User talk:Liné1/2019

Wandersong

You reverted my edits on Cinchonoideae incertae sedis and asked for my source. Find it here on WS with required references. Colleteria David W. Taylor (2003) is an invalid name see the explanation on Tropicos and has been replaced by Wandersong. Incidentally, Dolicholobium was placed in Condamineeae by Kainulainen et al., (2010), I have not created the required page, but will do so soon. Commons has it wrong sorry I do not contribute much here, as I do not have much in the way of media. Best regards. Andyboorman (talk) 13:58, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Andyboorman

In fact, I guessed that you had good reasons.

Just be careful of the way we site information.

The line you modified was said as coming from NCBI.

This is how you should have corrected the informations: [1]

Note the accessdate change in NCBI + the disambiguation (easy to duplicate between {{Genera}} + easy to keep when you update the Genera list) + the note containing your excellent explainations.

Cheers Liné1 (talk) 14:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks duly noted and I will endeavour to learn. Cheers Andyboorman (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Blacinae, Category:Blacini

Thanks for all the work you did in Blacinae. However the problem persists. The subfamily Blacinae doesn't exist anymore. It has been demoted to Tribe Blacini in subfamily Brachistinae in 2011 because of molecular studies.[2]. Wikispecies has made that correction already,[3] and so has Wikipedia [4]. I am afraid I don't know enough how to handle the changes required. I hope that you, or somebody else can update this on Wikicommons. Thanks for your work. --Polinizador (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Polinizador

Hmmm

Clearly you know your subject ;-)

But I would phrase it differently: The subfamily Blacinae is not recognized by ??? anymore. (Meaning, some source still recognize Blacinae (at least BioLib and NCBI). This because it takes time for a study to be fully integrated. By the way, perhaps there will never be a general integration)

Sadly, I cannot have access to the study renaming the taxon.

Do you have external sources that follow "BARBARA J. SHARANOWSKI, ASHLEY P. G. DOWLING, MICHAEL J. SHARKEY, 2011" ?

en.wikipedia seems to follow Broad, Gavin R.; Shaw, Mark R.; Godfray, H.C. (2016)

PS: By the way, en.wikipedia is not wikipedia ;-) Just one of the wikipedias ;-)

PS2: Wikispecies still recognizes wikispecies:Blacinae ;-)

Best regards Liné1 (talk) 16:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

BioRéférence et Ubuntu (suite)

Re : comme tu m'y invitais j'ai toujours ces erreurs... au lancement ça m'indique :

@rem java.exe doit être dans votre path @rem java.exe must be in your path

start /low "Wikipedia Bio References" javaw.exe -Xmx256m -jar WikipediaBioReferences.jar voilà, voilà !! Sg7438 (talk

Salut {{u|Sg7438]]

Le message est assez clair ;-)

Tu dois trouver le chemin vers ton installation java

Puis ajouter ce chemin dans ton path

Dans mon cas, .bachrc contient:

export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-oracle/jre

export PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin

Pour tester que tu as fait ce qu'il faut, tape "java" dans ton shell

Si ca te répond "command not found", tu n'as pas réussi ;-)

Bien cordialement Liné1 (talk) 13:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

SOS taxobox

Bonsoir Liné1. On a besoin d'urgence de ton avis sur le café des biologistes car un contributeur a pour ambition refondre le code des taxobox. Or sans ton WBR la vie dans le projet ne vaudrait plus la peine d'être vécue . --Salix (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Salut @Salix:

C'est ou ?

Amitiés Liné1 (talk) 16:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

C'est ICI . --Salix (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Berberis nervosa

Can you fix this category, please? Wieralee (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Titis égarés

Bonjour Liné1, il y a eu des changements dans les Callicebinae. Il faudrait donc revoir le contenu de la Category:Callicebinae en conséquence. Je ne sais pas trop comment procéder sans mettre la pagaille dans les catégories actuelles, alors je te refile le titi si tu veux bien . --Salix (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Ficus redirigé

Comme on se retrouve ! En comparant les feuillages dans la Category:Ficus citrifolia avec ceci, je viens de tomber sur cette redirection de Ficus popullifolia vers Ficus citrifolia. Or il y a deux taxons sous ce binom, dont l'un est toujours valide d'après The Plant list. Evidemment, comme les auteurs sont rarement précisés, il n'est pas facile de savoir qui est qui, mais je me demande s'il ne serait pas judicieux de rétablir une catégorie à part quand on compare ceci et cela, non ? En plus cette planche précise bien l'auteur du taxon valide, et la description de celle-ci aussi. --Salix (talk) 12:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Blacinae does not exist

According to en:Wiki, Wikispecies and to Bugguide.net the subfamily Blacinae has been demoted to tribe Blacini. "Based on a molecular phylogenetic analysis of subfamilial relationships within Braconidae, Sharanowski et al. (2011) demoted subfamily Blacinae to tribe (Blacini), and placed this new tribe in subfamily Brachistinae." (Molecular phylogenetics of Braconidae (Hym.:Ichneumonoidea) based on multiple nuclear genes, and implications for classification). I was trying to reflect that change. These pages and categories need to be changed. Thanks for your work. --Polinizador (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Magallana

Could you have a look back at Category:Magallana please? There seems to be Magallana (Q9026800) (plant) and Magallana (Q47463935) (oyster), which are mixed here. Also Category:Magallana (Q49761631), where the enwp link to commons seems to be wrong, if I understand things correctly. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Plant databases in WikipediaBioReferences

Hello my friend Liné1, the botanical database The Plant List has not been updated since 2013, and it will never be anymore. Meanwhile those lists of subtaxa and other links in WikipediaBioReferences citing TPL become rather out-of-date, e.g. the "unresolved" names, that are not unresolved in other databases. Maybe we should no longer rely on TPL too much. Would it be possible to include POWO (Kew Science Plants of the World online, http://plantsoftheworldonline.org) in your most useful WBR program? This database seems more up-to-date, it lists its references, distributions, and I think it is helpful. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

cross redirect

Hi Liné, could you please fix the redirect loop Category:Calycanthus chinensis - Category:Sinocalycanthus chinensis? Thank you! Best, --Achim (talk) 11:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

I fixed it already. Kind regards, --Thiotrix (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Forteresse de Najac maquette 01 by Line1.JPG

And also:

• File:Forteresse de Najac maquette 02 by Line1.JPG
• File:Forteresse de Najac maquette 03 by Line1.JPG
• File:Forteresse de Najac maquette 04 by Line1.JPG

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Terminalia acuminata

Terminalia acuminata has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Eryk Kij (talk) 07:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Ctenocheilocaris

Ctenocheilocaris has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rots61 (talk) 22:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata Infobox

Hello.Using Wikidata Infobox is better than using other templates.It makes us do without them ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2

Please, you are a beginner in biology in commons.

1. You create species category without sort key (Category:Panthera leo must contain [[Category:Panthera|leo]]
2. You cannot replace so many informations with simply Wikidata Infobox

   For example the subtaxa list is needed to know what subcategories should be present

Liné1 (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

1. If you don't know how to automatically display information, don't describe me as a beginner
2. "sort key" is difficult for me I am interested in connecting with Wikidata
3. The information is duplicated because it appears in the template automatically
4. The template already includes taxa list

In short:the best is to use Wikidata Infobox only and you can develop items ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:49, 19 December 2019 (UTC)