User talk:Kaiser Torikka

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kaiser Torikka!

Albert Arms[edit]

You might not know the sources but others do, Please refrain from making any edits until the issue is settled. Please see: User_talk:BrightRaven#Saxon_Arms_on_British_COAs. Sodacan (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, I hadn't seen that one before. I will refrain from making any edits then. Kaiser Torikka (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This COA has two problems. First, one lion passant is wrong drawned. The first lion is correct, but the second has the legs wrong designed. You should reduce the lion of the bottom, but using the same design that the lion on the top. Second, the semy of heats is not properly drawned. See other semy fields that are correct, like this: File:Brunswick-Lüneburg Arms.svg or File:Escudo de armas de los Cruïlles.svg or File:Blason Royaume de Danemark (selon Gelre).svg. Regards. --Xavigivax (talk) 10:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The second lion passant was made that way so I could fit the lions more easily inside the shield, otherwise they'd look smaller and stranger. I'll see what I do with the semy of hearts. Kaiser Torikka (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But is not correct to draw a lion passant in this way. Passant specificate the possition of the body and the legs, see all the images on the category: Category:Leopards in heraldry --Xavigivax (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Kaiser Torikka!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riksdag structure diagrams[edit]

Rather than modifying an image template that I were to produce for you, I would recommend that you use ADSVote to produce high resolution versions of these diagrams for each election. It's pretty simple to use, but should you need any help feel free to leave me a message and I'll do what I can to assist. Aricci526 (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Slovenia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]