User talk:MJJR/archive 2009

MJJR - User talk: ARCHIVE 2009

Thanks!

Thanks for your good image File:Taba Heights R10.jpg! I just wanted to let you know that I used it in a blog post (I, of course, mentioned you and the CC license). Again thanks for your nice image! Best wishes, Calandrella (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year to you, too! Calandrella (talk) 17:03, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint Salvatortoren R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Coincidence ?

Dag Marc. Zegt deze plek je nog iets? ;-)). Lycaon (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Haan duinen R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

D90

Hi Marc, i have seen that you have uploaded pictures taken with a D90. Did you buy this camera or did some lend it to you? How satisfied are you with the camera? Iam asking because I want to buy this camera, too. --Simonizer (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• Hi Marc, thanks for your comment. I just bought it myself today. Lets find out what this baby is made of! Maybe we can exchange our experiences? --Simonizer (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taba Heights Hyatt R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok. --Eusebius 08:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeebrugge berijmd Strand R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- Ianare 07:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Comme pour moi, photo copiée-collée sans mention d'auteur et de licence

Bonjour, Marc ! Je signale que le site d'une association généalogique a mis en ligne au moins une de tes photos sans te citer comme auteur et sans mention de la licence ! Qui plus est, le nom d'un autre accompagne ta photo ... c'est d'ailleurs celui du président lui-même de l'association, un certain Sébastien Sartori ! Regarde http://www.genealogie-aisne.com/ et clique sur le lien "Communes" dans le menu horizontal sur fond jaune en haut ! et tu prends ensuite le lien "Visiter la cathédrale" dans le menu vertical à droite ! Une assez grande quantité de vues sont ainsi illégitimement copiées par ce site ! J'en ai déjà repéré 3 de moi-même ! Je viens de prévenir hier et aujourd'hui sur le Bistro de la WP francophone ... et j'ai envoyé 2 mails au gestionnaire du site en "infraction" ! Il serait bien que tu les contactes aussi de ton côté pour ta vue

• File:Soissons Monument aux Morts.jpg

Les miennes sont celles-ci (mais j'en ai peut-être encore d'autres à découvrir !) :

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beaurain_%C3%A9glise_fortifi%C3%A9e_1.jpg
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saint-Algis_%C3%A9glise_fortifi%C3%A9e_(sud)_1.jpg
• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saint-Michel_abbaye_1.jpg

Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice colours --Böhringer 21:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments coole szene --Böhringer 19:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 23:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Turtle House R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice House --Böhringer 21:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Mosque R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Berthold Werner 17:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcissus R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO OK --Mbdortmund 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments interesting composition, no tourists :-) --Ianare 03:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Bus R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments funny --Mbdortmund 21:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Library R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok, nice colours --Berthold Werner 15:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)  Comment Maybe the palmtree bit on the left could be cropped out. -- Eusebius 13:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)  Done -- MJJR 21:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Zeytouna R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brillant durchgezeichnet mit hellen Lichtern und tiefen Schatten. Gute Komposition. Fingalo 21:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna AmUniv R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gute Komposition. Fingalo 19:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Golf R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Saubere Arbeit. Fingalo 19:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Golf R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Brillante Komposition. Fingalo 20:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, good quality --Simonizer 22:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good atmosphere --Mbdortmund 01:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 13:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

El Gouna Bus

Hi Marc, do you follow the nom ? After a hesitant start it's going better and better --Richard Bartz (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. Solid quality. --Dschwen 15:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pro2 14:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

El Gouna Bus II

CONGRATULATIONS
--Richard Bartz (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:El Gouna Bus R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:El Gouna Bus R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition Gnangarra 08:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna R27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Mbdortmund 18:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Tamr Henna R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine with me.--Mbz1 03:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EL Gouna R25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Gouna Tamr Henna R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulp R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough. --Siipikarja 10:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulp R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Pro2 14:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulp R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here -- Pro2 14:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polystichum setiferum MJJR 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for sure. Good DOF. Lycaon 21:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Hosta R01.jpg name

I often ask these questions at en:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous. For a quick response style it like a competition e.g. "first person to name the plant gets a barnstar" It worked for me! =P Jolly Janner (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aardbeienplant R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp, natural colours --Mbdortmund 23:18, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosta R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Can somebody help with the exact species name? Thanks. -- MJJR 20:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC) Possibly Hosta undulata 'Albomarginata'. Lycaon 17:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC) * Support I updated the description page. The photo is good. --Ianare 22:26, 11 May 2009 (UTC) -- Thanks a lot to you and to Lycaon (and to Jolly Janner for his suggestion). -- MJJR 09:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:El Gouna Turtle House R01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:El Gouna Turtle House R01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Loop2009 R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments De coupeure begot!! A kléen bitje lawijt in de lucht, moar anders nie slicht ;-). Lycaon 21:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zevenbladbloem R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great! Yann 21:12, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madeliefjes R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good. Lycaon 21:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniphofia Uvaria R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. Lycaon 21:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitalis R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good QI --George Chernilevsky 20:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koningskaars R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments background would look better with lower F-stop, but good otherwise. --Ianare 06:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupine R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A fast promote for me. --Iotatau 21:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Berthold Werner 12:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Zaun verdeckt leider unteren Teil der Gebäude --Mbdortmund 01:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC) It's the wall, not the fence(?) But still ok for me. --Berthold Werner 12:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Werk aan de winkel

Dag Marc.

Zou je als je eens een paar minuutjes (uurtjes?) tijd hebt je foto's kunnen indelen als volgt: [1] en [2]? Bedankt. Lycaon (talk) 13:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iraklion haven R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Ianare 08:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knossos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. You were lucky with the weather, it was overcast when I took a similar picture some years ago. Lycaon 22:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agave americana R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --George Chernilevsky 21:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iraklion fort R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good work, QI --George Chernilevsky 17:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)  Question What is tiny red spot at bottom center, like laser pointer? --George Chernilevsky 17:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC) -- Thank you for your remark. I have no explanation for the presence of that strange red spot. I removed it. -- MJJR 20:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crete Landscape R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, attractive foreground. --Iotatau 09:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. --High Contrast 22:22, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crete Landscape R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 09:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kissamos R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting contrast -- H005 09:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good shot, description should have more detail. --Smial 22:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC) --  Done Description completed -- MJJR 08:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herford Münsterkirche R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support -- H005 21:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phalasarna Coast R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maedin 06:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wewelsburg Sankt Jodokus R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Please add geocode. --Smial 09:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC) --  Done: Geocode added. -- MJJR 18:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasithi R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good for me --George Chernilevsky 11:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kissamos Bay R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maedin 06:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)  Comment Aaah, although it's been almost 10 years since I was there, I immediately knew where it is w/o looking at the description. Cool! 8-) -- H005 18:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC) -- It's my pleasure! MJJR 18:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterlelie R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Yerpo 06:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Smedenpoort R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wenn Du das Raw noch hast, hell doch die Schatten ein wenig auf, aber auch sonst gut --Mbdortmund 22:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagen Freilichtmuseum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 01:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Detmold Freilichtmuseum R05.jpg, which was nominated by Mmxx at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Detmold Freilichtmuseum R05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagen Freilichtmuseum R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster Dom R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Minnewater R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münster Liebfrauen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent detail. --Ferengi 13:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Poertoren R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Berthold Werner 12:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:FP promotion

Your welcome, actually I must thank you for providing this pictures to Wikimedia Commons. Thanks :)   ■ MMXX^talk  15:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detmold Freilichtmuseum R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it --Mbdortmund 21:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kissamos R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments someway a terrible place but good composition and it is good to show those places, too --Mbdortmund 12:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysoskalitissa R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good colors --Böhringer 21:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kissamos R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit boring, but technically good --Mbdortmund 12:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phalasarna R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Informative, good quality. -- Smial 12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysoskalitissa R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly overexposed, but still very good. -- Smial 12:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagen Freilichtmuseum R06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Smial 15:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 08:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania Lighthouse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments have you tried a little darker exposure? --Mbdortmund 23:12, 2 August 2009 (UTC) -- Unfortunately not. It was a sunny and somewhat hazy morning. I can try to edit this image, but in fact, it renders very good the atmosphere and light conditions of that day. -- MJJR 20:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC) it is QI anyway, good details and composition, I just thought it could even be a little better --Mbdortmund 03:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments but I would not like to stay in such hotels.--Two+two=4 01:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania R04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Two+two=4 01:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zarren Wullepitmolen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. -- Smial 22:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diksmuide Stadhuis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky a little noisy but good composition and DOF --Ianare 20:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boezinge Ieperleekanaal R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 19:59, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Augustijnenbrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Marcok 23:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Koningsbrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --George Chernilevsky 14:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Carmersbrug R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition--Kirua 13:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Goudenhandrei R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Lycaon 00:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Augustijnenbrug R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Lycaon 00:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knokke Strandcabines R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me --Korall 21:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pier Blankenberge R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks nice to me--Korall 20:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)New crop looks good to, ill promote anyone of them. Korall 20:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meetkerkse Moere R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --George Chernilevsky 09:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brugge Vlamingbrug R01 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The wall at the lower left is IMO 'too long'. Could you crop the lowermost part away? --Cayambe 08:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC) --  Done MJJR 21:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Ok, but IMO the crop should still be tighter: top (too much skye) and bottom, sorry. If done, I'll support --Cayambe 13:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC) I don't think that a further cropping will improve the image, sorry. -- MJJR 09:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Ok IMHO --Berthold Werner 11:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koksijde Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Mbz1 22:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Szechenyi lanchid R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough, but IMO less sky would have been better.--Mbz1 23:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest lantern R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough, although it could have been better, if highlights where not overexposed. Orientation is good, I would definitley not correct perspective or tilt here ;-) -- Johannes Robalotoff 21:38, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Castle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent IMO. --Cayambe 08:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Gellért R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Castle R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 08:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Funicular R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good QI. The unavoidable perspective distortion in the left and right background is acceptable here IMO. --Cayambe 21:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Széchenyi Baths R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- H005 21:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Vajdahunyad Castle R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Berthold Werner 06:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Castle R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good image, geocoded, QI. -- H005 16:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Panorama R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent IMO. --Cayambe 14:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Széchenyi Baths R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice room, light atmosphere, geocoded - perfect. -- H005 16:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Fine Arts Museum R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Budapest Széchenyi Baths R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Aqwis 15:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bredene Paelsteenpanne R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice shot. good composition. --Cayambe 07:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Godinne Meuse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Ianare 04:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinant Meuse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 21:52, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anseremme Spoorbrug R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good picture, no obvious quality issues. --Maurilbert 01:12, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anseremme Meuse R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 10:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anseremme Meuse R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maedin 19:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinant Rochers Freyr R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --AFBorchert 06:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anseremme Marina R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freyr R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 01:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vêves R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeebrugge Jachthaven R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 01:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostende Westerstaketsel R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes - QI to me --Herbythyme 18:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeebrugge Containerkranen R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Illustrative, impressive lighting and clouds. Well done. --Ikiwaner 18:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharm el Sheikh R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 18:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeebrugge Jachthaven R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me --Herbythyme 17:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naama Bay Promenade R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 09:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeebrugge Visserskruis R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a good image... which should be cropped IMO: slightly so at the top, a bit more at the bottom. --Cayambe 19:38, 21 December 2009 (UTC)  Support very good as is IMO. --George Chernilevsky 07:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naama Bay Promenade R02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 21:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naama Bay Beach R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Mbz1 21:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiran R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Mbz1 00:46, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharm Garden R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good--Mbz1 21:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naama Bay R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 19:23, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naama Bay Promenade R03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Cayambe 19:23, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharm Soho Square R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bigger DOF would be nice but its still ok --Simonizer 16:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sharm Road R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I would have cropped it at the right side to cut off the cut off palm.--Mbz1 21:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)  Done -- MJJR 12:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC). Good now. --Cayambe 20:14, 30 December 2009 (UTC)