User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2017/Q3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, King of Hearts. Could you handle my OTRS photo? Thank you. -- Alvincwh (talk) 12:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. In the future, please note that OTRS is not necessarily for cases such as this one, where you took the photo and have not previously published it anywhere else. -- King of 04:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS 授權許可: File:Judy Kwong.jpg[edit]

您好,King of Hearts。我曾經上載過這張照片,但那時被其他用戶以「Like a photo found on the Internet」提刪,之後就給管理員刪除。而現在已按照指示重新上載該照片和申請 OTRS 授權許可,未知能否協助檢查? 謝謝。 -- Miss Skyblue (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

你告诉我OTRS回报单号(应该是16位数,以“2017”开始),我能帮你找一下。 King of 05:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[Ticket#: 2017080210001378] -- Miss Skyblue (talk) 07:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done King of 17:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crystal Cave Sequoia July 2017 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 01:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crystal Cave Sequoia July 2017 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crystal Cave Sequoia July 2017 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 01:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I try to put this photo on the Wikipedia page of the Second Italo-Ethiopian War but it does not go https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dengell/sandbox

The inserted photo can be used in wikipedia English https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Keburzabagna.jpg

Thank you--Dengell (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you're saying. If you want to talk to a native Russian speaker, go to Commons:List of administrators by language and look for "ru". -- King of 05:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brookfield Place New York August 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:22, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brookfield Place New York August 2017 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:26, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn from Governors Island Ferry August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jersey City from Governors Island August 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:58, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you get a chance, can you remove the protection for this image? It's no longer on the main page and I need to update it. Thanks! Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done King of 01:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn from Governors Island September 2016 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Governors Island September 2016 panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Governors Island August 2017 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Exquisite. -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James's Park London May 2016 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manzanar September 2016 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Manhattan from Governors Island September 2016 panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brookfield Place New York August 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bold perspective, but good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden November 2015 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2017![edit]

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Hi there! My name is Kevin, one of the organizers of Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States. Last year, you contributed to our 2016 event. It was a great success thanks to you and many others, with over 1,700 people contributing over 11,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States. Over 1,000 of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, making our open knowledge about United States history and heritage all the better.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information, including updated tips, lists, and prizes. Like last year, you'll be able to upload your new photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, and we hope to see you in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, King of Hearts. I have already waited 3 weeks, but no volunteers deal with my photo, Can you take a look at it (pass or not) ? Thank you! Dafuqrinnie (talk) 10:01, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done In the future, please note that OTRS is not necessary for photos that you took and have not been previously published on another website. -- King of 05:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

您好,King of Hearts。請問若果版權持有人在其圖像描述中聲明「以 CC BY-SA 3.0 釋出圖像」[1][2]的話,是否能夠直接使用於這裡?謝謝。 Gm King (talk) 04:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

这些照片是他们自拍的吗?如果不是自拍的,那么摄影师才是版权持有人(除非摄影师把版权转给了他们),需要摄影师出这份文件。 King of 05:09, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
是他們自拍的,而基於藝人關係,為免多番打擾,所以本人指導他們在圖像描述中直接加上「以 CC BY-SA 3.0 釋出圖像」。如果這樣的話,是否可用「License Review」取代(即是透過他們在圖像來源裡加入「以 CC BY-SA 3.0 釋出圖像」+ 本人於上載照片後申請「License Review」)? Gm King (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal Botanical Garden April 2017 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jefferson Memorial Washington April 2017 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. Perhaps a FP candidate? -- Johann Jaritz 04:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden October 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden October 2016 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden October 2016 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jefferson Memorial Washington April 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden October 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The people are not the subject. The image is sharp enough for me -- Sixflashphoto 05:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Botanical Garden October 2016 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]