User talk:Lalupa/Archivio 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archivio 2013[edit]

Monument of Nizami Ganjavi[edit]

Buongiorno, Lalupa. I'm user from Azerbaijan. The last year in your city, in your beautiful city was erected a monument of a very famous Azerbaijani poet Nizami Ganjavi. This monument was erected in Villa Borghese park (in Viale Madama Letizia). Could you make a photo of this monument and upload it to the Commons? Grazie per il vostro tempo)) --Interfase (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ponte Pietro Nenni 2468.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 01:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hello,

I'm trying to gain copyright permission for the cave painting from Cueva Aranas. I need to contact the original author/creator.

Rob Myler ITN Productions rob.myler2@itn.co.uk

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Trevi - Galleria Sciarra - incipe parve puer 1120385.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 16:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Mud_Volcanoes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Beland (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Trastevere - s Cosimato - chiostro - il proiettile del 1849 e le monache salve 1160397.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 10:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Google Villa Glori.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Mono 16:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Lalupa.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Mono 16:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help need...[edit]

Olà Lalupa ! Da molto che non ci si sente. Come stai? Son tornato a lavorare su Commons, dopo un inverno-primavera in cui ho fatto modeste apparizioni. Troppi problemi e difficoltà di ogni genere... Non che siano passati, ma ho di nuovo un po' di tempo ed energie per fare qualcosa. Senti, come al solito vengo da te quando non mi ci capacito più. "Sto" a Tivoli... Mi trovo questo cd. Arco di Nerone più volte rappresentato, collocato nella zona di Tivoli, che io non riesco proprio a definire e collocare meglio. In tutte le ricerche che ho fatto, non trovo nessun Arco di Nerone a Tivoli o zona vicina. Si parla invece di una porta Maior, ma non ho trovato immagini in proposito. Qui si vede un ponte antico vicino, ma non credo che si tratti del Category:Ponte Lucano, poiché quello c'ha il mausoleo accanto; a meno che questi ruderi romani non siano stati inglobati poi nel albergo Renaissance. Ma ci credo poco. Sotto questo Arco di Nerone ci passa una strada... Qualcuno considera questo un arco dell'acquedotto romano dell'Aqua Marcia, e difatti ora li ho messi lì, ma senza esserne troppo convinto. L'unica immagine di questo acquedotto a Tivoli non mi sembra molto rassomigliante... Insomma, tu che cosa ne pensi e mi dici di questo sedicente "Arco di Nerone" di Tivoli? Fammi sapere. Spero che stai bene. Sempre impegnata coi nipoti? Baci, --DenghiùComm (talk) 18:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Come al solito sei stata un tesoro! Ed una fonte inesauribile di chiarezza, oltre che fonte preziosa per nuove conoscenze. Ho risolto il tutto così. Se ci ravvisi qualche inesattezza o strafalcione, naturalmente ti sarò grato se me lo vorrai correggere. Negli ultimi anni sono stato diverse volte a Tivoli, ora per i 20 anni di mia nipote, ora con amici, ma naturalmente sempre per visitare le tre ville maggiori, non per andare per campagne (quello lo dovrei fare una volta da solo). Mi fermo sempre al B&B del ristorante Antiche Terme di Diana, i cui gerenti oramai sono diventati miei cari amici. Si mangia bene, e le loro stanze sono.... indescrivibili! divertentissime! Ti abbraccio forte, e ancora grazie infinite! --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Villa Medici[edit]

Hello Lalupa I have never been to Villa Medici. This [1] is Giardino Villa Borghese (at the back of the Villa itself). Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Truppe inglesi e alleate al Foro Italico ?[edit]

Ciao Lalupa. Sopravvissuta indenne a questa torrida estate? Senti, ho scoperto un migliaio di foto della seconda guerra mondiale eseguite dagli inglesi, dalle quali ho individuato ed estrapolato quasi 200 immagini che riguardano l'Italia. Ora sto cercando di assegnare a quelle che è possibile la corretta categoria della localizzazione. Mi trovo quattro immagini del Foro Italico di Roma. Io non lo conosco, ma mi semba che non lo sia... troppo grande, troppe gradinate, e poi le statue dove sono? Che mi dici? Per intanto le ho messe nel Foro Italico. Aspetto tuoi lumi o tue correzioni. Un bacio, --DenghiùComm (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hai ragione. Vedi, ci sarei potuto arrivare anche io. Non c'è niente da fare, ho una mentalità antica, mezza paralizzata... Difficilmente mi viene in mente che potrei cercare una cosa del genere anche su Google maps. Perdonami. Comunque sempre grazie mille! Servo vostro devotissimo ed umilissimo. ; - ) Buona serata! --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cenotafio di Pietro da Cortona[edit]

Ciao Lalupa,

Quella nella foto non è la tomba di Pietro da Cortona, ma il cenotafio che si trova nella crypta della Chiesa (il busto di Pietro è opera di Bernardo Fioriti). La tomba vera e propria - cioè dove si trova il corpo dell'artista - è sempre all'interno della Chiesa dei Santi Luca e Martina, ma si trova all'ingresso, appena varcata la soglia della chiesa, al di sotto di una grande lastra tombale, come da espresso desiderio testamentario di Pietro da Cortona. La lastra tombale che segna la sepoltura effettiva di Pietro da Cortona reca la seguente iscrizione:

D.O.M./ EQUITI PETRO BERRETTINO NOBILI/ CORTONENSI MAGNIS ARTIBUS/ PICTURA, & ARCHITECTURA/ PRAECLARISSIMO PRINCIPIBUS/ REGIBUS, AC SUMMIS PONTIFICIBUS/ PROPTER EGREGIAM IN ARTE/ PRAESTANTIAM MORUMQUE/ PROBITATEM CHARISSIMO, DIVAE/ MARTINAE CULTORI EXIMIO, CUIUS/ SACRIS CINERIBUS ASSERVANDIS/ SEPULCRUM SUIS IMPENSIS/ MAGNIFICENTISSIME EXTRUXIT/ EJUSQUE CULTUI OPES SUAS OMNES/ TEMPLO AFFABRE DELINEATO/ TABULIS SUPERMIS ADDIXIT/ VIXIT AN. LXXII MENSES VI DIES/ XVI OBIIT DIE XVI MAII MDCLXIX./ FRANCISCUS S.R.E. CARD./ BARBERINUS/ TANTARUM VIRTUTUM MEMORIAE/ PONENDUM CURAVIT.

Il cenotafio che hai fotografato fu eretto diversi anni dopo la morte dell'artista. Per approfondire questa tematica e per trovare conferma di ciò che ho scritto puoi leggere su Google Books queste interessantissime pubblicazioni: Karl Noehles, La chiesa dei SS. Luca e Martina nell'opera di Pietro da Cortona, Roma: Ugo Bozzi, 1969 e Jörg Martin Merz, Pietro da Cortona and Roman Baroque architecture, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.

Ciao! --Ricercatrice81 (talk) 19:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prego! :) --Ricercatrice81 (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ludovisi - via Veneto min Corporazioni 1140879.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:M02 Q04 - villa Berlingieri a v le Regina M (Piacentini Pio e Marcello) 1270944.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:52, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizzare i files di Wiki Loves Monuments (Italia)[edit]

Ciao carissima. Ho aperto al bar italiano una discussione per capire qualcosa di più su questa operazione e soprattutto decidere insieme come affrontare questo grosso problema e risolvere il tutto. Naturalmente se hai idee e proposte da mettere in campo ti sarei molto grata se vorrai intervenire. Ciao e grazie di tutto. --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:46, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao mia cara. Grazie per la tua risposta. Vedo che reagisci alla mia stessa maniera: tu dici "irritazione"; io ho provato rabbia ed avvilimento. Stiamo lì. Per certi versi le tue parole mi tranquillizzano perché cominciavo a dubitare di me: forse sono troppo "isterico", e soprattutto troppo ignorante ed ottuso. Non capisco. E continuo a non capire: Sailko è stato cariino a spiegarmi, ma io non capisco come lui la faccia così semplice; a parte che non sono neppure sicuro di aver capito il suo procedere; e poi di bot io non ne capisco un fico secco, nemmeno su che possibilità essi possono offrire, o come nei loro automatismi riescano a scegliere questa o quella foto. Boh?! Penso che farò così, che mi limiterò a riordinare le regioni del sud ed il Lazio (se avrò tempo e voglia), altrimenti mi limiterò soltanto a categorizzare quelle immagini che reputo interessanti (p.es. quelle archeologiche, o chiese antiche, ecc.) e tutto il resto lo lascio al loro destino, nel limbo magnum di WLM. Un grande abbraccio, --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Parole sante! Mi piace l'immagine di "Questa casa non è un albergo!". : - )) Ma forse lo si dovrebbe dire anche a chi promuove e fa di questi caricamenti di massa. Alla prima occasione me ne ricorderò... Bacioni! --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:54, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing Rome pictures[edit]

Thank you very much for categorizing my pictures of Rome! --XRay talk 18:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Questo fontanile sta su Via Collatina Vecchia, nel punto in cui questa strada passa sotto il cavalcavia di Viale Palmiro Togliatti!

Queste sono le coordinate del fontanile:

Camera location41° 54′ 13.85″ N, 12° 34′ 29.01″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
--Nicholas Gemini (talk) 11:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also: