User talk:LC-de/Archive1

Hi, today a f*** son of a b**** broke into my flat and stole my computer I mostly work with. He stole my external HD too, on which most of my picture were saved, especially my nature pics. That means I can't provide new processings of older pics and new pics for a while. Fortunatly he didn't found my camera. So long.... --LC-de (talk) 23:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Got my computer back. Most pictures were deleted already and my attempt to recover them failed. Maybe the backup HDD will be found some day with all the data, but I don't believe in such kind of miracles... :-/ --LC-de (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rana temporaria LC0030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus cerasus LC0017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola riviniana LC0032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Help

Please see my photo at: [1] I hope you know the name and want to tell me the name of it so I can upload it to wikipedia with a proper name. Thanks, --Orlovic (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

It's an Aizoaceae. A foto of a plant, that looks like the one on your image, is designated as Drosanthemum speciosum, but I'm not sure about that. I'm sorry that I can't help you further. --LC-de 21:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ranunculus repens LC0036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Viola tricolor LC0041.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Viola tricolor LC0041.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 08:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Möwen

Da hast du ein wirklich schönes Bild in die FP Liste eingestellt, kommst du aus Hamburg? vergiß es, hab gerade gelesen das du aus Chemnitz kommst ;) --Makro Freak

Trotzdem danke für das Lob ;) Die Möwen waren aber sowieso griechisch, wenn das der Grund für deine Vermutung war... --LC-de 21:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Habe erst sehr spät die Description gelesen, uups ;) Wollte eigentlich sagen das mir der erfrischende Wind deiner schönen FP Beiträge sehr behagt. Da hätte Hamburg doch gut gepasst :) --Makro Freak ^talk 21:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Vielleicht schaue ich ja auch mal dort vorbei ;)

Ach ja, die Begründung, warum ich Image:Apis_mellifera_carnica_drone_aborning_3.jpg nicht für ein QI halte schreibe ich mal auf deutsch hier hin, da kann ich es verständlicher machen: Meiner Ansicht nach hebt sich das wesentliche Objekt zu wenig vom Beiwerk ab. Die Farbe und die Form ist fast die selbe wie die der leeren Waben. Und tatsächlich sieht der Kopf auf den ersten Blick wie eine weitere leere Wabe aus, vor allem da er in einer Reihe mit den beiden Nachbarwaben liegt. Der Blick irrt erst einmal etwas ziellos und ohne Halt über das Bild, da fehlt irgendwie der eye catcher. Bei Image:Apis_mellifera_carnica_drone_aborning.jpg wird da schon viel eher klar, dass da ein Alien aus der Höhle krabbelt. Und mein Lieblingsbild habe ich jetzt das zweite mal bewertet, das ist einfach genial. --LC-de 21:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus michahellis LC0046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill LC0035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver rhoeas LC0050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Larus michahellis LC0045.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Larus michahellis LC0045.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 07:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eriophorum vaginatum LC0042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

My crocodile pic

Hello, you gave a comment on the QIC-page on my crocodile pic. I tried to improve the pic now. You can see it here. It would be nice if you would give a comment on it. Thanks. --AngMoKio 15:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis pandora LC0052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Argynnis pandora LC0052.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Argynnis pandora LC0052.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer 09:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Voted to decline flower image

Hello, I noticed your picture was not evaluated yet, so I decided to take a look. I voted to decline your QI nomination, Crete Rockrose. I think it is a very pretty picture, and obviously you've taken some wonderful photos. However, it seemed to me that the main flower in the middle (with the visitor) has problems with exposure, so that much of the detail is washed out. Do you agree?--Skoch3 04:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't think so. There only little details in the flower, in fact the only contrast are an outcome of light and shadows. I put it up to disussion. --LC-de 11:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitalis lanata LC0053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus creticus LC0069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greifensteine LC0040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sus scrofa LC0074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirundo rustica LC0073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus chrysenteron LC0072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuehneromyces mutabilis LC0075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inachis io LC0077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens LC0076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitalis purpurea LC0082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Consolida spec LC0067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus tommasinianus LC0031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvia spec LC0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Coral_fungus.jpg

Hi, you appear to have some knowledge of identifying fungi, do you have any idea whether my id for Image:Coral_fungus.jpg is correct? (As far as I can make out it is some kind of Ramaria species). Thanks, --Tony Wills 23:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC).

Sorry, but my knowledge is limited to middle european species. I think Ramaria would be a good tip (and I would agree with you), but for instance some Dacrymycetaceae build similar fruiting bodies. --LC-de 08:37, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ranunculus circinatus LC0078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Impatiens parviflora LC0089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus erythropus LC0087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus erythropus LC0086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio machaon LC0085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hypholoma fasciculare LC0091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chlorophyllum rhacodes LC0093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitalis purpurea LC0101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavo cristatus feather LC0026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pontederia cordata LC0100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suillus grevillei LC0109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dew drops LC0107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpocoris purpureipennis LC0105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coprinus micaceus LC0103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leccinum scabrum LC0108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coprinus comatus LC0117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitalis purpurea LC0118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Lactarius vellereus LC0113.jpg, QIC

Hi, I made a comment on your image and created a sharpened alternative for you: File:Lactarius vellereus LC0113 - edit.jpg. I didn't want to go and change your nomination completely, but as I said, I will promote if you want to sharpen the image or use my sharpened sample. Best Regards, - (Relic38 01:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erinaceus europaeus LC0119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cortinarius flexipes LC0111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus domestica LC0122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lactarius vellereus LC0113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calocera viscosa LC0123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus dulcis LC0009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone nemerosa LC0124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a nice use of available DOF. I would have cropped the image at left and botton though -- Alvesgaspar 23:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brassica napus LC0027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and colors, DOF a bit shallow. Dori 21:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morchella conica LC0125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is tilted!! (just kidding). Good quality, though little tight crop. Lycaon 20:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lathraea squamaria LC0126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. Arria Belli 12:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrrhocoris apterus LC0130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good Lycaon 20:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola x bavarica LC0129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and interesting image. Lycaon 20:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trombidium holosericeum LC0127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments These guys really are hard to get. Good job. Thegreenj 14:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC) When did photoshop start to remove exif information? -- carol 13:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I'm not sure how this is relevant, but I have v.5.5 and there is no setting to retain exif. I'm pretty sure that feature was added in 7.0 Thegreenj 23:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC) No, they get lost in a previous step of postprocessing. I saved the file as PNG in between not keeping in mind, that this format doesn't support EXIF. But I don't even think, that this is relevant... --LC-de 06:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC) It is when there is a question of size of the subject. -- carol 09:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC) I can assure you that my camera doesn't use the SubjectDistance-tag so that you can't obtain any information about the subjects size, even if the EXIF-Data weren't lost. Btw the mite was 2-3 mm in size. --LC-de 15:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC) It looks like a red jelly bean to me, with legs and things attached; pocket fuzz too which is enough reason to not eat it -- 7-9mm -- carol 08:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inachis io LC0131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Meets QI requirements (nice colours). Lycaon 12:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

QI sorting

Hallo, ich bin gerade am einsortieren der neuen QIs. Mit deinem Bild (Image:Trombidium_holosericeum_LC0127.jpg) habe ich gerade etwas Probleme, da ich kein Biologe bin. Kannst du mir da aushelfen und es in die richtige Galerie setzen? Gruß --AngMoKio 20:47, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Das ist ne Milbe, also ein Spinnentier. Aber ich schau auch mal selbst... --LC-de 05:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussilago farfara LC0132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Solid image, with the main subject of interest in focus. Adequate composition. --Freedom to share 20:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Diskussion auf de:KEB

Anders kann man ihm glaube ich nicht begegnen, das habe ich jetzt gelernt...und wie du sagst, ist es besser für den Blutdruck. :))

Eigentlich ist mir de:KEB meist sowieso etwas zu ernst. Dort geht irgendwie der Spass verloren, den man hier auf Commons noch hat. ...vielleicht bilde ich mir das auch ein. Das ist auf jedenfall der Grund warum ich mich dort eher selten aufhalte. Aber danke für dein Support und dein Kommentar...man hätte es nicht treffender formulieren können! :) In diesem Sinne: Schönes langes Wochenende! Mal sehen vielleicht kommt einem ja was Schönes vor die Linse. --AngMoKio 22:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio bianor Raupe LC0134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well exposed. --Nevit 22:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio bianor Raupe LC0135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The "eye" is not as sharp as I'd like and we naturally look there first, but the actual subject is quite sharp and detailed, so I think this is a good job. If this caterpillar had no "eye", we'd promote it in a second. Ram-Man 02:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamium album LC0137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Still fine --B.navez 17:31, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajuga reptans LC0138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 21:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Papilio bianor Raupe LC0134.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Papilio bianor Raupe LC0134.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 07:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

cc-by-sa-2.0-de and cc-by-sa-3.0

Hello !

Regarding [2], if I may: while cc-by-sa-2.0-de and cc-by-sa-3.0 do grant the same liberties to the user, they are not exactly equivalent. Notably, Cc-by-sa-2.0-de inherits the German legal framework, which means that in case of litigation between you and a foreign user, German law would apply. This might be more comfortable for you if you are more accustomed to your local legal system than to others. It could also have an impact on the choice of where the litigation would physically take place.

I thus suggest that you give a second though on your opposition to putting Cc-by-sa-2.0-de on you image at Commons: not only is it not necessarily valid (since Free licences are irrevocable and the image was previously uploaded on de: under this licence), but it might not be in you own best interest at all.

In any case, thank you for your excellent work, and good continuation. Rama 14:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not opposing the CC-by-sa-2.0-de license, I don't wanted the double licencing, because I thought it's unnecessary. After careful consideration I think this is not only unnecessary, it's very tricky too. I provided the wikimedia foundation a pic with a 2.0-license on de.wikipedia.org. If someone else would had copied it to Commons, he has to put it under CC-by-sa-2.0-de or similar license. That's ensured by the license. But as the author I can provide the same pic a second time under different a completly different licence. According to the license terms and common german law I'm allowed to do so and this didn't touch the license of the first pic. The foundation can use the first picture under the first license further, but the pic was deleted. Adding a license template to the second template is only allowed in this sepecial case, because it doesn't violate the terms of my license (the CC-by-sa-3.0-unported), but it is unnecessary and unpolite in my eyes.

But you put me on some points I didn't recognize so far: the place for litigations and the applyability of german law. I think, I will publish my pics under the CC-by-sa-2.0-de in the future even on Commons. Thank you for that hint. --LC-de 18:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

You didn’t "provide the wikimedia foundation", but you released an image on a website hosted by the foundation. Anyone may use it now under the terms of the given license. I used the work and reshared it under cc-by-sa-2.0-de, specifically on commons. I know that you may give any other license you might want to, but I didn’t remove the old license. Adding cc-by-sa-2.0-de to the description of a file which is only released as cc-by-sa-3.0 would be a copyright infringement, these licenses are not replaceable. Code·is·poetry 22:31, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

No, you simply add a template. That's no resharing and not the "gentle way" in my eyes as I wrote on your discussion page. Second I think the double licensing is not useful. It doesn't provide any additional rights to the licensee. As Rama remarked, it added some restrictions which can easily avoided by the use of the first license. This doesn't make any sense to me. --LC-de 22:56, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The adding of the template is no resharing, but by adding the template, commons reshares the file under this license. That's perfectly valid. I still don't understand why you feel insulted about this. As I and Rama stated, these licenses actually are different. Not as different as cc-by-sa-x.0 and gfdl-1.2, but still different. Ramas posting didn't imply that 2 is exclusively more restrictive than 3. Regards, Code·is·poetry 00:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seabirds LC0141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image. --Nevit 20:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctostaphylos uva-ursi LC0146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good DOF, no noise, good composition (may be leaf must be moved slightly away from flower...). QI. #!George Shuklin 22:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reine i Lofoten LC0148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentPlease geocode and retain exif data. --Dschwen 18:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)  InfoI'd added the geocode, but I neither have the tools nor the fancy to retain the EXIF. Didn't even know why this should be a criterion. --LC-de 19:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)  SupportNice image. --Nevit 21:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola biflore LC0147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! Lycaon 12:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC) Could you add geolocation please? And maybe also reinsert EXIF data? Lycaon 13:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)  Done Geocode added --LC-de 19:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissa tridactyla LC0150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok quality. --Dschwen 22:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rissa tridactyla LC0149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Dschwen 22:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockfish LC0149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 19:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rubus chamaemorus LC0151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely photograph. -- carol 21:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silene acaulis LC0153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, certainly QI. --Dschwen 14:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathen LC0154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good detail and composition. Dori 04:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx splendens LC0156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice one --Mbdortmund 00:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gonepteryx rhamni LC0158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Definitely QI. A bit more DOF and slightly larger and it would be definitely FP too. Lycaon 13:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scleroderma citrinum LC0159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting and sharpness. It's OK. --Lestath 19:09, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gonepteryx rhamni LC0157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good DOF and lighting Ianare 08:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borg Vestvågøy LC0165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive building, good composition, detail and atmosphere. It's a pity modern devices (fence, road) to be so close, much more mud is missing --B.navez 03:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamnøy LC0164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A classical of good quality.--B.navez 03:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga oppositifolia LC0166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No doubt of QI --B.navez 19:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Seabirds LC0141.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Seabirds LC0141.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 08:44, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured picture promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Reine i Lofoten LC0148.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Reine i Lofoten LC0148.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

naerii 07:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa LC0174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb. TimVickers 04:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeshna juncea LC0173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crisp, superb detail, nice composition. TimVickers 17:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baerensteine LC0180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition, partially a bit overexposured --Mbdortmund 15:50, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum LC0168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I prefer this over many FPs. Ram-Man 21:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum LC0167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Borderline, but the quality is good. Ram-Man 21:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum LC0170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Obviously. Ram-Man 21:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schrammtor LC0181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality looks ok to me, and I like it (including the person giving the scale). --Eusebius 20:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeshna juncea LC0175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb shot, an astounding level of detail on the head of the insect. TimVickers 16:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mentha aquatica LC0169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Highlights on the limit but looks QI to me, well isolated from background Gnangarra 12:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalcolestes viridis LC0171.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superb, could only be improved by an increased DOF, but that would put it into FPC territory. TimVickers 21:53, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalciporus piperatus LC0182.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good indeed. TimVickers 18:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa LC0172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Rathen LC0154.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rathen LC0154.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 20:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rana temporaria LC0183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, passes QI requirements. TimVickers 18:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Preparation

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myosotis scorpioides LC0184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice DOF, good colours. --Lestath 19:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chorthippus brunneus LC0177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schrammsteine LC0185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good colors and composition. --Kosiarz-PL 09:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Puppets

Hi Jörg. I'm sorry if you took this personal, it was not meant to be. A know you long enough to be a solid and honest contributor. I only in this case indicated potential problematic votes as has been done now and then recently. There were two different cases on your image indeed: One was a single support effort by this User:Albertgenii12. It was the only thing this user ever did on commons, so highly suspect. That one I cancelled. The other one (which now turned out to be your girl friend) also went straight to voting for FPC after getting a login id. While this is allowed, it is suspect behaviour. I just indicated, but didn't cancel. The latter case is referred to as a meat puppet (telling your friends to come and rig a vote). I perfectly understand that this was not at all you intention here. I'm sorry if I caused irritation. Yet some people have to keep a watchful eye all the time as we've had serious and real cases of vote rigging on FPC before. So I hope you understand nothing personal was meant here. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 19:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seven Sisters LC0187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Find it very good, meeting the criteria --B.navez 14:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciconia episcopus LC0186.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good details --Mbdortmund 16:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxalis acetosella LC0190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice Bukeh and good impression of the flower --Mbdortmund 12:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos LC0192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The colours on the waves aren't smooth at low resolution, but the duck is of high quality, which is the most important thing. --Jolly Janner 22:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos LC0193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments exif-daten? --Böhringer 18:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC) Wozu? --LC-de 20:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC) zum lernen? --Böhringer 20:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxalis acetosella LC0191.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good, shows plant and environment --Ianare 18:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pyrrhocoris apterus LC0130.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pyrrhocoris apterus LC0130.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliaeetus leucocephalus LC0195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good portrait of the eagle --Mbdortmund 19:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliaeetus leucocephalus LC0196.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good considering lighting --Ianare 14:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliaeetus leucocephalus LC0198.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 17:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columba livia LC0199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good DOF --Ianare 02:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygnus olor LC0201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirundo rustica LC0200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Main subject quite dark, but I think it is ok. --Eusebius 10:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Used your image in a Youtube video

Hello, hello. I used your image of a bald eagle in my Youtube video. I attributed you in the Description.

Here are the links:

My video in SD

My video in HD

It's a video on vestigial organs. Your image was very useful in that it was an example of a WORKING nictitating membrane whereas a human's is vestigial.

I did crop it a bit, to make it fit the 16:9 Youtube player.

Thank you for your image. Elecbullet (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the info --LC-de (talk) 08:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium wildpretii LC0203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition, picture would IMHO be a tick better if you would turn the foreground a bit darker --Mbdortmund 19:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium wildpretii LC0204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lot's of wow, quality acceptable for QI. Lycaon 17:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthetrum chrysostigma LC0207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! QI --George Chernilevsky 19:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium auberianum LC0202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support DOF could be better, but composition OK. Yann 07:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallotia galloti LC0211.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --kallerna 18:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Echium simplex LC0213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is lacking but the subject is extraordinary, sharp and in good light. --Iotatau 07:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orthetrum chrysostigma LC0208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Ianare 19:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis canariensis LC0215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments First Commons image of this species, no significant technical weaknesses. --Iotatau 10:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferula linkii LC0214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit cluttered but good documentary value, sharp, good light. What about the missing interwiki link targets – are you planning to write the articles? --Iotatau 21:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC) I hope, that someone will do this... --LC-de 15:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gallotia galloti LC0211.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gallotia galloti LC0211.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Echium wildpretii LC0204.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Echium wildpretii LC0204.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheirolophus canariensis LC0212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments But close-up would be better. --kallerna 18:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, LC-de!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Lasiommata maera LC0097.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Marble stone pit Thasos LC0070.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Tuberaria guttata LC0051.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Cladonia fimbriata LC0005.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Salvia officinalis LC0057.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Mentha aquatica LC0099.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Lycoperdon perlatum LC0002.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Prunus cerasus LC0133.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Dear Jörg!

Hope it is ok for us to use your picture of Maniola jurtina in a report? We will of course give your name attached to the picture.

Best wishes!

Nicklas Jansson County Administration Board in Östergötland Sweden

No problem, feel free to use it. --LC-de (talk) 23:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Descurainia bourgeana LC0217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Pudelek 16:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Meet our photographers

Hallo LC-de! Magst Du Dir mal für Commons:Meet our photographers einen Profilkasten bauen, damit Du in die Liste eingefuegt werden kannst (Du hast schon so viele FPs)? Gruss Dschwen (talk) 17:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Ranunculus ficaria

I have replied on my talk page epibase (talk) 14:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geirangerfjord LC0188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments spectacular --Pjt56 20:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Descurainia bourgaeana LC0218.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather oversaturated, but acceptable for QI though. -- MJJR 20:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spartocytisus supranubius LC0219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Cayambe 17:56, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erysimum bicolor LC0220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and useful. --Cayambe 13:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Geirangerfjord LC0188.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geirangerfjord LC0188.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, kannst du mir die genaue Lokalität nennen von der dieses Foto entstanden ist? gruß!

Thasos

Hallo Jörg, hast du vielleicht Pflanzenfotos aus Thasos, insbesondere Pflanzen, Kräuter in der Phrygana? -- Haubi (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kronoberg LC0227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Berthold Werner 10:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onychogomphus forcipatus LC0224.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Darius Baužys 19:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platanthera chlorantha LC0225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm aware plants do not always grow straight, but it would be easy to straighten this one and the close-up. will support when done. Lycaon 13:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Straightened. --King of Hearts 17:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Better. Lycaon 17:59, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pleurotus pulmonarius LC0228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platanthera chlorantha LC0226.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments as previous. Lycaon 13:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC) Straightened. --King of Hearts 17:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC) OK now. Lycaon 12:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Biodiversity Photo - route

Hello Mr, My name is Rita Neves. I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal. Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone. The photo we are considering to use are the following:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lycoperdon_perlatum_LC0002.jpg 

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration

- Schedules for species identification
- Panels that will be fixed in the Land

As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you are the author and provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? Jörg Hempel  ? If it´s possible please respond to ritasoraia2001@hotmail.com or rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt or here on Wikimedia.

Thank you very much. Our best regards

Thanks

Thank you very much.

We will give news.

Our best regards.

request to use your photos

Hello,

I work on the League for the protection of birds on the Fame project. We study interaction between birds and human activities and we realize a document of sensitization and identification to the fishermen and we would wish used your photo of atlantic puffin (Fratercula arctica LC0142.jpg), that this will be onlycropping available on the website wikimedia. The photo of arctic skua will be cut. You allow us to use it and which name wish to see appearing on the photo.

In advance thank you,

You can answer me the address gaelle.gendry@lpo.fr

Gaëlle Gendry

deletion of QI nomination

Why did you do this??? [3] --LC-de (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

• I think there was a conflict of publishing. I never had the intention to clear your nommination. Sorry for the inconvenience involuntary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
  • np --LC-de (talk) 14:58, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrola minor LC0230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 23:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygonia c-album LC0237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Criteria satisfied. Well illuminated and exposed. Good DOF with f/10. --Wsiegmund 22:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saturnia pyri LC0236.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza maculata LC0233.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza maculata LC0232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Permission

Hello.

I have written a book for children about animals that I want to publish. In searching for photographic images, I have found your pictures that is very beautiful and fit the storyline that I want to convey. I will appreciate it if you will give me permission to use these photo's in my book. Below are the animals that will represents your photos. I will also include all info that will accompany the acknowledgements. I will acknowledge your work - Beneath the photo and at the end of the book, your information. I ask that if you agree, to kindly send me your Name and appropriate information as you wish it to be published.

Photographer: Jorg Hempel. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haliaeetus_leucocephalus_LC0196.jpg Eagle. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Erinaceus_europaeus_LC0119.jpg Hedgehog. Thank you.

user:zantree

zandtree

So sorry, wrong name, just cannot spell today - zandtree is my username.

e-mail

zandtree@yahoo.com

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haematopus unicolor LC0239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good image too bad there have not geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus 18:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gyps fulvus LC0202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! Might even be FP IMO. --Yann 12:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC) Don't hesitate to nominate it ;-) --LC-de 12:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mt Cook LC0247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Iifar 07:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haematopus unicolor LC0246.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallirallus australis LC0248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, QI to me. --Avenue 13:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Egretta novaehollandiae LC0249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz josef Glacier LC0250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, only a hint of CA, and it makes a nice contrast to our 2001 shot. --Avenue 02:19, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hieracium aurantiacum LC0106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Near the size limit, but QI. --NorbertNagel 19:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mt Cook LC0247.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mt Cook LC0247.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gyps fulvus LC0202.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gyps fulvus LC0202.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Mergus octosetaceus.png

Greetings LC, but the image is 1452 × 946 pixels, file size: 3.37 MB in full resolution, does not exceed the criterion of 2 MB? Thanks, Conrado (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I think this was already answered in the discussion: "the filesize is 3,37 MB, but the image size is 1.452 × 946 pixels = ~1.373.600 pixels = ~1,37 mega pixels < 2 Mpx." --LC-de (talk) 23:42, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vicia sativa LC0223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 21:41, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lythrum salicaria LC0090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 04:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chlorophyllum rhacodes LC0093.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chlorophyllum rhacodes LC0093.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tasman Glacier LC0251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Persicaria amphibia LC0253.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI, useful and very interesting reflection. --NorbertNagel 21:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Trombidium holosericeum LC0127.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trombidium holosericeum LC0127.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Wrong QI notice is wrong

This ended up on my page for some reason. Congratulations!

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drosera binata LC0252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 02:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctocephalus forsteri LC0255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sharpness, nice expression. --Danilo P 01:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone nemorosa LC0256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leucogenes grandiceps LC0257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a great image.--Telemaque MySon 09:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus LC0259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 18:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branta canadensis LC0260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 11:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thelymitra cyanea LC0261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 07:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cervus elaphus LC0265.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 06:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cervus elaphus LC0266.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this deer. --Florstein 10:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gallus gallus domesticus LC0262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this photo. --Florstein 10:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ovis orientalis LC0267.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 16:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araschnia levana LC0264.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Holleday 18:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araschnia levana LC0263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Holleday 18:57, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratiotes aloides LC0258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DOF a bit short. Yann 04:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC) * Support ok for me -- Smial 14:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata LC0270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 09:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza majalis LC0269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 14:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, LC-de. You have new messages at Gauravjuvekar's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 04:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Libellula quadrimaculata LC0271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 21:56, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zootoca vivipara LC0273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't mind here that the tail is not entirely shown. QI to me. --Cayambe 08:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pardosa amentata LC0272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chalciporus piperatus LC0182.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chalciporus piperatus LC0182.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Listera ovata LC0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:53, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Listera ovata LC0274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platanthera chlorantha LC0278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 15:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himantoglossum hircinum LC0280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platanthera chlorantha LC0281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO, such easy to take image should have higher resolution <end of unsigned posting> Does this mean, it should not be QI, because it doesn't fit your personal feelings about resolution even if it meets the (objectivly measurable) size criteria? Do we start the same stupid discussion here as we have already in FPC? --LC-de 11:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Well, it's written on the guidelines, "reviewers may demand more (resolution)". It'd be nice to have a bigger image, but it's ok for me. I'll promote it, since the other comment is unsigned. --Kadellar 12:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliotis iris LC0282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Kadellar 15:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum LC284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Poco a poco 06:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agrius convolvuli LC0287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agrius convolvuli LC0286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fringilla coelebs maderensis LC0285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Little out of focus on tail. --Elisardojm 23:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC) I'm willing to support this - the bird is in perfect focus apart from the tail, which is a shame, but I think acceptable. Mattbuck 08:40, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opilio canestrinii LC0163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. --A.Savin 20:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Datei:Windmill LC0035.jpg

Hallo, im Zuge eines Messeauftrittes planen wir die Gestaltung der Messewände mit Windmühlen im Zeitraffer von der Historie bis in die Moderne. Bei unserer Suche nach geeigneten Bildern sind wir auf Ihres gestoßen (Datei:Windmill LC0035.jpg). Daher möchten wir bei Ihnen anfragen, ob Sie Ihr Bild für diesen Zweck, in hoher Auflösung, zur Verfügung stellen würden und was uns dies kosten würde. --LC-de (talk) 21:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Vielen Dank. MfG Carolin Deicke

Hallo Frau Deicke, vielen Dank für ihr Interesse. Leider weiß ich nicht, wie ich sie erreichen kann. Wenn sie mir eine Nachricht mit ihren Kontaktdaten über den Menüpunkt "E-Mail an diesen Benutzer" auf der linken Seite zukommen lassen, können wir gern die Einzelheiten klären.--LC-de (talk) 21:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haematopus unicolor LC0290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, btw these guys are dangerous I know the place --Poco a poco 19:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Sefton LC0291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 07:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cryptocephalus sericeus LC0295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siona lineata LC0294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--S. F. B. Morse 05:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyommatus thersites LC0292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boloria euphrosyne LC0293.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Jorg,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Franz josef Glacier LC0250.jpg is due to make an appearance as the English Wikipedia's Picture of the Day on June 11, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-06-11. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trientalis europaea LC0296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza maculata LC0298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza maculata LC0299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 17:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza maculata LC0297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Heuschrecke 20:08, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyacinthoides non-scripta LC0139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps I'm not right, but  Support very good IMO--Lmbuga 22:14, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanessa cardui LC0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But why such a low resolution? Is it a crop? --Tuxyso 11:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stachys palustris LC0084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 22:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza incarnata ssp cruenta LC0305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Very good --Iifar 18:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lasiommata megera LC0311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:45, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aglais urticae LC0310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice shot and nice butterfly --Fbnpch 06:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ophiogomphus cecilia LC0313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --High Contrast 09:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella LC0315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --High Contrast 09:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lestes sponsa LC0314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 08:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum sanguineum LC0316.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --High Contrast 09:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenonympha pamphilus LC0309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice quality. QI for me. --Fbnpch 13:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vanessa atalanta LC0317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean11 09:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lestes sponsa LC0314.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lestes sponsa LC0314.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astragalus alpinus LC0319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenonympha pamphilus LC0325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 15:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sympetrum danae LC0324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 15:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bistorta vivipara LC0318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalcolestes viridis LC0323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 03:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulsatilla vernalis LC0322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geum rivale LC0328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pedicularis oederi LC0330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but the bottom of the image, blurred, is disturbing IMO. Can you crop the image?--Lmbuga 13:45, 16 September 2013 (UTC)  Done --LC-de 20:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 12:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astragalus frigidus LC0326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Can you upload the image at full size?--Lmbuga 14:40, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Frankly, I won't. It was my personal decision --LC-de 16:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Ok, I beg your pardon--Lmbuga 13:06, 17 September 2013 (UTC)  Support QI for me (After discussions with Smial on resizing, I changed my mind. I changed my mind on time).--Lmbuga 15:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Astragalus alpinus LC0319.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Astragalus alpinus LC0319.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sympetrum sanguineum LC0316.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sympetrum sanguineum LC0316.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula rotundifolia LC0321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 12:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryas octopetala LC0327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice pic, good sharpness and quality --Uoaei1 11:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panaeolus semiovatus LC0334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The DOF is borderline - the insects on the mushrooms are not crispy sharp, but I think, I can  Support it. Beside that: why not providing a higher resolution? Your camera can provide much better resolution. --Cccefalon 07:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bartsia alpina LC0333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 06:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga aizoides LC0332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 10:52, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella LC0336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great macro --Lewis Hulbert 20:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans LC0335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinguicula vulgaris LC0331.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 05:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris pseudacorus LC0338.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvia pratensis LC0340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 00:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus badius LC00337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, even if low resolution. --Anıl Öztaş 18:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphantopus hyperantus LC0342.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyommatus icarus LC0341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:39, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Himantoglossum hircinum LC0347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchid meadow LC0352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephalanthera rubra LC0350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenonympha arcania LC0349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some parts of the butterfly are not sharp; nevertheless QI for me. --Uoaei1 08:36, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans LC0356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:09, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ischnura elegans LC0357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platycnemis pennipes LC0359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella LC0358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coenagrion puella LC0362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 01:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis x hybrida LC0354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis x hybrida LC0353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ophrys insectifera LC0346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Panaeolus semiovatus LC0334.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panaeolus semiovatus LC0334 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Coenonympha arcania LC0349.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coenonympha arcania LC0349.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz

Hallo LC-de,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 10. Juli 2014)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo LC-de,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Araschnia levana LC0363.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:36, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austerdalen LC0364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - August - Holidays

Please could you consider removing File:Austerdalen LC0364.jpg as it doesn't appear to meet the challenge criteria. The theme is about going on holiday or being on holiday rather than just photos one took (of scenery) while on holiday. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC) Actually, I'm just going to remove the invalid photos now. Let me know if there is an problem. -- Colin (talk) 09:04, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Ok, it seems there was a misunderstanding on my side concerning the criteria. Comparing it with the remaining photos I understand now, that it should had the word "holiday" in the name and/or description. Whatever, just delete it, I don't care. --LC-de (talk) 11:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)