User talk:Kekator

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kekator!

Dziekuje za poprawki[edit]

Widze ze przegladasz i poprawiasz wiele zdiec z Powstania Warszawskiego. Dziekuje za pomoc i nowe wersje niektorych zdjec. Jesli potrzebujesz z czyms pomocy na Commons to pytaj. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 01:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token de5cc270bfbbcba178b3fce7ee9c540f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Re: Category:Lubomirski Dürers[edit]

Dodałem źródła, pozdrawiam BurgererSF (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo dziękuję! A nie masz może możliwości skompletowania tej kategorii? Może w źródłach papierowych są wizerunki reszty utraconych Durerów, które można by chociaż zeskanować? Bo niestety, ale wygląda na to, że w internecie już nic się nie da znaleźć. Kekator (talk) 02:13, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome, but please, use my talkpage the next time. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

higher res[edit]

Cheers for the improvements [1]. I suppose you were able to hack the site to obtain this better resolution, which I was not able to do, but if you used a different source could you please note that. cygnis insignis 16:11, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

kompresja i linki[edit]

Witaj! Właściwie ograniczam się najczęściej jedynie do kadrowania i w wypadku, który przytoczyłeś jako przykład kiepskiej jakości wynikającej z kompresji widocznie na tym stanowisku miałem tylko takie oprogramowanie. Wcześniej konwertowałem do png, ale przy większych ilustracjach były problemy z wyświetlaniem. Będę zwracał uwagę przy takich granicznych przypadkach:) (znalazłem ten sprzęt i zmieniłem ustawienia programu teraz będzie OK). Co do linkowania to nie znam wypracowanego zalecenia dotyczącego sposobu, który proponujesz. Jest to wygodne rozwiązanie, ale próbowałem kiedyś wykorzystać do archiwizacji przed obróbką tamtejsze katalogi i ze względu na ich strukturę zakończyło się to fiaskiem. Uznałem, że jedynym pewnym elementem jest numer, który podaję (jest też widoczny na oryginalnych skanach) pewnie nie zostanie zmieniony, a linki... cóż takiej pewności nie dają. Pozdrawiam Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Wojtek the bear.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wojtek the bear.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 12:30, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strona muzeum podaje że twórca nie jest znany, skąd wziąłeś informacje że to Siemiradzki? Pozdrawiam, Plushy (talk) 17:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cóż, strona muzeum które ten obraz posiada w swojej kolekcji jest prawdopodobnie lepszym źródłem niż abcgallery które twierdzi na dodatek że ten obraz znajduje się gdzie indziej. Obraz z abcgallery jest dość niskiej jakości i ciężko porównać ale wydaje mi się że brew ma inny kształt na nim więc nasze muzeum może posiadać kopie. Wysłałem do nich pytanie z prośbą o więcej informacji.Plushy (talk) 11:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NAC - prośba o pomoc[edit]

Witaj. Zwracam się do Ciebie z pytaniem odnośnie zamieszczania na Commons zdjęć z zasobów NAC, ponieważ zauważyłam że wrzucasz tu takowe. Możesz mi powiedzieć na jakiej zasadzie umieszczasz te zdjęcia? Na stronie NAC znalazłam cennik, w/g którego wrzucenie fotki do Internetu kosztuje 10zł (http://audiovis.nac.gov.pl/files/cennik.pdf). Jestem żywo zainteresowana tematem, ponieważ edytuję i zarazem ilustruję wiele artukułów biograficznych do których zdjęcia często są tylko w NAC, niestety z uwagi na prześledzenie ich zasad stwierdziłam, że wstawiając tu ich fotki ryzykuję ich wcześniejsze bądź późniejsze usunięcie wskutek np. interwencji NAC. Z drugiej strony pobieranie przez nich opłat od zdjęć na licencji PD wydaje mi się niezbyt legalne? Dlatego też staram się odnajdywać fotki ze starych czasopism umieszczonych w bibliotekach cyfrowych - wtedy chyba nie ryzykuję ich usunięcia w przyszłości? Przyznam, że mam zamieszanie w głowie w związku z tym NAC. Rzucisz trochę światła na tę kwestię, proszę? pozdrawiam serdecznie AldraW (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo bardzo gorąco dziękuję za wyczerpujące odpowiedzi oraz dodatkowe informacje. Szczególnie przydatne są dla mnie uwagi odnośnie błędnych dat. Oczywiście sukcesywnie je poprawię. Do tej pory automat sam wstawiał tam datę i myślałam że tak właśnie ma być. Pięknie dziękuję również za wyjaśnienie prawnych zawiłości co do korzystania z NAC. Bardzo mnie ucieszyło, że będę mogła jednak korzystać również i z tego źródła (choć z satysfakcją stwierdziłam, że żadnej z kilku ostatnich zdobytych przeze mnie zdjęć osób - w ogóle tam nie ma :) A przyznam, że cieszy mnie ta nieco detektywistyczna praca - zdobywania trudno dostępnych fotek :) Teraz, gdy jeszcze będę się starała ustalić ich datę - będzie to dodatkowy smaczek :)

Korzystając z okazji i Twojego doświadczenia - pozowlę sobie zapytać o jeszcze jedną - tym razem techniczną kwestię. Otóż jedyne zdjęcie Jana Adolfa Hertza jakie udało mi się znaleźć to fotka właśnie z NAC: http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/128942/be6ae5b844378694466fd74f14692c43/. Chciałam zapytać jak się robi taki manewr by z grupowego zdjęcia jakoś wykadrować jedną osobę i potem do artykułu wstawić właśnie takie wycięte zdjęcie. (wiem, że tak się da bo kiedyś natknęłam się na taki sposób wykorzystania grupowej fotki). pozdrawiam serdecznie AldraW (talk) 13:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oj jest, jest za co :) Dziękuję również za kolejne uwagi odnośnie znaków wodnych. Już obcięłam zdjęcie i wgrałam nową wersję. Nie wiedziałam też o możliwości zwrócenia się o pomoc do innych commonnistów :) Na prawdę bardzo bardzo serdecznie dziękuję. Bardzo doceniam Twoją pomoc i jeśli będę miała jeszcze jakieś pytania - nie omieszkam zwrócić się z nimi do Ciebie. Jeszcze raz dziękuję i pozdrawiam serdecznie AldraW (talk) 20:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for help[edit]

Dzien dobry, I have a question concerning the Upload of photos from Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe. I saw that you have uploaded a higher resolution photo of Vojtech Tuka. I would like to upload all possible photos from NAC concerning Slovak history during WWII, but I don't know how to do it without cutting the NAC Logo out of the pictures. Would you be so kind to explain me the right way to manage this or help me otherwise in this matter? Pozdrowienie, --Trimnapaschkan (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samolot kap. Skarżyńskiego.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 07:55, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ORP Orzel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:10, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chodźmy na roboty rolne do Niemiec.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:21, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polish Army capturing Zaolzie in 1938.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmiry ostatnia droga.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judenfrei Bydgoszcz synagoga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polish Priest as a German Hostage 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 09:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polishborder17091939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vojtech Tuka in uniform.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 09:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:JO-LO-AR (.380 ACP) - left.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergmann M1896 no. 3 (detail).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergmann M1896 no. 3 - left.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:JO-LO-AR (.380 ACP) - right.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergmann M1896 no. 3 - right.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Elisabeth Klein.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Elisabeth Klein.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

DaB. (talk) 21:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Second class dining room on RMS Olympic.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Bidgee (talk) 06:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vojtech Tuka in uniform.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:RMS Titanic's propeller shaft installation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SandyShores03 (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Verandah Café.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.33.146.103 08:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:King Alexander of Greece.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.
Pay attention to copyright
File:Józef Szczepański.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No date and place of publication - no PD-anon license is used.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Matlin (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Józef Szczepański.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--GPSLeo (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]