User talk:KaiBorgeest

Archive 1--KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch!

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

Du hast beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2014 in Deutschland teilgenommen, wofür wir Dir herzlich danken. Ohne jeden einzelnen Teilnehmer, ohne jedes einzelne Bild wäre Wiki Loves Earth nicht so erfolgreich. Mit den vielen neuen Bildern können jetzt einerseits zahlreiche Wikipedia-Artikel bebildert werden, andererseits schaffen sie Anreize, neue Inhalte zu erstellen, die sich mit ihnen illustrieren lassen.

Von den mehr als 14.000 eingesandten Bildern hat die Jury eines oder mehrere von Dir in die deutschen Top 100 gewählt.

Das Ergebnis mit den Top 100 ist hier einzusehen: Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014/Deutschland/Top100

Die ersten zehn wurden schon für den internationalen Ausscheid gemeldet: Wiki_Loves_Earth_2014_winners#Germany

Es war der erste Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Deutschland und wir als Jury sind vom Erfolg überwältigt. Daher würden wir uns sehr freuen, wenn Du dich nächstes Mal erneut beteiligen würdest!

Herzlichen Glückwunsch von der Jury und vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützung! --Indeedous (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

• Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

• Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Kalender-Poster für 2015 mit den Gewinner-Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2014

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

auch in diesem Jahr gibt es dank der Förderung durch WMDE einen WLM-Kalender im Format A1 mit den Gewinner-Fotos. Insgesamt sind es mit den Nachrücker-Fotos sogar 132 Bilder von Kulturdenkmalen in Deutschland, die durch 64 WLM-Teilnehmer hochgeladen wurden. Sicherlich wirst du darin schnell Dein(e) Foto(s) entdecken.

Mit der Vergabe der 100 Preise – es gibt in diesem Jahr max. 3 Preise pro Gewinner, woraus die Nachrücker resultieren – kann jeder Preisträger auch ein oder mehrere dieser gedruckten Poster bekommen. Es wäre schön, wenn du einige Poster auch an Wikipedianer Deiner Region oder Freunde verteilst und ihnen dabei auch den Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments erklärst, an dem auch sie 2015 teilnehmen können.

Dieses Poster wird sowohl auf der Leipziger Denkmalmesse (6.–8.11.) als auch auf der Mitgliederversammlung von WMDE am 29.11. in Berlin erhältlich sein.

Solltest du daran Interesse haben - und weder in Leipzig noch in Berlin die Gelegenheit zum Erwerb haben -, so sende bitte Deinen Wunsch mit Angabe des Real- und Benutzernamens, der Anschrift und der gewünschten Anzahl (1,3,5 .. oder gar 10) bis zum 14.11. mit dem Betreff "WLM-Poster" an das WMDE-Team Community mittels der Emailadresse: community@wikimedia.de.

Dies gilt: solange der Vorrat reicht, nach Maßgabe des geplanten Versandkosten-Budgets sowie nach der Reihenfolge der eingegangenen Bestellwünsche. Der Versand wird Ende November erfolgen.

Viel Freude – und auch Vorfreude auf WLM-2015 - mit diesem Poster

wünscht Dir die WLM-Orga.

( Bernd Gross), 01.11.2014

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreichen Teilnahme an WLM-2014

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

auf der gerade zu Ende gegangenen Europäischen Denkmal-Messe in Leipzig konnten wir sehr erfolgreich die Ergebnisse unseres vierten Fotowettbewerbs „Wiki Loves Monuments“ einem breiten Publikum und der Fachwelt vorstellen. Impressionen findest du hier. Dazu gehörten auch die Gewinnerfotos für Deutschland. Zu dem darin eingeschlossenen Wettbewerbsbeitrag von Dir möchten wir Dich herzlich beglückwünschen.

Die Jury hat bekanntlich Ende Oktober die Preisträger auf der Grundlage eines Rating-Verfahrens ermittelt und ging in diesem Jahr davon aus, die Zahl der Preise auf 3 pro Teilnehmer zu begrenzen. Insgesamt wurden 100 Preise durch WMDE gestiftet. Durch das Nachrücken ergaben sich insgesamt 132 Bilder, die auch auf dem diesjährigen WLM-Kalender für 2015 dargestellt sind. Diese wurden durch 64 Preisträger eingebracht. Im Rahmen der Denkmalmesse konnten wir bereits die ersten 11 Bildpreise und 2 Fleißpreise an vier Projektteilnehmer überreichen.

Bis Ende November werden auch die Urkunden und Preise (Büchergutscheine) für die anderen Preisträger in der Geschäftsstelle von WMDE vorbereitet; ebenso der Versand der WLM-Posterkalender, sofern du Deine Wünsche per mail übermittelt hast. Anfang Dezember und damit rechtzeitig zum Weihnachtsfest wirst du also alles erhalten.

Es würde uns sehr freuen, wenn du auch im kommenden Jahr aktiv bei WLM wieder dabei bist.

Nochmals unseren Dank für Deinen Wettbewerbsbeitrag und Herzlichen Glückwunsch

übermittelt Dir die WLM-Orga.

( Bernd Gross), 11.11.2014

Dein WLM-2014-Preis zu Weihnachten

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

der Fotowettbewerb "Wiki Loves Monuments 2014" liegt hinter uns und das Team Communitys von WMDE verschickt gegenwärtig an die Gewinner die Urkunden und Preise. Soweit ich weiß liegt Deine Anschrift noch nicht vor. Damit Dich aber dieser Preis rechtzeitig vor Weihnachten erreichen kann, sende doch bitte Deine Adresse mit Realnamen (und Benutzernamen zwecks Zuordnung) und Betreff "Mein WLM-Preis" so bald als möglich, spätestens bis zum Jahresende, per Email an mailto:community@wikimedia.de.

Gleichzeitig möchte ich Dich herzlich zu unserem nächsten Fotowettbewerb zum Themenbereich "Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit 2014/2015" einladen. Wir haben diesen am Nikolaustag gestartet und er läuft bis zum 16. Januar 2015. Nähere Informationen findest du auf der Projektseite bei Wikipedia.

Ich wünsche Dir eine schöne Advents- und Weihnachtszeit und einen erfolgreichen Start ins neue Jahr 2015.

Herzliche Grüße

( Bernd Gross), 08.12.2014

File:Linux SuSE Distribs.jpg

File:Linux SuSE Distribs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 09:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LSG-00561-01 NSG-00339-01 Wuestenei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Bildstock am Neuwiesenbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good for QI --Cccefalon 09:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DB Class 259.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Ericus1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 - die Organisatoren sagen Danke

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

am 31. Mai 2015 endete der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth, an dem Du mit Deinen Bildern teilgenommen hast. Dafür möchten wir Dir herzlich danken.

Dieses Jahr haben sich 26 Länder am Wettbewerb beteiligt, insgesamt wurden dabei 108.444 Bilder hochgeladen. Aus Deutschland kamen 14.115 Fotos, was einem Anteil von 13 % entspricht. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl von 1000 Teilnehmern allein beim deutschen Wettbewerb. Einen Überblick findest du auf unserer Ergebnisseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat Ende Juni auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die Top100 und die Preisträger ausgewählt. Eine Entscheidung der internationalen Jury wird noch im Juli erwartet.

Ein anderer Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet zum fünften Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, bei dem Kultur- und Baudenkmäler bebildert werden sollen. Mit dem Fotografieren dafür kann jetzt schon begonnen werden. Vielleicht möchtest Du Dich sogar an der Organisation dieses Wettbewerbs oder von Wiki Loves Earth 2016 beteiligen?

Wir würden uns über weitere Beiträge von Dir freuen.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht das Orga-Team.

--Blech (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Copyright status: File:AB Wilhelminenstr3.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:AB Wilhelminenstr3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Scoopfinder^(d) 10:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

erldedigt.--KaiBorgeest (talk) 19:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wue Heinestr7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DHC6 Barra.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 22:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Zeisssstr19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laufach Herz Jesu Kapelle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a touch of blue, but acceptable. --XRay 11:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Gailb Schutzmantelmadonna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DB 111 RtLgr Snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What camera did you use? it is a pretty small size for an easy to take photo; can you upload a higher resolution? Also please remove the reddish frings. --Cccefalon 04:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC) It's a detail chosen out of a bigger photo. Which reddish frings?--KaiBorgeest 20:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. (unsigned) weak  Support Please sign your comments. --Cccefalon 05:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.

Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.

Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.

Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00748 Sink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Atmospheric. QI -- Spurzem 21:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear KaiBorgeest,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB ND15 Quercus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:48, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB GlB6 Maple Alley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but i would like a bit more of the road. --C messier 09:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB gLB3 uKuehruhgr1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB ND03 Castanea Sativa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RehbgGailb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The level of detail isn't great, but it is OK for me. --C messier 09:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter infowikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Gentilstr 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Lueneburger Tor 2 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. --Haeferl 01:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Gailbach St Matthaeus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambridge KingsCollege Towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 00:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Feldchenstr Smoke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good idea and quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Adolf-von-Elm-Hof 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldbach Kugelburg Ruine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergedorf Friedhof CampanileK2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:51, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach Doerrmorsbach St Laurentius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 23:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Schweinh Gravita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Schwh Bildst311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The monument is in focus --Daniel Case 05:06, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.

Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.

Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.

Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.

Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DR 50 3552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit overexposed. IMO a darker version is probably a Q1 --Michielverbeek 05:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Done--KaiBorgeest

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Monorail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 23:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB gLB4 Herbigsw S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carl-von-Ossietzky-Straße 44 Görlitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goerlitz Melanchthonstr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Am Zollhafen 5-7, Katenweide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HV CurrentConverters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:55, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! G C Bartels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:01, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lok DB 139 310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Would you be able to upload a higher resolution or is this the highest resolution you've got? --Basotxerri 13:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC) *  Comment It's 11 years old. Unfortunately I haven't got any higher resolution from that period any more. OK, I accept the excuse ;-) Please don't forget to sign your edit with -- and four tildes. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Stengerts Felsmeer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could be improved, but me be acceptable. Not acceptable are the CAs at the branches and leafs. Please fix this issue. --XRay 12:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)  New version--KaiBorgeest 20:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thanl you. --XRay 16:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg NSG165521 Schweensand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB ND 26 07131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear KaiBorgeest,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Review of Quality Image Candidate AB ND25 07130.jpg

Hallo Kai,

hier die auf der Seite Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list versprochene ausführlichere Erläuterung zum Review deines Bildes File:AB ND25 07130.jpg.

Leider kann ich dem Bild nicht ansehen, wie genau du die Schatten "angehoben" hast. Ich stelle nur fest, dass die unteren 10% des RGB-Helligkeitshistogramms fast ungenutzt sind, die unteren 5% sind komplett leer. Außerdem ist der Schattenbereich der Bäume, besonders links und oberhalb der Straße sehr blass. Die Wiese sieht für die grelle Beleuchtung auch unerwaret blass aus.

Wenn ich genau hinsehe, scheint es so, als sei im Schattenbereich über der Straße ein dreieckiger Bereich ausgewählt und besonders stark manipuliert worden. Die Dreiecksform sieht unnatürlich aus. Es gibt noch eine weitere "matschige" Stelle weiter rechts.

Bereits wenn ich den Schwarzpunkt so korrigiere, dass der komplette verfügbare Helligkeitsbereich der RGB-Datei genutzt wird und dann bei unverändertem Schwarzpunkt mit dem Curve-Tool eines Bild-Editors (z.B. Gimp) die Helligkeitsverteilung verschiebe, dann kann ich die Helligkeit des Schattens anheben und dabei den Kontrast unterhalb der Bäume sogar verstärken und so die Strukturen dort besser sichtbar machen. Dies geschieht erst einmal auf Kosten des Kontrastes in helleren Bereichen. Dadurch, dass sich dieser Effekt über einen größeren Helligkeitsbereich verteilt, ist das auf der einen Seite nicht allzu gravierend. Auf der anderen Seite lässt sich mit fortgeschritteneren Werkzeugen (siehe z.B. RawTherapee) die Korrektur sogar durchführen, ohne lokalen Kontrast zu verlieren.

Leider werde ich bei meinen Versuchen die Artefakte aus deiner Bearbeitung nicht los, so dass das Ergebnis insgesamt nicht überzeugend ist. Insbesondere das seltsame Dreieck ist ärgerlich. Wenn du aber das Originalbild auf Wikipedia hochladen würdest, könnte ich dir zeigen, was ich meine.

Gruß

--JRff (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Das Original gibt es leider nicht mehr, aber ein Wenig konnte ich auch noch aus dem hochgeladenen Bild rausholen. Wenn das "Dreieck" die Schattenpartie der Krone der ersten Kastanie rechts ist, würde das Originalbild hier aber ohnehin nicht viel helfen. War übrigens meine erste Nutzung von RawTherapee, danke für den Hinweis. --KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Der Gesamteindruck des Bildes ist jetzt in meinen Augen viel besser. Ich glaube, mehr kannst du ohne das Originalbild bzw. eine RAW-Datei jetzt auch nicht mehr herausholen. Auf der anderen Seite bin ich mit dem Schattenbereich noch nicht so glücklich, dass ich eine QI Promotion aussprechen würde. Vielleicht ist auch Struktur im Schatten durch Rauschunterdrückung verlorengegangen?

Ich hab' auch schon darüber nachgedacht, ob das besagte Dreieck ein Effekt der Sonnenstrahlen bzw. Schattenwurf sein könnte, aber das ist es auf keinen Fall. Dann müsste es dunkler sein als seine Umgebung anstatt heller. Es scheint eher ein Artefakt der Bearbeitung zu sein. In der neuen Version fällt es aber optisch praktisch nicht auf, solange man nicht versucht, noch weiter aufzuhellen.

Wenn es bei extremen Helligkeitsunterschieden wirklich auf den Schatten ankommt, würde ich immer RAW-Dateien produzieren und aufheben.

Gruß

--JRff (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg 1Hafenstrasse 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 00:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

im Namen von Organisationsteam und Jury danke ich Dir für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland.

Im Jahr 2018 wurden ebenso wie im Vorjahr etwa 24.000 Fotos hochgeladen, von denen viele die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia illustrieren werden. Die Teilnehmerzahl lag diesmal bei 683, im Vorjahr waren es 1063.

Unsere Jury hat die Top100 der Bilder aus Deutschland ausgewählt. Die zehn bestplatzierten Fotos nehmen an der internationalen Ausscheidung teil.

Falls Du Lust auf einen weiteren Fotowettbewerb hast: Im September läuft Wiki Loves Monuments, wo Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Gebäuden eingereicht werden können.

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:04, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black White Sheep in Flock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 23:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Fuenfhausener Hauptdeich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image, it looks downsampled and the categorization should be better. Otherwise QI. --XRay 04:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC) How do you mean better categorization?--KaiBorgeest 21:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC) OK, categorization is acceptable. But IMO the image isn't still at full resolution. --XRay 08:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)  Comment There was a larger photo, just consider it, as it is.--KaiBorgeest 22:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC) The resolution of your camera is 4 times better. QI images should not be downsampled, the resolution should be better. Please upload the photograph with the better resolution. --XRay 08:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)  Comment I could have uploaded a larger file earlier if available, but in most of cases I (like this one) do not use to store additional local copies after upload.--KaiBorgeest 23:09, 8 November 2018 (UTC)--  Support Good quality for this case. You didn't have a the original file? Really? --XRay 05:53, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Fuenfhausener Strasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Am Radeland 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach D-6-71-112-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WU D-6-63-000-221 Cap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Eissendorfer Pferdeweg 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzingen Bahnhofspl 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Could do with a little bit more sharpness. --Ermell 08:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorburger Elbdeich 388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Grosser Schippsee 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little oddly cropped but OK otherwise; see what you can do,though, about the left wall seeming a little out of perspective --Daniel Case 04:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Sandhoehe 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wu D-6-63-000-221 Rot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart-Fe Stuttgarter Strasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prius 3 Inv.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Schoental Kuehruhgraben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Not so sharp at full size, but sharp at 3x the size of my 13-inch laptop screen. Very nice composition. If you can get compositions like this sharp at full size, you might be able to try an FPC nomination. -- Ikan Kekek 05:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heigenbrücken railway station with former Main-Spessart-Bahn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I think your scope is malformed. Consider it an encyclopedic category, not a series of key words. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks for fixing the scope. Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzingen Jerusalembrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:17, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzingen Paul-Eber-Denkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:27, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzinger Häcker am Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Printshop Carbon Arc Lamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlstein Langer See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:33, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FFH2428-393 VS2428-492 Mixed forrest at slope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB ND 26 07131 Path.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:57, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB gLB9 BischBg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 02:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Napier Deltic D18-11B-C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hirschfeldstr 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but not a really interesting composition --Michielverbeek 20:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi KaiBorgeest,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi KaiBorgeest,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi KaiBorgeest,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothenburg ShopDoor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 12:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Eißendorfer Pferdeweg 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Hagelhof WayS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo of the shrine. Too bad that the statue is not a little brighter. -- Spurzem 19:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzingen Friedenstraße 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Hauptstr 6 Parish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 06:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Hauptstr Breunsberger Str WayS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Hauptstr 6 Shed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Allende-Platz 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klingenberg Langgasse 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Grindelallee 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hansaplatz 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear KaiBorgeest,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--23:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-Harburg station stairs platf 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Alter Postweg 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)  Done --~~~~ A cut car in left bottom corner, leaves in right top corner don't anything tpo the composition --Michielverbeek 07:53, 6 December 2019 (UTC) good quality after corrections --Michielverbeek 07:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Jutestr 7 Plaque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Kleine Rainstrasse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear KaiBorgeest,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig Zentrum Burgstrasse 1 3 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows are too deep down below. Many details are lost. Are they recoverable? --Stoxastikos 16:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)  Done --KaiBorgeest 22:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)  Support I think it certainly looks better now. --Stoxastikos 19:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossostheim Bachgaubahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumpkin yellow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:55, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2020

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2020 findet zum achten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum siebten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2019
• 
  Hessigheimer Felsengärten
• 
  Silberteich im Harz
• 
  Nationalpark Jasmund

Dieses Jahr ist es aufgrund der Ausgangsbeschränkungen schwieriger aktuelle Fotos zu machen, deshalb läuft der Wettbwerb dieses Mal zwei Monate. Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du hier und vor allem unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du möchtest am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die deiner Meinung nach angeschafft werden sollte, freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 31. Juli 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 08:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spessart Buechelberg Rocks1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt Oberhuebnerwald Dick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although f5.6 is quite unfortunate for a landscape photo --Podzemnik 05:56, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach FlittnersHaelchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Obersoelchgraben Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-Moorwerder Heuckenlock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB Buechelberg Stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB gLB10 Biotop Obernau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Obersoelchgraben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulzbach Feuchtwiesen SodenerBach W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlstein Lindigwald B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB ND21 07061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:27, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SulzbachM ND 676.N.75 T.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support File far too big for this resolution, but ok, QI --Poco a poco 19:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-Morwerder Deich Heuckenlock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB gLB2 Boeschg Niedernberger Weg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainspitze LSG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LSG-00594 Waterfront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00748 Clear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LSG-00594 Meadow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support DoF could be better, but good enough. --MB-one 11:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Bischberg from Sternberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good composition and IQ --Tagooty 16:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Steinbacher Str 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 23:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach Friedhofstr 4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Well done DOF. --Augustgeyler 09:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Wilstorfer Str 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me, although it's more of an artistic shot than photo suited for encyclopedia. --JiriMatejicek 14:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Stillhorner Weg 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Mergellstr 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Veddeler Damm Windhukkai 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Bremer Str 313a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 23:32, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Mergellstr 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Bissingstr 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Stillhorner Weg W56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Rlwy Bridge Nilkheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Haakestr 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:56, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear KaiBorgeest,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Gerlachstr 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Crop is a bit tight on the top but ok. A small CCW rotation will straighten the vertical and horizontal lines. --Tagooty 07:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)  Done --KaiBorgeest 22:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:30, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Haakestr 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Haakestr 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Am Gleise 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz Breidenbacherstr 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Lagerstr 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Kapellenstr 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossostheim BabenhaeuserStr WaysideShrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Bubendey-Ufer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 23:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothenbuch Lichtenau Inn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 01:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach, Wenighösbach, Dorfstraße 37 barn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 23:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach, Wenighösbach, Dorfstraße 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 23:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach, Wenighösbach, Dorfstraße 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach, Wenighösbach, Dorfstraße 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach, Wenighösbach, Dorfstraße 37 house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals. --Ermell 22:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bietigheim Viaduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt Bridge-Gersprenz Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:25, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt Maingasse 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Elphi Half-Gantry-Cranes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't understand the composition. Should the image focus on the cranes? --PantheraLeo1359531 16:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC) As written in the description those are half-gantry cranes, so consider the giant red brick building and the cranes as a unit. What you see is just the true impression you get, when you stand in front of it.--KaiBorgeest 22:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 05:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Thoerlweg 1 Demolition.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinostheim Mainbruecke Mainflingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition and layout: Good. In my opinion the shadows are too dark and on the rigth there are some strong highlights. There also is a good ammount of colour noise pretty much everywhere. QI as of now: No. If lights and especially the noise is are fixed I would be OK with it. It would be near the bottom line for visual quality, but it would be fine for me. --D-Kuru 16:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC) In comparison to the available QI quality range it is still on the low end, but in my opinion good enough --D-Kuru 18:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2021

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2020
• 
  Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
• 
  Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
• 
  Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
• 
  Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
• 
  Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach A3 Enclosure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach A3 Housing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Interesting photo and a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 05:52, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg 661A004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heigenbruecken 671A011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt Main 671A006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:03, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forst Hain im Spessart 671A030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:44, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00596.01 Hoher Knuck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00380.01 Mönchberg, Aubachtal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00562.01 Auenwald bei Erlenfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00586.01 Spessartwiesen Kaltengrund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LSG-00561.01 Rückersbacher Schlucht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailauf 671A004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MaedaAkihiko 10:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailauf 671A004 NorthWall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg 661G001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments SDC P1071 and P1344 shoud be added. --F. Riedelio 15:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment P1071 is still missing. --F. Riedelio 09:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality (I am not familiar with the 'SDC' mentioned above, but I hope it’s not that much of a problem). --Nefronus 05:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00414.01 Metzgergraben und Krone Path.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00414.01 Metzgergraben und Krone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There are overexposed places, but probably nothing more could have been done in this lighting situation. If anyone objects, we can discuss. --Nefronus 11:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WI SPA Inselrhein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailaufer Forst 671G003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit blurry on the right, but perhaps acceptable. (Discussion?) --Nefronus 07:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00740.01 Eichhall N.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit bright atthe top, but imo Ok. --Isiwal 08:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach ND Hohes Kreuz Spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach ND Hohes Kreuz Winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz Christuskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Hastedtstr44 Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:35, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Heimfelder Straße 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HH Hastedtstr36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:05, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obernburg Main-Eisenbach SJohBaptist.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Stader Straße 120 122 124 126 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großostheim, Großostheimer Straße, Wayside shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 22:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt M, Untere Kirchgasse 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinostheim station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laudenbach, Chapel Fechenbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is there anything you can do about the burnt areas (especially on the chapel itself)? --Domob 13:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC) It is bright, shiny metal in the sun--KaiBorgeest 22:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC).  Support I understand that, just wanted to check if e.g. some highlight compression might still be possible from the raw file. It is bothering me a bit (since it is part of the main subject, not only the sky), but IMHO the picture overall is good quality. --Domob 14:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldbach, Lorenz-Heim-Straße 3,5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg, Sonnenbergstraße 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg, Hörsteiner Straße 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg, Nilkheimer Park, Schaukel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach, Schmerlenbacher Straße, Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Reigersbergstr W Hedge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großostheim, Bahnhofstraße 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Seevestraße factory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maple M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Breunsberg FireSt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Winzenhohl Barn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkahl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt, wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zur Wettbewerbskategorie Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldrainen und Feldgehölzen in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --~~~~

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossostheim Sattelberg nature monument spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amerikafeld und Schindkaute bei Steinheim C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldbach, forest path at Gartenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hirschfeldstr Stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moembris 671A016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hösbach ND Eiche am Forsthaus Schmerlenbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a bit bright but ok for me --Ezarate 23:00, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hafenlohrtal, view from west.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Friedrichstadt Sophora japonica Handelsstaette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Scientific names should be formatted in italics. --F. Riedelio 09:13, 18 July 2022 (UTC) I do not know the rule with the formatting scientific names in italics. Can I please have an indication of the source? --XRay 12:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)  Answered Please see here or hier. --F. Riedelio 07:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)  Comment But that is Wikipedia and has no relevance here. --XRay 14:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)  Support IMO good enough for QI. May be a little bit too bright. --XRay 08:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach ND Quercus Buchberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 01:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Streuobstwiesen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beech Canker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Suggest raising the level of the shadows to show more detail of the canker. --Tagooty 02:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 21:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger 2021 – Schloss Langenburg

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Kirchknöckel Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laufach Frohnhofen Cemetery Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laufach Frohnhofen Cemetery Fence Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Ruhlandstraße 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rüsselsheim Backesgasse 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Blue CAs on the wood of the house (on the contours), and the picture is probably overexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 19:27, 25 October 2022 (UTC)  Comment Where?--KaiBorgeest 21:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC)  Support Sorry, it's almost not visible. Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Waldmichelbach Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz Martinsstr 9 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Waldmichelbach 7 S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heigenbruecken Am Muehlacker 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldaschaff Germesgrund Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailauf Brueckenstrasse 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 04:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailauf Wingert Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heigenbruecken Jaegerstr 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! D-6-61-000-483 Store Administration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 18:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailauf Kirchberg 8 Cemetery Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Schmerlenbacher Str 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Hauptstrasse 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Schmerlenbach cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 17:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldbach Aschaffenburger Str 91 Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Hauptstrasse Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Faustenaecker Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goldbach Dammer Weg Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Feldkahl Schimborner Str 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexposed, especially the white and the foreground pavement. Fixable? --Tagooty 11:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 23:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:44, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinostheim Rotes Kreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossostheim Pflaumbachstr Wayside Shrine Int.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moenchberg Wingertsweg Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach Buechelbergstr Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 11:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sulzbach Main Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hafenbezirk 20 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Adolf-von-Elm-Hof 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:18, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Bundesstraße 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals at the right. --Ermell 19:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:58, 24 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Buxtehuder Str 35a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Große Rainstraße 29 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White empty space bottom left. --Ermell 19:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg-Harburg Town Hall South Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hafenbezirk 24 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sammandi 10:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hafenbezirk 12 14 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, but a bit soft. --C messier 21:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Adolf-von-Elm-Hof 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Blohmstr 18 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right side is leaning to the left. Othrwise good. --Cayambe 09:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 22:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC). Good quality now. --Cayambe 06:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solex 31PIC7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Heimfelder Str 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check again the verticals and the brightest areas look overexposed. Fixable? --C messier 21:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 23:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Monthly Photo Challenge

Hallo Kai, mit der Funktion ''Vorschau'' kannst Du im Editier-Modus feststellen, ob Dein neuer Eintrag (Hyundai Theta II 2.4L MPI (G4KE).jpg) im richtigen Abschnitt gelandet ist. Ein wichtiger Hinweis: sobald ein 'thumbs' nötig ist, um das Bild zu sehen, befindet man sich sicherhalb ausserhalb des gültigen Eintragsbereiches. (Ich hab's schon korrigiert - neben den jeden Monat üblichen Korrekturen der Einträge von Vi Ko ;-) ) --PtrQs (talk) 00:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Danke fürs Aufräumen und den Hinweis. Das Bild mit dem Hyundai-Motor stammt aber von jemand anderem, der die Nachricht wahrscheinlich noch nicht bekommen hat. KaiBorgeest (talk) 14:38, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, da hab' ich mich in der Historie verlaufen. Danke für Deinen freundlichen Hinweis auf meinen Fehler. --PtrQs (talk) 22:54, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear KaiBorgeest,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - December - Under the hood/Winners

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Solex 31PIC7.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Under the hood, in December 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:06, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 15:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt Hauptstr 22 24 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockstadt am Main HV work.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Spessart Grauberg Stone&Root.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Mainaue Gehoelz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image, good quality -- Spurzem 22:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Spessart Grauberg Stone&Root.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Kilianswald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldaschaffer Forst Doernberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoesbach Waldbachsee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:09, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00740.01 Eichhall NE1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach Doerrmorsbach Mittelwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSG-00414.01 Metzgergraben und Krone E.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB ND11 Tilia platyphyllos W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AB gLB7 Roederbachtal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moembris ND05284 Rosskastanie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakobsthal Tree Group.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sailauf Friedhof Grab.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heigenbruecken Jakobsthal Kirchstr 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesen Cemetery Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilt to the right side --Grunpfnul 12:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)  Support. I see no lack. Good quality -- Spurzem 20:45, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Strassbessenbach oldChapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments could take some advantage of sharpening --Grunpfnul 11:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 20:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 19:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heigenbruecken Jakobsthal Muehlstr 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heigenbruecken Jakobsthal Wayside Shrine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiesen Cemetery Plate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Denickestraße 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:27, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanau Grossauheim Water Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Soft and good quality. --Terragio67 22:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Seehafenstr 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannesberg Cemetery Sink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanau Hafenstr 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Heimfelder Str 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Winsener Str 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dammbach Krausenbach Cemetery Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Rutschbahn 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Rutschbahn 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Eißendorf Cemetery Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A lot of color noise in the white canopy and the doors, can you reduce that? --Plozessor 04:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)  Done--KaiBorgeest 20:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainz Liebfrauenplatz Flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 66 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mespelbrunn Hauptstr 161.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Moorwerder Norderdeich 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This has some CA at the roof and also at the neighboring house. Overall, it has quite poor quality for a photo taken with an APS-C sensor at ISO 100. Did you probably take the low-quality JPG from the camera instead of manually processing the raw file? --Plozessor 06:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC) Done--KaiBorgeest 22:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Ok now! --Plozessor 16:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Keilberg Church Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Vogelerstr 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bessenbach Keilberg Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haibach Well House Ensemble.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TurretClock GrossheubachCollection Nees.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Heimfelder Str 69 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mespelbrunn Schlossallee iron crucifix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Blick auf den Campus mit dem Hauptgebäude der Hochschule Aschaffenburg

Hello Kai. You requested to move the file to TH Aschaffenburg because they changed their name in 2019. But the picture is from 2017, so I refused your request. --Gereon K. (talk) 10:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Hagenbeckallee 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Labe Brná.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too noisy --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Done noise reduced  Support Not perfect but good enough --MB-one 13:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mainflinger Wald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2024 - Deutschland

Hallo KaiBorgeest,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
• 
  Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
• 
  Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
• 
  Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

• Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
• 
  Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
• 
  Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
• 
  männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt, wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zur Wettbewerbskategorie Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldrainen und Feldgehölzen in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang August tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)