User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores 8

De vuelta[edit]

Tu cuenta ya está desbloqueada. Bienvenido. Un abrazo. Anna (talk) 15:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bem-vindo de volta :). Patrícia ^msg 20:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

¿Poca cosa?[edit]

Supongo que lo de poca cosa lo dices por el tamaño de los animalitos que fotografías, porque la foto es grandiosa. Ni siquiera puedo imaginar el tiempo y la paciencia que habrás invertido para conseguirla, así que acepto la dedicatoria encantada :) Anna (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Benvido[edit]

Moitas gracias Lmbuga por volver estar aquí.Elvire (talk) 07:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poís o que che pareza Lmbuga, eu penso ca túa colaboración é sempre de moito proveito tanto para os proxecto en xeral e en particular para os da lingua galega. Saúdos Lmbuga, estou mui contenta e ata outraElvire (talk) 20:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Santiago Jaureguizar[edit]

Graciñas--Iesmgb2 (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:2 nuevas arañas sin identificar[edit]

Todas las imágenes son las arañas cangrejo, pero la araña en Vilarromarís, Oroso es masculino Diaea sp. ¿Quizá masculino Diaea dorsata? Yo ni idea de la otra araña... aún. Sorry it took me so long, pero es difícil a veces!:) Bugboy52.40 (talk) 19:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lmbuga!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Moedas.JPG is uncategorized since 22 June 2009.
Image:Voando de Madrid a Compostela.jpg is uncategorized since 22 June 2009.
Image:Velaíña 350.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Esteiro. Muros. Galiza 5.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Agrotis exclamationis 336.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Cabo da Roca eue.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Esteiro. Muros. Galiza 4.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Re:Vall de Xàlima[edit]

Toda la página de Lycos parece copiada de este sitio, puesto que la imagen tiene esa marca de copyright, marca que ha desaparecido misteriosamente de la subida aquí, así que borrada. Todas las contribuciones de este usuario son sospechosas, las imágenes que he revisado al azar proceden de 5 cámaras diferentes, y otras carecen totalmente de metadatos, además de tener muy poca resolución. He borrado una segunda que era claramente copyvio, pero el localizarlas todas (estoy convencida de que ninguna es trabajo propio) es tarea imposible. Un abrazo. Anna (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2009 (UTC) PD:Encontré algunas más[reply]

Tendré en cuenta tu oferta, ya sabes que todas las manos y todos los ojos son pocos siempre por aquí. Un bico. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Escultura en Lalín[edit]

Mira, esta tela na Category:Sculptures in Galicia, pero non lle pega moito, non? Non cha movín, pero tes lista a Category:Sculptures in Lalín por se a querese seguir considerando escultura. Supoño que a meteches nesa cat. polo gran cartel, non? --Iago ^Conversation 09:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Río Arnoia[edit]

Estas tres fotos: 1, 2 e 3 son do Río Arnoia ou do Río Avia? --Iago ^Conversation 15:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de foto[edit]

Hola. Resulta que por error subí la misma foto 2 veces, podrías borrar esta? [1] Muchas gracias. --Fotg (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Missplagioperu2009.jpg[edit]

Hola, Lmbuga, tanto tiempo. ¿Podrías borrar Missplagioperu2009.jpg? Se trata de un esfuerzo de sabotaje por parte de un usuario en es.wikipedia. El nombre de usuario con que la subió es el nombre de un usuario levemente modificado con el que tiene un desacuerdo. La foto original no está licenciada. Muchas gracias --Cratón (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abellón, abázcaro en Bastavales, Brión, 090726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Categorías incorrectas[edit]

Ya están todas borradas y las imágenes trasladadas, comprueba que esté todo bien Category:Churches in Lugo. La plantilla para borrado rápido es {{speedy|razón}} No te extrañe que se te haya olvidado, yo tampoco recuerdo la mayoría y cada vez que necesito alguna me paso un buen rato buscando, será porque hay demasiadas, o que nos estamos haciendo viejos :). En cualquiera de los casos, estas dos categorías ayudan Category:Commons templates-gl y Category:Translated problem tags y sino me das un silbidito. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

De nada, es un trabajo más ameno que perseguir vándalos, así que poco a poco puedo ir trasladando las subcategorías de los monasterios, realmente está desastrosa. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request for Mosca[edit]

Mosca[edit]

Mosca has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--gian_d (talk) 19:12, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

——>

Galego: Crin que este era un proxecto multilingüe: gl:Mosca, es:Mosca, pt:Mosca

Español: Creía que Commons era un proyecto multilingüe: gl:Mosca, es:Mosca, pt:Mosca

Português: Pensava que Commons era um projecto multilingüe: gl:Mosca, es:Mosca, pt:Mosca

Commons:Language policy#Titles of articles: Redirect : an article that provides a redirect from one language to the main article...Anyone can create redirects from their own language to the main article page --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 11:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid! I didn't know that, so I'll remove the request. ~~Please, when create a redirect, don't categorize the redirect!~~ --gian_d (talk) 15:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: we tell "mosca" (as fly) also in italian language --gian_d (talk) 15:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araña. A Estrada, Galiza. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 20:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscas. Fecundación. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments really good --Mbdortmund 16:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Meras fotografías[edit]

Hola Luis, me alegro de verte por aquí (aunque sea sólo de vez en cuando) ayudando a descubrir material ilegal. He puesto una solicitud de borrado a la Category:Festival Rock Zaidín, la política sobre carteles/affiches no ha cambiado, se siguen considerando fair use o copyvio pero no siempre se detectan, cada día hay más archivos y no creo que aumente la cantidad de "vigilantes" en la misma proporción, por lo tanto gracias por estar atento. En cuanto a Galicia, no creas que es tanta mi labor, me paso de vez en cuando, vigilo o toqueteo algo aquí y allá, pero sigue faltando tu mano :-( Un gran abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:55, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ventando en Vilanova de Arousa.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:19, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Faro de Cabo Vilán, Camariñas, Galiza.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:37, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Ría de MUROS. Serres, Muros, Galiza.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Pequeño problema[edit]

Hola Luis, ante todo feliz año nuevo. En cuanto a la imagen que me comentas, he borrado todas las versiones dejando únicamente la última subida por ti, pero temo que he metido la pata según el comentario de User:DrJunge en respuesta a tu queja, traduzco:

Hola Lmbuga, si hubieras observado el historial de la imagen te habrías dado cuenta de que estábamos editando el fichero al mismo tiempo. Cuando noté el conflicto revertí la imagen a la tuya. El que la miniatura mostrara aún la firma de la imagen de Flickr es un error relacionado con la caché que se da cuando las imágenes subidas consecutivamente no difieren en tamaño. En este momento el conflicto de caché está resuelto, por eso las dos últimas imágenes son absolutamente idénticas. Por tanto no hay mal comportamiento por mi parte. Además, la imagen subida debería ser siempre la misma que la de Flickr y la versión retocada debería sobrescribir la original. Esto ayuda a FlickrBot y nos ahorra un montón de trabajo. Adelante con el buen trabajo. -Mirko Junge (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Esa frase que he marcado en negrita es la que me hace pensar en la metedura de pata, debería haber dejado también la versión con firma. Como apenas he trabajado con imágenes de Flickr no lo sabía.

Otra cosa, he estado ojeando ese grupo de Flickr y me parece una idea excelente que ayudará a ilustrar muchos artículos que no tienen imagen, lo que (a mi parecer) crea un poco de confusión es el título del grupo "Galiza. Dominio público". De las imágenes que he visto, todas tienen licencia Creative Commons, no dominio público, sin embargo, según el comentario que has dejado en las que has subido a Galipedia éstas las has licenciado en dominio público. Entonces ¿has subido las mismas a Commons con licencia CC? o ¿si alguien quiere trasladarlas aquí debería cambiar la licencia de DP a CC que es la que tiene cada imagen original en Flickr? No sé si me he explicado bien o te he armado un lío, ya me dirás.

Y, por último, si necesitas ayuda para categorizar las imágenes que vayas subiendo dímelo, me pasaré todos los días por tus contribuciones (o con la frecuencia que las subas) y las categorizaré.

Un abrazo, Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Entendido, no sabía que en Flickr no se pudiera licenciar en dominio público. Siempre se aprende algo, como tú dices. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galego2006.gif[edit]

Hello!

Can you give more detailed information about the above stated file? Essential source information is missing; the stated source Commons is not sufficient. It remains unclear under which licence the single images fall that appear in the background of that gif-animation. Thanks. --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: You are no Commons-admin. Please remove the tag on your Userpage. That misrepresentation may confuse other users. Thank you. --High Contrast (talk) 17:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Why do you boast being an administrator, when you actually aren't an admin? --High Contrast (talk) 18:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand you. Please speak spanish, portuguesh or galician language. Sameone speak that, i can't understand what tag I must remove--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 18:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. See User:Lmbuga--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 18:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK! This image: modificación = muy bien. Done! ¡muchas gracias! --High Contrast (talk) 18:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categorías de graffitis[edit]

Boas Lmbuga ! Non sei moito se estas dúas categorías merecen un amaño :

esta Category:Graffiti in Galicia (Spain) liga directamente coa categoría nai de Galicia, cousa que non me convence. Pero o titulo Category:Graffiti in Galicia (Spain) resulta harmonizado cos nomes das categorías en commons ;
esta Category:Graffiti in Galicia esta ligada coa categoría : Art of Galicia (Spain), mellor categorizada, pero titulo malo.
Propoñote de levar todo o contido de Category:Graffiti in Galicia dentro da Category:Graffiti in Galicia (Spain) e de mudarlle a categoría desta ultima ?
Ti dirás, eu estou disposta a facer o traballo como ti digas, ou como se consensue se outros querén opinar.
Poño nota na taberna, polo caso coutros usuarios queiran opinar.
A túa disposición e dos outros usuarios. Saúdos Lmbuga Elvire (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias Lmbuga.

Para o das categorías dos graffitis penso que fixen o adecuado. Quero engadir que xa fas moito traballo coas fotos, ten coidado de non facer maís co que dache prazer a ti, de meterte presión para que todo sexa perfecto podes desanimarte, enrabiarte, disculparte etc etc., e eso sería unha gran perdida para os proxctos wiki en galego e sobre Galicia. Eu sei, que non che damos moita axuda, non che vou explicar a razón eiqui, pero podoche asegurar que eso non ten relación nin coa túa personalidade, nin por falla de estar conciente cas metas que vas levando a cabo necesitan un equipo. Lembra sempre que calquer usuario da Galipedia ou de commons con sentido común aprecia a importancia, a calidade e a cantidade do teu traballo.
Polo das tarefas que estan pendentes que me dis, non estou segura de entender correctamente o que eu podo facer. De vez en cando intentaria dar unha mán dentro das miñas posibilidades.
De todas formas lembra sempre que cando fago algo mal sempre podes corrixir e/ou comentarmelo. Xa sabes que eu concordando ou discordando non me ofendo.
Ánimate Lmbuga, e ten confianza na colaboración doutros (e en particular da miña) ainda que non sexan como ti queres. Unha aperta Elvire (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Da última vez[edit]

Sóache?:

File:Mosca fly GFDL934.JPG[edit]

This is Stomoxys calcitrans They bite Notafly (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:File:Mixós, Estevesiños, Monterrei 05jpg[edit]

Hola, el archivo ya había sido borrado por otro admin. En cuanto a la plantilla {{Bad name}} estaba bien puesta para ese caso. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Sellos[edit]

En España los sellos no están en dominio público, salvo los de autor desconocido y sólo tras 70 años después de su emisión. En Category:Stamps of Spain hay una nota avisando de ello con el enlace a la página donde se explica. He borrado la imagen y advertido al usuario. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:39, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Luis, gracias a ti, a ti y a otros como tú que necesitan algo de mí, yo no hago lo que haces tú, hacer buenas fotos, subirlas, subir las de otros y colaborar en ilustrar artículos. Mis actividades son otras y entre ellas ayudar en lo que pueda y sepa, por lo tanto quítate el mal sabor y gracias por esa confianza que es la que estimula para seguir dedicando el tiempo y el esfuerzo y, sobre todo, sentirse útil en este trabajo. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bechos Bastavales 060705 19.jpg[edit]

La controversia se suscitó en Image Value en las fotografías de los insectos (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Valued_image_candidates.) Yo sostengo que la fotografía que usted está haciendo es lo mejor, pero no es géododé puede añadir esta, gracias y bravo para sus fotos. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carteles Rock Zaidín[edit]

¿Por qué usted afirma que no respeto los derechos de autor? Yo soy el autor y cedí los derechos. ¿Por qué borraron tantas fotos? KronT 02:19, 13 Marzo 2010 (UTC)

RE: Supongo que usted conoce las políticas expresadas en Commons:Trabajos derivados. Si las conoce, sabe que para poder mantener esas fotos, además de ser usted el autor de las fotos tiene que ser el autor de los carteles.

Por otro lado, el origen de las imágenes debe estar claramente referenciado y en los datos de las mismas debería aparecer que usted es el autor de los carteles. La ausencia de ese dato me llevó a dirigirme a un administrador preguntando si se permitían los carteles.

El administrador con buen criterio creó una discusión el 16 de diciembre de 2009. Tiene enlace a esa discusión justo en el mensaje inmediatamente superior a este. Dado que usted no ha defendido en la discusión las fotos, estas han sido tres meses después borradas.

¿Realmente es usted el autor de los carteles?. Gracias y un cordial saludo--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 04:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He explicado al usuario los pasos a seguir para obtener el permiso de OTRS. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prairie dog[edit]

Do you know where you took File:Can da pradeira-Prairie dog.jpg? I'm trying to identify it but that is hard without knowing where it is from. Ucucha (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll look up what prairie dogs there are in zoos in Madrid. Ucucha (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Insua[edit]

Ola, Lmbuga: Observei que unha foto túa da ría de Ortigueira non foi tirada dende Insua, senon dende Barbos. Tentei arranxalo. Un saúdo--Céltigos (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Violación de copyright[edit]

Hola Luis, como puedes ver aquí el asunto está solucionado, Nilfanion ha simplificado las descripciones, añadido el autor de cada una de ellas y actualizado la licencia. En casos así tú mismo podrías haberlo hecho, no es necesario ser administrador. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.D: No había visto el hilo superior al enlace que me has dado en el que se trata el mismo tema. Te ruego que te calmes y leas http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Licensing_update/Result/es&uselang=es en Meta, la actualización de licencias ya lleva tiempo haciéndose.

Traduzco la explicación que Nilfanion ha dejado en mi página:

Una imagen marcada con {{GFDL}} se licencia bajo GFDL 1.2 y cualquier versión posterior, esto incluye GFDL 1.3. Esta GFDL 1.3 permite explícitamente relicenciar bajo cc-by-sa-3.0. No hay restricciones en el uso de imágenes PD en una obra derivada. Las imágenes cc-by se pueden usar en una obra derivada bajo "cualquier licencia" a condición de que sea atribuida al creador original. Las imágenes cc-by-sa requieren que la obra derivada sea utilizada bajo una licencia "similar". El texto exacto de cc-by-sa-2.1-es y cc-by-sa-2.5-es es "Usted puede reproducir, distribuir o comunicar públicamente una obra derivada solamente bajo los términos de esta licencia, o de una versión posterior de esta licencia con sus mismos elementos principales, o de una licencia iCommons de Creative Commons que contenga los mismos elementos principales que esta licencia (ejemplo: Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 2.5 Japón)." Por tanto esto permite que las obras derivadas sean licenciadas bajo cc-by-sa-3.0, a condición de que el autor original sea atribuido. La imagen compuesta File:Galegos de soa.jpg es una obra derivada de las 20 originales y como todas permiten que los trabajos derivados sean licenciados con cc-by-sa-3.0, ese archivo tiene la licencia correcta.

Espero que esto te aclare algo del complicado tema de las licencias. Si tienes más dudas dímelo y se las transmitiré a Nilfanion, quien parece dominar el asunto, yo la verdad es que no sería capaz de darte una explicación tan precisa. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos[edit]

Ola outra vez: Sobre duas fotos que subiches na páxina da parroquia de Céltigos. A da rompente, si que é en Mazorgán, pero a outra é unha vista da Estaca de Bares dende o cabo Ortegal, por descontado que se ve Mazorgán, pero coido que no debería figurar en Céltigos.Un saúdo--Céltigos (talk) 20:12, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki.touros.jpg[edit]

Sacámola no bar que hai na rotonda enriba da túa casa, lembras? Falamos... --Sobreira (parlez) 08:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Category:Obradoiro Place[edit]

Hola Luis, ya he puesto el cartel a la categoría para que el bot la redirija y traslade el contenido a Category:Obradoiro Square (es posible que cuando leas esto ya esté hecho).

En cuanto al poster, entra en el contenido no permitido ya que es un póster de hace menos de 70 años (Fair use). Lo he borrado y avisado al usuario. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soigrexa, Bastavales, Brión, Galiza-33.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Soigrexa, Bastavales, Brión, Galiza-31.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Paederus littoralis en Galiza.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Lilioceris lilii 002. Galiza.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Soigrexa, Bastavales, Brión, Galiza-4.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:38, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Adding correct {{Information}} to 1253 of your files[edit]

Hi There! I found 1253 of your files which have a non standard {{Information}} template. I have added a bot request here to change all of them to the standard {{Information}}. I have done an example here. Are you okay with that? Amada44 ^{talk to me} 10:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Español: Gracias. Gracias sobre todo por lo del bot. Hace mucho tiempo que no coloco esa caja de datos, pero quizás haya cientos de imágenes que como esa que indicas fueron subidas en el año 2005 (quizás alguna en el 2006). Un cordial saludo

English: (poor english) Thanks. Thanks mainly for the bot. From year 2005 or 2006 I not put that rectangle of data

. Greetings--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 06:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tabán en Bastavales, Brión, Galicia (Spain).jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Tabán en Bastavales, Brión, Galiza.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Tipulidae en Bastavales, Brión.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Insecto en Soigrexa, Bastavales, Brión, Galicia.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Araña en Soigrexa, Bastavales, Brión, Galiza.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ruego[edit]

Hola Luis, obviamente tienes derecho a opinar pero, en una imagen nominada el lugar para dar tu opinión (argumentada, por supuesto) de porqué no te parece buena esa foto es el espacio de la votación. Entiendo que lo que quieres expresar es tu desacuerdo a que llegue a ser "imagen de calidad", por lo tanto tu opinión sería correcta en ese contexto, no así en la página de discusión, ya que si no resulta elegida se convertirá simplemente en una más de las miles de imágenes que hay aquí y tu opinión resultaría tanto irrelevante como inapropiada, porque las páginas de discusión de una imagen no son para expresar opiniones personales salvo que, por un motivo muy puntual, surja la necesidad de argumentar a favor o en contra de una (para su borrado, por ejemplo). Figúrate la veda tan peligrosa que se abriría si cada uno se dedicara a poner esta foto no me gusta o está foto es estupenda, surgirían réplicas y contraréplicas en plan foro y no es el objetivo de Commons dar cabida a las opiniones subjetivas de cada comunero o visitante ocasional, cuando se permite albergar casi todo tipo de imágenes, desde las excelentes hasta las mediocres sin exigir un baremo de calidad para su permanencia (salvo un mínimo lógico para que se pueda considerar útil). Por consiguiente, te ruego que no continúes la guerra de ediciones, Alvesgaspar no es administrador sino un usuario corriente que también está expresando su opinión y por todo lo que he explicado arriba considero que debes ceder tú. Sinceramente no sé cómo funcionan esas nominaciones y si la imagen ya ha sido definitivamente promovida, si no lo ha sido quizá aún puedas argumentar tu oposición en el sitio adecuado. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incluso en vacaciones sabes que tienes a tu disposición a "alguien" para traducir lo que necesites :):

To avoid a slight blur the image has been treated with an excessive sharpness that creates hard borders and noise.

P.D: El periodo de votación finalizó el 9 de mayo y ya no se pueden añadir votos ni comentarios en la página. Da la impresión de que ha sido aceptada como candidata a imagen de calidad y debería haber una "segunda vuelta" para elegirla como tal o no, pero ya ha llovido desde mayo y no está enlazada a ninguna otra votación, no sé cómo funciona el sistema, es un poco lioso, la verdad.

Un abrazo y recuerda que no me molesta que me molestes. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cantalarrana, Ortoño, Ames-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tremo, Os Ánxeles, Brión.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tremo, Os Ánxeles, Brión. Vicente Ramos Rodríguez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support imo --Niabot 09:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dog. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re:Alucine[edit]

No creo que sea error tuyo, he estado revisando edición por edición desde la última de The High Fin Sperm Whale a las 21:16 hasta la tuya a las 22:09 y en todas (hasta esa tuya) se ve como -- ~~~~ ¿Fallo del software que no reconoció los signos hasta que de repente lo hizo coincidiendo con una edición tuya? A saber, es un misterio. En es-wiki tenemos al Cojuelo para echar la culpa de casos inexplicables como este, igual se ha dado una vuelta por aquí para hacer alguna travesura y te ha tocado a ti ;) Sea lo que sea, no te preocupes, la imagen no ha sido nominada con lo cual ha terminado en el baúl de los recuerdos y no creo que nadie se moleste en revisar el historial por un detalle así. No obstante, si alguien te pidiera cuentas ya ha quedado constancia en este intercambio de mensajes y si necesitas la traducción para hacerte entender intentando explicar lo inexplicable, ya sabes donde estoy. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Follas Novas. Rosalia de Castro Galiza.jpg[edit]

File:Follas Novas. Rosalia de Castro Galiza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--78.55.57.13 10:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De nada[edit]

Si se quiere siempre se encuentran razones para guerrear, pero al final lo único que se consigue es vivir en un cabreo perpetuo y envejecer prematuramente (lo cual cabrea aún más), así que yo prefiero empuñar razones en lugar de hachas y el que las ignore allá su conciencia. De todos modos, no hay mal que por bien no venga, ahora tenemos la portadilla de una primera edición real que quizá no se hubiera subido en años, o nunca. Voy a darle las greacias a Trycatch por el trabajo. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:39, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lamento tu decepción, pero como esto no es una guerra yo no puedo estar de tu parte o en tu contra, lee bien lo que he escrito arriba. He explicado al usuario el error de su acción precipitada (precipitada, no punible, porque no va en contra de ninguna política), acción de la que presumo fe, además de por ser lema de esta santa casa, porque no tengo pruebas para presumir lo contrario, salvo que tu aportes alguna de acciones parecidas, aquí no en galipedia, por supuesto. La cordialidad es una obligación (o debería ser) en un proyecto colaborativo como este y si a eso le llamas templar gaitas pues tú mismo, las seguiré templando donde sea necesario y aplicaré las políticas donde se requiera. La verdad es que no sé porqué te estoy explicando todo esto, Luis, tienes una larga trayectoria como usuario y administrador así que deberías haber reflexionado un poco antes de dejarme ese mensaje tan victimista. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¿La ética de quién, mía o del usuario que ha retirado la imagen? Si es la suya ha quedado clara con su acción, que cada uno lo interprete como guste y si lo indique si cree necesario. Si es la mía no creo haber faltado a ella en ningún momento. En cuanto a la solidaridad tampoco sé a qué te refieres. He intervenido en esa votación en calidad de usuaria dando mi opinión sobre la imagen, si ha sido a favor de mantenerla es porque ese es mi criterio, si hubiera considerado que debía ser borrada habría votado en ese sentido, simplemente. Alucino. Demos el tema por zanjado antes de que la escalada de tonterías llegue a mayores. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 18:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Rivas. Que me queres amor.jpg[edit]

File:Manuel Rivas. Que me queres amor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--78.55.153.140 21:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010-06-12 Valverde Vilarromaris Oroso-5.jpg[edit]

This is a tiny parasitic wasp.I think 95% Pteromalidae. All the best from Ireland Notafly (talk) 08:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Lmbuga!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rúa en Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain) 3.jpg was uncategorized on 20 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ordoeste - A Baña - Galicia - España-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The tree is distracting, but another perspective is not possible--Lmbuga 21:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC) Good for me, with the tree too ! --Jebulon 22:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-07-18. San Martiño Pinario-Santiago Compostela-Galicia (Spain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition, I like it. -- Felix Koenig 14:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opened eggs of Palomena prasina and neoborn stink bug.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seminario maior. Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments An identification of this bishop (?) or abbott (?) would be interesting. The picture is a little bit tilted CW, and needs a perspective correction, especially left IMO. Could be promoted if technical requests done. --Jebulon 16:42, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. New image. I don't know if it's better. Perhaps the image represents Saint Peter, but I am not sure--Lmbuga 20:38, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
imo OK --Mbdortmund 11:46, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Martiño de Fontecada - Santa Comba - Galicia (Spain) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. (Nominated by Lmbuga?) --Berthold Werner 08:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks--Lmbuga 01:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cee - Galiza - Cruceiro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Santa Baia de Dumbría - Dumbría - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Berthold Werner 10:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro de Coucieiro - Muxía - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp --Berthold Werner 17:32, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igrexa de Salomé, Santiago de Compostela 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted. Pitke 09:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
New image, but now I doubt that it is QI. Thanks--Lmbuga 13:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree --Berthold Werner 17:56, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! O Atlante - Porto de Sanxenxo - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wondering where he would find shoes :)--Gaeser 08:51, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-Catedral de Santiago de Compostela-Galicia (Spain) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-Catedral de Santiago de Compostela-Galicia (Spain) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re:A Coruña - La Coruña[edit]

Hola Miguel, he redirigido ambas categorías a las correctas y dejado el aviso en la página de CommonsDelinker para que haga los traslados. Ahora voy a ponerle una nota a Zarateman para avisarle.
Enhorabuena por el montón de fotos destacadas, vaya sorpresa me he llevado al entrar. saludos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.D. Por cierto, el Atlante me ha recordado que puse otra perspectiva de él en Sanxenxo hace unos días ¿Qué te parece añadirla a la galería con la marca de calidad, o sustituirla por la que hay? Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC) (Se me olvidaba otra cosa, debe ser el sueño) Algunos de los pies de foto los he puesto en gallego, copiando de las descripciones de cada foto, claro, pero otros no he sabido. Echa un vistazo por si he metido mucho la pata y añade lo que falta si lo crees conveniente.[reply]

Siempre he visto la marca como la has puesto, antes del texto. Bueno, la galería ha quedado bastante guapa, creo que ya te comenté que las galerías me parecen una herramienta muy útil, en lugar de que la gente tenga que bucear entre las categorías y subcategorías de un tema o lugar en busca de una buena foto que llevarse a las wikis, ahí pueden escoger lo que necesiten de un solo vistazo y se pueden ir incorporando también las imágenes de calidad o destacadas (y va a haber bastantes que añadir como sigas a este ritmo :) ). Disfruta de tu nueva cámara, que ya le estás sacando buen jugo. Ah, la traducción está en el hilo de debajo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 10:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi, it seems you have way more advanced photoediting software than I do, I'm managing somehow with the more or less ancient Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0. If you posses the Curves function, would you please take the original version of File:Palkinnot.jpg to it and see it could be fixed? I tried something, but I'm afraid I cannot help the image too much before I get my hands on newer softa :( Pitke (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, I'd like to see your version of the picture uploaded on a different name :) Pitke (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, parece que tienes software de fotoedición bastante más avanzado que el mío. Me las arreglo de alguna forma con el más o menos anticuado Photoshop. Si tienes la función de Curvas, ¿podrías meter la versión original de File:Palkinnot.jpg en él a ver si se puede solucionar? Intenté algo, pero me temo que no puedo ajustar la imagen mucho más antes de tener un software más nuevo.

Gracias por tu ayuda. Me gustaría ver tu versión de la imagen subida con nombre diferente.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bar Trafalgar - Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sharp --Mbdortmund 17:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro na Ermida de San Xosé de Val, Mazaricos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Pitke 19:04, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio á par do faro - Fisterra - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good, only the photographing tourist I find expendable --Haneburger 05:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leiteira. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --kallerna 17:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Axuda[edit]

El ver las fotos de esa categoría me ha despistado. ¿Son lápidas funerarias o se podrían considerar estelas?
Si son estas últimas hay una Category:Steles in Spain donde puedes incluir la nueva.
Si son lápidas funerarias, en inglés se dice de tres formas, pero la categoría que hay aquí es con la palabra "gravestone" Category:Gravestones in Spain y sí hay una palabra para gremio, es "guild", o sea que la categoría se escribiría Guild gravestones in...(donde sea). Si aún no está claro sigue preguntando. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¡No, no, no! Ya hay una red de categorías llamada lápidas, esta es la principal Category:Gravestones y en ella multitud de subcategorías. La tuya, es decir, las lápidas gremiales es algo muy específico, además de interesante. No sé si habrá otras repartidas por diferentes países, pero haya o no es lo suficientemente interesante como para crear una categoría con ese nombre, porque sino además de repetir la principal (recuerda que la tienes que crear en inglés), se convertiría en coladero de todo tipo de lápidas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vale, si necesitas una mano para algo me lo dices. Estoy buscando más lápidas "raras", pero por ahora solo encuentro marcas de cantero en piedras incrustadas en iglesias o catedrales. Seguiré indagando, me ha picado la curiosidad. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Na igrexa da Nosa Señora das Dádivas e do Bo Parto - Noia - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto de Sanxenxo - Galiza-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok, althought partially burnt and bit noisy. --kallerna 13:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Mariña de Ribasar - Rois - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and good. --Cayambe 13:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Praia de Nemiña - Muxía - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 14:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro de Fisterra -Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good.. except for the very tight top crop (could easyly be improved by cloning the sky there). --Cayambe 09:53, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bréhec - côte.JPG[edit]

Hi. I'm not 100% sure why you reverted your opposition in the QI review, but I certainly don't want you to avoid opposition if you feel like it. There's nothing personal about it, I'm totally ok with opposition and I'm not "fighting" for the picture. --Eusebius (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario da Angustia en San Pedro das Viñas - Betanzos - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro de Oza dos Ríos - Galiza-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Jebulon 23:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiestra defensiva do Castelo de San Carlos de Fisterra - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 23:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Xacobe na igrexa de San Martiño de Noia - Noia - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruz na igrexa de Cumbraos - Mesía - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not that exciting, but ok to me. --Cayambe 17:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura ó emigrante - Sada - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a dustspot at the upper left border. --Berthold Werner 12:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Good to me.--Jebulon 08:03, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro na Igrexa - Cumbraos - Mesía - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 07:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo na Praza de Mazarelos, Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pescando no porto de Sada - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 17:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~== File source is not properly indicated: File:01_Tristeza.jpg == {{Autotranslate|1=File:01_Tristeza.jpg|base=Image source}} 4028mdk09 (talk) 08:44, 29 August 2010 (UTC)~~ [reply]

~~File source is not properly indicated: File:2Gato_Cat113.JPG[edit]~~
{{Autotranslate|1=File:2Gato_Cat113.JPG|base=Image source}} 4028mdk09 (talk) 08:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
-->RE:
Español: Sigo considerando un atentado contra mi nombre sus mensajes. Sigo a la espera de contestación. No entiendo su problema con esas imágenes. Hágamelo saber, por favor. Gracias--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Español: Repetiré el mensaje mientras lo considere oportuno. Si ha sido error suyo, debe hacerse cargo. Si no es error, debería explicármelo
--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Español: Si ha sido un error, le ruego que tache los comentarios--Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez (talk) 16:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

El usuario te ha pedido disculpas en su propia página diciendo que obviamente había cometido un error y yo no encuentro ningún problema con las imágenes. Como ves he tachado los avisos, pero si quieres puedes borrarlos no es necesario mantenerlos ni como futura referencia de algo que pudieras haber hecho mal porque no hay nada incorrecto en los datos de esas fotos, así que no le des más vueltas al asunto. Apertas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 - 08 - Bastavales fly.jpg[edit]

Stomorhina lunata A female (eyes are separated) .I think this is correct (90%) Nice photo Notafly (talk) 21:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaivota - Portosín-1.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Gaivota_-_Portosín-5.jpg[edit]

Hi Louis, thanks for sharing this excellent picture wuîth us. I dared to nominate it as a Featured Picture. Keep on goin'! --Ikiwaner (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your picture just got promoted as FP. Congratulations! --Ikiwaner (talk) 13:20, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaivota - Portosín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 22:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaivota - Portosín-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments great --Mbdortmund 22:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC) see FP-nom --Ikiwaner 14:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portosín - Porto deportivo - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pescando no porto de Portosín - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaivota - Portosín-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support The best one IMO: great light, good contrast and composition. Yann 12:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sada - Porto - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice place (for rich people :-)) and good image. --Cayambe 08:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:...Líos[edit]

Me alegro verte de vuelta, aunque sea ya metido en líos (llamémoslo debates que suena menos problemático). Estoy de acuerdo contigo en que se pierde mucho tiempo en esos debates y si encima estás luchando por hacerte entender en otro idioma el asunto se complica, pero es lo que tiene esta torre de Babel, a veces es un poco frustrante, así que no me importa en absoluto traducir lo que necesites. Lo hago mejor aquí y tú lo añades en su sitio cuando creas conveniente.

However, any Galician citizens would assert that your photo is over exposed, falsificated whereas mine is not. Maybe not every flies' eyes are equal, something that I know, as Galician flies have their eyes almost black. Please, you should not say something about the photo on the basis of the appearance of the dipterous, the comparation of your image or your experience on the photographed object. (If the flies in your part of the world look this way, then that's excellent for me)

After this second proposal I have got in contact with all of the participants in this debate to inform them about it, not because I want to influence or interfere with somebody's vote, just because I think it's ethical as they have voted.

Ahora borro las otras versiones de la imagen. Un saludo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No te agobies tanto, hombre o no te van a servir de nada las vaciones. Los debates, si se mantienen en un nivel civilizado, pueden ser positivos, no los tomes como algo estresante o te saldrán canas prematuras ;).
Sobre ese comentario sin fecha ni hora, no se debe tachar ni borrar, está muy mal vista esa práctica, lo mejor es poner el "no firmado" (es uno de los iconos de la ventana de edición, si paseas el puntero por ellos lo encontrarás) o, en caso de que no encuentres el icono, se escribe {{subst:unsigned|username or IP|time, date}} puedes verlo en Template:Unsigned. La verdad es que hay demasiadas puñeterías que recordar y si no se usan con frecuencia se terminan olvidando, lo que no significa ser un inepto. Aplica el principio wikipédico antes de flagelarte: presume buena fe contigo mismo. Que duermas bien esta noche. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portosín - Porto - Galiza-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Nice colours, nice place. --Cayambe 10:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaivota - Portosín-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. It's a juvenile, please make an addition to the file descr. :-) --Cayambe 18:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaivota - Larus michahellis - Portosín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Same remark as for the image above :-) --Cayambe 18:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barco salvavidas en embarcación pesqueira de Portosín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Carschten 16:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo en Fisterra - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Coyau 21:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escudo na confraría de pescadores de Portosín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Coyau 21:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portosín - Porto - Galiza-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Albertus teolog 12:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No,[edit]

mi cabeza sigue intacta, la tuya es la que va a romperse si sigues dando tanta importancia a asuntos que no la tienen. El mutismo de una persona puede tener causas muy diferentes, y no precisamente el ningunear al otro por falta de pedigrí. Cada persona somos un mundo y aquí, además, cada uno somos de una parte diferente de ese mundo, por lo que esperar que el resto actúe según actuaríamos nosotros mismos es impensable. No tienes porqué sentirte mal y mucho menos sentir vergüenza ¿por qué? Ni cometiste un error, ni es vergonzoso no poder expresarse o entender un idioma que no es el propio. ¿No he recurrido yo a ti en ocasiones por no entender un mensaje en gallego? Al igual que tendría que pedir ayuda si recibiera un mensaje en alemán, francés, chino... Las barreras idiomáticas son un fastidio, pero hasta ahí debe llegar el grado de afectación que nos causen, el fastidio de tener que buscar un intermediario para hecernos entender. Hasta que no aprendas a pasar de estas pequeñeces no vas a sentirte a gusto aquí, en serio, no te comas el coco, tómate esto como un pasatiempo y disfrútalo, que bastante largo y estresante es el día en la vida real. Y piensa que lo positivo de este invento es que aunque te separe de unos por incomprensión, te puede unir a otros a kilómetros de distancia. Que descanses :) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aparellos de pesca - Portosín.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality very good, but I think the has a gray film. Could you correct it please? --Carschten 16:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC) Good enough for QI IMO.--Jebulon 22:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your version, Carschten--Lmbuga 22:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gonipterus scutellatus[edit]

Hello Lmbuga, could you please add some pixels at the boundary of your weevil image such that it fulfils the formal requirements, I could support it then at QIC. Best wishes, --Quartl (talk) 08:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bamio, Vilagarcía de Arousa, Galiza. 090830 032.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Bertamiráns - Ames - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 08:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gonipterus scutellatus from Coira, Portosín, Porto do Son, Galicia, Spain - 20100830-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Dof could be a bit better, but to me it would be still ok. Size is just below 2 mpx, though. --Quartl 07:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
More size (2,101 × 1,578) from RAW--Lmbuga 07:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good to me now. --Quartl 07:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanxenxo - edificos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good now. :-) --Cayambe 09:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamio, Vilagarcía de Arousa, Galiza. 090830 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I am not sure about the species and if it can be determined from the two images you provided. --Quartl 08:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an expert, but in this page, two experts have considered Chorthippus brunneus (the grasshopper is the same, in the two images: I'm the author of the images)--Lmbuga 11:41, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this proof is good enough to me. --Quartl 12:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It's a female--Lmbuga 12:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en Bertamiráns - Ames - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 16:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White balance[edit]

Is there a way to fix white balance after an image has been taken? --Jmh649 (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro en San Xulián de Bastavales - Brión - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Cayambe 06:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saltón, Bastavales. 2010-07-08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 06:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manuel Reimóndez Portela - A Estrada - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goord. --Berthold Werner 07:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosas en Bastavales - Brión - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Okay imo -- Pro2 11:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-09-25 Roseira en Bastavales - Brión - Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice --George Chernilevsky 11:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Manuel Reimóndez Portela - A Estrada - Galiza.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Manuel Reimóndez Portela - A Estrada - Galiza.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura de Manuel Vázquez Figueroa - Santiago de Compostela-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very sharp and otherwise also good.--Cayambe 16:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veleiro en Sada. Galiza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, please add geolocation. --Cayambe 15:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, added geolocation--Lmbuga 18:29, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Tremo, Os Ánxeles, Brión. Vicente Ramos Rodríguez.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tremo, Os Ánxeles, Brión. Vicente Ramos Rodríguez.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escultura de Manuel Vázquez Figueroa - Mirador da Alameda de Santiago de Compostela.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

I forgot to congratulate you for your two first FPs! Parabéns e bem-vindo ao clube. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- (en français) : Bravo pour ces deux premières FP ! Bienvenue au club ! --Jebulon (talk) 22:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - A súa crítica é sempre construtiva. Parabéns polas súas dúas fotos FP.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:54, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pasaba por aquí...[edit]

a saludarte, hace mucho que no cruzamos palabra y, de paso, a felicitarte también por esas dos fotos destacadas. Excelentes, se ve hasta el mínimo detalle de la escultura. Hoy he dedicado un ratito a los cruceiros, añadiendo algunas de tus últimas de calidad y poniendo las marcas en otras que ya estaban en la página. Espero que todo te vaya tan bien como con las fotos. Apertas. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 20:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, no llegué a ver tus mensajes anoche, me fui a wiki. Me alegra saber que te encuentras cómodo entre imágenes, nominaciones y todo lo que conllevan, seguro que es un trabajo más agradecido que pelear con artículos.
Con respecto a tu frase bandera lo malo que tiene es que si al final resulta un día corriente te decepcionas. Durante años, cuando era joven, tuve pegada en la pared de mi habitación esta:Hoy es el primer día del resto de tu vida y funciona si te despiertas con ese pensamiento todos los días, te lo aseguro, así que mejor liga el Mediterráneo con la luz, que es espectacular, aunque carece de las puestas de sol del Atlántico, esas sí son espectaculares y se quedan grabadas para siempre en el corazón. Ya me contarás el país elegido para tu viaje, pero difícil elección porque los dos deben ser un paraíso para los ojos de un fotógrafo. Elijas el que elijas espero que te sirva como inyección de energía para el curso, que los críos son como vampiros, desgastan hasta el alma. Un abrazo. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental data[edit]

You said this picture luck environmental data, what data do you mean?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 09:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I can't say that because I don't know what mean "environmental data". I remember read this, but I'm sure that I don't write this--Miguel Bugallo 20:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I write that, now I can't remember what I would say, sorry--Miguel Bugallo 20:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, never mind.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 22:35, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Nasser Al-Attiyah 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Nasser Al-Attiyah 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xosé Manuel Martínez Oca 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Personal problems[edit]

No, of course not, I haben't any personal problems with you. That the understanding's a bit difficult is bad... I'm currently pressed for time, but just one thing which is important: You're not one of the inept ones! Check out [2] or [3] for example. I give you a more detailed statement later or at the weekend. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:30, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acivro_Acebo_Galicia.jpg[edit]

File:Acivro_Acebo_Galicia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vearthy (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry: {{Duplicate|Acivro Ilex aquifolium.jpg}} --Miguel Bugallo 16:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Araña. A Estrada, Galiza. 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Araña. A Estrada, Galiza. 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logo volvo[edit]

Boas Miguel

Nin sequera lembro de que vai nas derradeiras mensaxes que deixaches na miña paxina de conversa. Concordar ou non, non lle dou importancia, pero si doulle importancia ao respeto mutuo. Inda non teño posibilidade de andar pola web e de ler o que se me di por correo electronico. Hoxe teño unha pequena posibilidade fora. Sempre con todo o respeto e o grandisimo aprecio pola tua persoa Ata logo, un bico Elvire (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Chichen Itza 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chichen Itza 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ficheiro-Araña alimentándose de Auchenorrhyncha. Bastavales, Brión, 090905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and interesting. --Cayambe 11:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

estimado bugallo[edit]

te respondo donde me indicas, muchas gracias por todo, borrad lo que querais y dejad lo que querais, ya lo vais a hacer de todos modos, un saludo--Rokambolexko (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ella.jpg[edit]

de lo que dices que no entiendes es una simple reflexión: esta reflexión es que realmente no sabía cual era la utilidad de las imágenes y yo las almacenaba en wikimedia con objeto de utilizarlas posteriormente

otras no, otras han sido incluidas con el fin de que sirvieran para aportar informacion a determinados artículos estas últimas son de mi propia creacion, yo las he sacado y las he pasado a internet por mi mismo y creo que son un trabajo valioso para algunos artículos

pero como ya dije, dado que no puedo hacer nada para evitarlo, tendré que aceptar que las quiteis a vuestro antojo

y sí, efectivamente wikimedia resulta poco confortable y poco intuitivo --Rokambolexko (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC) pues podeis borrarme cuando querais, y cuanto antes, no vaya a ser que os estropee vuestro estupendo proyecto, chao --Rokambolexko (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]