Pava (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS

I've noticed that you've never visited Italy (the beautiful country) but you have visited other European countries much more ugly :D .. I am very sorry, you are welcome in Italy, we come to the EXPO Milano 2015? Hello thanks again. --Pava (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pava, unfortunately I only took pictures of green cars at the show, and Fiat didn't have any. I have been trying to travel to Italy for a long time, and visit at least Rome, Venice and Florence, but I need at least two weeks to accomplish this goal. I hope 2015 will be the year. Cheers and happy 2015--Mariordo (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ok thank you :) if you see Fiat automobiles in Brazil and if you want, take it with a camera or smartphone. Wikimedia commons is very poor in brazilian automobiles :( . Thank you and happy new year --Pava (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File talk:VW Golf TDI Clean Diesel WAS 2010 8983.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Davidwr (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Fusion paint[edit]

Regarding these pictures: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Ford_Fusion_Hybrid_trim.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Ford_Fusion_Hybrid.jpg The paint, especially on the doors, looks to have faint black swirls in it. I suppose it could be a reflection of the foreground, but there doesn't appear to be anything there that would cause this. Is it some kind of weird paint, or an artifact of being a digital image?

Hi there. The original pic is not mine. My guess is that the image is low resolution in bad lighting, so when you adjust contrast it gets distorted. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 03:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am just temporarily uploading the full image, so that it will pass the Flickr review. Once that's done, I will revert it back to the cropped version. Elisfkc (talk) 03:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Elisfkc, but it doesn't work that way. The bot requested an admin, he will check manually and passed the pic. I have uploaded dozens of cropped/derivative works without any problem. The way you did I will have to upload the derivative separately and link to the original. I would appreciate if you restore the version I uploaded initially, the file is already in use in three articles (ant the original shows the car very small to show the green sticker). Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 03:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Already done, both what I wanted from it and what you wanted. Elisfkc (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks.--Mariordo (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rio 01 2013 TransOeste 5819.JPG[edit]

Why are the faces censored in File:Rio 01 2013 TransOeste 5819.JPG? Can this image be re-uploaded without censorship? People in public have no expectation of privacy. Commons should not accept censored images because they are an insult to the art of documentary photography. Belnik Asrick (talk) 02:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a matter of expectation of privacy or art, please read the policy about photographs of identifiable people, which varies by country. In the particular case of Brazil, consent is needed for just taking a photograph of one or more identifiable people, not to mention publishing it and/or using it commercially even if the person is in a public place (and the Commons license always allows commercial use!). Check the list of Country specific consent requirements, in Brazil the consent is required by law. Therefore, I can not attend your request. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:BEV EPA range comparison 2016-2017 MY priced under 50K US.png[edit]

Hi! I see that the Ioniq Electric (2017) with combined EPA-rated range of 124 mi (200 km) is missing. You should add it when you have time. I will also say that the new upgraded 2017 E-Golf is said to achieve an EPA-estimated range of 125 mi (but I think it is not confirmed yet). SideMaster (User SideMaster) 18:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, I will update it as soon as I have some time available. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 22:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I really like this graph. In addition to the update provided by Sidemaster, the following two vehicles seem to fall into the 2016-2017 MY period - http://www.motoring.com.au/ford-focus-electric-has-range-boosted-to-185km-104765/?gclid=COHMwOKR9NICFYWXvQodvFAAuA and http://www.motoring.com.au/renault-reveals-long-range-zoe-104112/ — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 49.197.182.195 (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. Nevertheless note that the graph only includes EPA-rated models. The Zoe is not available in the U.S., and because only has a NEDC rated range it is not possible to include, because of difference in testing methods. The NEDC test results in much higher driving ranges than EPA's (it is well-known that NEDC is very lax as compared to EPA). I will check for the EPA-rating for the Focus. Right now I am quite busy, so I expect to do these changes in early April. Cheers and thx again.--Mariordo (talk) 13:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Update done. All other EV models rated as of March 26, 2017 were included.Mariordo (talk) 15:22, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to give attribution[edit]

Hi Mariordo,

How does one attribute the pictures to the original photographer. What format and where are you expecting it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.113.46.215 (talk) 22:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You just add in the caption or somewhere else "Picture taken by xxxx license under the Creative Commons yyyy" (just copy the description of the license accompanying the photo). Sometimes the author explicitly request how their name is to be credited. In my case, when asked, I prefer "Mario R. Durán Ortiz" - Cheers.Mariordo (talk) 22:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hey, Mario. I've just sent you an email, ok? Regards, CasteloBrancodiskuto 15:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oi Michel, ja respondi seu email. Abraços. --Mariordo (talk) 03:27, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 14:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 14:43, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Top selling electric cars[edit]

hola. has hecho un gran trabajo con la tabla https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Global_plug-in_car_sales_since_2011.png

busco algo parecido de modelos mas vendidos y lo único que encuentro es la tabla que hay al final de este apartado https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car#Highway_capable pero eso no lo puedo copiar/usar en wikipedia en español

creo que estaría muy bien si hicieras una tabla en formato png (que si podría usar en wikipedia en español y cualquier idioma) con esos datos (yo no se hacerlo). gracias. saludos --146.158.200.236 02:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. En realidad si la puedes copiar, yo te ayudo a traducir los encabezados y el resto de la tabla. Si fuera un png prefiero hacer un grafico. Si la copias me avisas y yo te completo la traduccion, o solo dime en cual articulo la quieres copiar y yo lo exporto. Saludos. --Mariordo (talk) 05:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

me gustaría incluirlo en https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autom%C3%B3vil_el%C3%A9ctrico#Ventas si lo puedes incluir tu te lo agradezco. de todos modos creo que sería mejor hacer un gráfico en png . gracias. saludos --146.158.200.236 00:18, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please correct the caption of your graph, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Top_countries_plug-in_ownership_per_1000_people_2018.png ? The numbers are apparently the market share of EV's sold in a given year by place rather than the total fraction of EVs in the place as stated in the caption. Thanks. Fotoguru (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fotoguru. This graph is NOT about market share. It is the total number of registered EVs divided by the population of the country (stock of vehicles per capita) for a given year. Ownership per capita changes every year, and in the transportation field the convention is to report it by 1000 inhabitants. Check here for further clarification of this parameter. I hope this clarifies your question.--Mariordo (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Nissan Leaf and Tesla Model S racing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ghouston (talk) 02:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:PEV sales US California 2010 2017.png[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 06:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging copyvios[edit]

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 06:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the cue, I will next time.--Mariordo (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Damien Meyer EcoPass Milan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need to ask you a question[edit]

Good morning, I need to ask you a question about a picture that you uploaded several years ago. It's important, please contact me. Thanks a lot

Zambesi returns (talk) 22:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Mariordo,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Friaren[edit]

Hola. Vi que categorizaste y describiste algunas de las fotos que subí hace tiempo. Me temo que en el caso de file:Geirangerfjorden 45.jpg, no es la cascada de Friaren. Lo puedes comprobar comparando con file:Geirangerfjorden 66.jpg tomada el mismo día. Saludos. --Millars (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, tienes razón, no es la misma, ya revertí mis cambios. No se cuál cascada es, entones dejé la descripción y cat originales. Gracias por avisarme de mi error. — Mariordo (talk) 00:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Juan Santamaria International Airport has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Liverpoolpics (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sloveniaforyou - your Venice photo[edit]

Hello Mariordo!

Making a request here as I can't see the email button anywhere? Anyway, love your photo of the San Frangisk in Venice. Is it possible to use this on our ferry page? Of course we will credit but just wanted permission first.

Regards Greg Sloveniaforyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sloveniaforyou (talk • contribs) 23:15, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greg, of course you can use it, the image license is attribution share-alike. Please use my full name for attribution: Mario R. Duran Ortiz, and I will appreciate if you drop me a line here with the web link where the image is being used. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 03:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mario! The page is uploaded so please have a look - www.sloveniaforyou.com/Ferry.htm . There is a credit at the bottom as well. Thanks again and have a great day! Greg

Christ the Redeemer panoramic picture[edit]

Hi Mariordo - Is the Christ the Redeemer panoramic picture an aerial shot, from a helicopter ? Ot is there any spot in Rio from where you took this picture..... I am going to Rio and your response would really help. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:646:8D00:8860:840B:C6E:5F64:96E6 (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It was taken from a helicopter. Cheers and enjoy Rio!—-Mariordo (talk) 10:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Digital control screen Tesla Model 3 DCA 08 2018 0268.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Digital control screen Tesla Model 3 DCA 08 2018 0268.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2011 Chevrolet Volt NRMA cropped.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2011 Chevrolet Volt NRMA cropped.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sourced to file since deleted as copyvio or missing Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for letting me know. I do not have any idea of the source of the original file, I did not uploaded it, only made the derivative work. So if the original was deleted as copyvio the derivative must go. I already replaced it in most articles it was used. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 14:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thanks for your effort!

Libardomm (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please update chart US_PEV_Sales_2010_by_PHEV_vs_BEV.png[edit]

Thanks for your previous contributions to the EV articles. Would you please update this chart with the 2020 numbers now included in the article? Thanks again. Fotoguru (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fotoguru. I have been quite busy lately, but I will try to update it in the next couple of weeks. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 23:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Skyline La Defense Paris 04 2018 9411 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Sketch La Isabela SDQ 10 2019 1056.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sketch La Isabela SDQ 10 2019 1056.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Matlin (talk) 09:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:2014 Honda Accord Plug-In Hybrid Sedan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : None.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:The Three Soldiers and Vietnam Veterans Memorial DC 12 2011 000129.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : H-stt.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Three Soldiers and Vietnam Veterans Memorial DC 12 2011 000129.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

h-stt !? 18:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Damage 2011 earthquake Washington National Cathedral has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]